Skip to content

Trial of Continuous Versus Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy

Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00928499
Enrollment
32
Registered
2009-06-26
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2021-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urge Incontinence

Keywords

urge/frequency, urge incontinence, Interstim, after success Interstim planning IPG placement

Brief summary

Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) delivers non-painful, mild electrical pulses to the sacral nerves to modulate the reflexes that influence the bladder, sphincter, and pelvic floor to improve or restore normal voiding function. Sacral nerve stimulation is indicated for refractory voiding dysfunction including urinary urgency/frequency, urinary urge incontinence, and nonobstructive urinary retention. Since its introduction, SNS has undergone significant improvements in design and application so that implantation is now a minimally invasive procedure under local and intravenous (IV) sedation. However, despite the progress made in advancing this therapy to a minimally invasive procedure, there are neither data nor guidelines on ideal program settings. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the programming parameter of cyclic versus continuous stimulation on efficacy of the therapy. If the therapy is equally efficacious at both settings, the cyclic setting has the advantage of resulting in a longer battery life.

Detailed description

The components of SNS include a quadripolar lead wire that is placed adjacent to a sacral nerve root (typically S3), and an implantable pulse generator (IPG) that the lead wire is attached to. The IPG provides the electrical impulse and has several parameters that are amenable to adjustment including rate, strength and length of stimulation. Additionally, the stimulation can be programmed to be continuous or cyclic. If the therapy is equally efficacious at both settings, the cyclic setting has the advantage of resulting in a longer battery life. This would prolong the time interval between IPG replacements which would reduce the number of times a patient is exposed to a surgical procedure and may have a substantial impact on reducing cost to the healthcare system. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups: either cyclic stimulation or continuous stimulation after IPG placement and will continue with this setting for four weeks. Subjects will return to the office 4 weeks post-op. They will complete a 3-day consecutive voiding diary just prior to their study visit. The subject will then undergo reprogramming to change the stimulation to the alternate pattern (from cyclic to continuous or vice versa as appropriate) keeping all other parameters the same. Subjects will be asked to return to the office 4 weeks after being switched to the alternate setting. She will complete a 3-day consecutive voiding diary just prior to the visit. The subject will also be asked their preference of mode of stimulation and the reason for their choice. After this visit, the participant will be switched to the mode of stimulation that is most efficacious for her.

Interventions

DEVICEInterstim (SNS)

Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* You are eligible to participate in this study if you have the diagnosis of urge/frequency or urge incontinence and have undergone a successful Interstim trial and are planning on proceeding with IPG placement. * All subjects must have had a minimum of a 50% improvement of one or more of the parameters being measured on the voiding diary to be considered a candidate for implant. * Eligibility criteria also include non-pregnant women over the age of 18 who are able to provide informed consent and are willing to accept randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* You are not eligible to participate in this study if: * you are under 18 years of age; * pregnant or planning to become pregnant; * have underlying neurological disease; * stress incontinence; * unable to read English; * inability to complete the voiding diary; and * inability to complete the follow-up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Micturitions in 24 HoursAfter 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completedCollected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis
Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes in 24 HoursAfter 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completedCollected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Medical clinic over the course of 2 years

Pre-assignment details

No participants were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interstim - Continuous Stimulation First, Then Cyclic Stimulation
Continuous stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
18
Interstim - Cyclic Stimulation First, Then Continuous Stimulation
Cyclic stimulation Interstim (SNS) : Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
14
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterstim - Cyclic Stimulation First, Then Continuous StimulationInterstim - Continuous Stimulation First, Then Cyclic StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants18 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Micturitions in 24 Hours

Collected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Time frame: After 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completed

Population: Data was insufficient to be analyzed and therefore no resulting data was collected.

Primary

Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes in 24 Hours

Collected in the 3 day voiding diary depending on their primary diagnosis

Time frame: After 4 weeks of stimulation a 3-day consecutive voiding diary was completed

Population: Data was insufficient to be analyzed and therefore no resulting data was collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026