Cardiovascular Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Cardiovascular Disease
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acute, postprandial effects and mechanism of action of various walnut components (separated nut skins, de-fatted nut meat, nut oil) versus whole walnuts on oxidative stress, inflammation and measures of platelet and endothelial function in healthy adults with moderately elevated cholesterol levels.
Detailed description
Walnuts contain high contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), particularly linoleic acid and linolenic acid. The high PUFA content has been suggested to reduce CVD risk through decreasing total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations, and increasing HDL-C concentrations. In addition, walnuts are rich in substances such as ellagic acid (a polyphenol), antioxidants, vitamin E, fiber, essential fatty acids, flavanoids, and phenolic acids. Polyphenolic compounds are believed to have multiple biological effects influencing oxidative stress, platelet function, inflammation, and cancer initiation and propagation. There is interest in identifying foods with these and other favorable compounds to test their efficacy in real world settings to further understand their role in the human diet. Despite positive benefits found in consumption of the walnuts, it is not known which specific component of the walnut (i.e., whole walnut, walnut skin, defatted walnut, or walnut oil) is most beneficial to health. The investigators hypothesize that maximum improvements in oxidative stress, inflammatory markers, platelet and endothelial function will be observed following consumption of the whole nut versus isolated walnut components, thereby leading to a recommendation to consume walnuts. In addition, results from the research proposed will provide new information about the antioxidant, inflammatory, platelet activity and endothelial effects of the different walnut components and the synergistic effects these components have in the postprandial state.
Interventions
Separated, ground walnut de-fatted nut meat incorporated into inert food carrier
Walnut oil extracted from nut meat and incorporated into inert food carrier
Separated, ground walnut skins incorporated into inert food carrier
85g whole walnuts, ground, incorporated into inert food carrier
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 21 - 60 years * Body mass index 25-39 kg/m2 * LDL cholesterol \>110 mg/dL * \<95 percentile for age and gender for both (based on NHANES data) * TG \< 350 mg/dL
Exclusion criteria
* High alcohol consumption \> 21 units/week (female subjects) or \> 28 units/week (male subjects) * Intake of vitamin and mineral supplements within the past 3 weeks or unwillingness to discontinue for 3 weeks prior to screening and for entire study. * Use of prescription cholesterol-lowering or blood pressure-lowering medications during the study * Intake of other putative cholesterol-lowering supplements (excl. psyllium, fish oil capsules, soy lecithin, phytoestrogens) * Intake of anti-inflammatory medications (containing aspirin or NSAIDS) on a regular basis or if an acute intake, within 48 hours of a test day * Diabetes, liver, kidney, thyroid (unless controlled and stable on replacement medication) or other endocrine disorders from self-reported medical history * Treatment with drugs acting on the gut, such as ezetimibe, bile acid-binding resins, orlistat * Dietary restrictions such as a medically prescribed diet, or a slimming diet prior to or during the trial * Weight loss or gain of 10% body weight or more during a period of 6 months before pre-study examination. * Blood/plasma donation for reason(s) other than the present study prior to the study (1 month for a male subject or 2 months for a female subject), or during the study * Lactation 6 weeks before the start of and during study, pregnant or wishing to become pregnant 3 months before or during the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min) | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and CRP measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Serum CRP was measured by latex-enhanced immunonephelometry. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut oil/120 min, whole walnut/240 min, and walnut skin/360 min). |
| Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments. | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and FRAP was measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. The FRAP assay was used to determine the reducing ability of plasma in a redox-linked colorimetric reaction. Plasma was incubated with the FRAP reagent at room temperature for 1 h and the absorbance at 593 nm was then recorded. Trolox was used as a reference to construct a standard curve to calculate the FRAP value of the samples. The FRAP assay measures lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants (total antioxidant capacity), both of which are present in walnuts. |
| Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min) | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and FRAP was measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. The FRAP assay was used to determine the reducing ability of plasma in a redox-linked colorimetric reaction. Plasma was incubated with the FRAP reagent at room temperature for 1 h and the absorbance at 593 nm was then recorded. Trolox was used as a reference to construct a standard curve to calculate the FRAP value of the samples. The FRAP assay measures lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants (total antioxidant capacity), both of which are present in walnuts. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut skin group at 360 min, walnut oil group at 120 min, whole walnut group at 240 min). |
| Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments. | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and total thiols measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Total thiols in plasma were determined by the following methods: an aliquot of EDTA plasma was mixed with Tris-EDTA buffer, followed by addition of 10 mmol/L 2,2-dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid and methanol. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min and centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 412 nm. |
| Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min) | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and total thiols measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Total thiols in plasma were determined by the following methods: an aliquot of EDTA plasma was mixed with Tris-EDTA buffer, followed by addition of 10 mmol/L 2,2-dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid and methanol. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min and centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 412 nm. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut skin group at 360 min, walnut oil group at 120 min, whole walnut group at 240 min). |
| Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments. | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and MDA measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Plasma MDA was measured by an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with fluorometric detection. |
| Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min) | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the clinic after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and MDA measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Plasma MDA was measured by an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with fluorometric detection. Several blood samples (n=2) could not be obtained (walnut oil group at 120 min and whole walnut group at 240 min). |
| Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments. | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and CRP measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Serum CRP was measured by latex-enhanced immunonephelometry. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline at 240 min | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. fRHI is an alternative calculation derived from the same raw data (as RHI) and differs in that it uses the period from 90 to 120 s of postocclusion hyperemia, does not incorporate a baseline correction factor, and has a natural log transformation applied to the resulting ratio. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group. |
| Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline at 240 min | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group. |
| Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline at 240 min | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. AI is a measure of vascular stiffness (pulse wave reflection) that is calculated from the shape of the pulse wave recorded during baseline. No endothelial function test data was available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group. |
| Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline at 240 min | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. AI is a measure of vascular stiffness (pulse wave reflection) that is calculated from the shape of the pulse wave recorded during baseline. AI can be adjusted to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AI\_75) to correct for the independent effect of heart rate on this measure.No endothelial function test data was available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group. |
| Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments. | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and TG was measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. TG were determined by standard colorimetric and enzymatic procedures with commercially available kits (Alfa Wassermann). |
| Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline for each timepoint (30, 60, 120, 240, 360 min) | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and TG was measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. TG were determined by standard colorimetric and enzymatic procedures with commercially available kits (Alfa Wassermann). Several blood samples (n=4) could not be obtained/measured \[walnut skin group at 360 min (n=1), walnut oil group at 120 min (n=2), whole walnut group at 240 min(n=1)\]. |
| Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | Change from baseline at 240 min | On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. RHI was calculated as the ratio of the average pulse wave amplitude during hyperemia (60 to 120 s of the post occlusion period) to the average pulse wave amplitude during baseline in the occluded hand divided by the same values in the control hand and then multiplied by a baseline correction factor. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited through advertisements in the local newspaper and university e-mails from April 2008 to October 2008.
Pre-assignment details
Of the individuals (n=246) who were contacted and screened with a semi-structured telephone interview, 50 qualified and were scheduled for a screening visit at the Penn State General Clinical Research Center. After written informed consent was obtained, a fasting blood sample was drawn. Eligible participants (n=20) were randomized to the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| All Completed Participants (n=15) Whole walnut (85 g) Walnut skins (5.6 g) Walnut oil (51 g) Defatted walnut nutmeat (34 g) | 15 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | All Completed Participants (n=15) |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 |
| Body mass index | 29 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 76 mm Hg STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 |
| Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) | 1148 umol TE/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 195 |
| Framingham reactive hyperemia index (fRHI) | 0.43 ln(ratio) STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.39 |
| HDL-cholesterol | 1.1 mmol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 |
| LDL-cholesterol | 3.4 mmol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 |
| Malondialdehyde (MDA) | 0.75 umol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32 |
| Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) | 2.0 ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants |
| Systolic blood pressure | 119 mm Hg STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Total cholesterol | 5.0 mmol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 |
| Total thiols | 0.40 mmol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 |
| Triglycerides | 1.2 mmol/L STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and CRP measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Serum CRP was measured by latex-enhanced immunonephelometry. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut oil/120 min, whole walnut/240 min, and walnut skin/360 min).
Time frame: Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min)
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.12 mg/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.08 mg/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.06 mg/L | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.16 mg/L | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Walnut Skins (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.04 mg/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Walnut Skins (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.03 mg/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Skins (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.04 mg/L | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Walnut Skins (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.06 mg/L | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Walnut Oil (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.20 mg/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Walnut Oil (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.20 mg/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Oil (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.18 mg/L | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Walnut Oil (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.25 mg/L | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.12 mg/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.09 mg/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.08 mg/L | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on C-reactive Protein (CRP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.20 mg/L | Standard Error 0.13 |
Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the clinic after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and MDA measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Plasma MDA was measured by an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with fluorometric detection. Several blood samples (n=2) could not be obtained (walnut oil group at 120 min and whole walnut group at 240 min).
Time frame: Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min)
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.081 umol/L | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.018 umol/L | Standard Error 0.054 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.022 umol/L | Standard Error 0.061 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.063 umol/L | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Walnut Skins (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.054 umol/L | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Walnut Skins (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.047 umol/L | Standard Error 0.054 |
| Walnut Skins (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.012 umol/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Walnut Skins (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.049 umol/L | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Walnut Oil (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.057 umol/L | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Walnut Oil (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.032 umol/L | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Walnut Oil (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.021 umol/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Walnut Oil (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.111 umol/L | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.017 umol/L | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.004 umol/L | Standard Error 0.054 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.002 umol/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Malondialdehyde (MDA) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.032 umol/L | Standard Error 0.075 |
Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and FRAP was measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. The FRAP assay was used to determine the reducing ability of plasma in a redox-linked colorimetric reaction. Plasma was incubated with the FRAP reagent at room temperature for 1 h and the absorbance at 593 nm was then recorded. Trolox was used as a reference to construct a standard curve to calculate the FRAP value of the samples. The FRAP assay measures lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants (total antioxidant capacity), both of which are present in walnuts. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut skin group at 360 min, walnut oil group at 120 min, whole walnut group at 240 min).
Time frame: Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min)
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 69 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 63 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -34 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 63 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -65 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -75 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 63 |
| Walnut Skins (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -4 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Walnut Skins (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 10 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Walnut Skins (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 7 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Walnut Skins (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 98 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 65 |
| Walnut Oil (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -10 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Walnut Oil (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 5 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 65 |
| Walnut Oil (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 53 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Walnut Oil (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -13 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 64 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -139 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 66 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -92 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 66 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -175 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 66 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -134 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)/L | Standard Error 66 |
Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and total thiols measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Total thiols in plasma were determined by the following methods: an aliquot of EDTA plasma was mixed with Tris-EDTA buffer, followed by addition of 10 mmol/L 2,2-dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid and methanol. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min and centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 412 nm. Several blood samples (n=3) could not be obtained/measured (walnut skin group at 360 min, walnut oil group at 120 min, whole walnut group at 240 min).
Time frame: Change from baseline for each timepoint (60, 120, 240, 360 min)
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.051 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.017 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.035 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.017 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.001 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.021 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.010 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.022 |
| Walnut Skins (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.018 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.018 |
| Walnut Skins (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.004 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.018 |
| Walnut Skins (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.005 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.021 |
| Walnut Skins (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.019 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.023 |
| Walnut Oil (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.022 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.017 |
| Walnut Oil (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.029 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.018 |
| Walnut Oil (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.003 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.02 |
| Walnut Oil (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.010 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.023 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.038 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.019 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.037 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.02 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.022 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.022 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Total Thiol Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.008 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.024 |
Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and CRP measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Serum CRP was measured by latex-enhanced immunonephelometry.
Time frame: AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments.
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.10 mg*min/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.01 mg*min/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.20 mg*min/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.12 mg*min/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and MDA measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Plasma MDA was measured by an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with fluorometric detection.
Time frame: AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments.
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.015 umol*min/L | Standard Error 0.036 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.004 umol*min/L | Standard Error 0.036 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.041 umol*min/L | Standard Error 0.036 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Malondialdehyde (MDA) Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.001 umol*min/L | Standard Error 0.037 |
Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and total thiols measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. Total thiols in plasma were determined by the following methods: an aliquot of EDTA plasma was mixed with Tris-EDTA buffer, followed by addition of 10 mmol/L 2,2-dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid and methanol. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min and centrifugation, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 412 nm.
Time frame: AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments.
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.024 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.014 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.010 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.015 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.011 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.014 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Changes in Total Thiol Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.026 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.017 |
Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and FRAP was measured at 0, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. The FRAP assay was used to determine the reducing ability of plasma in a redox-linked colorimetric reaction. Plasma was incubated with the FRAP reagent at room temperature for 1 h and the absorbance at 593 nm was then recorded. Trolox was used as a reference to construct a standard curve to calculate the FRAP value of the samples. The FRAP assay measures lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants (total antioxidant capacity), both of which are present in walnuts.
Time frame: AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments.
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -26 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)*min/L | Standard Error 46 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 28 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)*min/L | Standard Error 47 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 9 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)*min/L | Standard Error 47 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -135 umol Trolox equivalents (TE)*min/L | Standard Error 51 |
Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and TG was measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. TG were determined by standard colorimetric and enzymatic procedures with commercially available kits (Alfa Wassermann). Several blood samples (n=4) could not be obtained/measured \[walnut skin group at 360 min (n=1), walnut oil group at 120 min (n=2), whole walnut group at 240 min(n=1)\].
Time frame: Change from baseline for each timepoint (30, 60, 120, 240, 360 min)
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.04 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.13 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.32 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.47 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Walnut Skins (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.24 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Skins (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.05 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Walnut Skins (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.05 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Skins (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.02 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Oil (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.06 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Walnut Oil (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.08 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Oil (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.08 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Walnut Oil (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.10 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.41 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.47 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.14 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.05 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (60 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.02 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (120 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.06 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (240 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.17 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (360 Min) | Main Effect of Treatment by Timepoint on Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.13 mmol/L | Standard Error 0.08 |
Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. AI is a measure of vascular stiffness (pulse wave reflection) that is calculated from the shape of the pulse wave recorded during baseline. No endothelial function test data was available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 240 min
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -6.6 Percent change | Standard Error 3.1 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -1.4 Percent change | Standard Error 3.2 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -2.6 Percent change | Standard Error 3.2 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index (AI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -4.0 Percent change | Standard Error 3.7 |
Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. AI is a measure of vascular stiffness (pulse wave reflection) that is calculated from the shape of the pulse wave recorded during baseline. AI can be adjusted to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AI\_75) to correct for the independent effect of heart rate on this measure.No endothelial function test data was available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 240 min
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -4.0 Percent change | Standard Error 2.7 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -1.2 Percent change | Standard Error 2.8 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.1 Percent change | Standard Error 2.9 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Augmentation Index Standardized to a Heart Rate of 75 Beats/Min (AI_75) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -2.9 Percent change | Standard Error 3.3 |
Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. fRHI is an alternative calculation derived from the same raw data (as RHI) and differs in that it uses the period from 90 to 120 s of postocclusion hyperemia, does not incorporate a baseline correction factor, and has a natural log transformation applied to the resulting ratio. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 240 min
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.14 ln(ratio) | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.14 ln(ratio) | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.09 ln(ratio) | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.02 ln(ratio) | Standard Error 0.07 |
Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 240 min
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 3.9 beats/minute | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.2 beats/minute | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 4.4 beats/minute | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Heart Rate (HR) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 1.9 beats/minute | Standard Error 1.5 |
Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. At baseline the endothelial function test was performed using pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) (Itamar Medical). Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. The endothelial function test was performed again at 240 min postmeal. RHI was calculated as the ratio of the average pulse wave amplitude during hyperemia (60 to 120 s of the post occlusion period) to the average pulse wave amplitude during baseline in the occluded hand divided by the same values in the control hand and then multiplied by a baseline correction factor. No endothelial function test data available for one participant within the walnut oil group and one within the defatted walnut nutmeat group.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 240 min
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.19 ratio | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.26 ratio | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.07 ratio | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | -0.09 ratio | Standard Error 0.09 |
Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments
On the day of each test, participants arrived at the General Clinical Research Center after a 12-h overnight fast. A baseline (0 min) fasting blood sample was collected. Participants then had 15 min to consume 1 of the 4 walnut test meals. Blood samples (∼30 mL) were subsequently taken at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min following the meal and TG was measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min. TG were determined by standard colorimetric and enzymatic procedures with commercially available kits (Alfa Wassermann).
Time frame: AUC values were calculated with the trapezoidal rule, using the respective fasting baseline value as the line of reference. Measured at 0 to 360 min (baseline to 360min post meal) for each of the 4 walnut treatments.
Population: All participants who completed each of the 4 treatment arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Walnut (85 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.24 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Skins (5.6 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.05 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Walnut Oil (51 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.24 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Defatted Walnut Nutmeat (34 g) | Main Effect of Treatment on the Triglyceride (TG) Changes in Response to 4 Walnut Treatments | 0.09 mmol*min/L | Standard Error 0.06 |