Skip to content

Impact Of Bacterial Resistance On Healthcare Costs For Hospitalized Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

The Impact Of Bacterial Resistance On Healthcare Costs For Hospitalized Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00929643
Enrollment
203
Registered
2009-06-29
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2012-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Keywords

health care costs, Intra-Abdominal Infection

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to estimate the costs of empiric antibiotic therapy and hospitalization costs for patients with a complicated intra-abdominal infection, and to assess the impact of treatment failure of initial antibiotic empiric therapy on pharmacological and total healthcare costs for these patients in Greece.

Detailed description

Every patient diagnosed with complicated intra-abdominal infections will enter the study, until the pre-specified number of patients is reached. Patients diagnosed with any of conditions mentioned below (inclusion criteria) will enter the study, until the pre-specified number of patients is reached.

Interventions

OTHERno intervention

success of the initial empiric treatment

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A recorded primary diagnosis of a complicated intra-abdominal. infection (cIAI) and a procedure involving a laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess The study will be a prospective, multi-centre, epidemiological study of patients (aged \> 18 years) diagnosed with a complicated intra-abdominal infection AND who received a procedure involving laparotomy/laparoscopy or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess. cIAI's will include the following conditions/ diagnoses: * Gastric ulcer with perforation; * Gastric ulcer with hemorrhage and perforation; * Duodenal ulcer with perforation; * Duodenal ulcer with hemorrhage and perforation; * Peptic ulcer with perforation; * Peptic ulcer with hemorrhage and perforation; * Gastrojejunal ulcer with perforation; * Gastrojejunal ulcer with hemorrhage and perforation; * Acute appendicitis with generalized peritonitis; * Acute appendicitis with peritoneal abscess; * Peritonitis; * Abscess of intestine; * Fistula of intestine, excluding rectum and anus; * Ulceration of intestine; * Perforation of intestine; * Abscess of liver; or * Acute cholecystitis with perforation. The initial antibiotic regimen will be defined as all IV antibiotics newly received either on the day immediately prior to laparotomy or laparoscopy or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess, or on the day of these procedures, given that the use of these procedures prior to initiation of IV antibiotic regimens in complicated IAIs , which is increasingly common, is likely reflective of prophylaxis.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not signing an informed consent form. * Patients participating in another interventional study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of HospitalizationBaseline up to 6 monthsOverall health care resource utilization was analyzed using mean duration of hospitalization.
Percentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Baseline up to 6 months
Percentage of Participants With Failure of Initial Empiric Antibiotic TherapyBaseline up to 6 monthsFailure of initial empiric therapy was assessed by an independent committee of qualified healthcare professionals (surgeon, and microbiologist specialist) and defined as requirement of additional antibiotic or change in antibacterial therapy on any day following the initial laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage; or additional laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage at least 2 days following the initial surgical/radiological intervention; or participant death due to infection.
Duration of Hospitalization (by Failure of Initial Empiric Treatment)Baseline up to 6 monthsYes equals (=) initial empiric antibiotic treatment failed (additional antibiotic therapy or a change in antibacterial therapy was required following laparotomy/laparoscopy or percutaneous draininge or participant died due to infection); No=initial empiric antibiotic treatment successful (infectious process resolved and no change in initial empiric antibiotic therapy was required during the course of hospitalization except for stepdown therapy, de-escalation or intravenous to oral switch).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Specific PathogenBaseline up to 6 months
Percentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeMonth 6 or study exit

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Observational, epidemiological, noninterventional study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Enrolled Participants
Hospitalized participants over 18 years of age, diagnosed with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) who had received a procedure involving laparotomy/laparoscopy or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess; treatment followed standard clinical practice.
201
Total201

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Enrolled Participants
Age Continuous57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
136 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 201
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 201

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Hospitalization

Overall health care resource utilization was analyzed using mean duration of hospitalization.

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled participants who fulfilled the protocol inclusion criteria. N=number of participants with nonmissing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled ParticipantsDuration of Hospitalization14.1 DaysStandard Deviation 12.7
Primary

Duration of Hospitalization (by Failure of Initial Empiric Treatment)

Yes equals (=) initial empiric antibiotic treatment failed (additional antibiotic therapy or a change in antibacterial therapy was required following laparotomy/laparoscopy or percutaneous draininge or participant died due to infection); No=initial empiric antibiotic treatment successful (infectious process resolved and no change in initial empiric antibiotic therapy was required during the course of hospitalization except for stepdown therapy, de-escalation or intravenous to oral switch).

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: FAS; n=number of participants with nonmissing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Enrolled ParticipantsDuration of Hospitalization (by Failure of Initial Empiric Treatment)No (n=111)8.9 DaysStandard Deviation 4.5
All Enrolled ParticipantsDuration of Hospitalization (by Failure of Initial Empiric Treatment)Yes (n=78)21.9 DaysStandard Deviation 16.4
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Failure of Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy

Failure of initial empiric therapy was assessed by an independent committee of qualified healthcare professionals (surgeon, and microbiologist specialist) and defined as requirement of additional antibiotic or change in antibacterial therapy on any day following the initial laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage; or additional laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage at least 2 days following the initial surgical/radiological intervention; or participant death due to infection.

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: FAS; n=number of participants in which failure could be assessed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Failure of Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy42.9 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Metronidazole59.2 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)b-Lactamase Inhibitors (BLI)38.3 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Cephalosporines (2nd generation)30.3 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Quinolones16.9 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Aminoglycocides12.4 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Carbapenems8.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Glycopeptides8.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Glycycyclines5.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Antifungals4.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Cephalosporines (3rd generation)4.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Lipopeptides/oxazolidinones2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Clindamycin1.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Beta lactams0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Cephalosporines (4th generation)0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy (by Therapeutic Class)Other0.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Diagnosis at Discharge

Time frame: Month 6 or study exit

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargePerforation of intestine15.9 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeAcute appendicitis with (w/) peritoneal abscess13.4 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargePostoperative peritonitis13.4 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeAcute cholecystitis w/perforation10.4 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeAcute appendicitis w/generalized peritionitis10.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeGastric ulcer w/ perforation9.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeDuodenal ulcer w/perforation7.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeAbscess of liver4.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeDiverticulitis complicated4.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeFistula of intestine, excluding rectum and anus3.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargecIAI: abdominal neplasm surgical extract/decrease3.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeGastrojejunal ulcer w/perforation2.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeGastrojejunal ulcer w/hemorrhage and perforatio2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeAbscess of intestine2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeGastric ulcer w/hemorrhage and perforation1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargePeptic ulcer w/perforation0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargePeritonitis0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants by Diagnosis at DischargeOther8.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Specific Pathogen

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 months

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPrevotella bivia0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPeptostreptococcus0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEscherichia coli23.9 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa9.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae9.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenAcinetobacter baumanii8.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStaphylococcus (S.) aureus (methicillin sensitive)1.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. aureus (methicillin resistant)1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStenotrophomonas0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenFungi without species identification0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. epidermis2.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. hominis2.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. haemolyticus1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. lentus0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenS. intermedius0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterococcus faecalis10.9 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterococcus faecium7.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterococcus durans0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterococcus spp (vancomycin resistant)2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus viridans1.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus salivarius1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus haemolyticus1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus mitis1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus pneumoniae0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus pyogenes0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus group C0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus Bovis0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenStreptococcus acidominimus0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenBacteroides fragilis group4.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterobacter spp2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenProteus spp2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenProteus mirabilis2.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenBacteroides spp. (non fragilis)1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenAeromonas hydrophila1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenHafnia alvei1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterobacter cloacae1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenCitrobacter braakii1.0 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenHaemophilus spp0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenMorganella morganii0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenCandida albicans7.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenCandida species (spp) (non Albicans)1.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPrevotella intermedia0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPrevotella oralis0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenActinomyces israelii0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenEnterobacter aerogenes0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenRalstonia mannitolilytica0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenComamonas acidovorans0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenComamonas spp0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenPrevotella species0.5 Percentage of participants
All Enrolled ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Specific PathogenCitrobacter freundii0.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026