Skip to content

Adult Study / OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (HCL) (OROS MPH) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

A Placebo Controlled Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Individualizing Dosing Study Optimizing Treatment of Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder to an Effective Response With OROS Methylphenidate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00937040
Enrollment
357
Registered
2009-07-10
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2013-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Keywords

Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS®) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCl, CONCERTA® (OROS MPH)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the ADHD symptom response of adults with ADHD treated with OROS MPH to those treated with placebo.

Detailed description

The hypothesis is that Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCL (OROS MPH) is safe and effective in improving Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in adults with ADHD when compared to placebo as demonstrated using specific study measures. This is a double-blind (neither participant nor investigator knows the name of the assigned study drug), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OROS MPH using the optimal dose for each adult patient in the study with ADHD. The primary efficacy variable in this study is the change from baseline to final evaluation using the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) to measure patient ADHD symptoms. Participants will also be assessed for adverse events throughout the study. Patients will initiate treatment with oral OROS MPH 18 mg or matching placebo at baseline and continue morning dosing with increases every week until an optimal dose is achieved, up to the maximum of 72 mg/day of OROS MPH or matching placebo. Eligible patients will remain in the study for a maximum of 6 weeks.

Interventions

Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks

DRUGOROS MPH Tablets

Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

DRUGPlacebo Tablets

Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults * ADHD diagnosis (any type: Combined, Predominantly Inattentive, or Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive) * Patients with an Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score greater than 24 at screening/baseline * Ability to read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Any significant history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease detectable via ECG * History of diagnosis of substance or alcohol dependence or admission/hospitalization for rehabilitation for dependence * Current neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis that would make patient inappropriate for participation * Anxiety assessments of moderate or severe * Depression assessments of moderate or severe * History or current suicidal thoughts or attempts * Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to OROS MPH

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisBaseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the investigator's rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The Shifting Attention Test (SAT) a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a computerized measure of vigilance or sustained attention/attention over time. Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) Score = Stroop Commission Errors + SAT Errors + CPT Commission Errors + CPT Omission Errors. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. sustained attention).
Cognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The SAT is a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The scores generated by the SAT are: correct matches, errors, and response time. The testing score is a measure of cognitive flexibility. Cognitive Flexibility Domain Score = SAT Correct Responses - SAT Errors - Stroop Commission Errors. Higher scores indicate better accuracy.
Processing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a computerized variant of the Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), but the position of symbols and digits is reversed. Scoring is the number of correct responses generated in 2 minutes. Processing Speed Domain = SDMT correct responses - SDMT errors. Higher scores indicate better functioning (i.e. information processing).
Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The BRIEF-A is a self-reported measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of the subject's own functioning in the everyday environment. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in 9 non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and GEC are then derived.
Performance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The AIM-A is a subject-reported measure (low=0, high=100, a higher score is more favorable) to assess the overall impact and role that ADHD may have in the conduct of tasks that are expected of adults. The AIM-A is comprised of four global quality of life items, five economic impact items, and five multi-item scales that describe important concepts. Items include: Living with ADHD; General Well-Being; Work, Home and School Performance and Daily Functioning; Relationships; and Communication; and Impact of Symptoms (emotional, degree of daily interference).
Subject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The EWPS provides a measure of the subject's report of their overall productivity (low=0, high=100, a higher score indicates worsening work productivity and efficiency). There are 25 items (questions 15-39) on the scale that describe types of behaviors/ subjective feelings that are highly likely to reduce work productivity/efficiency. These 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, to 4=almost always) indicating how often the behavior, feeling or attitude has been manifested in the past week. The total score is the sum of the 25 items.
Subject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. The response format varies across the entire scale and includes 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question subset of the DAS, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Subject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires subjects to answer 4 questions related to how much their ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit they received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. The responses for this question vary with range of satisfaction (e.g. extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied).
Reaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The 1st part generates basic reaction time to colors. The 2nd part generates complex reaction time score to matching color names and font color. The 3rd part establishes a Stroop reaction time and an error score to unmatched color names/fonts. Reaction Time Domain Score = (Stroop Complex Reaction Time Correct + Stroop Reaction Time Correct)/2. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. reaction time).
Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated subscale (low=0, high=7, higher score indicates increasing illness). The clinician rates the severity of the ADHD symptoms in relation to the clinician's total experience with ADHD subjects using a 7-point scale (1=normal, not at all ill, 2= borderline ill, 3= mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5= markedly ill, 6= severely ill, 7= among the most extremely ill subjects) in response to the question Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the subject at this time?.
Significant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVBaseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (Significant Other) is an 18-item list of core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms. Each item is rated on a four point Likert type scale (0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often). The subject's designated observer will complete this scale, with baseline assessment based on the subject's usual functioning when not on medication. The total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Designated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The BRIEF-A, as completed by the DO, is a measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of an adult informant familiar with the subject's functioning. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in nine non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC) are then derived.
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleBaseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) completed by DOs who were spouses or significant others assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. Possible responses include 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question DAS subset, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires the subject's DO to answer 4 questions related to how much the subject's ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit was received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. Responses vary from extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, mildly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied.
Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeBaseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the subject's own rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The ASRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreBaseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The PSQI discriminates between good and poor sleepers. The self-administered scale contains 15 multiple-choice items concerning frequency of sleep disturbances and subjective sleep quality and 4 write-in items that inquire about typical bedtime, wake-up time, sleep latency, and sleep duration over the past month. The PSQI generates 7 scores corresponding to the different sleep domains. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3. Total sleep index is calculated by adding up the 7 component scores (low=0, high=21, the lower the score, the better in sleep quality).
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-rated questionnaire designed to assess the overall level of daytime sleepiness. Each item describes normal daily situations (i.e., watching TV, lying down in the afternoon, sitting inactive in a public place) and subjects rate the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in each situation. Responses use a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing). Item scores are summed to produce a total score (range of 0-24) with lower score suggesting more alertness.
Responder Rate Using AISRSEndpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)AISRS responder rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with AISRS \< 18 at endpoint.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PLACEBO
Once daily (morning) tablet(s) taken orally of 18, 36 , 54, or 72 mg of placebo
179
OROS MPH
Once daily (morning) tablet(s) taken orally of 18, 36 , 54, or 72 mg of Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCl (MPH) - CONCERTA
178
Total357

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event58
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1212
Overall StudyNONCOMPLIANCE WITH STUDY DRUG32
Overall StudyPOST ENROLL EXCLUSIONARY LAB(S)/ECG FIND58
Overall StudyProtocol Violation30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject137

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOROS MPHPLACEBOTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
173 Participants175 Participants348 Participants
Age Continuous36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87
34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.53
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73
Region of Enrollment
USA
178 participants179 participants357 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
86 Participants79 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants100 Participants192 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 175100 / 174
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1750 / 174

Outcome results

Primary

Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for Diagnosis

The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the investigator's rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set was defined as all randomized subjects who have received at least one dose of the study medication and have any post-baseline efficacy data (not including ASRS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisBaseline37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.51
PLACEBOAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisEndpoint25.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.47
PLACEBOAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisChange from baseline at endpoint-11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
OROS MPHAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisBaseline37.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
OROS MPHAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisEndpoint20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.76
OROS MPHAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for DiagnosisChange from baseline at endpoint-17.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence#01. The primary efficacy was tested at the 0.05 level of significance. To control the overall Type I error at 0.05, the secondary efficacy endpoints were tested in a fixed sequence if the preceding null hypothesis was rejected. No further hypotheses could be tested when the preceding null hypothesis was not rejected. All nominal p-values were presented even though the formal testing procedure stopped at the primary endpoint. No unqualified statements can be made.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over Time

The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the subject's own rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The ASRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeBaseline (N=167, 166)49.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
PLACEBOAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeEndpoint (N=171,167)37.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.33
PLACEBOAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeChange from baseline at endpoint (N=166, 165)-12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
OROS MPHAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeBaseline (N=167, 166)51.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
OROS MPHAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeEndpoint (N=171,167)32.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.04
OROS MPHAdult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over TimeChange from baseline at endpoint (N=166, 165)-19.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
Comparison: P-value for Change from baseline at endpointp-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated subscale (low=0, high=7, higher score indicates increasing illness). The clinician rates the severity of the ADHD symptoms in relation to the clinician's total experience with ADHD subjects using a 7-point scale (1=normal, not at all ill, 2= borderline ill, 3= mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5= markedly ill, 6= severely ill, 7= among the most extremely ill subjects) in response to the question Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the subject at this time?.

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Baseline4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
PLACEBOClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Endpoint (N=160,158)3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
PLACEBOClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=160,158)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
OROS MPHClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Baseline4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
OROS MPHClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Endpoint (N=160,158)3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
OROS MPHClinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=160,158)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#12.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Cognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)

The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The SAT is a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The scores generated by the SAT are: correct matches, errors, and response time. The testing score is a measure of cognitive flexibility. Cognitive Flexibility Domain Score = SAT Correct Responses - SAT Errors - Stroop Commission Errors. Higher scores indicate better accuracy.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)34.0 correct responsesStandard Deviation 21.54
PLACEBOCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)45.9 correct responsesStandard Deviation 17.4
PLACEBOCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)11.3 correct responsesStandard Deviation 18.86
OROS MPHCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)31.5 correct responsesStandard Deviation 21.57
OROS MPHCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)46.6 correct responsesStandard Deviation 17.67
OROS MPHCognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)13.9 correct responsesStandard Deviation 20.34
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#04.p-value: 0.324ANCOVA
Secondary

Designated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)

The BRIEF-A, as completed by the DO, is a measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of an adult informant familiar with the subject's functioning. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in nine non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC) are then derived.

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline (N=66,58)139.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.08
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Endpoint (N=55,52)133.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.54
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=44,39)-10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline (N=66,58)144.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.77
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Endpoint (N=55,52)127.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.18
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=44,39)-20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.25
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#14.p-value: 0.016ANCOVA
Secondary

Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale

The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) completed by DOs who were spouses or significant others assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. Possible responses include 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question DAS subset, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleBaseline (N=44,43)36.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleEndpoint (N=43,38)37.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.08
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleChange from baseline at endpoint (N=31,31)0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.32
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleBaseline (N=44,43)35.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.29
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleEndpoint (N=43,38)37.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction SubscaleChange from baseline at endpoint (N=31,31)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#15.p-value: 0.092ANCOVA
Secondary

Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?

The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires the subject's DO to answer 4 questions related to how much the subject's ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit was received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. Responses vary from extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, mildly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied.

Time frame: Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set for non-missing response to this question

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Extremely Dissatisfied5 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Very Dissatisfied4 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Dissatisfied8 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Neither Dissatisfied or Satisfied19 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Satisfied5 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Very Satisfied6 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Extremely Satisfied0 Participants
PLACEBODesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Missing/Unknown33 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Missing/Unknown44 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Extremely Dissatisfied2 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Satisfied10 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Very Dissatisfied2 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Extremely Satisfied0 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Dissatisfied6 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Very Satisfied3 Participants
OROS MPHDesignated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?Neither Dissatisfied or Satisfied9 Participants
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#16.p-value: 0.284Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-rated questionnaire designed to assess the overall level of daytime sleepiness. Each item describes normal daily situations (i.e., watching TV, lying down in the afternoon, sitting inactive in a public place) and subjects rate the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in each situation. Responses use a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing). Item scores are summed to produce a total score (range of 0-24) with lower score suggesting more alertness.

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline (N=167,166)9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.01
PLACEBOEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Endpoint (N=157,155)8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
PLACEBOEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=152,153)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
OROS MPHEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline (N=167,166)9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
OROS MPHEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Endpoint (N=157,155)7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
OROS MPHEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=152,153)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.13
Comparison: P-value for Change from baseline at endpointp-value: 0.007ANCOVA
Secondary

Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)

The BRIEF-A is a self-reported measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of the subject's own functioning in the everyday environment. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in 9 non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and GEC are then derived.

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline (N=168,166)153.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.22
PLACEBOGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Endpoint (N=157,155)137.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.19
PLACEBOGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=153,153)-14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.18
OROS MPHGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Baseline (N=168,166)153.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.73
OROS MPHGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Endpoint (N=157,155)128.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.98
OROS MPHGlobal Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=153,153)-25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.97
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#06.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Performance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)

The AIM-A is a subject-reported measure (low=0, high=100, a higher score is more favorable) to assess the overall impact and role that ADHD may have in the conduct of tasks that are expected of adults. The AIM-A is comprised of four global quality of life items, five economic impact items, and five multi-item scales that describe important concepts. Items include: Living with ADHD; General Well-Being; Work, Home and School Performance and Daily Functioning; Relationships; and Communication; and Impact of Symptoms (emotional, degree of daily interference).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Baseline (N=168,166)36.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.34
PLACEBOPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Endpoint (N=157,155)48.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.11
PLACEBOPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=153,153)12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
OROS MPHPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Baseline (N=168,166)31.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.45
OROS MPHPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Endpoint (N=157,155)59.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.14
OROS MPHPerformance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=153,153)27.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.44
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#07.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score

The PSQI discriminates between good and poor sleepers. The self-administered scale contains 15 multiple-choice items concerning frequency of sleep disturbances and subjective sleep quality and 4 write-in items that inquire about typical bedtime, wake-up time, sleep latency, and sleep duration over the past month. The PSQI generates 7 scores corresponding to the different sleep domains. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3. Total sleep index is calculated by adding up the 7 component scores (low=0, high=21, the lower the score, the better in sleep quality).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreBaseline (N=167, 166)8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.47
PLACEBOPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreEndpoint (N=157, 155)8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
PLACEBOPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreChange from baseline at endpoint (N=152, 153)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
OROS MPHPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreBaseline (N=167, 166)9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.17
OROS MPHPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreEndpoint (N=157, 155)8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
OROS MPHPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total ScoreChange from baseline at endpoint (N=152, 153)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Comparison: P-value for Change from baseline at endpointp-value: 0.319ANCOVA
Secondary

Processing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a computerized variant of the Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), but the position of symbols and digits is reversed. Scoring is the number of correct responses generated in 2 minutes. Processing Speed Domain = SDMT correct responses - SDMT errors. Higher scores indicate better functioning (i.e. information processing).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)53.9 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 12.65
PLACEBOProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=109,114)59.7 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 13.23
PLACEBOProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=104,101)5.9 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 9.14
OROS MPHProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)52.8 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 13.17
OROS MPHProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=109,114)58.8 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 25.68
OROS MPHProcessing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=104,101)4.9 acccurate responses per minuteStandard Deviation 23.88
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#05.p-value: 0.631ANCOVA
Secondary

Reaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)

Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The 1st part generates basic reaction time to colors. The 2nd part generates complex reaction time score to matching color names and font color. The 3rd part establishes a Stroop reaction time and an error score to unmatched color names/fonts. Reaction Time Domain Score = (Stroop Complex Reaction Time Correct + Stroop Reaction Time Correct)/2. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. reaction time).

Time frame: Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)708.0 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 134.36
PLACEBOReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)653.2 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 108.68
PLACEBOReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)-39.8 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 118.16
OROS MPHReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)700.3 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 141.09
OROS MPHReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)645.2 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 116.56
OROS MPHReaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)-51.2 milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 123.45
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#02.p-value: 0.206ANCOVA
Secondary

Responder Rate Using AISRS

AISRS responder rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with AISRS \< 18 at endpoint.

Time frame: Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PLACEBOResponder Rate Using AISRSResponder30.8 Percent of participants
PLACEBOResponder Rate Using AISRSNon-responder69.2 Percent of participants
OROS MPHResponder Rate Using AISRSResponder45.0 Percent of participants
OROS MPHResponder Rate Using AISRSNon-responder55.0 Percent of participants
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#11.p-value: 0.008Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Significant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV

The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (Significant Other) is an 18-item list of core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms. Each item is rated on a four point Likert type scale (0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often). The subject's designated observer will complete this scale, with baseline assessment based on the subject's usual functioning when not on medication. The total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set and non-missing values at each timepoint. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVBaseline (N=51,40)29.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
PLACEBOSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVEndpoint (N=40,35)27.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.01
PLACEBOSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVChange from baseline at endpoint (N=35,28)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
OROS MPHSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVBaseline (N=51,40)29.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
OROS MPHSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVEndpoint (N=40,35)21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.75
OROS MPHSignificant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IVChange from baseline at endpoint (N=35,28)-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#13.p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
Secondary

Subject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)

The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. The response format varies across the entire scale and includes 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question subset of the DAS, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Baseline (N=65,80)32.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Endpoint (N=66,68)32.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.57
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=46,52)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.88
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Baseline (N=65,80)31.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.62
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Endpoint (N=66,68)33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.68
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=46,52)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.66
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#09.p-value: 0.372ANCOVA
Secondary

Subject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)

The EWPS provides a measure of the subject's report of their overall productivity (low=0, high=100, a higher score indicates worsening work productivity and efficiency). There are 25 items (questions 15-39) on the scale that describe types of behaviors/ subjective feelings that are highly likely to reduce work productivity/efficiency. These 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, to 4=almost always) indicating how often the behavior, feeling or attitude has been manifested in the past week. The total score is the sum of the 25 items.

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Baseline (N=129,141)44.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.68
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Endpoint (N=126,124)33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=104,115)-9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Baseline (N=129,141)46.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.07
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Endpoint (N=126,124)27.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.53
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=104,115)-18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.54
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#08.p-value: 0.008ANCOVA
Secondary

Subject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?

The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires subjects to answer 4 questions related to how much their ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit they received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. The responses for this question vary with range of satisfaction (e.g. extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied).

Time frame: Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set for non-missing response to this question

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Dissatisfied24 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Satisfied16 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Very Dissatisfied18 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Very Satisfied15 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Neither Dissatisfied or Satisfied38 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Extremely Satisfied7 Participants
PLACEBOSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Extremely Dissatisfied39 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Extremely Satisfied13 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Extremely Dissatisfied14 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Very Dissatisfied17 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Dissatisfied7 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Neither Dissatisfied or Satisfied36 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Satisfied40 Participants
OROS MPHSubject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?Very Satisfied28 Participants
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#10.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)

The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The Shifting Attention Test (SAT) a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a computerized measure of vigilance or sustained attention/attention over time. Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) Score = Stroop Commission Errors + SAT Errors + CPT Commission Errors + CPT Omission Errors. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. sustained attention).

Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set. Only non-missing values are shown at each category (timepoint). Change from baseline to endpoint requires a non-missing value at both baseline and endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)28.2 errorsStandard Deviation 39.43
PLACEBOVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)27.2 errorsStandard Deviation 43.97
PLACEBOVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)-0.2 errorsStandard Deviation 47.98
OROS MPHVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Baseline (N=140,132)35.7 errorsStandard Deviation 47.15
OROS MPHVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Endpoint (N=108,114)23.9 errorsStandard Deviation 37.04
OROS MPHVigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)Change from baseline at endpoint (N=103,101)-10.4 errorsStandard Deviation 45.82
Comparison: Gate-Keeper-Sequence-Number#03.p-value: 0.348ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026