Skip to content

Actuation Indicator Trial in Patients With COPD

ATROVENT HFA Actuation Indicator Open-Label Study in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00928746
Enrollment
142
Registered
2009-06-26
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance, accuracy, and handling of the actuation indicator in patients with COPD. The actuation indicator is integrated into mouthpiece of the ipratropium bromide HFA inhalation aerosol device. As part of Boehringer Ingelheim's program to qualify an actuation indicator for use with the ipratropium bromide HFA inhalation aerosol device, this study is intended to complement the results from the ongoing in-vitro studies.

Interventions

DEVICEIpratropium bromide

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. A diagnosis of COPD based on medical history at a severity to require maintenance treatment with a bronchodilator 2. Male or female patients 40 years of age or older 3. A smoking history of more than ten pack-years. A pack-year is defined as the equivalent of smoking one pack of 20 cigarettes per day for a year 4. Must be able to use the study MDI with the mouthpiece containing actuation indicator

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant diseases other than COPD are excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study 2. Malignancy for which the patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the last three months. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed 3. History of asthma 4. Significant history active alcohol or drug abuse 5. Known active tuberculosis 6. Known narrow-angle glaucoma 7. Current significant psychiatric disorders 8. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or Norplant®) 9. Known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide, HFA-134a or MDI components 10. Previous participation in this trial 11. Patients who are currently participating in another trial and/or who have received investigational drug within the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator21 DaysThis outcome measure presents the number of actuations (doses) of medication used in the specific time frame as measured by the actuation indicator
Actuations Dispensed21 DaysActuations dispensed is determined by the weight differential of the canister over the course of the study divided by the shot weight
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed21 DaysDifference between the number of actuations registered by the actuation indicator and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed21 DaysDifference between the number of actuations recorded on patient diary and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed21 DaysDifference between the number of actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)
Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire21 Days
Actuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator21 DaysActuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment
Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator21 Days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ATROVENT 42mcg
ATROVENT HFA (42 mcg)- Oral inhalation
142
Total142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyOther2
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicATROVENT 42mcg
Age, Continuous58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Alcohol status
Does not drink alcohol
94 participants
Alcohol status
Drinks alcohol - should not interfere with trial
48 participants
Height167.2 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
20 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
122 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants
Smoking history
Currently smoke
80 participants
Smoking history
Ex-smoker
62 participants
Weight88.8 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 142
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 142

Outcome results

Primary

Actuations Dispensed

Actuations dispensed is determined by the weight differential of the canister over the course of the study divided by the shot weight

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgActuations Dispensed159.77 CountStandard Deviation 20.78
Primary

Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator

This outcome measure presents the number of actuations (doses) of medication used in the specific time frame as measured by the actuation indicator

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgActuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator167 CountStandard Deviation 19.44
Primary

Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed

Difference between the number of actuations registered by the actuation indicator and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: The primary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgDifference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed1.85 Count95% Confidence Interval 9.8
Secondary

Actuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator

Actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgActuations Based on Advancing the Actuation Indicator166 CountStandard Deviation 19.57
Secondary

Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgActuations Recorded on Patient Diary168 CountStandard Deviation 20.57
Secondary

Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgActuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator164 CountStandard Deviation 19.66
Secondary

Difference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed

Difference between the number of actuations based on advancing the actuation indicator to a zero reading or to the next increment and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgDifference Between the Number of Actuations Based on Advancing Actuation Indicator Versus Actuations Dispensed1.71 Count95% Confidence Interval 9.3
Secondary

Difference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed

Difference between the number of actuations recorded on patient diary and the number of actuations dispensed (calculated using weight differential and shot weight)

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgDifference Between the Number of Actuations Recorded on Patient Diary Versus Actuations Dispensed5.07 Count95% Confidence Interval 18.85
Secondary

Difference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
ATROVENT 42mcgDifference Between the Number of Actuations Registered by the Actuation Indicator and Read by Site Coordinator Versus Actuations Dispensed3.33 Count95% Confidence Interval 9.8
Secondary

Number of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo103 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Having Any Additional Comments According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes21 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo5 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Inhaler and Dose Counter Performing as Expected Based on Instructions According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes119 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaireno15 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Seeing Red Warning Indicating Inhaler Near End of Recommended Doses According to Patient Handling Questionnaireyes109 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo113 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Problems With Use of Inhaler With Integrated Dose Counter According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes11 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo6 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction That the Dose Counter Worked Reliably According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes118 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo4 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Dose Counter in the Mouthpiece of the Inhaler According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes120 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo3 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Ease of Use of the Dose Counter According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes121 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling Questionnaire

Time frame: 21 Days

Population: This secondary analysis was performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireNo6 participants
ATROVENT 42mcgNumber of Participants Who Reported Satisfaction With Performance of the Dose Counter for Indicating Approximately How Many Doses Remain in Inhaler According to Patient Handling QuestionnaireYes118 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026