Skip to content

The McKenzie Method Versus Manipulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

The Effect of the McKenzie Method as Compared With That of Manipulation When Applied Adjunctive to Information and Advice for Patients With Clinical Signs of Disc-related Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00939107
Enrollment
350
Registered
2009-07-14
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2009-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, Intervertebral disc, McKenzie, Physical Therapy, Spinal manipulation, Chiropractics, Patient education, Exercise therapy, Random allocation

Brief summary

Introduction: The McKenzie method as well as spinal manipulation is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain throughout the western world. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of persistent symptoms originating from a diskus in the low back. Methods: After clinical screening 350 patients with or without leg pain who presented with centralization of symptoms or signs of disc herniation were randomized to the McKenzie group or the manipulation group. The outcome measures, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, 11 point numerical pain scale, 6 point global perceived change scale, and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed at baseline, at end of treatment, and at 2 and 12 months follow-up.

Detailed description

In 1998, Cherkin et al. published a study showing no difference between outcomes following the McKenzie method, chiropractic manipulation, or the provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with acute non-specific low back pain. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of disc-related symptoms for duration of more than 6 Weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREspinal manipulation

Spinal manipulation to the lumbopelvic spine in combination with information about examination findings and advice about back care

McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy

Sponsors

The Danish Rheumatism Association
CollaboratorOTHER
The Danish Physiotherapy Organization.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Post Graduate Education
CollaboratorOTHER
The Danish Institute for Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Back and Rehabilitation Center, Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 60 years of age * suffering from low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain for a period of more than 6 weeks * able to speak and understand the Danish language * with a presentation of clinical signs of disc-related symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

* positive non-organic signs * serious pathology suspected based on physical examination and/or magnetic resonance imaging * application for disability pension or pending litigation * pregnancy * comorbidity * recent back surgery * problems with communication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disabilitytwo months after treatmentProblems performing daily activities measured on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (worst: 23 points, best:0 points).
Number of Patients With Treatment SuccessTwo months posttreatmentTreatment success was defined as a reduction of at least 5 points or an absolute score below 5 points on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (best value: 0 points, worst value 23 points)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Lifetwelve months posttreatmentQuality of life, general health, measured on the Short Form 36 questionnaire (worst:100, best:0)
Paintwelve months posttreatmentThe back and leg pain questionnaire included three separate 11 point box scales comprising the following items: Low Back Pain (LBP) at the moment, the worst LBP within the past two weeks, and the average level of LBP within the last two weeks. These summed to a total score ranging from 0 points (no back or leg pain at all) to 60 points (worst possible back and leg pain on all items).
Number of Patients on Sick Leavetwelve months posttreatmentMeasured by self-report of beeing on sick leave at the moment because of LBP
Cost Effectivenesstwelve months posttreatment

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited patients from September 2003 through May 2007 among those referred for treatment at a primary care specialist centre in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Pre-assignment details

1969 Patients were screened for eligibility. 1619 Were excluded (580 Were unable to speak and understand Danish, 252 Had comorbidity, 224 Had no peripheralization or centralization, 101 Had previous surgery, 87 Could not be examined, 165 other reasons, 210 Declined to participate)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
McKenzie Exercises
McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy
175
Spinal Manipulation
Spinal manipulation in combination with information of clinical findings and advice about back care
175
Total350

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1412

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMcKenzie ExercisesSpinal ManipulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
175 Participants175 Participants350 Participants
Age Continuous38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Duration of pain97 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 230
94 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 181
95 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 210
Number sick-listed
Number of patients not on sick leave due to LBP
110 participants128 participants238 participants
Number sick-listed
Number of patients on sick leave due to LBP
65 participants47 participants112 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
175 participants175 participants350 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants92 Participants195 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants83 Participants155 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 1759 / 175
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1750 / 175

Outcome results

Primary

Disability

Problems performing daily activities measured on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (worst: 23 points, best:0 points).

Time frame: two months after treatment

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
McKenzie ExercisesDisability6.7 Units on a scale
Spinal ManipulationDisability5.2 Units on a scale
p-value: >0.0595% CI: [0.2, 2.8]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Number of Patients With Treatment Success

Treatment success was defined as a reduction of at least 5 points or an absolute score below 5 points on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (best value: 0 points, worst value 23 points)

Time frame: Two months posttreatment

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
McKenzie ExercisesNumber of Patients With Treatment Success120 participants
Spinal ManipulationNumber of Patients With Treatment Success95 participants
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness

Time frame: twelve months posttreatment

Secondary

Number of Patients on Sick Leave

Measured by self-report of beeing on sick leave at the moment because of LBP

Time frame: twelve months posttreatment

Population: Number of patients on sick leave due to LBP pre-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
McKenzie ExercisesNumber of Patients on Sick Leave14 Participants
Spinal ManipulationNumber of Patients on Sick Leave6 Participants
Secondary

Pain

The back and leg pain questionnaire included three separate 11 point box scales comprising the following items: Low Back Pain (LBP) at the moment, the worst LBP within the past two weeks, and the average level of LBP within the last two weeks. These summed to a total score ranging from 0 points (no back or leg pain at all) to 60 points (worst possible back and leg pain on all items).

Time frame: twelve months posttreatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
McKenzie ExercisesPain15.0 Units on a scale
Spinal ManipulationPain12.2 Units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life

Quality of life, general health, measured on the Short Form 36 questionnaire (worst:100, best:0)

Time frame: twelve months posttreatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026