Skip to content

Study Comparing Traditional and Gender-specific Total Knee Replacement Designs

A Prospective, Randomized, Control Trial Comparing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Traditional and Gender-Specific Designs

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00937170
Enrollment
0
Registered
2009-07-10
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2011-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Total Knee Replacement, Gender Specific Design

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare results obtained with gender-specific and traditional knee replacement systems design among women undergoing total knee replacement surgery. Women who qualify and agree to participate will be randomly assigned to receive either a traditional or gender-specific knee replacement. During surgery, measurements of bone resection and bone-to-implant relationships will be recorded. At selected time intervals, participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires regarding pain and function, will be examined by their surgeon and routinely obtained xrays will be evaluated. In addition, a subset of participants will be randomly selected to undergo gait analysis to evaluate knee motion and muscle function.

Interventions

DEVICEZimmer LPS flex Gender Specific Implant (Total knee replacement)

Outcomes comparison between a gender specific total knee implant, a standard total knee implant by the same company, and a standard total knee implant from another company

DEVICEZimmer High Flex LPS Implant (Total knee replacement)

Outcomes comparison between a gender specific total knee implant, a standard total knee implant by the same company, and a standard total knee implant from another company

DEVICEStryker Triathlon Implant (Total knee replacement)

Outcomes comparison between a gender specific total knee implant, a standard total knee implant by the same company, and a standard total knee implant from another company

Sponsors

Stryker Orthopaedics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
UConn Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of end-stage degenerative joint disease of the knee * must be deemed appropriate for total knee replacement surgery

Exclusion criteria

* severe flexion deformity of the knee * greater than 20deg varus or valgus malalignment * osteomyelitis, septicemia, prior infection of the knee joint * presence of infections or highly communicable diseases * significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that affect gait or ability to bear weight on lower extremity * metastatic disease * congenital, developmental, bone disease or previous knee surgery that may interfere with the total knee prosthesis survival or success * previous total knee replacement in affected knee * arthrodesis of the affected knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evidence of improved pain relief and functionPre-op, 4 weeks, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evidence of improved patellofemoral biomechanicsPre-op, 4 months, 1 year

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026