Prostate Cancer, Sexual Dysfunction
Conditions
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma of the prostate
Brief summary
RATIONALE: Tadalafil may help prevent erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with prostate cancer that has been treated with radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether tadalafil is more effective than a placebo in preventing erectile dysfunction. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying tadalafil to see how well it works compared with a placebo in preventing erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine whether tadalafil maintains spontaneous (off-drug) erectile function, as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as compared to placebo at weeks 28-30 after initiation of radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Secondary * Determine the difference in spontaneous (off-drug) erectile function between tadalafil and placebo at 1 and 2 years. * Determine the difference in overall sexual function as measured by the IIEF between tadalafil and placebo at weeks 28-30 and at 1 and 2 years. * Determine differences in patient and partner overall sexual satisfaction as measured by the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) between tadalafil and placebo at weeks 28-30 and at 1 and 2 years. * Determine differences in patient and partner marital adjustment as measured by Locke's Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) between tadalafil and placebo at weeks 28-30 and at 1 and 2 years. * Determine associations between patient and partner overall sexual satisfaction as measured by SAQ and patient and partner marital adjustment as measured by LMAT at weeks 28-30 and at 1 and 2 years. * Determine patient-related factors (i.e., age, pretreatment sexual response, tobacco use, and comorbidities) that may predict response to tadalafil therapy at weeks 28-30 and at 1 and 2 years. * Determine the difference in adverse events between tadalafil and placebo as assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v3.0 criteria. Tertiary * Characterization of preference and erectile function among patients who choose to stay on (or if on placebo, to start) tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor other than tadalafil, a non-PDE5-inhibitor erectile aide, or no PDE5 inhibitor or erectile aide at 28-30 weeks and at 1 and 2 years. * Identification of radiotherapy factors (i.e., modality, prescribed total dose, planning target volume margin, penile bulb dose-volume parameters) associated with erectile function. * Evaluation of the number of patients screened for eligibility, the number eligible that are presented the study, the number who refuse, and the number who are accrued. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (≤ 65 years vs \> 65 years) and radiotherapy treatment (external beam radiation therapy vs brachytherapy\*). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Note: \* Radiotherapy start date for brachytherapy patients is the date of the procedure. All patients undergo either external beam radiotherapy alone to the prostate ± seminal vesicles only or low-dose rate permanent brachytherapy alone. * Arm I: Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil once daily for 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II: Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ), the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) (if applicable), and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Sexual Medications and Devices Evaluations Supplement questionnaires periodically. Partners or spouses complete the SAQ-Partner, LMAT (if applicable), and IIEF questionnaires periodically. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 28-30 weeks, and annually for up to 2 years.
Interventions
DRUGTadalafil
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks.
OTHERPlacebo
Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks.
Sponsors
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NRG Oncology
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Clinical stage T1b-T2b (AJCC, 6th ed.) adenocarcinoma of the prostate within 6 months of registration 2. Clinically negative lymph nodes as established by imaging (pelvic ± abdominal CT or MR), nodal sampling, or dissection within 3 months prior to registration. Patients with lymph nodes equivocal or questionable by imaging are eligible if the nodes are ≤ 1.5 cm. Lymph node assessment is optional, and at investigator discretion, for patients with Gleason Score \<7. 3. No evidence of bone metastases (M0) on bone scan within 3 months prior to registration. Equivocal bone scan findings are allowed if plain films are negative for metastasis. Bone metastases assessment is optional, and at investigator discretion, for patients with Gleason Score \<7. 4. Baseline serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) value performed with an FDA-approved assay (e.g., Abbott, Hybritech) within 3 months prior to registration. -4.1 Any of the following combinations of factors (NOTE: tumor found in 1 or both lobes on biopsy, but not palpable, will not alter T stage): * T1b-T2b disease, Gleason Score \<7 and serum total PSA that is \<20 ng/ml or * T1b-T2b disease, Gleason Score ≥7 and PSA that is \<15 ng/ml 5. Serum total testosterone level prior to the initiation of radiation therapy (RT) within normal range according to institutional guidelines 6. Zubrod Performance Status 0 or 1 (Appendix III) 7. Age ≥ 18 years 8. Treatment that will consist of either external beam RT alone to the prostate ± seminal vesicles only at a dose between 75 Gy and 79.2 Gy or brachytherapy alone (NOTE: treatment with combined external RT and brachytherapy excludes patient participation) 9. Pretreatment (before starting prostate cancer treatment) erectile function as measured by IIEF Question 1, How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? - with responses of: * sometimes (about half the time) \[response 3\] or * most times (much more than half the time) \[response 4\] or * almost always/always \[response 5\] 10. History of prior tadalafil use: Document usual dosage per sexual encounter, date of last dose, and patient's response (No; Yes-Unsatisfactory Response; Yes-Satisfactory Response). Regardless of past experience, the patient is eligible if he agrees to adhere to protocol and take only tadalafil or placebo prescribed on study. 11. Although patients with partners are targeted for recruitment, patients without partners or without partners willing to participate are eligible. Patients (and spouses/partners, if willing to participate) must be able to provide study-specific informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. The patient's participation in another medical research study that involves the treatment of ED 2. Previous or concomitant invasive cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] Stage \>0), other than localized basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma (AJCC Stage 0-II), or a hematological malignancy (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma) unless continually disease free for at least 5 years 3. History of myocardial infarction within the last year 4. Heart failure in the last 6 months 5. Uncontrolled arrhythmias, hypotension (\<90/50mm Hg), or uncontrolled hypertension (\>170/100 mm Hg) 6. Stroke within the last 6 months 7. Use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist androgen suppression (e.g., Lupron, Zoladex), anti-androgen (e.g., Casodex, Eulexin, Nilandron), or estrogenic (e.g., diethylstilbestrol) agents within the last 6 months 8. Current use of any organic nitrate or as needed nitrates (e.g., use of nitroglycerin) 9. Current use of cimetidine, ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, or ritonavir 10. Known moderate to severe renal insufficiency or end-stage renal disease 11. Known severe hepatic impairment 12. Use of mechanical (vacuum) devices, intracorporeal, intraurethral, topical, or oral (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil) agents as therapy for ED or supplements to enhance sexual function within 5-7 days prior to the start of RT. Patients who discontinue these therapies remain eligible if they can meet eligibility criteria 13. Pretreatment (before starting prostate cancer treatment) ED as measured by IIEF Question 1, How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? - with responses of: * no sexual activity \[response 0\] or * almost never/never \[response 1\] or * a few times (much less than half the time) \[response 2\] 14. Prior penile implant or history of bilateral orchiectomy 15. Prior prostatectomy, prostatic cryosurgery or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), radionuclide prostate brachytherapy, or chemotherapy for prostate cancer 16. Prior or anticipated combined external RT and brachytherapy 17. Prior or anticipated external RT to the pelvic ± para-aortic lymph nodes 18. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; note, however, that HIV testing is not required for entry into this protocol. The need to exclude patients with AIDS from this protocol is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive. Protocol-specific requirements may also exclude immunocompromised patients. 19. Anatomical genital abnormalities or concurrent conditions that in the estimation of the physician would prohibit sexual intercourse or prevent study completion 20. Major medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent completion of treatment or would interfere with follow-up
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT) | Baseline and 30 weeks from the start of radiation therapy | EF is measured by Question 1 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5 on IIEF Q1. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at this time point are also reported with this outcome measure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Baseline, 1 and 2 years from the start of tadalafil or placebo | The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at Years 1 and 2 are also reported with this outcome measure. |
| Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Baseline, week 30, and years 1 and 2 from start of treatment | The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. A score of 0-5 is given to each of the 15 questions that examine 5 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Domain scores are the sum of each item. The erectile function domain has 5 items with a score range of 1-30, orgasmic function has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, sexual desire has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, intercourse satisfaction has 3 items with a score range of 0-15, and overall satisfaction has 2 items with a score range of 2-10. Total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting baseline score from score at the time point of interest. |
| Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment | The Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 20-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 8 and 100 including the following domains: desire, ranging between 5 and 30; dysfunction, 0 and 25; activity, 0 and 10; satisfaction, 1 and 10; and fatigue, 1 and 5. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being. |
| Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment | The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. |
| Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment | The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. |
| Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment | The SAQ-P is an 18-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 0 and 90 including the following domains: desire, dysfunction, activity, satisfaction, and fatigue. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Radiotherapy Factors Associated With Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Weeks 28-30 and Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment |
| Patient Follow-up Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction at Weeks 28-30 and Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tadalafil Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral tadalafil 5mg once daily for 24 weeks. | 112 |
| Placebo Beginning ≤ 7 days after the start of radiotherapy, patients receive oral placebo once daily for 24 weeks. | 109 |
| Total | 221 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Assessment outside of Time Frame | 22 | 23 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 9 | 12 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tadalafil | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63 years | 63 years | 63 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 112 Participants | 109 Participants | 221 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 85 / 111 | 76 / 108 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 111 | 4 / 108 |
Outcome results
Primary
Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT)
EF is measured by Question 1 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5 on IIEF Q1. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at this time point are also reported with this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline and 30 weeks from the start of radiation therapy
Population: All randomized eligible patients with IIEF at both baseline and 30 week time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT) | 79 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT) | 74 percentage of participants |
Comparison: Sample size calculations were based on the hypothesis that the use of tadalafil would statistically significant increase the proportion of patients maintaining spontaneous erectile function compared to the use of placebo. Based on a 2-sided Fisher exact test with alpha=0.05, 91 patients/arm would provide 80% statistical power to detect an increase from 20% to 40% in spontaneous erectile response at weeks 28-30. Although designed for the Fisher exact test, Chi-square was used and reported.p-value: 0.4995% CI: [1, 9]Chi-squared
Comparison: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX vs. N0)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA).) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Treatment arm is reported here.p-value: 0.2386Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX vs. N0)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.)The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. RT method is reported here.p-value: 0.7908Regression, Linear
Comparison: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX vs. N0)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Age is reported here.p-value: 0.0467Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX vs. N0)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. N Stage is reported here.p-value: 0.0068Regression, Logistic
Secondary
Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score
The SAQ-P is an 18-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 0 and 90 including the following domains: desire, dysfunction, activity, satisfaction, and fatigue. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment
Population: Consenting partners of randomized eligible patients with data at baseline and corresponding time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Year 1 | -3.9 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Week 30 | -4.9 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Year 2 | 1.5 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Placebo | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Week 30 | -1.8 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Placebo | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Year 1 | -2.5 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Placebo | Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score | Year 2 | 5.1 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
Comparison: Week 30p-value: 0.14t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.64t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 2p-value: 0.18t-test, 2 sided
Secondary
Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score
The Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 20-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 8 and 100 including the following domains: desire, ranging between 5 and 30; dysfunction, 0 and 25; activity, 0 and 10; satisfaction, 1 and 10; and fatigue, 1 and 5. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment
Population: Eligible patients with data at baseline and corresponding time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Week 30 | -2.0 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Year 1 | -3.7 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Year 2 | -3.4 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Placebo | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Week 30 | -2.9 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Placebo | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Year 1 | -4.9 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Placebo | Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score | Year 2 | -4.6 change in SAQ score | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
Comparison: Week 30p-value: 0.7t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.65t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.72t-test, 2 sided
Secondary
Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. A score of 0-5 is given to each of the 15 questions that examine 5 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Domain scores are the sum of each item. The erectile function domain has 5 items with a score range of 1-30, orgasmic function has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, sexual desire has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, intercourse satisfaction has 3 items with a score range of 0-15, and overall satisfaction has 2 items with a score range of 2-10. Total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting baseline score from score at the time point of interest.
Time frame: Baseline, week 30, and years 1 and 2 from start of treatment
Population: Eligible patients with IIEF at baseline and corresponding time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Week 30 | -8.2 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Year 1 | -9.5 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| Tadalafil | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Year 2 | -9.7 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Placebo | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Week 30 | -9.0 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Placebo | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Year 1 | -10.5 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Placebo | Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) | Year 2 | -14.1 change in total IIEF | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
Comparison: Week 30p-value: 0.97t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.99t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 2p-value: 0.24t-test, 2 sided
Secondary
Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score.
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment
Population: Consenting spouses of randomized, eligible patients with data at baseline and time point of interest
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 1 | -2.3 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 5.1 |
| Tadalafil | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 2 | -2.8 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 5.8 |
| Tadalafil | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Week 30 | -1.5 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 6.3 |
| Placebo | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 1 | 1.2 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 7.3 |
| Placebo | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Week 30 | -2.6 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 6.4 |
| Placebo | Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 2 | -4.7 change in LMAT score | Standard Error 7.1 |
Comparison: Week 30p-value: 0.86t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.93t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 2p-value: 0.52t-test, 2 sided
Secondary
Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score.
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment
Population: Eligible patients with data at baseline and time point of interest.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Week 30 | -3.5 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Tadalafil | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 1 | -1.9 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Tadalafil | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 2 | -1.3 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 9.87 |
| Placebo | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 2 | -1.4 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Placebo | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Week 30 | -2.6 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Placebo | Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test | Year 1 | -1.9 change in LMAT score | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
Comparison: Year 2p-value: 0.96t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 30p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.98t-test, 2 sided
Secondary
Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at Years 1 and 2 are also reported with this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years from the start of tadalafil or placebo
Population: All randomized eligible patients with IIEF at both baseline and corresponding time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Year 1 | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tadalafil | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Year 2 | 68.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Year 1 | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT | Year 2 | 63.3 percentage of participants |
Comparison: Year 1p-value: 0.93Chi-squared
Comparison: Year 2p-value: 0.58Chi-squared
Comparison: Year 1: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[none\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, N stage, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Treatment arm is reported here.p-value: 0.9501Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 1: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[none\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, N stage, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. RT method is reported here.p-value: 0.102Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 1: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[none\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, N stage, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Age is reported here.p-value: 0.1855Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 2: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Treatment arm is reported here.p-value: 0.5739Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 2: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. RT method is reported here.p-value: 0.0422Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 2: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. Age is reported here.p-value: 0.5237Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Year 2: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed modeling the probability of non-responders. Only treatment arm (Placebo vs. Tadalafil), age (\> 65 vs. other), RT method (External RT vs. brachytherapy), and significant pretreatment characteristics \[N stage (NX)\] were retained in the model. (Dropped pretreatment characteristics: ethnicity, Zubrod, T stage, PSA.) The results for each explanatory variable are reported separately. N Stage is reported here.p-value: 0.477Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified
Patient Follow-up Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction at Weeks 28-30 and Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment
Other Pre-specified
Radiotherapy Factors Associated With Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Weeks 28-30 and Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
Time frame: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment