Skip to content

Monopolar Electrosurgery Versus Ultrasound Scissors in Thoracoscopic Ventral Spondylodesis

Comparison of the Quantity of Bleeding and the Duration of Operation in Thoracoscopic Ventral Spondylodesis During Preparation With Monopolar Electrosurgery Compared to Ultrasound Scissors.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00941213
Acronym
Harmonic
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-07-17
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2010-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractures of Vertebral Bodies

Keywords

fractures of vertebral bodies Th10-L2, (AO A1 with kyphosis, A2.3, B or C-type)

Brief summary

This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of using ultrasound scissors in the preparation for Thoracoscopic Ventral Spondylodesis. Quantity of bleeding and the duration of operation in Thoracoscopic Ventral Spondylodesis are compared to the preparation with monopolar electrosurgery.

Detailed description

One group of patients will be operated on using ultrasound scissors in the preparation during Thoracoscopic Ventral Spondylodesis. The other group will be operated on using Monopolar Electrosurgery. The study is designed as a randomized trial. That means that all patients who have given their consent to participate in the study will be allocated to either ultrasound scissors or Monopolar Electrosurgery by chance. A total of 40 patients will be included in this study. The study ends with finishing of the first day after the operation, there is no longer follow up.

Interventions

DEVICEultrasound scissors - Harmonic ACE

preparation with ultrasound scissors during operation

DEVICEelectroscalpel (Erbe Vio 300; Aesculap AG)

preparation with electroscalpel during operation

Sponsors

Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Cologne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* informed consent * fracture of vertebral bodies Th10-L2 with indication for operative treatment

Exclusion criteria

* missing informed consent * mission indication for operative treatment * revision of the trailing edge * clotting inhibition therapy * ASA III/IV * pregnancy * malfunction of liver Child C

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
duration of the operationend of the scin suture at the end of operation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
loss of blood during operation and at first day after the operation24 hours after end of operation
length of stay at the hospitalday of discharge from hospitalization
trauma of internal organs during operationend of the scin suure at the end of operation

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactChristina Otto, MD
christina.otto@uk-koeln.de+49 221 478 86973

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026