Skip to content

Study Evaluating Safety and Adherence to Treatment With Etanercept in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis

A Post-Marketing Surveillance For Safety And Adherence To Treatment Of Enbrel In Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis In Belgium

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00938015
Acronym
PROVE
Enrollment
303
Registered
2009-07-13
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2013-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Psoriatic

Keywords

postmarketing surveillance, Enbrel, psoriatic arthritis

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if the data obtained in controlled clinical trials are confirmed when Enbrel is used in usual clinical practice in Belgium according to local reimbursement criteria.

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaire

This is a non-interventional study

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active erosive psoriatic arthritis of poly-articular type or active erosive or with joint space narrowing psoriatic arthritis of oligo-articular type * At least 18 years old * Have fulfilled reimbursement criteria for Enbrel in psoriatic arthritis of poly-articular type or oligo-articular type * Physician decides to prescribe Enbrel or patient is already on Enbrel * Give written informed consent at time of inclusion to study

Exclusion criteria

NA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Baseline up to Year 1Baseline up to Year 1An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 1 up to Year 2Year 1 up to Year 2An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 2 up to Year 3Year 2 up to Year 3An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 3 up to Year 4Year 3 up to Year 4An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 4 up to Year 5Year 4 up to Year 5An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 5 up to Year 6Year 5 up to Year 6An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearBaseline up to Year 6An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Quality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78HAQ is a 20 item questionnaire to measure functional limitations. Participants were rated on 4 point scale with scores: 0=no difficulty (normal), 1=some difficulty (adequate), 2=much difficulty (limited), 3=unable to do based on degree of difficulty experienced with 20 items grouped into 8 areas of dressing, rising, hygiene, reach, walking, eating, grip and activities. Total score range 0-60, higher score indicating greater functional limitations.
Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearBaseline up to Month 6, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (mean study drug exposure duration multiplied by safety set population). Incidence calculated as AEs or SAEs divided by Participant-Year multiplied by 100. Incidence of AEs and SAEs were broken down by each follow-up time period.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Receiving Enbrel Who Stayed on the TreatmentBaseline up to Month 78
Number of Joints With Active ArthritisBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78Numbers of joints with active arthritis were defined as joints that were swollen or, in absence of swelling, joints with limited motion with pain and/or tenderness.
Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per participant was evaluated.
Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point NRS ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per physician was evaluated.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received etanercept (Enbrel) as per standard practice were observed for 6.5 years.
303
Total303

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event32
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up32
Overall StudyNon-responder52
Overall StudyReason not related to Etanercept29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age Continuous48.29 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
Sex: Female, Male
Female
137 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
166 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
179 / 301
serious
Total, serious adverse events
65 / 301

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Baseline up to Year 1

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Baseline up to Year 1

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed informed consent form (ICF) and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Baseline up to Year 17.97 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 1 up to Year 2

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Year 1 up to Year 2

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 1 up to Year 27.91 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 2 up to Year 3

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Year 2 up to Year 3

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 2 up to Year 34.85 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 3 up to Year 4

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Year 3 up to Year 4

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 3 up to Year 44.55 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 4 up to Year 5

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Year 4 up to Year 5

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 4 up to Year 53.37 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 5 up to Year 6

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Year 5 up to Year 6

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Year 5 up to Year 62.52 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-Year

Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (mean study drug exposure duration multiplied by safety set population). Incidence calculated as AEs or SAEs divided by Participant-Year multiplied by 100. Incidence of AEs and SAEs were broken down by each follow-up time period.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 1214.54 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 6145.68 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 12138.51 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 18134.23 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 30125.73 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 42117.93 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 54118.49 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of AEs till Month 66112.79 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 69.44 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 1813.23 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 3014.11 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 4212.23 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 5411.29 Events per participant year
EtanerceptIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Per Participant-YearIncidence of SAEs till Month 6610.65 Events per participant year
Secondary

Number of Joints With Active Arthritis

Numbers of joints with active arthritis were defined as joints that were swollen or, in absence of swelling, joints with limited motion with pain and/or tenderness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78

Population: Efficacy set included all the participants who signed ICF. 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 30 (n=215)1.13 JointsStandard Deviation 2.91
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisBaseline (n=302)11.81 JointsStandard Deviation 6.77
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 6 (n=288)2.10 JointsStandard Deviation 3.36
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 12 (n=260)1.80 JointsStandard Deviation 4.65
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 18 (n=261)1.34 JointsStandard Deviation 3.45
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 42 (n=189)0.83 JointsStandard Deviation 2.17
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 54 (n=169)0.77 JointsStandard Deviation 2.47
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 66 (n=152)0.73 JointsStandard Deviation 2
EtanerceptNumber of Joints With Active ArthritisMonth 78 (n=5)1.00 JointsStandard Deviation 1.41
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per Year

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Time frame: Baseline up to Year 6

Population: Safety set included all the participants who signed ICF and had at least one dose of study medication and had follow-up data. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearTill Year 1 (n=301)44.19 Percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearYear 1 to Year 2 (n=278)37.77 Percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearYear 2 to Year 3 (n=227)33.92 Percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearYear 3 to Year 4 (n=198)34.85 Percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearYear 4 to Year 5 (n=178)31.46 Percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE) Per YearYear 5 to Year 6 (n=159)21.38 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Receiving Enbrel Who Stayed on the Treatment

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 78

Population: Efficacy set included all the participants who signed ICF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Receiving Enbrel Who Stayed on the Treatment51.49 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

HAQ is a 20 item questionnaire to measure functional limitations. Participants were rated on 4 point scale with scores: 0=no difficulty (normal), 1=some difficulty (adequate), 2=much difficulty (limited), 3=unable to do based on degree of difficulty experienced with 20 items grouped into 8 areas of dressing, rising, hygiene, reach, walking, eating, grip and activities. Total score range 0-60, higher score indicating greater functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78

Population: Efficacy set included all the participants who signed ICF. 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Baseline (n=261)26.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.94
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 6 (n=239)9.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.37
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 12 (n=194)8.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.51
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 18 (n=209)8.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 30 (n=182)7.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.93
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 42 (n=166)7.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 54 (n=149)7.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 66 (n=135)7.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) For Poly-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Month 78 (n=4)15.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.31
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant Evaluation

Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per participant was evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78

Population: Efficacy set included all the participants who signed ICF. 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationBaseline (n=37)7.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 6 (n=27)3.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 12 (n=19)3.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 18 (n=24)3.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 30 (n=18)3.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 42 (n=13)2.23 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 54 (n=9)3.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 66 (n=5)3.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Participant EvaluationMonth 78 (n=0)NA Units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician Evaluation

Quality of life for oligo-articular type arthritis was assessed on a 11-point NRS ranging from 1 (best health status) to 10 (worst health status). NRS for the most affected joint as per physician was evaluated.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 30, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66, Month 78

Population: Efficacy set included all the participants who signed ICF. 'N' (Number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationBaseline (n=37)6.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 6 (n=27)2.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 12 (n=20)2.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 18 (n=24)2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 30 (n=18)2.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 42 (n=13)1.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 54 (n=9)2.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 66 (n=5)3.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
EtanerceptQuality of Life Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) For Oligo-Articular Type Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) - Physician EvaluationMonth 78 (n=0)NA Units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026