Metastatic Squamous Neck Cancer With Occult Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Recurrent Metastatic Squamous Neck Cancer With Occult Primary, Recurrent Salivary Gland Cancer, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity, Recurrent Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx, Recurrent Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Salivary Gland Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Stage IVA Salivary Gland Cancer, Stage IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity, Stage IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Stage IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity, Stage IVA Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVA Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Stage IVB Salivary Gland Cancer, Stage IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity, Stage IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Stage IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity, Stage IVB Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVB Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Stage IVC Salivary Gland Cancer, Stage IVC Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVC Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity, Stage IVC Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Stage IVC Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity, Stage IVC Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx, Stage IVC Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx, Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx, Tongue Cancer, Untreated Metastatic Squamous Neck Cancer With Occult Primary
Conditions
Brief summary
Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. It is not yet known whether cetuximab is more effective when given alone or together with sorafenib tosylate in treating patients with head and neck cancer. This randomized phase II trial is studying cetuximab to see how well it works when given together with or without sorafenib tosylate in treating patients with refractory, recurrent, and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the progression free survival (PFS) of the combination of cetuximab and sorafenib to that of cetuximab alone in patients with recurrent, refractory or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the response rate, overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the combination of cetuximab and sorafenib and of cetuximab alone. II. To evaluate the presence of EGFRvIII mutation, increased EGFR gene copy number and activated EGFR gene expression signature, and correlate with clinical parameters (RR, OS and PFS) in the cetuximab alone and cetuximab/sorafenib arms. III. To evaluate whether VEGF receptor family and their ligand expression can predict response to cetuximab/sorafenib. IV. To determine the proteomic profiles in serum and tumors that can predict the response and survival upon the treatment with cetuximab or cetuximab/sorafenib. V. To evaluate the effect of therapy on both general and head and neck specific functionality, symptom burden and QOL. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral placebo twice daily on days 1-21. (oral placebo closed as of 02/18/2010). ARM II: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-21. In both arms, courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Paraffin embedded tissue samples are collected at baseline for pharmacogenomic studies and blood samples are collected at baseline and for the first 3 courses for research purposes. Quality of life and symptom burden are assessed by Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey, FACT-HN, and Fatigue and Pain Inventory questionnaires at baseline, at day 43, and at 3 and 6 months. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 3 years.
Interventions
Given IV
Given orally
Given orally
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with recurrent, refractory or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity, oropharynx and larynx, hypopharynx or paranasal sinus, head and neck unknown primary or nasopharyngeal carcinoma WHO type 1; patients with recurrent, refractory or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity, oropharynx and larynx, hypopharynx or paranasal sinus, head and neck unknown primary or nasopharyngeal carcinoma WHO type 1; patients may have had up to 1 prior palliative chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease; please note that chemotherapy given as part of a regimen for curative intent for recurrent disease does not count as "prior chemotherapy;" patients must not presently be candidates for curative therapy * ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2 * Hemoglobin \>= 9.0/dl * Absolute-neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1500/mm\^3 * Platelet count \>= 100,000/mm\^3 * Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 x ULN * ALT and AST =\< 2.5 x ULN (=\< 5 x ULN for patients with liver involvement) * INR \< 1.5 or a PT and PTT within normal limits * Creatinine =\< 1.5 x ULN * If primary therapy was given for curative intent, at least 4 weeks must have elapsed after completion of primary therapy prior to enrollment on this clinical trial; however, toxicities from prior treatment must have resolved to grade 1 or less * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to the start of the treatment; women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation (i.e, a hormonal contraceptive, intra-uterine device, diaphragm with spermicide, condom with spermicide, or abstinence) for the duration of the study and for a minimum of 3 months following the last dose of chemotherapy; male subject agrees to use an acceptable method for contraception for the duration of the study and for a minimum of 3 months following the last dose of chemotherapy * Patients must have a measurable disease defined by RECIST criteria * Voluntary written informed consent before performance of any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the subject at any time without prejudice to future medical care; patients or their legal representatives must be able to read, understand and provide informed consent to participate in the trial
Exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with sorafenib or cetuximab * Patients with active clinically significant infection or with a fever \>= 38.5º C within 3 days of the first scheduled day of protocol treatment * History of prior malignancy within the past 3 years except for curatively treated basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, CIN or localized prostate cancer with a current PSA \< 1.0 mg/dL on 2 successive evaluations at least 3 months apart, with the most recent evaluation within 4 weeks of study entry * Patients with known hypersensitivity to sorafenib or cetuximab * Prior severe infusion reaction to a monoclonal antibody * History of hand-foot syndrome * Pregnant or lactating; sexually active women of childbearing potential must use an effective method of birth control during the course of the study, in a manner such that risk of failure is minimized * Known untreated brain metastasis; patients with neurological symptoms must undergo a CT scan/MRI of the brain to exclude brain metastasis or progression of brain metastasis; patients with treated brain metastasis are eligible for study as long as no evidence of progression of CNS disease; hemorrhagic brain metastases are not allowed on study * Uncontrolled comorbid illness * Patients with HIV who are taking antiretroviral mediations will be excluded because of the potential interactions of anti-retroviral medications with these agent; however, given the potential immune modulating effects of sorafenib, investigators should still be very cautious about placing HIV positive patients on this trial as the effects of these medications on the HIV virus itself are not know * History of allogeneic transplant * Patient has received other investigational drugs within 28 days before enrollment * Cardiac disease: congestive heart failure \> class II NYHA; patients must not have unstable angina (anginal symptoms at rest) or new onset angina (began within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months; significant history of uncontrolled cardiac disease; i.e., uncontrolled hypertension (defined as defined as systolic blood pressure \> 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 90 mmHg, despite optimal medical management), uncontrolled congestive heart failure, and cardiomyopathy with decreased ejection fraction will also be excluded from study; cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy will also be excluded from study * Thrombotic or embolic events such as a cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attacks within the past 6 months * Pulmonary hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE grade 2 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug * Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug * Tumor that invades the carotid artery as shown unequivocally by imaging studies * Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture * Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy * Major surgery, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of first study drug * Use of St. John's Wort or rifampin (rifampicin) * Use of the following medications will not be allowed within 4 weeks prior to enrollment on the study and during the study: ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir, cyclosporine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital; products containing grapefruit juice will not be allowed while on study * Known or suspected allergy to sorafenib or any agent given in the course of this trial * Any malabsorption problem * Known HIV positive patients will be excluded from trial due to the potential immune modulation that these agents may cause
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | On-study date to lesser of date of progression or date of death from any cause (assessed up to 3 years) | Estimated probable duration of life without disease progression, from on-study date to earlier of progression date or date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details). Disease progression is defined under Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as \>=20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Best Response | On-treatment date to date of disease progression (assessed up to 3 years) | Number of patients in each response category, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, summarized as follows for target lesion criteria (see RECIST v1.1 for additional details): complete response (CR),disappearance of target lesions; partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease (PD), \>=20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease (SD), insufficient change in target lesions or new lesions to qualify as either PD or SD. Patients are categorized according to the best response achieved prior to occurrence of progressive disease, where best response hierarchy is CR\>PR\>SD\>PD. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | On-study date to date of death from any cause (assessed up to 3 years) | Estimated probable duration of life from on-study date to date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details) |
| Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | On-study date to 30 days following final dose of study drug | Count of patients according to the worst-grade toxicity experienced by each, where worst-grade toxicity is per NCI common toxicity criteria: grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe; grade 4, life-threatening; grade 5, death |
| Gene Expression Levels | Pre-therapy | Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors were collected. The FFPE tumors were to be evaluated for p16 expression using immunohistochemistry staining with antibody. Gene Expression Levels (positive when \>70% cells stained, otherwise negative) were to be described using frequencies. |
| Overall Survival Associated With Immunomodulatory Cytokines | Pre-therapy, up to about 42 months (follow-up for overall survival) | Twelve immunomodulatory cytokines were selected based on previous a feasibility study and detected using multiplex Luminex bead assays from patient's plasma. One cytokines, HGF, was eliminated due to extremely low expression. Three representative cytokines, TGF-beta 1, IL-8 and VEGF were to be evaluated for association with survival due to clustering. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Southeast Phase II Consortium (SEP2C) study enrolling participants at seven participating sites during August 2009 through October 2011.
Pre-assignment details
Fifty-five patients were consented and assigned to a treatment arm; 3 withdrew before treatment. Fifty-two patients were treated on study. After 19 patients were enrolled, the trial was amended to remove the placebo (and blinding) due to issues with placebo tablet solubility.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Arm A - Cetuximab Patients were to receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral placebo twice daily on days 1-21. After 19 patients were enrolled, the trial was amended to remove the placebo (and blinding) due to issues with placebo tablet solubility. | 27 |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate Patients receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-21. | 28 |
| Total | 55 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Arm A - Cetuximab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 21 Participants | 20 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Age, Customized | 60 years | 59 years | 59 years |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 28 participants | 27 participants | 55 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 23 Participants | 25 Participants | 48 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| other Total, other adverse events | 25 / 26 | 27 / 27 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 26 | 10 / 27 |
Outcome results
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Estimated probable duration of life without disease progression, from on-study date to earlier of progression date or date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details). Disease progression is defined under Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as \>=20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: On-study date to lesser of date of progression or date of death from any cause (assessed up to 3 years)
Population: All patients are included in the analysis on intention-to-treat basis. Analysis is by Kaplan-Meier method, where either death or progression is an event, with censoring for non-progressed, non-expired patients at greater of off-study date or last known alive date.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 3 months |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 3.2 months |
Best Response
Number of patients in each response category, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, summarized as follows for target lesion criteria (see RECIST v1.1 for additional details): complete response (CR),disappearance of target lesions; partial response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease (PD), \>=20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions or appearance of new lesions; stable disease (SD), insufficient change in target lesions or new lesions to qualify as either PD or SD. Patients are categorized according to the best response achieved prior to occurrence of progressive disease, where best response hierarchy is CR\>PR\>SD\>PD.
Time frame: On-treatment date to date of disease progression (assessed up to 3 years)
Population: All patients with best overall response data. Patients are excluded if best overall response data is missing or if the patient is not evaluable for best overall response.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients with Complete Response | 0 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients with Partial Response | 1 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients with Stable Disease | 11 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients with Progressive Disease | 9 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients Not Evaluable | 4 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Best Response | Patients with Less Than Partial Response | 1 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients Not Evaluable | 6 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients with Complete Response | 0 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients with Progressive Disease | 8 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients with Partial Response | 2 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients with Less Than Partial Response | 0 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Best Response | Patients with Stable Disease | 10 participants |
Gene Expression Levels
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors were collected. The FFPE tumors were to be evaluated for p16 expression using immunohistochemistry staining with antibody. Gene Expression Levels (positive when \>70% cells stained, otherwise negative) were to be described using frequencies.
Time frame: Pre-therapy
Population: Due to an insufficient amount of tumor tissue available to complete planned analysis, this analysis was abandoned.
Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity
Count of patients according to the worst-grade toxicity experienced by each, where worst-grade toxicity is per NCI common toxicity criteria: grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe; grade 4, life-threatening; grade 5, death
Time frame: On-study date to 30 days following final dose of study drug
Population: Total number of patients reported with any toxicity. Because not all patients experience a toxicity, and some experience more than one; the number of patients analyzed does not coincide with the number of patients on study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 3 | 5 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 2 | 11 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 4 | 1 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 5 | 0 participants |
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 1 | 6 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 5 | 0 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 1 | 7 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 2 | 4 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 3 | 12 participants |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Number of Participants With Each Worst-Grade Toxicity | Number of Patients with Worst-Grade Toxicity 4 | 1 participants |
Overall Survival Associated With Immunomodulatory Cytokines
Twelve immunomodulatory cytokines were selected based on previous a feasibility study and detected using multiplex Luminex bead assays from patient's plasma. One cytokines, HGF, was eliminated due to extremely low expression. Three representative cytokines, TGF-beta 1, IL-8 and VEGF were to be evaluated for association with survival due to clustering.
Time frame: Pre-therapy, up to about 42 months (follow-up for overall survival)
Population: Data were not collected due to an insufficient amount of tumor tissue available.
Overall Survival (OS)
Estimated probable duration of life from on-study date to date of death from any cause, using the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring (see analysis population description for additional details)
Time frame: On-study date to date of death from any cause (assessed up to 3 years)
Population: All patients are included in the analysis on intention-to-treat basis. Analysis is by Kaplan-Meier method, where death is an event, with censoring for non-expired patients at greater of off-study date or last known alive date.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Cetuximab | Overall Survival (OS) | 9 months |
| Arm B - Cetuximab and Sorafenib Tosylate | Overall Survival (OS) | 5.7 months |
Quality of Life
Quality of Life Survey results.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Population: Data were not collected as The Quality of Life survey instrument was not completed by study participants..