Skip to content

Balloon Colonoscopy for Incomplete Colonoscopy

Balloon Colonoscopy Versus Repeat Standard Colonoscopy for Prior Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00935857
Enrollment
30
Registered
2009-07-09
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2014-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diverticulosis

Keywords

Balloon Enteroscopy, Looping

Brief summary

Patients with a prior incomplete colonoscopy will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be randomized to either an initial repeat attempt with a standard colonoscope or the single balloon enteroscope. If the procedures is unsuccessful, the patient can be crossed-over to the other group. The primary endpoint of the study is a complete colonoscopy.

Detailed description

Colonoscopy is a well-established practice utilized for the evaluation of lower gastrointestinal tract diseases including, mostly commonly, the screening for colorectal polyps and cancer. Despite improvements in endoscope technology, a significant minority of procedures (up to 10%) can not be safely completed due to a variety of patient factors and technical difficulties. These factors primarily include prior abdominal surgeries resulting in adhesions, severe diverticular disease, inadequate bowel cleansing, and patient discomfort. Options for an incomplete colonoscopy include several endoscopic and non-endoscopic modalities. Non-endoscopic modalities include radiologic studies such as CT/MRI colonography as well as a retrograde barium study. Relative disadvantages of these modalities is the inability to remove colonic polyps, perform biopsies, and in the case of barium studies, a lower sensitivity for pathology. Alternative endoscopic modalities have been described that may assist in successfully completing colonoscopy Of these alternative methods, balloon-overtube assisted colonoscopy is the most promising, but this method has not been studied in a randomized, controlled fashion. In this study, we aim to compare balloon-overtube assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Interventions

DEVICESingle Balloon Colonoscopy

Use of the single balloon enteroscopy system (enteroscope and balloon-overtube) to complete colonoscopy.

DEVICEStandard Colonoscopy

Use of the standard adult colonoscope to complete colonoscopy.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* prior colonoscopy that was incomplete within the previous 12 months or their two most recent colonoscopies (performed at any time interval) were incomplete

Exclusion criteria

* incomplete colonoscopy due only to poor bowel preparation or inadequate sedation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Colonoscopy to the CecumDay of ProcedureNumber of patients with a complete colonoscopy to the cecum

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time (Minutes) to CecumDay of ProcedureTime, in minutes, until reaching cecum in each arm.
Procedural Complications7 days post procedureNumber of patients with any procedural complications as assessed 7 days after procedure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subject recruitment completed.

Pre-assignment details

Early termination at 30 patients due to clinically significant differences at midpoint of study. Patients in the Standard Colonoscopy group could cross-over to the Balloon Colonoscopy group after 20 minutes of procedure time but they were not included in further analysis after cross-over.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Balloon Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using the single balloon enteroscope system.
14
Standard Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using a standard adult colonoscope
16
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard ColonoscopyBalloon ColonoscopyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants14 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Colonoscopy to the Cecum

Number of patients with a complete colonoscopy to the cecum

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Per Protocol, Terminated at Interim Analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Balloon ColonoscopyComplete Colonoscopy to the Cecum13 patients
Standard ColonoscopyComplete Colonoscopy to the Cecum8 patients
Secondary

Procedural Complications

Number of patients with any procedural complications as assessed 7 days after procedure.

Time frame: 7 days post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Balloon ColonoscopyProcedural Complications0 participants
Standard ColonoscopyProcedural Complications0 participants
Secondary

Time (Minutes) to Cecum

Time, in minutes, until reaching cecum in each arm.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Balloon ColonoscopyTime (Minutes) to Cecum24 minutesStandard Deviation 15
Standard ColonoscopyTime (Minutes) to Cecum22 minutesStandard Deviation 18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026