Skip to content

Controlled Myelofibrosis Study With Oral Janus-associated Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor Treatment-II: The COMFORT-II Trial

A Randomized Study of Ruxolitinib Tablets Compared to Best Available Therapy in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera-Myelofibrosis or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00934544
Enrollment
219
Registered
2009-07-08
Start date
2009-07-01
Completion date
2015-03-04
Last updated
2019-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelofibrosis

Keywords

Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Brief summary

This was an open label, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of randomized 2:1 Ruxolitinib tablets versus best-available therapy, as selected by the investigator. The purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Ruxolitinib (INC424/INCB018424) given twice daily to the best-available therapy, in subjects with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF).

Detailed description

This study included a randomized treatment phase, followed by an extension phase. The treatment phase lasted from Study Day 1 (day of randomization) to the occurrence of a protocol-specified progressive disease event or study conclusion, whichever came first. The extension phase (including crossover of control group patients) lasted from the progressive disease event until the earliest of the following events: a) the patient was no longer receiving clinical benefit, b) the patient chose to withdraw from the study, or c) the study ended. All patients received ruxolitinib in the extension phase of the study. Maximum individual patient duration was 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

5 mg tablets packaged as 60-count in high-density polyethylene bottles

Prescribing and usage per respective package inserts

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must be diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria * Subjects with MF requiring therapy must be classified as high risk OR intermediate risk level 2 according to the prognostic factors defined by the International Working Group * Subjects with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3 * Subjects with peripheral blood blast count of \< 10%. * Subjects who have not previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months * Subjects with inadequate bone marrow reserve as demonstrated by specific clinical laboratory counts * Subjects with any history of platelet counts \< 50,000/µL or ANC \< 500/µL except during treatment for a myeloproliferative disorder or treatment with cytotoxic therapy for any other reason * Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function * Subjects with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which require therapy * Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 5 years except specific skin cancers * Subjects with severe cardiac conditions * Subjects who have had splenic irradiation within 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was then calculated by treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)Baseline, up to Year 5This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing a 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was then calculated by treatment group.
Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)Time from randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volumeThis is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Time from randomization and the earliest of either increase in spleen volume >=25% from on-study nadir, splenic irradiation, splenectomy, leukemic transformation or deathMedian of time progression free survival (95% CI), years
Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)Baseline, up to Year 5DoMSR is defined as the interval between the first spleen volume measurement that is \>=35% reduction from baseline and the first scan that is no longer = 35% reduction AND that is a \>25% increase over nadir. It was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate for each treatment arm. The analysis was performed only for subjects who achieved greater than 35% reduction in spleen volume.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization until death from any causeDefined as the interval between randomization and the date of the bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater OR the date of the first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to have been sustained for at least 8 weeks OR the date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first. OS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm. The estimates were supplemented by tables of number of events and probability estimates at several timepoints
Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)48 weeksThis was noted as fibrosis density and was tabulated by fibrosis grade at baseline and at week 48 (post-baseline). Descriptive statistics (participant percentages) were used. Fibrosis grades: 0 Scattered linear reticulin with no intersections corresponding to normal bone marrow ; 1 Loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; 2 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; 3 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis
Bone Marrow HistomorphologyBaseline, once a yearShift table from baseline to last available postbaseline fibrosis grade by treatment The grade gives an indication of the activity or amount of inflammation and the stage represents the amount of fibrosis or scarring. The grade is assigned a number based on the degree of inflammation, which is usually scored from 0-4 with 0 being no activity and 3 or 4 considered severe activity
Duration of Follow-up by Treatmentbaseline, 260 weeks (end of study)Number of Participants with duration of Follow up
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)Time from randomization and earliest of either leukemia or deathTime from randomization and earliest of either (1) date of bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater; (2) date of first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to sustain for at least 8 weeks; (3) date of death from any cause

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 9 countries located in Europe: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom.

Pre-assignment details

219 unique participants were randomized to either ruxolitinib or BAT. Of the 73 participants randomized to BAT, 45 were crossed over to ruxolitinib after a protocol-specified qualifying disease progression event.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ruxolitinib
5 milligram tablets administered orally in an outpatient setting according to the protocol-specified dosing schedule
146
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Commercially available therapy, oral or parenteral, per manufacturer's instructions and Investigator discretion. BAT included the option of no treatment.
73
Total219

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upAdverse Event35510
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upDisease progression3247
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upIncluding stem cell transplantation1696
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upLack of Efficacy805
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upNoncompliance with study medication401
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upNoncompliance with study procedures010
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upProtocol Violation205
Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject1090
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Adverse Event1240
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Disease Progression130
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Entered extension phase29180
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Non-compliance with study Medication200
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Non-compliance with study procedures010
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Other reasons770
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Protocol Violation200
Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim)Withdrawal by Subject290

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRuxolitinibBest Available Therapy (BAT)Total
Age, Continuous65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.27
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89
Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis
21 Participants14 Participants35 Participants
Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis
48 Participants20 Participants68 Participants
Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis
77 Participants39 Participants116 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants31 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants42 Participants125 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
145 / 146145 / 14664 / 7342 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
51 / 14685 / 14622 / 7320 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48

The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was then calculated by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. The table included participants with non-missing baseline MRI measurement of spleen volume only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 4828.5 Percentage of Participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 480 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [21.3, 36.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Bone Marrow Histomorphology

Shift table from baseline to last available postbaseline fibrosis grade by treatment The grade gives an indication of the activity or amount of inflammation and the stage represents the amount of fibrosis or scarring. The grade is assigned a number based on the degree of inflammation, which is usually scored from 0-4 with 0 being no activity and 3 or 4 considered severe activity

Time frame: Baseline, once a year

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)~Numbers of Participants Analyzed reflect only those participants who were randomized to either Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy and do not count those participants who could have crossed over to Ruxolitinib

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 30 participants
RuxolitinibBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 01 participants
RuxolitinibBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 10 participants
RuxolitinibBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing2 participants
RuxolitinibBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 20 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing2 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 110 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 22 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 01 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 36 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 02 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing17 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 319 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 19 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 28 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 28 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing20 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 12 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 01 participants
Ruxolitinib - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 328 participants
Ruxolitinib - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 32 participants
Ruxolitinib - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing3 participants
Ruxolitinib - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 21 participants
Ruxolitinib - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 10 participants
Ruxolitinib - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 02 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 00 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing2 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 10 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 30 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 20 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 30 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing2 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 20 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 00 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 11 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 00 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing19 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 34 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 24 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 10 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 11 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 21 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 38 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing24 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3Bone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 00 participants
Best Available Therapy - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 10 participants
Best Available Therapy - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 00 participants
Best Available Therapy - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Missing4 participants
Best Available Therapy - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 33 participants
Best Available Therapy - MissingBone Marrow HistomorphologyPostbaseline Grade 20 participants
Secondary

Duration of Follow-up by Treatment

Number of Participants with duration of Follow up

Time frame: baseline, 260 weeks (end of study)

Population: Safety Set~Numbers of Participants Analyzed reflect only those participants who were randomized to either Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy and do not count those participants who could have crossed over to Ruxolitinib

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment<=1 year16 participants
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment>1 year - <=2 years21 participants
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment>2 years - <=3 years9 participants
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment>3 years - <=4 years12 participants
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment>4 years - <=5 years27 participants
RuxolitinibDuration of Follow-up by Treatment5 years61 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment>4 years - <=5 years8 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment<=1 year15 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment>3 years - <=4 years5 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment>1 year - <=2 years10 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment5 years22 participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Follow-up by Treatment>2 years - <=3 years13 participants
Secondary

Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)

This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing a 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Year 5

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)1.0 year0.72 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)3.0 years0.51 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)2.0 years0.63 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)3.5 years0.48 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)1.5 years0.67 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)4.0 years0.48 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)2.5 years0.54 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)5.0 years0.48 probability of response
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)4.5 years0.48 probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)5.0 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)4.5 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)1.0 yearNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)1.5 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)2.0 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)2.5 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)3.0 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)3.5 yearsNA probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)4.0 yearsNA probability of response
Secondary

Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)

DoMSR is defined as the interval between the first spleen volume measurement that is \>=35% reduction from baseline and the first scan that is no longer = 35% reduction AND that is a \>25% increase over nadir. It was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate for each treatment arm. The analysis was performed only for subjects who achieved greater than 35% reduction in spleen volume.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Year 5

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RuxolitinibDuration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)3.22 years
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)NA years
Secondary

Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)

Time from randomization and earliest of either (1) date of bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater; (2) date of first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to sustain for at least 8 weeks; (3) date of death from any cause

Time frame: Time from randomization and earliest of either leukemia or death

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RuxolitinibLeukemia-free Survival (LFS)NA Years
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)4.1 Years
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Defined as the interval between randomization and the date of the bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater OR the date of the first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to have been sustained for at least 8 weeks OR the date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first. OS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm. The estimates were supplemented by tables of number of events and probability estimates at several timepoints

Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RuxolitinibOverall Survival (OS)NA Years
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Overall Survival (OS)4.1 Years
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24

The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was then calculated by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. The table included participants with non-missing baseline MRI measurement of spleen volume only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 2431.9 Percentage of Participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 240 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)

This was noted as fibrosis density and was tabulated by fibrosis grade at baseline and at week 48 (post-baseline). Descriptive statistics (participant percentages) were used. Fibrosis grades: 0 Scattered linear reticulin with no intersections corresponding to normal bone marrow ; 1 Loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; 2 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; 3 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 28.9 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 02.7 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 17.5 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Missing Grade56.8 Percentage of participants
RuxolitinibPercentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 324.0 Percentage of participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Missing Grade75.3 Percentage of participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 26.8 Percentage of participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 315.1 Percentage of participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 00.0 Percentage of participants
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)Grade 12.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Median of time progression free survival (95% CI), years

Time frame: Time from randomization and the earliest of either increase in spleen volume >=25% from on-study nadir, splenic irradiation, splenectomy, leukemic transformation or death

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RuxolitinibProgression-free Survival (PFS)1.6 years
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Progression-free Survival (PFS)1.4 years
Secondary

Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)

This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume

Time frame: Time from randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume

Population: Full analysis set (FAS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RuxolitinibTime to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)12 weeks0.23 probability of response
RuxolitinibTime to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)24 weeks0.67 probability of response
RuxolitinibTime to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)36 weeks0.87 probability of response
RuxolitinibTime to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)48 weeks0.97 probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)48 weeks1 probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)12 weeks0 probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)36 weeks1 probability of response
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)24 weeks1 probability of response

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026