Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer, Stage III Prostate Cancer, Stage IV Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized phase II trial studies the side effects and how well giving leuprolide acetate or goserelin acetate works compared to observation in treating patients with high-risk prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Antihormone therapy, such as goserelin acetate and leuprolide acetate, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body and thus control prostate cancer growth. Many times, after surgery, the tumor may not need more treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. However, in some prostate cancers there is a chance that tumors can re-grow despite surgery based on certain high risk features.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the difference in the biochemical progression-free survival rate (bPFS) at 2-years between immediate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for nine months in high risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy and a similar high risk patient population followed without initiation of immediate ADT treatment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the difference in bPFS, prostate cancer specific survival, and overall survival between immediate ADT for nine months and observation for high risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. II. To evaluate the toxicity profile and quality of life (QOL) measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and linear analogue self assessment (LASA) between two treatment arms. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore if serum and urine biomarker(s) levels at study entry, 9 months, or 24 months in the two treatment arms are correlated with biochemical progression-free survival rate. II. To explore if \> 5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating endothelial cells (CECs) following study treatments are associated with biochemical progression-free survival rate. III. To explore the prognostic and predictive value of tissue based biomarkers in high risk prostate cancer patients. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive leuprolide acetate intramuscularly (IM) on day 1 OR goserelin acetate subcutaneously (SC) on day 1. Courses repeat every 3 months for 9 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients undergo observation every 3 months for 9 months. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every three months for 2 years.
Interventions
Given SC
Correlative studies
Given IM
Ancillary studies
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* PRE-REGISTRATION: * Informed consent explained and signed prior to any study related procedures * Patients with any one of the following high risk criteria: * Clinical or pathological Gleason score 8-10 * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 20 ng/ml at initial presentation prior to radical prostatectomy * Willingness to provide mandatory tissue for research purposes * Willingness to provide mandatory blood for research purposes * Has no history of androgen deprivation therapy within the past 6 months or has been treated neoadjuvantly up to 6 months prior to radical prostatectomy with the following agents; luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, anti-androgens, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors, and peripheral anti-androgens * REGISTRATION: * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2; or Karnofsky performance of \> 60% * Patients with any one of the following high risk criteria: * Gleason, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status (GPSM) score \>= 10 \[GS + 1\*(PSA 4-10)+2\*(PSA 10.1-20)+3\*(PSA \> 20)+2\*(seminal vesicular or nodal involvement) +2\*(margin)\](determined post radical prostatectomy) * Post prostatectomy seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) or pT4 * Two or less microscopic lymph nodal metastasis determined at the time of prostatectomy OR * Gleason 4+3 at the time of prostatectomy with margin positivity * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) =\< 2 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total bilirubin =\< 2 x institutional ULN * For patients identified as high-risk on the basis of pathological criteria after undergoing radical prostatectomy: interval time for study enrollment after radical prostatectomy will be =\< 28 days of the prostatectomy * For patients identified as high-risk prior to undergoing radical prostatectomy: patients presenting with a high Gleason score (8-10) and/or a PSA \> 20 ng/ml are deemed eligible for study participation and study registration as long as the eligibility criteria is reconfirmed post radical prostatectomy; these patient groups may choose to register prior to or after prostatectomy * Study randomization must occur =\< 28 days of radical prostatectomy; all patients consented on the trial, whether consented in the pre-prostatectomy or post-prostatectomy period, will be randomized to study treatments =\< 28 days of prostatectomy * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
Exclusion criteria
* PRE-REGISTRATION * Transitional cell, small cell, or squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate; NOTE: patients consented for participation prior to prostatectomy, if detected to have above listed histo-pathologies after prostatectomy will be deemed ineligible and not proceed to study randomization * History of primary prostate cancer treatment * Evidence of clinical nodal disease (N1) or grossly evident metastasis at the time of enrollment * History of bilateral orchiectomy; unilateral orchiectomy with normal range serum testosterone levels will be allowed for enrollment * Evidence of metastasis on radiographic metastatic workup within a preceding period of 4 months from the time of study entry, including whole body radionuclide bone scan, computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) scan of the pelvis and abdomen; otherwise will perform at the time of the baseline tests and result must be normal to continue on study; results of ProstaScint or other radionuclide scans, excluding radionuclide bone scans, will NOT be used to establish metastatic disease if all other studies are negative * Receiving other experimental drugs =\< 4 weeks prior to consenting * Uncontrolled infection * History of other cancer, excluding squamous cell and basal cell skin cancers, within the preceding 2 years * Documented history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or other acquired immunodeficiency disorder, congenital immunodeficiency disorder, or history of organ transplantation * Unable to follow up every three months for the first year to Mayo Clinic, Rochester for receiving LHRH analogues or study monitoring * REGISTRATION: * Uncontrolled infection * Unable to follow up every three months for the first year to Mayo Clinic, Rochester for receiving LHRH analogues or study monitoring
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate | 2 years | Biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the time of biochemical progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of biochemical progression, the patient will be considered to have had progressed at the time of death. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution | 2 years | Percentage of Participants with Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events regardless of attribution per NCI CTCAE Version 3 |
| Number of Deaths | 2 years | The number of deaths due to any cause are reported below. |
| Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline and months 3 and 6 | The overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline and months 3 and 6 mean and standard deviations are reported below. The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life. |
| Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline to Months 3 and 6 | LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6. Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the single-item Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) on a 0-10 scale, with 0=as bad as it can be and 10=as good as it can be. The average and standard deviation of the LASA overall quality of life score are reported below at baseline, months 3 and 6. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Measurements of Serum and Urine Biomarkers, and Comparison Between the Two Arms | 2 years |
| Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Tissue Based Biomarkers (CTCs, CECs) | 2 years |
| Correlation of Circulating Tumor Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Following Study Treatments With Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate | 2 years |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Sixteen (16) participants were recruited at Mayo Clinic (Rochester) between July 2009 and June 2012.
Pre-assignment details
This trial was terminated early due to funding issues.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy Patients receive leuprolide acetate intramuscularly (IM) on day 1 OR goserelin acetate subcutaneously (SC) on day 1. | 8 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy Patients undergo observation every 3 months for 9 months. | 8 |
| Total | 16 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Alternate Treatment | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | No Further Funding | 4 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Refused Further Treatment | 3 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Androgen Deprivation Therapy | No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 62.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 | 62.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 8 participants | 8 participants | 16 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 16 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 8 | 6 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 | 1 / 8 |
Outcome results
Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate
Biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the time of biochemical progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of biochemical progression, the patient will be considered to have had progressed at the time of death.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: No participants reached the 2 years follow up due to the early termination of the trial.
Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6. Quality of Life (QOL) was measured using the single-item Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) on a 0-10 scale, with 0=as bad as it can be and 10=as good as it can be. The average and standard deviation of the LASA overall quality of life score are reported below at baseline, months 3 and 6.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 3 and 6
Population: Patients who completed the LASA and had LASA Overall Quality of Life data at each of the time points are included in each analysis at each time point below.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline | 8.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 3 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 6 | 6.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.19 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline | 6.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 3 | 7.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.22 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average LASA Overall Quality of Life at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 6 | 8.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6
The overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline and months 3 and 6 mean and standard deviations are reported below. The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess participant function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which is the sum of all 5 domain scores and ranges from 0 to 156 where higher scores represent better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and months 3 and 6
Population: Patients who completed the FACT-P and had FACT-P Total Score data at each of the time points are included in each analysis at each time point below.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 3 | 118.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.11 |
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 6 | 109.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.83 |
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline | 122.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 3 | 117.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.67 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Month 6 | 136.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.43 |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Average Overall FACT-P Total Score at Baseline, Months 3 and 6 | Baseline | 114.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.92 |
Number of Deaths
The number of deaths due to any cause are reported below.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Study terminated prematurely due to funding issues. Planned analysis for Overall Survival and Prostate Cancer Specific Survival was not performed due to the nature of the closure. Thus, the number of deaths are reported below.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Number of Deaths | 0 Participants |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Number of Deaths | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution
Percentage of Participants with Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events regardless of attribution per NCI CTCAE Version 3
Time frame: 2 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution | 100 percentage of patients |
| No Androgen Deprivation Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution | 37.5 percentage of patients |
Correlation of Circulating Tumor Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Following Study Treatments With Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Study terminated prematurely due to funding issues. Planned analysis was not performed due to the nature of the closure.
Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Tissue Based Biomarkers (CTCs, CECs)
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Study terminated prematurely due to funding issues. Planned analysis was not performed due to the nature of the closure.
Measurements of Serum and Urine Biomarkers, and Comparison Between the Two Arms
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Study terminated prematurely due to funding issues. Planned analysis was not performed due to the nature of the closure.