Skip to content

Non-Mesh Versus Mesh Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Comparison of Non-mesh (Desarda) and Mesh (Lichtenstein) Methods for Inguinal Hernia Repair at Mulago Hospital: a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00941941
Acronym
IHR
Enrollment
98
Registered
2009-07-20
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2009-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

Inguinal, Hernia, Hernia-repair, Non-mesh, Mesh, Desarda, Lichtenstein

Brief summary

The study aims at establishing the effectiveness of the non-mesh (Desarda) technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernias at Mulago Hospital in Uganda. First developed and used in India, the Desarda method is reported to offer superior outcomes such as minimal postoperative groin pain and near zero recurrence rates. In comparison to the mesh-based repairs, it is a simple and affordable technique suitable for the resource-constrained communities. It is devoid of complications associated with foreign body implants. Early clinical outcomes which include acute groin pain, time to resumption of normal gait, operative time and complications will be assessed. Participants will be followed at 2 hours, 3 days, 7 days and 14 days postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the mean postoperative acute groin pain score, or the mean postoperative day of return to normal gait is different in adult patients who undergo the non-mesh (Desarda) repair from what it is in those who undergo the mesh (Lichtenstein) technique of hernia repair.

Interventions

PROCEDURENon-mesh Hernia Repair

Non-mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernia without the use of a foreign material (mesh). It involves reinforcement of the weakened posterior wall of inguinal canal with a small, undetached strip of aponeurotic tissue of external

PROCEDUREMesh Hernia Repair

Mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernias by use of an implant (mesh) to reinforce the weakened posterior wall of the inguinal canal. The mesh is made of polypropylene material.

Sponsors

Mulago Hospital, Uganda
CollaboratorOTHER
Makerere University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 and above; * with a primary, reducible inguinal or inguino-scrotal hernia; * who consent to participate in the study; * who have a telephone contact.

Exclusion criteria

* Giant inguino-scrotal hernias; * Obstructive uropathy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; * Impaired mental state and are unable to give an accurate assessment of the key outcomes of the operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Acute groin pain after surgery (measured on pain visual analogue scale of 0-10)2 Weeks
Time (in days) taken to return to normal gait2 Weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operative time (in Minutes)2 hours
Complications during and after surgery2 Weeks

Countries

Uganda

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026