Skip to content

Angiography Versus (vs) IVUS Optimisation

Angiography vs. IVUS Optimisation: A Multi-Centre European Study of Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00936169
Acronym
AVIO
Enrollment
284
Registered
2009-07-09
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2012-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Patients with at least one complex lesion suitable for implantation of a drug-eluting stent

Brief summary

The purpose of the study id to demonstrate an advantage for intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) optimized drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to angiography in complex lesions

Interventions

PROCEDUREIVUS optimised DES implantation

Ivus optimised stent implantation

PROCEDUREangiographically guided DES implantation

angiographically guided DES implantation

Sponsors

Mediolanum Cardio Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione Evidence per Attività e Ricerche Cardiovascolari ONLUS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A complex lesion is regarded as a lesion where the operator would expect a lower immediate and long term success rate compared to non-complex lesions (according to the results of Randomized Controlled Trials and from large Registries). The operator must consider the implantation of a drug-eluting stent, feasible and appropriate for this particular complex lesion

Exclusion criteria

* Contra-indication to dual anti-platelet therapy. * Ejection fraction \<30%. * Renal failure (creatinine \>2 mg/dL). * Significant co-morbidity precluding clinical follow-up. * Acute myocardial infarction in the 48 hours prior to the procedure. * In-stent restenosis * Prior brachytherapy * Thrombocytopenia \<100,000 * Unprotected left main stem stenosis * Venous or arterial grafts * Recipient of heart transplant * A positive pregnancy test in women with child bearing potential * Acute infections * Major surgery planned which will lead to discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy * Patients with prior BMS or DES implanted in the target vessel less than one year prior to the enrollment, including one year from any intercurrent restenotic or thrombotic event * Age under 18 years old. * There is no maximum number of lesions which can be treated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post-procedure Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD) evaluated by core lab QCA: superiority for the IVUS optimised group.Procedure day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 9 months: superiority or statistical trend for the IVUS optimized group9 months
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 9 months: superiority or statistical trend for the IVUS guided group due to lower TLR and no difference in myocardial infarction (MI) or death.9 months
MACE events at 2 years.2 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026