Myelofibrosis
Conditions
Keywords
Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
Brief summary
This was an open label, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of randomized 2:1 Ruxolitinib tablets versus best-available therapy, as selected by the investigator. The purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Ruxolitinib (INC424/INCB018424) given twice daily to the best-available therapy, in subjects with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF).
Detailed description
This study included a randomized treatment phase, followed by an extension phase. The treatment phase lasted from Study Day 1 (day of randomization) to the occurrence of a protocol-specified progressive disease event or study conclusion, whichever came first. The extension phase (including crossover of control group patients) lasted from the progressive disease event until the earliest of the following events: a) the patient was no longer receiving clinical benefit, b) the patient chose to withdraw from the study, or c) the study ended. All patients received ruxolitinib in the extension phase of the study. Maximum individual patient duration was 5 years.
Interventions
5 mg tablets packaged as 60-count in high-density polyethylene bottles
Prescribing and usage per respective package inserts
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must be diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria * Subjects with MF requiring therapy must be classified as high risk OR intermediate risk level 2 according to the prognostic factors defined by the International Working Group * Subjects with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3 * Subjects with peripheral blood blast count of \< 10%. * Subjects who have not previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months * Subjects with inadequate bone marrow reserve as demonstrated by specific clinical laboratory counts * Subjects with any history of platelet counts \< 50,000/µL or ANC \< 500/µL except during treatment for a myeloproliferative disorder or treatment with cytotoxic therapy for any other reason * Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function * Subjects with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which require therapy * Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 5 years except specific skin cancers * Subjects with severe cardiac conditions * Subjects who have had splenic irradiation within 12 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48 | Baseline, Week 48 | The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was then calculated by treatment group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | Baseline, up to Year 5 | This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing a 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was then calculated by treatment group. |
| Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | Time from randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume | This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Time from randomization and the earliest of either increase in spleen volume >=25% from on-study nadir, splenic irradiation, splenectomy, leukemic transformation or death | Median of time progression free survival (95% CI), years |
| Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median) | Baseline, up to Year 5 | DoMSR is defined as the interval between the first spleen volume measurement that is \>=35% reduction from baseline and the first scan that is no longer = 35% reduction AND that is a \>25% increase over nadir. It was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate for each treatment arm. The analysis was performed only for subjects who achieved greater than 35% reduction in spleen volume. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From randomization until death from any cause | Defined as the interval between randomization and the date of the bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater OR the date of the first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to have been sustained for at least 8 weeks OR the date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first. OS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm. The estimates were supplemented by tables of number of events and probability estimates at several timepoints |
| Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | 48 weeks | This was noted as fibrosis density and was tabulated by fibrosis grade at baseline and at week 48 (post-baseline). Descriptive statistics (participant percentages) were used. Fibrosis grades: 0 Scattered linear reticulin with no intersections corresponding to normal bone marrow ; 1 Loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; 2 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; 3 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis |
| Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Baseline, once a year | Shift table from baseline to last available postbaseline fibrosis grade by treatment The grade gives an indication of the activity or amount of inflammation and the stage represents the amount of fibrosis or scarring. The grade is assigned a number based on the degree of inflammation, which is usually scored from 0-4 with 0 being no activity and 3 or 4 considered severe activity |
| Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | baseline, 260 weeks (end of study) | Number of Participants with duration of Follow up |
| Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) | Time from randomization and earliest of either leukemia or death | Time from randomization and earliest of either (1) date of bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater; (2) date of first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to sustain for at least 8 weeks; (3) date of death from any cause |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited from 9 countries located in Europe: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom.
Pre-assignment details
219 unique participants were randomized to either ruxolitinib or BAT. Of the 73 participants randomized to BAT, 45 were crossed over to ruxolitinib after a protocol-specified qualifying disease progression event.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib 5 milligram tablets administered orally in an outpatient setting according to the protocol-specified dosing schedule | 146 |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) Commercially available therapy, oral or parenteral, per manufacturer's instructions and Investigator discretion. BAT included the option of no treatment. | 73 |
| Total | 219 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Adverse Event | 35 | 5 | 10 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Disease progression | 32 | 4 | 7 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Including stem cell transplantation | 16 | 9 | 6 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Lack of Efficacy | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Noncompliance with study medication | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Noncompliance with study procedures | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Protocol Violation | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Overall Disposition at 5 Year Follow-up | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 9 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Adverse Event | 12 | 4 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Disease Progression | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Entered extension phase | 29 | 18 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Non-compliance with study Medication | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Non-compliance with study procedures | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Other reasons | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Protocol Violation | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Primary Endpoint Analysis (Interim) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 9 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ruxolitinib | Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 65.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74 | 65.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.27 | 65.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89 |
| Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF) Post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis | 21 Participants | 14 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF) Post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis | 48 Participants | 20 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Disease Profile - Type of Myelofibrosis (MF) Primary Myelofibrosis | 77 Participants | 39 Participants | 116 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 63 Participants | 31 Participants | 94 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 83 Participants | 42 Participants | 125 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 145 / 146 | 145 / 146 | 64 / 73 | 42 / 45 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 51 / 146 | 85 / 146 | 22 / 73 | 20 / 45 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48
The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was then calculated by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. The table included participants with non-missing baseline MRI measurement of spleen volume only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48 | 28.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
Bone Marrow Histomorphology
Shift table from baseline to last available postbaseline fibrosis grade by treatment The grade gives an indication of the activity or amount of inflammation and the stage represents the amount of fibrosis or scarring. The grade is assigned a number based on the degree of inflammation, which is usually scored from 0-4 with 0 being no activity and 3 or 4 considered severe activity
Time frame: Baseline, once a year
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)~Numbers of Participants Analyzed reflect only those participants who were randomized to either Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy and do not count those participants who could have crossed over to Ruxolitinib
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 0 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 1 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 2 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 2 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 10 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 2 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 1 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 6 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 2 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 17 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 19 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 9 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 8 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 8 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 20 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 2 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 1 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 28 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 2 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 3 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 1 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Ruxolitinib - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 2 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 2 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 0 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 2 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 1 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 1 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 19 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 4 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 4 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 2 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 1 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 1 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 8 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 24 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) - Grade 3 | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 1 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 0 | 0 participants |
| Best Available Therapy - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Missing | 4 participants |
| Best Available Therapy - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 3 | 3 participants |
| Best Available Therapy - Missing | Bone Marrow Histomorphology | Postbaseline Grade 2 | 0 participants |
Duration of Follow-up by Treatment
Number of Participants with duration of Follow up
Time frame: baseline, 260 weeks (end of study)
Population: Safety Set~Numbers of Participants Analyzed reflect only those participants who were randomized to either Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy and do not count those participants who could have crossed over to Ruxolitinib
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | <=1 year | 16 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >1 year - <=2 years | 21 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >2 years - <=3 years | 9 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >3 years - <=4 years | 12 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >4 years - <=5 years | 27 participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | 5 years | 61 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >4 years - <=5 years | 8 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | <=1 year | 15 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >3 years - <=4 years | 5 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >1 year - <=2 years | 10 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | 5 years | 22 participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Follow-up by Treatment | >2 years - <=3 years | 13 participants |
Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)
This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing a 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume.
Time frame: Baseline, up to Year 5
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 1.0 year | 0.72 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 3.0 years | 0.51 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 2.0 years | 0.63 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 3.5 years | 0.48 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 1.5 years | 0.67 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 4.0 years | 0.48 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 2.5 years | 0.54 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 5.0 years | 0.48 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 4.5 years | 0.48 probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 5.0 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 4.5 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 1.0 year | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 1.5 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 2.0 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 2.5 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 3.0 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 3.5 years | NA probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) | 4.0 years | NA probability of response |
Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)
DoMSR is defined as the interval between the first spleen volume measurement that is \>=35% reduction from baseline and the first scan that is no longer = 35% reduction AND that is a \>25% increase over nadir. It was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate for each treatment arm. The analysis was performed only for subjects who achieved greater than 35% reduction in spleen volume.
Time frame: Baseline, up to Year 5
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median) | 3.22 years |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median) | NA years |
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
Time from randomization and earliest of either (1) date of bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater; (2) date of first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to sustain for at least 8 weeks; (3) date of death from any cause
Time frame: Time from randomization and earliest of either leukemia or death
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) | NA Years |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) | 4.1 Years |
Overall Survival (OS)
Defined as the interval between randomization and the date of the bone marrow blast count of 20% or greater OR the date of the first peripheral blast count of 20% or greater that was subsequently confirmed to have been sustained for at least 8 weeks OR the date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first. OS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for each treatment arm. The estimates were supplemented by tables of number of events and probability estimates at several timepoints
Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Years |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Overall Survival (OS) | 4.1 Years |
Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24
The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 was then calculated by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. The table included participants with non-missing baseline MRI measurement of spleen volume only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24 | 31.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis)
This was noted as fibrosis density and was tabulated by fibrosis grade at baseline and at week 48 (post-baseline). Descriptive statistics (participant percentages) were used. Fibrosis grades: 0 Scattered linear reticulin with no intersections corresponding to normal bone marrow ; 1 Loose network of reticulin with many intersections, especially in perivascular areas; 2 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; 3 Diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis
Time frame: 48 weeks
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 2 | 8.9 Percentage of participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 0 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 1 | 7.5 Percentage of participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Missing Grade | 56.8 Percentage of participants |
| Ruxolitinib | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 3 | 24.0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Missing Grade | 75.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 2 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 3 | 15.1 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 0 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Bone Marrow Histomorphology at Week 48 (Primary Analysis) | Grade 1 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Median of time progression free survival (95% CI), years
Time frame: Time from randomization and the earliest of either increase in spleen volume >=25% from on-study nadir, splenic irradiation, splenectomy, leukemic transformation or death
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who were randomized and put in strata according to International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment(IWG MRT) prognostic criteria. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 1.6 years |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 1.4 years |
Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)
This is defined as the interval between randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume. The analysis was performed for participants who achieved a 35% reduction in spleen volume
Time frame: Time from randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume
Population: Full analysis set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 12 weeks | 0.23 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 24 weeks | 0.67 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 36 weeks | 0.87 probability of response |
| Ruxolitinib | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 48 weeks | 0.97 probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 48 weeks | 1 probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 12 weeks | 0 probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 36 weeks | 1 probability of response |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis) | 24 weeks | 1 probability of response |