Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with Tarceva and gemcitabine, and of gemcitabine monotherapy, as first line treatment of elderly patients, or patients with ECOG performance status of 2, with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Patients will be randomized to receive either sequential gemcitabine 1250mg/m2/day on days 1 and 8 + Tarceva 150mg po on days 15-28 of each 4 week cycle, or gemcitabine monotherapy 1000mg/m2/day on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Interventions
150mg po on days 15-28 of each 4 week cycle
1250mg/m2/day on days 1 and 8 of each 4 week cycle
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* adult patients, \>=70 years of age or with ECOG PS of 2; * advanced (stage IIIB or IV)non-small cell lung cancer; * no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC or prior treatment with HER-axis targeted drugs.
Exclusion criteria
* active brain metastasis or spinal cord suppression; * unstable systemic disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death | BL, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (12 months after randomization of the last participant). | Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (V) 1.0, or date of death from any cause. PD was defined for target lesions (TLs) as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment, and for non-target lesions (NTLs) as unequivocal progression of NTLs. Participants without documented PD were censored at the date of last tumor assessment, the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. Participants without a post-Baseline (BL) tumor assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization. |
| PFS | BL, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (up to 2 years) | The median time, in weeks, between randomization and PFS event. Participants without documented PD were censored at the date of last tumor assessment, the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. Participants without a post-BL tumor assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization. PFS was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier methodology. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0 | BL, Day 22 of Cycle 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (12 months after randomization of the last participant). | As per RECIST V 1.0: for TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs taking as reference the BL SLD. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for one-sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper Method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16 | Weeks 8 and 16 | Non-progression was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease according to RECIST V 1.0: for TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs taking as reference the BL SLD, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits. The 95% CI for one-sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Died | BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years. | — |
| Overall Survival (OS) | BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years. | OS was defined as the median time, in weeks, between randomization and death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be alive, whichever was last. Participants without a post-BL assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. |
| Duration of Response | BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years. | Duration of response was defined as the time between the first documentation of CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first as assessed by the RECIST V 1.0) until the date of documented disease progression or death. Participants with no documented disease progression or death after confirmed CR or PR were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last date of follow-up when the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. |
Countries
Australia
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy Participants received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, IV, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles). Participants consented to post-treatment survival follow-up received no further treatment. | 28 |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib Participants received gemcitabine, 1250 mg/m\^2, IV, on Days 1 and 8 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles). Participants also received erlotinib, 150 mg tablets, PO, once per day on Days 15-28 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles); and 150 mg tablets, PO, once per day thereafter until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or study termination (12 months after randomization of the last participant). | 26 |
| Total | 54 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-Study Treatment | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Post-Study Treatment | Disease Progression | 0 | 2 |
| Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 9 | 3 |
| Treatment Phase | Death | 3 | 5 |
| Treatment Phase | Disease progression | 9 | 11 |
| Treatment Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Phase | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 74.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72 | 72.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91 | 73.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.32 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 16 Participants | 16 Participants | 32 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 28 / 31 | 22 / 23 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 20 / 31 | 14 / 23 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (V) 1.0, or date of death from any cause. PD was defined for target lesions (TLs) as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment, and for non-target lesions (NTLs) as unequivocal progression of NTLs. Participants without documented PD were censored at the date of last tumor assessment, the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. Participants without a post-Baseline (BL) tumor assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization.
Time frame: BL, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (12 months after randomization of the last participant).
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death | 96.4 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death | 96.2 percentage of participants |
PFS
The median time, in weeks, between randomization and PFS event. Participants without documented PD were censored at the date of last tumor assessment, the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last. Participants without a post-BL tumor assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization. PFS was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time frame: BL, Day 22 of Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (up to 2 years)
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | PFS | 8.0 weeks |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | PFS | 10.3 weeks |
Duration of Response
Duration of response was defined as the time between the first documentation of CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first as assessed by the RECIST V 1.0) until the date of documented disease progression or death. Participants with no documented disease progression or death after confirmed CR or PR were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last date of follow-up when the participant was known to be progression free, whichever was last.
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years.
Population: Data could not be summarized to be included in the data table because there are too few events to calculate a median and confidence intervals.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the median time, in weeks, between randomization and death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at the last date recorded in the drug log, or the last date of follow-up the participant was known to be alive, whichever was last. Participants without a post-BL assessment who were known to be alive were censored at the date of randomization. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years.
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Overall Survival (OS) | 21.3 weeks |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Overall Survival (OS) | 17.1 weeks |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0
As per RECIST V 1.0: for TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs taking as reference the BL SLD. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for one-sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper Method.
Time frame: BL, Day 22 of Cycle 2, 4, and 6 (28-day cycles), every 2 months thereafter until disease progression, participant withdrawal, or study termination (12 months after randomization of the last participant).
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0 | 7.1 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST V 1.0 | 3.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1-6 (28-day cycles), every 28 days thereafter until death, participant withdrawal, or study termination up to 2 years.
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Percentage of Participants Who Died | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Percentage of Participants Who Died | 76.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16
Non-progression was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease according to RECIST V 1.0: for TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs taking as reference the BL SLD, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the start of treatment. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits. The 95% CI for one-sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16 | Week 8 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine Monotherapy | Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16 | Week 16 | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16 | Week 8 | 38.5 percentage of participants |
| Gemcitabine + Erlotinib | Percentage of Participants With Non-Progression at Weeks 8 and 16 | Week 16 | 11.5 percentage of participants |