Skip to content

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) + Xeloda (Capecitabine)as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Randomized Study of the Effect of Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab + Capecitabine Versus Bevacizumab Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Has Not Progressed During First-line Docetaxel Plus Bevacizumab Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00929240
Enrollment
287
Registered
2009-06-26
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized study will compare maintenance therapy with Avastin (bevacizumab) + Xeloda (capecitabine) versus Avastin alone, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who have not progressed during first-line therapy with docetaxel + Avastin. Eligible patients will receive up to 6 x 3 week cycles of treatment with Avastin (15 mg/mg IV on Day 1 of each cycle) + docetaxel (75-100 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of each cycle). Those patients who do not progress will be randomized to 3 week cycles of either a) Avastin (15 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each cycle) + Xeloda (1000 mg/m2 po bid on Days 1-14 of each cycle) or b) Avastin alone. Study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient request for withdrawal or end of study, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab [Avastin]

15 mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle (maintenance phase)

DRUGcapecitabine [Xeloda]

1000 mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle (maintenance phase)

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer * candidates for taxane-based chemotherapy; * ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.

Exclusion criteria

* previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer; * prior adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months prior to study; * prior radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic disease; * chronic daily treatment with aspirin (325 mg/day) or clopidogrel(\>75mg/day).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 yearsProgression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first study drug dosing (during the maintenance treatment phase) to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression was based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as a 20 percent (%) or greater increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter (LD) of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded or appearance of new lesions.
Progression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 yearsPFS was defined as the time from first study drug dosing to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression defined per RECIST 1.0 criteria. Participants without an event at data cut-off or who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free. Participants who took other non-protocol anti-cancer drugs while being on study medication, and who were still event free were censored on the date of first dose of the anti-cancer drug. Participants without post-randomization tumor assessments but alive were censored at the time of randomization. Participants without post-randomization assessments, who died after randomization were considered to have the PFS event at date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for median time to PFS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Died (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years
Overall Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 yearsDuration of Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death of any cause. The OS data for participants for whom no death was captured in the clinical database were censored at the last time they were known to be alive. Kaplan Meier estimation was used to determine OS.
Percentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Years 1 and 2Probability of being alive after 1 and 2 years on treatment with 95% CIs was calculated using Kaplan Meier approach with LOGLOG transformation.
Percentage Of Participants With PD or Death Due to PD (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013PD was defined per RECIST 1.0 as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 yearsObjective Response was determined by the investigator using modified RECIST criteria, Version 1.0. An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria. Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for Confidence intervals (CIs).
Quality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Baseline, Randomization and Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeksObjective Response was determined by the investigator using RECIST criteria, Version 1.0. An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for CI.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeksCR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.
Time To Progression (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013Time to Progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression (using investigator assessments of disease progression by RECIST 1.0). PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 yearsCR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥ 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Countries

Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intial Treatment Phase: Bevacizumab + Docetaxel
During the Initial Phase all participants received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a minimum of 3 cycles and a maximum of 6 cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant request for withdrawal, whichever occurred first. Participants also received docetaxel, a recommended dose of 100 mg/m\^2 IV administered on Day 1 of each cycle. Doses of 75 to 100 mg/m\^2 of docetaxel could be administered at investigator's discretion. At the end of the Initial Treatment Phase, participants with an objective response (PR or CR) or SD following 3-6 cycles of bevacizumab + docetaxel were randomized to receive maintenance therapy with either bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab + capecitabine.
287
Total287

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Initial Treatment PhaseAdverse Event3100
Initial Treatment PhaseDeath200
Initial Treatment PhaseDisease progression4100
Initial Treatment PhaseHealth authority/Study termination300
Initial Treatment PhasePhysician Decision400
Initial Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation500
Initial Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject1300
Maintenance PhaseAdverse Event0912
Maintenance PhaseChange of treatment040
Maintenance PhaseDisease progression07360
Maintenance PhaseHealth authority/Study termination012
Maintenance PhaseParticipant not treated020
Maintenance PhasePhysician Decision021
Maintenance PhaseProtocol Violation010
Maintenance PhaseTreatment ongoing at study closure0010
Maintenance PhaseWithdrawal by Subject026

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntial Treatment Phase: Bevacizumab + Docetaxel
Age, Continuous52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
287 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 2844 / 9232 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
78 / 2847 / 9210 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first study drug dosing (during the maintenance treatment phase) to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression was based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as a 20 percent (%) or greater increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter (LD) of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded or appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)88.3 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)75.8 percentage of participants
Primary

Progression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

PFS was defined as the time from first study drug dosing to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression defined per RECIST 1.0 criteria. Participants without an event at data cut-off or who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free. Participants who took other non-protocol anti-cancer drugs while being on study medication, and who were still event free were censored on the date of first dose of the anti-cancer drug. Participants without post-randomization tumor assessments but alive were censored at the time of randomization. Participants without post-randomization assessments, who died after randomization were considered to have the PFS event at date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for median time to PFS

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabProgression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)4.3 months
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineProgression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)11.9 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.266, 0.551]Log Rank
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.309, 0.597]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Duration of Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death of any cause. The OS data for participants for whom no death was captured in the clinical database were censored at the last time they were known to be alive. Kaplan Meier estimation was used to determine OS.

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabOverall Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)23.7 months
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineOverall Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)39.0 months
p-value: <0.000395% CI: [0.263, 0.685]Log Rank
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.334, 0.798]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Probability of being alive after 1 and 2 years on treatment with 95% CIs was calculated using Kaplan Meier approach with LOGLOG transformation.

Time frame: Years 1 and 2

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)1 Year71.6 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)2 Years49.4 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)1 Year90.4 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants Expected to Be Alive After 1 and 2 Years on Treatment (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)2 Years69.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Who Died (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)56.4 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants Who Died (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)36.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)

Objective Response was determined by the investigator using RECIST criteria, Version 1.0. An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for CI.

Time frame: Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks

Population: Initial Phase ITT population; only participants who were not randomized at the end of the initial treatment phase were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)8.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Objective Response was determined by the investigator using modified RECIST criteria, Version 1.0. An objective response was a complete or partial overall confirmed response as determined by investigators. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria. Pearson-Clopper one-sample method was used for Confidence intervals (CIs).

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)76.6 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR Per RECIST 1.0 (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)85.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.11395% CI: [-2.1, 20.3]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥ 30 % decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)97.9 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)98.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5895% CI: [-2.6, 4.6]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)

CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions, no progress in the non-measurable disease, and no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Time frame: Screening and at the end of every third cycle until randomization for an average of 18 weeks

Population: Initial Phase ITT population; only participants who were not randomized at the end of the initial treatment phase were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (CR, PR and SD) Per RECIST 1.0 (Initial Treatment Phase)56.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage Of Participants With PD or Death Due to PD (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

PD was defined per RECIST 1.0 as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabPercentage Of Participants With PD or Death Due to PD (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)88.3 percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage Of Participants With PD or Death Due to PD (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)74.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.

Time frame: Baseline, Randomization and Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population; n (number) = number of participants analyzed at the specific visit. Only timepoints with more than 10 participants in each treatment arm are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 3 (n= 44, 52)0.76 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 9 (n= 18, 37)8.80 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 6 (n= 26, 54)4.17 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 12 (n= 12, 31)0.69 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization (n= 83, 86)-3.51 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 12 (n= 12, 31)0.00 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Randomization (n= 83, 86)-4.46 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 3 (n= 44, 52)-3.21 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 6 (n= 26, 54)-5.40 units on a scale
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineQuality of Life Assessed As Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)Cycle 9 (n= 18, 37)-1.80 units on a scale
Secondary

Time To Progression (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

Time to Progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression (using investigator assessments of disease progression by RECIST 1.0). PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013

Population: Maintenance Phase ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Maintenance Phase: BevacizumabTime To Progression (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)4.3 months
Maintenance Phase: Bevacizumab + CapecitabineTime To Progression (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)11.9 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.266, 0.551]Log Rank
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.305, 0.591]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026