Skip to content

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Buttock Lipoatrophy Treatment With Macrolane

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Buttock Lipoatrophy Treatment With Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid of Non-animal Origin (Macrolane); a Baseline-controlled Single-centre Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00931268
Enrollment
10
Registered
2009-07-02
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrophy

Keywords

Lipoatrophy, Buttock treatment

Brief summary

The study is being undertaken to establish the effectiveness and safety of Macrolane volume restoration factor 30 (VRF30) when used for treatment of HIV-infected subjects with buttocks lipoatrophy.

Interventions

DEVICEMacrolane VRF 30

One administration

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have buttocks lipoatrophy and is unable to remain seated for more than 30 minutes due to pain. * Have undergone HIV treatment for more than 2 years. * Have RNA copies less than 50/ml. * Have CD4 more than 200 cell/mm3.

Exclusion criteria

* Active infections. * Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions. * Perineal pathology. * Condition that may affect pain assessment. * Skin with underlying fibrous tissue. * BMI less than 19. * Insufficient tissue cover in the area to be treated. * Concomitant anticoagulant therapy and therapy with inhibitors of platelet aggregation within 14 days prior to treatment, or a history of bleeding disorders. * Permanent implant placed in the treatment area. * Other injectable implant, liposuction or other surgical therapy in the treatment area. * Presence or history of connective tissue diseases. * Tumors or pre-malign tissue disorder near or on the area to be treated. * Contraindications for MRI * Previous hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid, or to the local anesthetic or antibiotic used in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting6 months after treatment compared to baselinePain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = no pain to the left and 100 = worst possible pain to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The VAS pain at 6 months was compared to baseline and the change was calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) QuestionnaireBaseline and at 6 months after treatmentA physical health summary score and a mental health summary score was generated on a rating scale of 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health. The change in health summary scores were assessed at the time points 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.
Number of Participants With Global Esthetic ImprovementOne month and up to 18 months after treatmentNumber of participants maintaining an improvement compared to baseline using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) consisting of 5 grades (worse/no change/improved/much improved/very much improved), where the three latter indicates improvement. GEIS was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to pre-treatment photos.
Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingBaseline and up to 18 months after treatmentPain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = no pain to the left and 100 = worst possible pain to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The change in VAS pain was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.
Adverse Event RecordingUp to 18 months after treatmentAdverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, investigator findings, spontaneous reports and by direct questioning in the Case Report Form (CRF).
Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay SittingBaseline and at 6 months after treatmentEvaluation of when (in minutes) it became impossible for the subject to stay in the sitting position on a standardized chair, at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline. In this analysis more than 60 minutes was handled as 60 minutes.
Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 months after treatmentMRI was performed at baseline and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine the implant volume, thickness, localization and the possible local displacement of the implant. At the 6, 9 and 12 month visits any displacement was evaluated with MRI by comparison to the 1-month position of the gel. The number of participants with gel displacement are shown below.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject enrolled (screened) and treated: 11 August 2009. Last subject completed study: 2 September 2011.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Macrolane VRF 30
Open label, baseline-controlled, one treatment session with injection of Macrolane VRF30 to each buttock, not exceeding 400 ml per subject.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMacrolane VRF 30
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age, Continuous44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Region of Enrollment
France
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = no pain to the left and 100 = worst possible pain to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The VAS pain at 6 months was compared to baseline and the change was calculated.

Time frame: 6 months after treatment compared to baseline

Population: All efficacy analyses were performed using the intention to treat (ITT) population. The ITT population at baseline and 6 months comprised all 10 treated subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Macrolane VRF 30Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting-28.1 mmStandard Deviation 22.2
Secondary

Adverse Event Recording

Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, investigator findings, spontaneous reports and by direct questioning in the Case Report Form (CRF).

Time frame: Up to 18 months after treatment

Population: Reported AEs, Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF 30Adverse Event Recording3 participants
Secondary

Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = no pain to the left and 100 = worst possible pain to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The change in VAS pain was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 18 months after treatment

Population: The VAS pain at 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months after treatment was compared to baseline. Of 10 treated subjects the ITT populations at each time point was: 9 (1 month), 8 (3 months), 7 (9 months), 5 (12 months) and 4 (18 months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Macrolane VRF 30Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingVAS pain; change from 1 month to baseline-14.3 mmStandard Deviation 15.3
Macrolane VRF 30Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingVAS pain; change from 3 months to baseline-40.3 mmStandard Deviation 8.9
Macrolane VRF 30Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingVAS pain; change from 9 months to baseline-29.4 mmStandard Deviation 22.3
Macrolane VRF 30Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingVAS pain; change from 12 months to baseline-22.4 mmStandard Deviation 25.2
Macrolane VRF 30Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of SittingVAS pain; change from 18 months to baseline-15.8 mmStandard Deviation 12.7
Secondary

Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI was performed at baseline and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine the implant volume, thickness, localization and the possible local displacement of the implant. At the 6, 9 and 12 month visits any displacement was evaluated with MRI by comparison to the 1-month position of the gel. The number of participants with gel displacement are shown below.

Time frame: 12 months after treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF 30Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Gel displacement right buttock0 participants
Macrolane VRF 30Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Gel displacement left buttock0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Global Esthetic Improvement

Number of participants maintaining an improvement compared to baseline using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) consisting of 5 grades (worse/no change/improved/much improved/very much improved), where the three latter indicates improvement. GEIS was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to pre-treatment photos.

Time frame: One month and up to 18 months after treatment

Population: The ITT population at 6 months comprised all 10 treated subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF 30Number of Participants With Global Esthetic ImprovementSubject assessed improvement at 6 months10 participants
Macrolane VRF 30Number of Participants With Global Esthetic ImprovementPhysician assessed improvement at 6 months10 participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) Questionnaire

A physical health summary score and a mental health summary score was generated on a rating scale of 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health. The change in health summary scores were assessed at the time points 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment

Population: The physical and mental health summary scores at 6 months after treatment were compared to baseline. The ITT population comprised 8 of 10 treated subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Macrolane VRF 30Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) QuestionnairePhysical health; change from 6 months to baseline9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Macrolane VRF 30Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) QuestionnaireMental health; change from 6 months to baseline5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay Sitting

Evaluation of when (in minutes) it became impossible for the subject to stay in the sitting position on a standardized chair, at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline. In this analysis more than 60 minutes was handled as 60 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment

Population: The ITT population at 6 months comprised all 10 treated subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Macrolane VRF 30Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay SittingMean value at baseline23.8 minutesStandard Deviation 4.1
Macrolane VRF 30Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay SittingMean value at 6 months59.0 minutesStandard Deviation 3.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026