Skip to content

Growth Hormone in Neuroendocrine Dysfunction With Severe Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Growth Hormone Treatment of Severe Fibromyalgia Syndrome Associated With Functional Failure of Somatotropic Axis. A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00933686
Enrollment
113
Registered
2009-07-07
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2013-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) treatment in severe fibromyalgia subjects with growth axis dysfunction.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo and Saizen®

Placebo matched to Saizen® will be administered for the first 6 months followed by treatment with Saizen® (Somatropin) 0.006 mg/kg subcutaneously daily for next 6 months. Saizen® dose will be titrated (an increase of 0.2 milligram per day) if the increase in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is less than 50 percent of the baseline value. Dose titrations will be made at Month 7 and 9.

Saizen® (Somatropin) 0.006 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) will be administered subcutaneously daily for 12 months. Dose will be titrated (an increase of 0.2 milligram per day) if the increase in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is less than 50 percent of the baseline value. Dose titrations will be made at Month 1, 3, 7 and 9.

Sponsors

Merck, S.L., Spain
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged greater than or equal (\>=) 18 years * Fibromyalgia diagnosed at least one year before * History of generalized pain and at least 16 positive tender points (1990 American College of Rheumatology \[ACR\] criteria) * Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to(=\<) 32 * Normal GH stimulation test (insulin) * Stable (\>= 3 months unchanged) standard treatment with amitriptyline (10-50 milligram per day \[mg/day\]) plus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (10-40 mg/day) plus tramadol (25-400 mg/day) * Active rehabilitation program during the previous year (at least 30 minutes/day) * Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score \>=75 * IGF-1 serum level =\< 150 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) otherwise =\< 2 SD of the local lab normality) * Normal response to IGF-1 generation test * Chronic Fatigue Symptoms (Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue \[MAF\]) * Effective anti-conception * Willingness to comply with the protocol * Written Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Major psychiatric condition * Rheumatic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) * Previous or current malignancies, active or inactive * Clinical history intracranial space occupying lesion * Reactive or secondary (rheumatoid arthritis \[RA\], osteoarthritis) fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) * Antinuclear antibody (ANA) greater than or equal 1:80 * Abnormal Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) or aldolase serum levels * Not controlled thyroid disease in the last 3 months (free Thyroxine \[T4\] and Thyrotrophin-stimulating hormone \[TSH\] serum levels) * Diabetes mellitus * Adrenal gland disease (any abnormal cortisolemia, will be confirmed by 24-hour cortisoluria) * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Known to be hypersensitive to somatotropin or any of the excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 6Month 6The musculoskeletal component in form of pain on palpation in at least 11 of 18 tender point sites is required to fulfill the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for fibromyalgia syndrome, An important response is considered when the number of tender points falls below 11 since it is the threshold for fibromyalgia diagnosis.
Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 12Month 12The musculoskeletal component in form of pain on palpation in at least 11 of 18 tender point sites is required to fulfill the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia syndrome, An important response is considered when the number of tender points falls below 11 since it is the threshold for fibromyalgia diagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreBaseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a measure of health status and quality of life (QoL). The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Score range for each item is 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe. Total score range is 0 to 15. Lower scores represent a better QoL.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreBaseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures physical impairment, well-being, missed work, pain, fatigue, rest, stiffness, anxiety, and depression. Score ranges from 0 (best result - very well) to 100 (worst result - awful).
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleBaseline, Month 6 and 12Quality of Life Assessment of GH Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) questionnaire consists of 25 items that evoke yes or no answers. A score of 1 is given to each item affirmed and these are summed to give the total score. The maximum score is 25, which represents a poor quality of life. The minimum score is 0, which represents a good quality of life. Each question has to be answered with a NO/YES and for each YES, one point is added. The more YES, the higher the score and the worse. Decrease in the positive responses is an index of improvement. So, when the percentage of positive responses on the scale decreases, it is considered a response rate.
Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total ScoreBaseline, Month 6 and 12Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) consists of 16 questions. The score range for first 14 questions is between 0 and 10 for each question while for the last two questions it is 0 and 4 for each question. Total score range for first 14 questions is 0 to 100 and for last two questions is 0 to 8. Lower scores on the each represent the better participant's condition, whereas, higher scores indicate worsening condition.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreBaseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 millimeter (mm) scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

123 subjects were enrolled of whom 113 subjects were randomised and treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saizen®
Saizen® (Somatropin) 0.006 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously daily for 12 months. Saizen® dose was titrated (an increase of 0.2 milligram per day) if the increase in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was less than 50 percent of the baseline value. Dose titrations were made at Month 1, 3, 7 and 9.
55
Placebo + Saizen®
Placebo matched to Saizen® was administered for the first 6 months followed by treatment with Saizen® (Somatropin) 0.006 mg/kg subcutaneously daily for next 6 months. Saizen® dose was titrated (an increase of 0.2 milligram per day) if the increase in IGF-1 was less than 50 percent of the baseline value. Dose titrations were made at Month 7 and 9.
58
Total113

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyFailure to show up at endpoint visits02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject65

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaizen®Placebo + Saizen®Total
Age Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants58 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 5551 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 550 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 12

The musculoskeletal component in form of pain on palpation in at least 11 of 18 tender point sites is required to fulfill the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia syndrome, An important response is considered when the number of tender points falls below 11 since it is the threshold for fibromyalgia diagnosis.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 1253 Percentage of participants
Placebo + Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 1234 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 6

The musculoskeletal component in form of pain on palpation in at least 11 of 18 tender point sites is required to fulfill the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for fibromyalgia syndrome, An important response is considered when the number of tender points falls below 11 since it is the threshold for fibromyalgia diagnosis.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 620 Percentage of participants
Placebo + Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Less Than 11 Tender Points at Month 622 Percentage of participants
Secondary

EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Score

EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a measure of health status and quality of life (QoL). The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Score range for each item is 0 to 3, with 3 being the most severe. Total score range is 0 to 15. Lower scores represent a better QoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each time-point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)10.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)9.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)10.46 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)9.49 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)10.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)9.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)11.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)9.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)11.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)10.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)10.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)10.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)9.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Placebo + Saizen®EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)9.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures physical impairment, well-being, missed work, pain, fatigue, rest, stiffness, anxiety, and depression. Score ranges from 0 (best result - very well) to 100 (worst result - awful).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each time-point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)72.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)59.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)74.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)58.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)65.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)52.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)85.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)64.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)86.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)73.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)66.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)68.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)65.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Placebo + Saizen®Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)65.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score

Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) consists of 16 questions. The score range for first 14 questions is between 0 and 10 for each question while for the last two questions it is 0 and 4 for each question. Total score range for first 14 questions is 0 to 100 and for last two questions is 0 to 8. Lower scores on the each represent the better participant's condition, whereas, higher scores indicate worsening condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each time-point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Month 6 (n=51, 50)6 Units on a scale
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Baseline (n=54, 57)90 Units on a scale
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Month 6 (n=51, 50)85 Units on a scale
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Month 12 (n=45, 47)73 Units on a scale
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Baseline (n=54, 57)7 Units on a scale
Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Month 12 (n=45, 47)5 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Baseline (n=54, 57)7 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Month 6 (n=51, 50)6 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Month 12 (n=45, 47)78 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Baseline (n=54, 57)83 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score15 and 16 question: Month 12 (n=45, 47)6 Units on a scale
Placebo + Saizen®Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Total Score1 to 14 questions: Month 6 (n=51, 50)78 Units on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) Scale

Quality of Life Assessment of GH Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) questionnaire consists of 25 items that evoke yes or no answers. A score of 1 is given to each item affirmed and these are summed to give the total score. The maximum score is 25, which represents a poor quality of life. The minimum score is 0, which represents a good quality of life. Each question has to be answered with a NO/YES and for each YES, one point is added. The more YES, the higher the score and the worse. Decrease in the positive responses is an index of improvement. So, when the percentage of positive responses on the scale decreases, it is considered a response rate.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each time-point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleBaseline (n=54, 57)73 Percentage of participants
Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleMonth 6 (n=51, 50)70 Percentage of participants
Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleMonth 12 (n=45, 47)59 Percentage of participants
Placebo + Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleBaseline (n=54, 57)72 Percentage of participants
Placebo + Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleMonth 6 (n=51, 50)69 Percentage of participants
Placebo + Saizen®Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone [GH] Deficiency in Adults (QoL AGHDA) ScaleMonth 12 (n=45, 47)70 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total Score

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 millimeter (mm) scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized in the study. 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each time-point for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)57.6 mmStandard Deviation 5.7
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)54.6 mmStandard Deviation 5.2
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)73.3 mmStandard Deviation 3.4
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)51.2 mmStandard Deviation 6.7
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)63.7 mmStandard Deviation 5.6
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)45.0 mmStandard Deviation 6.9
Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)65.1 mmStandard Deviation 4.2
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 12 (n=45, 47)60.6 mmStandard Deviation 6
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreBaseline (n=54, 57)74.3 mmStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 1 (n=52, 54)68.0 mmStandard Deviation 5.7
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 3 (n=52, 54)58.4 mmStandard Deviation 5.8
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 7 (n=51, 50)56.1 mmStandard Deviation 6.2
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 9 (n=51, 50)60.3 mmStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo + Saizen®Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total ScoreMonth 6 (n=51, 50)60.4 mmStandard Deviation 6.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026