Skip to content

BATAR: Individuals Currently Taking Boosted Atazanavir as Part of an HIV Treatment Regimen Will be Evaluated to See if Substituting Raltegravir for Nucleoside Transcriptase Inhibitors Will be Safe and Well Tolerated.

A Pilot Study of the Novel Antiretroviral Combination of Atazanavir and Raltegravir in HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Virologic Suppression on a Standard Regimen of Boosted Atazanavir, Tenofovir and Emtricitabine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00931801
Acronym
BATAR
Enrollment
43
Registered
2009-07-02
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

AIDS, HIV, Atazanavir, Raltegravir, Tenofovir, protease inhibitors

Brief summary

The purpose of this Phase IV pilot study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and satisfaction of a nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)sparing regimen for participants fully suppressed on an atazanavir/ritonavir based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)regimen plus emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada). Several pharmacologic factors support this concept including the favorable drug interaction between atazanavir and raltegravir. Participants will be randomized to either continue on their current regimen or one of two study arms (atazanavir 300mg plus ritonavir 100mg daily plus raltegravir 400mg twice daily or atazanavir 300mg twice daily plus raltegravir 400mg twice daily). Participants will be followed for 48 weeks for safety, tolerability, and satisfaction. After baseline, the participants will have six clinic visits for evaluation and labs.

Interventions

DRUGatazanavir/raltegravir

Atazanavir/r 300/100mg once daily plus raltegravir 400mg twice daily

DRUGatazanavir/tenofovir/emtricitabine

Continue baseline regimen of atazanavir/r 300/100mg once daily plus tenofovir and emtricitabine

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Community Research Initiative of New England
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infection * Treatment with a stable antiretroviral regiment containing boosted atazanavir, tenofovir and emtricitabine at screen and for at least 90 days prior to screening * No plan to make changes to HIV treatment regimen (other than those required by the study) in the next 48 weeks * Undetectable HIV RNA at screening AND no HIV RNA\>200 copies during the 180 day period prior to screening * CD4 count\>200 * No evidence of resistance to any of the drugs in any of the 3 arms, if prior resistance tests are available * Subjects who, in the opinion of their treating physicians, would be candidates to switch antiretroviral medications * Women of childbearing potential must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to raltegravir or elvitegravir * Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or with a positive pregnancy test * Sexually active fertile men not using effective birth control if their female partners are of child-bearing potential * Women of child-bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period and for up to 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug * Life expectancy less than 6 months * Presence of any currently active AIDS defining conditions with the exception of stable cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma * Treatment with proton-pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist * ECG demonstrating atrioventricular block, prolonged QRS interval greater than 12 ms, or known complete bundle branch block * Acute or chronic hepatitis B infection as evidenced by presence of hepatitis B surface antigen and absence of hepatitis B surface antibody * Clinical or laboratory evidence of significantly decreased hepatic function of decompensation irrespective of liver enzyme levels * Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated * Subjects who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maintenance of Virologic Suppression48 weeksTo evaluate and compare maintenance of virologic suppression with raltegravir (RAL) 400mg 2x daily plus atazanavir (ATV) dosed either as ATV/ritonavir (RTV)300/100mg 1x daily or ATV 300mg 2x daily in subjects with virologic suppression on a standard regimen of ATV/RTV plus Truvada. Virologic suppression is defined as HIV RNA \< 40 copies/mL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48Baseline and Week 48Change in mean CD4 from Baseline to Week 48.
The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48Baseline and Week 48Adherence to study treatment reported as the percentage of doses of the prescribed treatment arm regimen taken, described by each subject through recall of dosing in the three days prior to the visit Baseline and Week 48 vistis. The change in adherence is reflected as the difference of the mean percentage of adherence per arm between Baseline and Week 48 visits.
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study Treatmentbaseline and 48 weeksQuality of Life was measured by self report using a standardized scale, where 0 is death and 100 is perfect health. The baseline measure was obtained prior to initiation of study treatment arm. The week 48 measure captures Quality of Life by self report at 48 weeks of study treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was initiated on 15 APR 2010 and enrolled subjects through 31 JAN 2011. Recruitment and screening took place at 10 participating sites (9 medical clinics and 1 clinical research organization). 43 subjects were enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

There were 7 participants that did not meet eligibility criteria (either due to disallowed concomitant medication use or safety labs outside of the required parameters). 2 of those 7 subjects re-screened at a later date and were confirmed eligible. 2 subjects withdrew consent after the screening visit but prior to starting the assigned treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Arm
atazanavir/tenofovir/emtricitabine : Continue baseline regimen of atazanavir/r 300/100mg once daily plus tenofovir and emtricitabine
14
Intervention Arm No.1
atazanavir/raltegravir: switch to atazanavir/r 300/100mg once daily plus raltegravir 400mg twice daily
15
Intervention Arm No.2
atazanavir/raltegravir: switch to atazanavir 300mg twice daily plus raltegravir 400mg twice daily
14
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyConfirmed Virologic Failure003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl ArmIntervention Arm No.1Intervention Arm No.2Total
Age, Continuous43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants2 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants13 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mean CD4544.6 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 197.7
518.5 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 198.9
533.9 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 198.3
532.0 cells/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 193.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants12 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants15 participants14 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants13 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 1413 / 1513 / 1435 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 142 / 152 / 145 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Maintenance of Virologic Suppression

To evaluate and compare maintenance of virologic suppression with raltegravir (RAL) 400mg 2x daily plus atazanavir (ATV) dosed either as ATV/ritonavir (RTV)300/100mg 1x daily or ATV 300mg 2x daily in subjects with virologic suppression on a standard regimen of ATV/RTV plus Truvada. Virologic suppression is defined as HIV RNA \< 40 copies/mL.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants were included in this analysis of primary outcome measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control ArmMaintenance of Virologic SuppressionVirologic Response13 participants
Control ArmMaintenance of Virologic SuppressionConfirmed Virologic Failures0 participants
Control ArmMaintenance of Virologic SuppressionWithdrawal Due to AE; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL0 participants
Control ArmMaintenance of Virologic SuppressionOther Withdrawal; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL1 participants
Intervention Arm No.1Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionOther Withdrawal; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL1 participants
Intervention Arm No.1Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionVirologic Response14 participants
Intervention Arm No.1Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionWithdrawal Due to AE; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL0 participants
Intervention Arm No.1Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionConfirmed Virologic Failures0 participants
Intervention Arm No.2Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionOther Withdrawal; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL0 participants
Intervention Arm No.2Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionConfirmed Virologic Failures3 participants
Intervention Arm No.2Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionWithdrawal Due to AE; HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL1 participants
Intervention Arm No.2Maintenance of Virologic SuppressionVirologic Response10 participants
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study Treatment

Quality of Life was measured by self report using a standardized scale, where 0 is death and 100 is perfect health. The baseline measure was obtained prior to initiation of study treatment arm. The week 48 measure captures Quality of Life by self report at 48 weeks of study treatment.

Time frame: baseline and 48 weeks

Population: Data for all participants assigned to a study treatment was analyzed except data for participants that did not have both baseline and week 48 data, including early withdrawal, virologic failure, loss to follow-up or missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control ArmChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Baseline92.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Control ArmChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentChange in Quality of Life-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Control ArmChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Week 4890.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Intervention Arm No.1Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Baseline77.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Intervention Arm No.1Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentChange in Quality of Life0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Intervention Arm No.1Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Week 4878.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Intervention Arm No.2Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Week 4881.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Intervention Arm No.2Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Baseline82.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Intervention Arm No.2Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentChange in Quality of Life-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
TotalChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Baseline84.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
TotalChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentChange in Quality of Life-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
TotalChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 48 Weeks of Study TreatmentMean Quality of Life Score at Week 4883.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Secondary

The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48

Adherence to study treatment reported as the percentage of doses of the prescribed treatment arm regimen taken, described by each subject through recall of dosing in the three days prior to the visit Baseline and Week 48 vistis. The change in adherence is reflected as the difference of the mean percentage of adherence per arm between Baseline and Week 48 visits.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: Values included for all enrolled participants excluding participants with confirmed virologic failure or those missing values due to early withdrawal, loss to follow-up or other error.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control ArmThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Baseline100 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 0
Control ArmThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48Change in 3 Day Adherence Recall0 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 0
Control ArmThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Week 48100 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 0
Intervention Arm No.1The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Baseline97.5 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 9.2
Intervention Arm No.1The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48Change in 3 Day Adherence Recall0 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 13.5
Intervention Arm No.1The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Week 4897.5 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 9.2
Intervention Arm No.2The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Week 4895.0 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 15.8
Intervention Arm No.2The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Baseline96.7 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 10.4
Intervention Arm No.2The Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48Change in 3 Day Adherence Recall-1.7 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 19.9
TotalThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Baseline98.1 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 7.8
TotalThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 48Change in 3 Day Adherence Recall-0.5 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 13
TotalThe Change in Adherence to Study Treatment Arm From Baseline to Week 483 Day Adherence Recall at Week 4897.6 percentage of prescribed dosesStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48

Change in mean CD4 from Baseline to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: Values included for all enrolled participants excluding participants with confirmed virologic failure or those missing values due to early withdrawal, loss to follow-up or lab error.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control ArmThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Baseline535.8 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 210.9
Control ArmThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 Change75.4 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 133.9
Control ArmThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Week 48611.2 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 218.1
Intervention Arm No.1The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Baseline514.1 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 205.7
Intervention Arm No.1The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 Change12.1 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 96.4
Intervention Arm No.1The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Week 48526.3 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 210.5
Intervention Arm No.2The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Week 48507.2 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 201.7
Intervention Arm No.2The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Baseline539.1 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 206.2
Intervention Arm No.2The Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 Change-31.9 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 122
TotalThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Baseline528.3 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 201.9
TotalThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 Change21.0 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 121.5
TotalThe Difference in CD4 From Baseline to Week 48CD4 at Week 48549.3 cells/mm3Standard Deviation 209.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026