Skip to content

A Study Of PF-04447943 Compared To Placebo In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

A PHASE 2 MULTICENTER, DOUBLE BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF PF-04447943 IN SUBJECTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00930059
Enrollment
191
Registered
2009-06-30
Start date
2009-09-10
Completion date
2010-09-22
Last updated
2020-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, PF-04447943, efficacy, safety, plasma concentrations

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of PF-04447943 compared to placebo on cognitive, behavioral and overall symptoms of Alzheimer's disease; evaluate the safety and tolerability of PF-0444793 compared to placebo; and determine the levels of PF-04447943 in the plasma over the course of the study.

Interventions

tablets, 25 mg every 12 hours for 12 wks

DRUGPlacebo

matching placebo tablets, every 12 hours for 12 wks

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (MMSE 14-26) * Good general health (such controlled conditions as Type 2 diabetes and hypertension allowed)

Exclusion criteria

* Use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine) or memantine within 12 weeks of the start of the study * Significant cardiovascular disease in the past 6 months * Illness other than Alzheimer's disease that could contribute to cognitive impairment * History of stroke or seizure disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) Score at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Baseline, Week 3, 6, 9ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 3, 6, 9, 12CGI-I is a 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale.
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at BaselineBaselineNPI total score evaluates disturbances in 12 behavioral domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating and night time behavior. NPI total score ranged from 0 (minimum severity) to 144 (maximum severity); higher score indicates greater behavioral disturbances.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Baseline, Week 3, 6, 9, 12NPI total score evaluates disturbances in 12 behavioral domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating and night time behavior. NPI total score ranged from 0 (minimum severity) to 144 (maximum severity); higher score indicates greater behavioral disturbances.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 12Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: a) Hematology: white blood cells (WBC) \<0.6\*lower limit of normal (LLN)/\>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN), hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), lymphocytes \<0.8\*LLN, total neutrophils \<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN; b) Liver Function: total bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT\[\>0.3\*ULN, total protein, albumin \<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN; c) Renal Function: creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, uric acid \>1.2\*ULN; d) Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN/ \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate \<0.9\*LLN/ \>1.1\*ULN; e) Clinical Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN, glycosylated hemoglobin \>1.3\*ULN; f) Urinalysis: ketones, protein, blood/hemoglobin, urine glucose \>=1, RBC, WBC \>=6, hyaline casts \>1; g) Hormones: tetraiodothyronine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) \<0.8\*LLN/1.2\*ULN.
Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 12Criteria for ECG (12-lead) abnormalities were as follow: 1) PR interval: greater than and equal to (\>=) 300 milliseconds (msec), 2) PR interval: maximum increase from baseline \>=25 percent (%) (if baseline PR interval greater than \[\>\] 100 msec) or \>=50% (if baseline PR interval less than or equal to \[\<=\] 100 msec); 3) QRS complex: \>=200 msec, 4) QRS complex: maximum increase from baseline \>=25% or \>=50%; 5) QT interval \>=500 msec; 6) QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB): 450 to less than (\<) 480 msec, 7) QTcB: 480 to \<500 msec, 8) QTcB: \>=500 msec, 10) QTcB: 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, 11) QTcB: \>=60 msec increase from baseline; 9) QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF): 450 to \<480 msec, 10) QTcF: 480 to \< 500 msec, 11) QTcF: \>=500 msec, 12) QTcF: 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, 13) QTcF: change\>=60 msec increase from baseline.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsScreening (28 days before Baseline), Week 12The complete physical and neurological examination included examination of abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, general, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, mouth, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, ocular fundi, pulse, skin, throat, thyroid, and others. Abnormality was judged by investigator.
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Screening, Baseline, Post-baseline (Week 1 up to 12)C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced the following: suicidal behavior which includes suicide attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior (response of Yes on preparatory acts or behavior); suicidal ideation (response of Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent); self-injurious behavior (SIB), intent unknown (response of Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior?).
PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationPre-dose on Week 1; 0 to 3 hours following cognitive testing at Week 3, 6, 9, 12
Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 12 for change in supine or standing blood pressure; Week 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 for orthostatic hypotensionPre-defined criteria vital signs abnormalities included maximum increase or decrease of greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) from baseline for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP); maximum increase or decrease of \>=20 mmHg from baseline for supine diastolic BP (DBP); maximum increase or decrease of \>=30 mmHg from baseline for standing SBP; maximum increase or decrease of \>=20 mmHg from baseline for standing DBP. Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a drop of more than 10 mmHg in diastolic BP or a drop of more than 20 mmHg in systolic BP within 3 minutes of standing from the supine position.

Countries

Canada, Chile, Czechia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matched to PF-04447943 tablet orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
100
PF-04447943
PF-04447943 25 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
91
Total191

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Study1 site terminated by sponsor11
Overall StudyAdverse Event16
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDid not meet entrance criteria11
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04447943Total
Age, Continuous73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
73.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants58 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants33 Participants69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 10057 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1003 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) Score at Baseline

ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAlzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) Score at Baseline21.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
PF-04447943Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) Score at Baseline22.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.39
Primary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 12

ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 12-1.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 12-1.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Comparison: Least squares (LS) mean difference and p-values were based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.335390% CI: [-1.52, 0.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9

ADAS-cog is a structured scale assessing the severity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. It comprises of following 11 items (range): word recall (0-10), naming objects and fingers (0-5), following commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), recall of test instructions (0-5), spoken language ability (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5). Total ADAS-cog 70 score was sum of all items and ranged from 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most severe impairment), higher score indicating worse cognition.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 6, 9

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 3-1.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 6-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 9-2.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 3-1.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 6-1.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3, 6 and 9Change at Week 9-2.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Comparison: Change at Week 3: LS mean difference and p-values were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.607390% CI: [-0.99, 1.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 6: LS mean difference and p-values were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.308690% CI: [-1.56, 0.84]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 9: LS mean difference and p-values were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.19790% CI: [-1.82, 0.58]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12

NPI total score evaluates disturbances in 12 behavioral domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating and night time behavior. NPI total score ranged from 0 (minimum severity) to 144 (maximum severity); higher score indicates greater behavioral disturbances.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, 6, 9, 12

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 9-3.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 6-2.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 12-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 3-2.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 12-2.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 6-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 9-2.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
PF-04447943Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3, 6, 9 and 12Change at Week 3-1.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Comparison: Change at Week 3: LS mean difference and p-value were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.763490% CI: [-0.89, 2.27]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 6: LS mean difference and p-value were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.807790% CI: [-0.75, 2.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 9: LS mean difference and p-value were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.83590% CI: [-0.66, 2.57]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 12: LS mean difference and p-value were based on ANCOVA on change from baseline with treatment, baseline value, scheduled visit and visit by treatment interaction as covariates, and participant effect as random effect.p-value: 0.437790% CI: [-1.78, 1.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)

CGI-I is a 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale.

Time frame: Week 3, 6, 9, 12

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 33.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 63.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 93.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 123.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PF-04447943Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 123.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-04447943Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 33.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PF-04447943Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 93.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-04447943Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)Week 63.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Comparison: Week 3: Inferential statistics were based on linear model with fixed effects for visit (nominal scale) and visit by treatment interaction, and a random effect for participant.p-value: 0.654790% CI: [-0.18, 0.29]Linear model
Comparison: Week 6: Inferential statistics were based on linear model with fixed effects for visit (nominal scale) and visit by treatment interaction, and a random effect for participant.p-value: 0.70290% CI: [-0.16, 0.31]Linear model
Comparison: Week 9: Inferential statistics were based on linear model with fixed effects for visit (nominal scale) and visit by treatment interaction, and a random effect for participant.p-value: 0.113890% CI: [-0.41, 0.06]Linear model
Comparison: Week 12: Inferential statistics were based on linear model with fixed effects for visit (nominal scale) and visit by treatment interaction, and a random effect for participant.p-value: 0.081690% CI: [-0.44, 0.04]Linear model
Secondary

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Baseline

NPI total score evaluates disturbances in 12 behavioral domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating and night time behavior. NPI total score ranged from 0 (minimum severity) to 144 (maximum severity); higher score indicates greater behavioral disturbances.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNeuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Baseline12.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.86
PF-04447943Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Baseline10.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.28
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological Examinations

The complete physical and neurological examination included examination of abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, general, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, mouth, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, ocular fundi, pulse, skin, throat, thyroid, and others. Abnormality was judged by investigator.

Time frame: Screening (28 days before Baseline), Week 12

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of the investigational or control drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified rows for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMouth: Week 129 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHead: Screening1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMusculoskeletal: Screening11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEars: Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMusculoskeletal: Week 127 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHead: Week 121 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNeck: Screening1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEyes: Screening26 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNeck: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHeart: Screening3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNose: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEars: Screening6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNose: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHeart: Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOcular fundi: Screening1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEyes: Week 1224 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOcular fundi: Week 121 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLungs: Screening3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsPulses: Screening2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsExtremities: Screening15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsPulses: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLungs: Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsSkin: Screening30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsGeneral: Screening1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsSkin: Week 1225 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLymph nodes: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThroat: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsAbdomen: Week 125 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThroat: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLymph nodes: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThyroid: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsGeneral: Week 122 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThyroid: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMouth: Screening11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOther: Screening2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsExtremities: Week 1210 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOther: Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsAbdomen: Screening9 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOther: Week 123 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsAbdomen: Screening9 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsAbdomen: Week 126 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEars: Screening9 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEars: Week 129 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsExtremities: Screening15 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsExtremities: Week 1211 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEyes: Screening26 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsEyes: Week 1222 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsGeneral: Screening2 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsGeneral: Week 122 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHead: Screening1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHead: Week 121 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHeart: Screening8 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsHeart: Week 125 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLungs: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLungs: Week 120 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLymph nodes: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsLymph nodes: Week 121 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMouth: Screening3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMouth: Week 123 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMusculoskeletal: Screening13 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsMusculoskeletal: Week 1212 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNeck: Screening2 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNeck: Week 120 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNose: Screening2 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsNose: Week 121 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOcular fundi: Screening2 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOcular fundi: Week 120 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsPulses: Screening3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsPulses: Week 120 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsSkin: Screening23 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsSkin: Week 1221 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThroat: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThroat: Week 120 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThyroid: Screening3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsThyroid: Week 123 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations and Neurological ExaminationsOther: Screening1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced the following: suicidal behavior which includes suicide attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior (response of Yes on preparatory acts or behavior); suicidal ideation (response of Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent); self-injurious behavior (SIB), intent unknown (response of Yes on Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior?).

Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Post-baseline (Week 1 up to 12)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of the investigational or control drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified rows for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-suicidal SIB: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Baseline4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted attempt: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-Suicidal SIB: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted Attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior:Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Screening5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Post baseline6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-suicidal SIB: Post baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Screening0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-Suicidal SIB: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted attempt: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Screening6 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-suicidal SIB: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted Attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior: Baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Baseline5 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Screening0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior: Post baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicide attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Interrupted attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Aborted attempt: Post baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Imminent suicidal behavior:Post baseline0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation: Post baseline6 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Non-suicidal SIB: Post baseline1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: a) Hematology: white blood cells (WBC) \<0.6\*lower limit of normal (LLN)/\>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN), hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), lymphocytes \<0.8\*LLN, total neutrophils \<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN; b) Liver Function: total bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT\[\>0.3\*ULN, total protein, albumin \<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN; c) Renal Function: creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, uric acid \>1.2\*ULN; d) Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN/ \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate \<0.9\*LLN/ \>1.1\*ULN; e) Clinical Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN, glycosylated hemoglobin \>1.3\*ULN; f) Urinalysis: ketones, protein, blood/hemoglobin, urine glucose \>=1, RBC, WBC \>=6, hyaline casts \>1; g) Hormones: tetraiodothyronine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) \<0.8\*LLN/1.2\*ULN.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of the investigational or control drug. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities33 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities28 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Criteria for ECG (12-lead) abnormalities were as follow: 1) PR interval: greater than and equal to (\>=) 300 milliseconds (msec), 2) PR interval: maximum increase from baseline \>=25 percent (%) (if baseline PR interval greater than \[\>\] 100 msec) or \>=50% (if baseline PR interval less than or equal to \[\<=\] 100 msec); 3) QRS complex: \>=200 msec, 4) QRS complex: maximum increase from baseline \>=25% or \>=50%; 5) QT interval \>=500 msec; 6) QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB): 450 to less than (\<) 480 msec, 7) QTcB: 480 to \<500 msec, 8) QTcB: \>=500 msec, 10) QTcB: 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, 11) QTcB: \>=60 msec increase from baseline; 9) QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF): 450 to \<480 msec, 10) QTcF: 480 to \< 500 msec, 11) QTcF: \>=500 msec, 12) QTcF: 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, 13) QTcF: change\>=60 msec increase from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of the investigational or control drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified rows for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQT interval >=500 msec2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 30 to <60 msec increase11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR interval: 25% or 50% increase0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: >=60 msec increase0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 450 to < 480 msec19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS interval: >=25% or 50% increase1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 480 to < 500 msec4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF Interval >= 500 msec0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS complex >=200 msec0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 30 to <60 msec increase6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval >= 500 msec0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: >=60 msec increase2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR interval >=300 msec0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: >=60 msec increase1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR interval >=300 msec0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR interval: 25% or 50% increase0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS complex >=200 msec1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS interval: >=25% or 50% increase1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQT interval >=500 msec1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 450 to < 480 msec22 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 480 to < 500 msec1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval >= 500 msec3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: 30 to <60 msec increase13 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval: >=60 msec increase1 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec12 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec0 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF Interval >= 500 msec3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria for Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval: 30 to <60 msec increase10 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs Abnormalities

Pre-defined criteria vital signs abnormalities included maximum increase or decrease of greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) from baseline for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP); maximum increase or decrease of \>=20 mmHg from baseline for supine diastolic BP (DBP); maximum increase or decrease of \>=30 mmHg from baseline for standing SBP; maximum increase or decrease of \>=20 mmHg from baseline for standing DBP. Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a drop of more than 10 mmHg in diastolic BP or a drop of more than 20 mmHg in systolic BP within 3 minutes of standing from the supine position.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12 for change in supine or standing blood pressure; Week 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 for orthostatic hypotension

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of the investigational or control drug. Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified rows for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in standing SBP (>=30 mmHg)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Standing DBP(>=20 mmHg)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in supine DBP (>=20 mmHg)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in supine SBP (>=30 mmHg)5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 33 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Supine DBP (>=20 mmHg) (9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 64 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Standing SBP (>=30 mmHg)11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 92 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in standing DBP(>=20 mmHg)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 125 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in supine SBP (>=30 mmHg)9 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 124 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in supine SBP (>=30 mmHg)4 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in supine SBP (>=30 mmHg)8 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in standing SBP (>=30 mmHg)7 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Standing SBP (>=30 mmHg)9 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in supine DBP (>=20 mmHg)2 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Supine DBP (>=20 mmHg) (8 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesIncrease in standing DBP(>=20 mmHg)3 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDecrease in Standing DBP(>=20 mmHg)6 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 13 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 33 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 62 Participants
PF-04447943Number of Participants With Pre-defined Criteria of Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension: Week 94 Participants
Other Pre-specified

PF-04447943 Plasma Concentration

Time frame: Pre-dose on Week 1; 0 to 3 hours following cognitive testing at Week 3, 6, 9, 12

Population: FAS included all the participants who consumed at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and Number Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 3NA nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 90.0000 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 6NA nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 12NA nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 1NA nanogram per milliliter
PF-04447943PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 12250.5 nanogram per milliliter
PF-04447943PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 171.60 nanogram per milliliter
PF-04447943PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 3241.0 nanogram per milliliter
PF-04447943PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 6225.0 nanogram per milliliter
PF-04447943PF-04447943 Plasma ConcentrationWeek 9239.5 nanogram per milliliter

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026