Skip to content

Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia

Randomized Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA (Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty) for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00941733
Acronym
INPACT-DEEP
Enrollment
358
Registered
2009-07-20
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2017-11-30
Last updated
2018-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Keywords

BTK, CLI, PTA

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized (2:1) trial of symptomatic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) secondary to atherosclerotic lesions (stenotic or occluded) of the infrapopliteal vessels. Patients will undergo a percutaneous transluminal endovascular procedure with either the IN.PACT Amphirion™ drug eluting balloon or with a standard (Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty) PTA balloon. Patients will be followed with pre-study, post-study, and follow-up evaluations.

Interventions

DEVICEIN.PACT Amphirion

Balloon Angioplasty

Balloon Angioplasty

Sponsors

Medtronic Endovascular
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria * Age ≥18 years and ≤85 years * Patient or patient's legal representative have been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed an Ethical Committee approved consent form * Female patients of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test ≤7 days before the procedure and are willing to use a reliable method of birth control for the duration of study participation * Patient has documented chronic Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) in the target limb prior to the study procedure with Rutherford Category 4, 5 or 6 * Life expectancy \>1 year in the Investigator's opinion General Angiographic Inclusion Criteria * Reference vessel(s) diameter between 2 and 4 mm * Single or multiple lesions with ≥70% diameter stenosis (DS) of different lengths in one or more main afferent crural vessels including the tibioperoneal trunk * At least one non occluded crural vessel with angiographically documented run-off to the foot either direct or through collaterals Angiographic Inclusion Criteria for Late Lumen Loss (LLL) assessment * Angio-target lesion (TL) is one identifiable single solitary or series of multiple adjacent lesions with a diameter stenosis (DS) ≥70% and a cumulative length ≤100 mm that can be covered by a single IN.PACT Amphirion™ (10 mm balloon landing zone in both edges is mandatory) * Angio-target lesion (TL) is the only lesion in that vessel (only one Angio-TL per patient is allowed)

Exclusion criteria

General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Lumen Loss (LLL) of the Target Lesion by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)12 months or at Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) timeThe difference between minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and MLD at 12 months follow-up
Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) of the Target Lesion in the Amputation Free Surviving Patients12 monthsPercentage of participants in the amputation free survival population with Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months, CD-TLR defined as any TLR of the target lesion associated with Deterioration of Rutherford Class and / or increase in size of pre-existing wounds and / or occurrence of a new wound(s).
Composite of All Cause Death, Major Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)6 monthsPercentage of participants experiencing all cause death, major amputation and clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) at 6 months. CD-TLR defined as any TLR of the target lesion associated with Deterioration of Rutherford Class and / or increase in size of pre-existing wounds and / or occurrence of a new wound(s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amputation Free Survival and Resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI)12 monthsPercentage of participants with an amputation free survival and resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) at 1 year.
Death, Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)12 monthsPercentage of participants that experienced death, amputation and clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 1 year.
Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement12 monthsPercentage of participants that experienced primary sustained clinical improvement at 1 year, specified as an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation free, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) free surviving subjects.
Secondary Sustained Clinical Improvement12 monthsPercentage of participants that experienced a secondary sustained clinical improvement, specified as an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class including the need for clinically driven TLR in amputation free surviving subjects at 1 year.
Quality of Life Assessment by EQ5D12 monthsQuality of life assessment by EQ5D at 1 year compared to baseline. EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-3L essentially consists of 2 parts:the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: (1) no problems, (2) some problems, (3) extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. EQ-5D health states can be converted into a single summary index where 0.0='worst possible outcome' and 1.0='best possible outcome'.
Walking Capacity Assessment12 monthsWalking Impairment assessment by WIQ at 1 year compared to baseline. The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a questionnaire for evaluating walking impairment in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This can be used to identify patients with significant impairment and to monitor effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. The questionnaire was self-administered by the patients and contains three domains measuring three important factors of walking impairment in patients with intermittent claudication: (1) difficulty walking a distance during the past month, (2) difficulty walking at a certain speed during the past month, (3) symptoms associated with walking impairment. For each separate domain, a subscore was calculated. The total WIQ score was defined as the mean of the three subscores. A WIQ score of 42.5 or less identified low performers; while a score of 75.5 or more identified high performers. The WIQ score range is 0 (minimum) - 100 (maximum).
Amputation Free Survival12 monthsPercentage of participants with a 1 year amputation free survival.
Device SuccessDay 1Percentage of device success defined as exact deployment of the device according to the instructions for use as documented with suitable imaging modalities
Technical SuccessDay 1Percentage of technical success defined as successful vascular access and completion of the endovascular procedure and immediate morphological success with less or equal to 50% residual diameter reduction of the treated lesion on completion angiography
Procedural SuccessDay 1Percentage of patients with a procedural success defined as combination of technical success, device success and absence of procedural complications
Days of Hospitalization12 monthsDays of hospitalization at 1 year
Improvement % Diameter Stenosis (%DS) of the Target Leasion (TL) Assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)12 monthsPercentage of participants with an improvement in percent diameter stenosis (%DS) of the target leasion (TL) assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)
MAE (Major Adverse Events)12 monthsPercentage of participants with a MAE (Major Adverse Events) at 1 year. Major Adverse Events, defined as Death of any Cause, Major Amputation of target limb, Minor Amputation of target limb
Rate of Wound Healing12 monthsPercentage of participants with completed wound healing, wound healing as defined as core lab adjudication of \> 50% area/volume reduction of baseline ulcer(s) in the treated leg at 1 year.
Amputation Free Survival and Wound Healing12 monthsPercentage of participants with a 1 year amputation free survival and wound healing. Wound healing is defined as core lab adjudication of \> 50% area/volume reduction of baseline ulcer(s) in the treated leg at a specified time point.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Drug Eluting Balloon
IN.PACT Amphirion: Balloon Angioplasty
239
Standard PTA
Standard PTA balloon: Balloon Angioplasty
119
Total358

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event204
Overall StudyDeath2410
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation156
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject146

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard PTATotalDrug Eluting Balloon
Age, Continuous71.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
72.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Region of Enrollment
Austria
25 participants72 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
31 participants91 participants60 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
35 participants108 participants73 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
13 participants39 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
15 participants46 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants92 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
84 Participants266 Participants182 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
220 / 239108 / 119
serious
Total, serious adverse events
197 / 23992 / 119

Outcome results

Primary

Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) of the Target Lesion in the Amputation Free Surviving Patients

Percentage of participants in the amputation free survival population with Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months, CD-TLR defined as any TLR of the target lesion associated with Deterioration of Rutherford Class and / or increase in size of pre-existing wounds and / or occurrence of a new wound(s).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Amputation free surviving meaning participants without an amputation at 12 months. This analysis population consists of 196 participants in the Drug Eluting Balloon arm and 107 participants in the Standard PTA arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonClinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) of the Target Lesion in the Amputation Free Surviving Patients9.2 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAClinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) of the Target Lesion in the Amputation Free Surviving Patients13.1 percentage of participants analyzed
Primary

Composite of All Cause Death, Major Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)

Percentage of participants experiencing all cause death, major amputation and clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) at 6 months. CD-TLR defined as any TLR of the target lesion associated with Deterioration of Rutherford Class and / or increase in size of pre-existing wounds and / or occurrence of a new wound(s)

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (232 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 114 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonComposite of All Cause Death, Major Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)17.67 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAComposite of All Cause Death, Major Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)15.79 percentage of participants analyzed
Primary

Late Lumen Loss (LLL) of the Target Lesion by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)

The difference between minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and MLD at 12 months follow-up

Time frame: 12 months or at Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) time

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Eluting BalloonLate Lumen Loss (LLL) of the Target Lesion by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)0.605 mm
Standard PTALate Lumen Loss (LLL) of the Target Lesion by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)0.616 mmStandard Deviation 0.781
Secondary

Amputation Free Survival

Percentage of participants with a 1 year amputation free survival.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (227 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 111 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonAmputation Free Survival81.1 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAAmputation Free Survival89.2 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Amputation Free Survival and Resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI)

Percentage of participants with an amputation free survival and resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) at 1 year.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (205 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 103 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonAmputation Free Survival and Resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI)57.1 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAAmputation Free Survival and Resolved Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI)66.0 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Amputation Free Survival and Wound Healing

Percentage of participants with a 1 year amputation free survival and wound healing. Wound healing is defined as core lab adjudication of \> 50% area/volume reduction of baseline ulcer(s) in the treated leg at a specified time point.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (206 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 103 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonAmputation Free Survival and Wound Healing58.7 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAAmputation Free Survival and Wound Healing68.0 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Days of Hospitalization

Days of hospitalization at 1 year

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All randomized subjects with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Eluting BalloonDays of Hospitalization4.5 daysStandard Deviation 8.5
Standard PTADays of Hospitalization4.0 daysStandard Deviation 7.2
Secondary

Death, Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Percentage of participants that experienced death, amputation and clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 1 year.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (227 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 111 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonDeath, Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)39.6 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTADeath, Amputation and Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)34.2 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Device Success

Percentage of device success defined as exact deployment of the device according to the instructions for use as documented with suitable imaging modalities

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Number of device deployments

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonDevice Success98.0 percentage of device deployments
Standard PTADevice Success96.3 percentage of device deployments
Secondary

Improvement % Diameter Stenosis (%DS) of the Target Leasion (TL) Assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)

Percentage of participants with an improvement in percent diameter stenosis (%DS) of the target leasion (TL) assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Angiographic subgroup only. Angio-target lesion is one identifiable single solitary or series of multiple adjacent lesions with a diameter stenosis higher than 70% and a cumulative length less than 100 mm that can be covered by a single IN.PACT Amphirion™; and Angio-target lesion is the only lesion in that vessel.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonImprovement % Diameter Stenosis (%DS) of the Target Leasion (TL) Assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)82.0 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAImprovement % Diameter Stenosis (%DS) of the Target Leasion (TL) Assessed by Quantitative Vascular Angiography (QVA)71.0 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

MAE (Major Adverse Events)

Percentage of participants with a MAE (Major Adverse Events) at 1 year. Major Adverse Events, defined as Death of any Cause, Major Amputation of target limb, Minor Amputation of target limb

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Percentage based on number of evaluable subjects for safety events (227 participants in the drug eluting balloon arm and 111 patients in the Standard PTA arm). All randomized subjects experiencing at least one component for the safety endpoint or with follow-up of at least 330 days post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonMAE (Major Adverse Events)35.2 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAMAE (Major Adverse Events)25.2 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement

Percentage of participants that experienced primary sustained clinical improvement at 1 year, specified as an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation free, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) free surviving subjects.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis population consists of amputation free, clinically driven (target lesion revascularization)TLR free surviving subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonPrimary Sustained Clinical Improvement69.3 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAPrimary Sustained Clinical Improvement68.1 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Procedural Success

Percentage of patients with a procedural success defined as combination of technical success, device success and absence of procedural complications

Time frame: Day 1

Population: All randomized subjects with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonProcedural Success98.3 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTAProcedural Success100 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessment by EQ5D

Quality of life assessment by EQ5D at 1 year compared to baseline. EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-3L essentially consists of 2 parts:the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: (1) no problems, (2) some problems, (3) extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. EQ-5D health states can be converted into a single summary index where 0.0='worst possible outcome' and 1.0='best possible outcome'.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Effectiveness Analysis sets - all randomized subjects with available data for EQ5D at baseline and 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Eluting BalloonQuality of Life Assessment by EQ5D0.6975 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.308
Standard PTAQuality of Life Assessment by EQ5D0.7445 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3035
Secondary

Rate of Wound Healing

Percentage of participants with completed wound healing, wound healing as defined as core lab adjudication of \> 50% area/volume reduction of baseline ulcer(s) in the treated leg at 1 year.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Patients with pre-existing wounds and/or occurence of new wounds

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonRate of Wound Healing73.8 percentage of patients analyzed
Standard PTARate of Wound Healing76.9 percentage of patients analyzed
Secondary

Secondary Sustained Clinical Improvement

Percentage of participants that experienced a secondary sustained clinical improvement, specified as an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class including the need for clinically driven TLR in amputation free surviving subjects at 1 year.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analysis population consists of amputation free, clinically driven (target lesion revascularization)TLR free surviving subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonSecondary Sustained Clinical Improvement73.6 percentage of participants analyzed
Standard PTASecondary Sustained Clinical Improvement78.0 percentage of participants analyzed
Secondary

Technical Success

Percentage of technical success defined as successful vascular access and completion of the endovascular procedure and immediate morphological success with less or equal to 50% residual diameter reduction of the treated lesion on completion angiography

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Number of device deployments

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug Eluting BalloonTechnical Success93.2 percentage of device deployments
Standard PTATechnical Success88.4 percentage of device deployments
Secondary

Walking Capacity Assessment

Walking Impairment assessment by WIQ at 1 year compared to baseline. The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a questionnaire for evaluating walking impairment in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This can be used to identify patients with significant impairment and to monitor effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. The questionnaire was self-administered by the patients and contains three domains measuring three important factors of walking impairment in patients with intermittent claudication: (1) difficulty walking a distance during the past month, (2) difficulty walking at a certain speed during the past month, (3) symptoms associated with walking impairment. For each separate domain, a subscore was calculated. The total WIQ score was defined as the mean of the three subscores. A WIQ score of 42.5 or less identified low performers; while a score of 75.5 or more identified high performers. The WIQ score range is 0 (minimum) - 100 (maximum).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Effectiveness Analysis sets - all randomized subjects with available data for Walking Impairment assessment at baseline and 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Eluting BalloonWalking Capacity Assessment74.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.2
Standard PTAWalking Capacity Assessment75.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026