Skip to content

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00938704
Enrollment
71
Registered
2009-07-14
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2011-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of two non-preserved artificial tears, (carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, + glycerin 0.9% vs. sodium hyaluronate 0.18%) eye drops for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Interventions

DRUGcarboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%

To open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container.

To open, twist and pull tab to remove. Instill study medication as needed, but at least one drop 3 times a day as instructed in the protocol and then discard the container.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current use of an artificial tear product at least 2 times per day (e.g. for relief of dry eye symptoms of dryness). * Be likely to complete the entire course of study and to comply with appropriate instructions

Exclusion criteria

* Have undergone refractive surgery (e.g., cataract surgery, PRK, LASIK, or any surgery involving a limbal or corneal incision) within the last 12 months. * Have uncontrolled systemic disease * Are currently using, or have used within 14 days of study enrollment, any ocular medications other than artificial tears * Have anticipated contact lens wear during the study * Have an active ocular infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Change from baseline in OSDI at Week 2. The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Change from baseline in TBUT at Week 2. TBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Change from baseline in corneal staining at Week 2. Staining of the cornea following ocular administration of fluorescein dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Change from baseline in conjunctival (temporal) staining at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Change from baseline in conjunctival staining (nasal) at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%
carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, glycerin 0.9%
33
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%
sodium hyaluronate 0.18%
37
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Total
Age Continuous54.386 years48.787 years51.5865 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants28 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2

Change from baseline in OSDI at Week 2. The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Baseline56.06 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.43
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Week 2-27.048 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.87
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Baseline54.292 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Week 2-28.303 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.821
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2

Change from baseline in conjunctival staining (nasal) at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Baseline1.758 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.902
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Week 2-1.061 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.899
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Baseline2.000 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.913
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Week 2-1.459 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.043
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2

Change from baseline in conjunctival (temporal) staining at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Baseline1.818 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Week 2-1.152 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.972
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Baseline1.919 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Week 2-1.216 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.084
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2

Change from baseline in corneal staining at Week 2. Staining of the cornea following ocular administration of fluorescein dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Baseline1.818 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.779
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Week 2-1.288 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.718
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Baseline1.608 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.936
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Week 2-1.23 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2

Change from baseline in TBUT at Week 2. TBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Baseline6.501 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.73
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Week 22.919 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.388
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Baseline5.914 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.646
Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Week 22.538 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.923

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026