Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance, accuracy, and handling of the actuation indicator in patients with COPD. The actuation indicator is integrated into mouthpiece of the ipratropium bromide HFA inhalation aerosol device. As part of Boehringer Ingelheim's program to qualify an actuation indicator for use with the ipratropium bromide HFA inhalation aerosol device, this study is intended to complement the results from the ongoing in-vitro studies.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. A diagnosis of COPD based on medical history at a severity to require maintenance treatment with a bronchodilator 2. Male or female patients 40 years of age or older 3. A smoking history of more than ten pack-years. A pack-year is defined as the equivalent of smoking one pack of 20 cigarettes per day for a year 4. Must be able to use the study MDI with the mouthpiece containing actuation indicator
Exclusion criteria
1. Significant diseases other than COPD are excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study 2. Malignancy for which the patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the last three months. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed 3. History of asthma 4. Significant history active alcohol or drug abuse 5. Known active tuberculosis 6. Known narrow-angle glaucoma 7. Current significant psychiatric disorders 8. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or Norplant®) 9. Known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide, HFA-134a or MDI components 10. Previous participation in this trial 11. Patients who are currently participating in another trial and/or who have received investigational drug within the past 30 days
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator | 21 Days | This outcome measure presents the number of actuations (doses) of medication used in the specific time frame as measured by the actuation indicator |
| Actuations Dispensed | 21 Days | Actuations dispensed is determined by the weight differential of the canister over the course of the study divided by the shot weight |
| Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 21 Days | Difference between the number of actuations registered by the actuation indicator and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed | 21 Days | Difference between the number of actuations recorded on patient diary and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight) |
| Difference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 21 Days | Difference between the number of actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight) |
| Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | 21 Days | — |
| Actuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator | 21 Days | Actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment |
| Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator | 21 Days | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg ATROVENT HFA (42 mcg)- Oral inhalation | 142 |
| Total | 142 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | ATROVENT 42mcg |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 58.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 |
| Alcohol status Does not drink alcohol | 94 participants |
| Alcohol status Drinks alcohol - should not interfere with trial | 48 participants |
| Height | 167.2 centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 20 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 122 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 65 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 77 Participants |
| Smoking history Currently smoke | 80 participants |
| Smoking history Ex-smoker | 62 participants |
| Weight | 88.8 kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.7 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 142 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 142 |
Outcome results
Actuations Dispensed
Actuations dispensed is determined by the weight differential of the canister over the course of the study divided by the shot weight
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Actuations Dispensed | 159.77 Count | Standard Deviation 20.78 |
Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator
This outcome measure presents the number of actuations (doses) of medication used in the specific time frame as measured by the actuation indicator
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator | 167 Count | Standard Deviation 19.44 |
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed
Difference between the number of actuations registered by the actuation indicator and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 1.85 Count | 95% Confidence Interval 9.8 |
Actuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator
Actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Actuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator | 166 Count | Standard Deviation 19.57 |
Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary | 168 Count | Standard Deviation 20.57 |
Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator | 164 Count | Standard Deviation 19.66 |
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed
Difference between the number of actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Difference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 1.71 Count | 95% Confidence Interval 9.3 |
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed
Difference between the number of actuations recorded on patient diary and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Difference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed | 5.07 Count | 95% Confidence Interval 18.85 |
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed | 3.33 Count | 95% Confidence Interval 9.8 |
Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 103 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 21 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 5 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 119 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | no | 15 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | yes | 109 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 113 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 11 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 6 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 118 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 4 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 120 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 3 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 121 participants |
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire
Time frame: 21 Days
Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | No | 6 participants |
| ATROVENT 42mcg | Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire | Yes | 118 participants |