Overactive Bladder
Conditions
Keywords
Urgency Urinary Incontinence OAB
Brief summary
This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a flexible dose regimen of fesoterodine on urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes in vulnerable elderly subjects with overactive bladder (OAB).
Interventions
Fesoterodine 4 mg and 8 mg
Placebo sham 4 mg and 8 mg
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* male or female subjects 65 years of age or older * OAB symptoms for at least 3 months * score 3 or greater on Vulnerable Elderly Survey (VES-13) * adequate mobility for independent toileting * mean number of at least 2 UUI episodes per 24 hours * mean urinary frequency of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours * able to independently complete the bladder diaries
Exclusion criteria
* PVR urinary volume greater than 200 ml * MMSE score less than 20 * greater than 15 UUI episodes per 24 hours * creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min * an average resting heart rate of greater than or equal to 90 beats per minute
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline | UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Percent change of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). |
| Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Baseline | Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. |
| Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline | The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Percent change of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). |
| Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline | Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Percent change of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). |
| Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours | Baseline | Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. |
| Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Screening, Week 4, 12 | PPBC: a self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asks participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. The PPBC assessment is rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Deterioration=score difference is greater than 0; no change=score difference is 0; minor improvement=score difference is -1; major difference=score difference is less than or equal to -2. |
| Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score | Baseline | OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. |
| Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. |
| Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Baseline | OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL. |
| Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control | Week 12 | OAB-S: a validated self-administered instrument that evaluates OAB medication expectations, daily life with AB, and satisfaction with OAB medication and includes 3 stand-alone items that assess overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Satisfaction coded on scale of 1 to 5: (1=very satisfied to 5=very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically and results transformed: total score range 0 to100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction. |
| Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Week 12 | Participant's response to question, overall, how satisfied are you with your OAB medication? was obtained on a 5 point scale, 1- very satisfied, 2- somewhat satisfied, 3- neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4- somewhat dissatisfied and 5- very dissatisfied. Response values 1 and 2 were combined into satisfied, and 4 and 5 were combined into dissatisfied. |
| Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) | Screening | MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. |
| Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12 | Screening, Week 12 | MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week X minus mean score at baseline |
| Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | PVR volume is defined as volume of urine remaining in the bladder immediately after urination. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Protective Undergarments included pads, protective padding, protective underwear (pull up), and briefs (diaper). The mean number of undergarments changed per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of undergarments changed divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change from baseline values were reported at week 4 for subsets of population with baseline values less than or equal to (=\<) 3.5 and more than (\>) 3.5 undergarments/day and at Week 12 for subsets of population with baseline values =\< 2.5 and \> 2.5 undergarments/day. |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants who received placebo matched to fesoterodine 4 milligram (mg) oral tablet once daily for 4 weeks followed by placebo matched to fesoterodine 8 mg once daily as part of optional dose escalation at investigator's discretion for remaining 8 weeks. | 281 |
| Fesoterodine Participants who received fesoterodine 4 mg oral tablet once daily for 4 weeks followed by an optional dose-escalation to 8 mg once daily at investigator's discretion for remaining 8 weeks. | 281 |
| Total | 562 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 14 | 26 |
| Overall Study | Did not meet entrance criteria | 16 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 9 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other | 5 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 6 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Randomized but not treated | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Fesoterodine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 65 to 74 years | 134 participants | 145 participants | 279 participants |
| Age, Customized 75 to 84 years | 118 participants | 106 participants | 224 participants |
| Age, Customized At least 85 years | 29 participants | 30 participants | 59 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 236 Participants | 225 Participants | 461 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 45 Participants | 56 Participants | 101 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 120 / 281 | 155 / 281 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 281 | 8 / 281 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: FAS population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline UUI episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | -2.20 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.15 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | -2.84 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.15 |
Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline UUI episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours | 3.93 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 2.16 |
| Fesoterodine | Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours | 4.07 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline frequency urgency sum rating greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -6.95 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.86 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -11.53 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.84 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -11.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.86 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -16.50 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.84 |
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12
OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. LOCF method was used to impute Week 12 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at both Week 4 and 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: concern domain | 12.35 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.61 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: coping domain | 12.90 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.65 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: sleeping domain | 13.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.56 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: social interaction domain | 8.77 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.19 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: total | 12.00 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.37 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: concern domain | 17.20 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: coping domain | 20.34 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.72 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: sleeping domain | 19.05 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: social interaction domain | 12.12 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.26 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: total | 17.55 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.46 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: sleeping domain | 23.10 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.63 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: concern domain | 20.51 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.61 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: concern domain | 26.24 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.7 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: coping domain | 19.86 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.66 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: total | 23.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.46 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: sleeping domain | 17.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.56 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: coping domain | 25.66 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.72 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: social interaction domain | 11.22 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.19 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: social interaction domain | 14.47 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.26 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: total | 17.80 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.38 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -1.64 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.24 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -2.75 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -2.74 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.24 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -4.15 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.25 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline micturition frequency greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -0.77 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -1.50 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -1.64 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.17 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -2.34 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.16 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline nocturnal urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -0.44 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -0.68 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -0.58 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -0.97 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.09 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Protective Undergarments included pads, protective padding, protective underwear (pull up), and briefs (diaper). The mean number of undergarments changed per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of undergarments changed divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change from baseline values were reported at week 4 for subsets of population with baseline values less than or equal to (=\<) 3.5 and more than (\>) 3.5 undergarments/day and at Week 12 for subsets of population with baseline values =\< 2.5 and \> 2.5 undergarments/day.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'n' is signifying those participants of the population subsets who were evaluated for this measure at the time point for each group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: =<3.5 undergarments (n=193,184) | 1.41 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: >3.5 undergarments (n=12,19) | 4.97 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: =<2.5 undergarments (n=172,169) | 1.21 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: >2.5 undergarments (n=35,35) | 3.71 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: =<3.5 undergarments(n=193,184) | -0.27 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: >3.5 undergarments(n=12,19) | -2.56 undergarments | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: =<2.5 undergarments(n=172,169) | -0.31 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: >2.5 undergarments(n=35,35) | -2.14 undergarments | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: >2.5 undergarments(n=35,35) | -1.98 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: =<3.5 undergarments (n=193,184) | 1.49 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: =<3.5 undergarments(n=193,184) | -0.61 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: >3.5 undergarments (n=12,19) | 4.81 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: =<2.5 undergarments(n=172,169) | -0.72 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: =<2.5 undergarments (n=172,169) | 1.35 undergarments | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: >3.5 undergarments(n=12,19) | -2.11 undergarments | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: >2.5 undergarments (n=35,35) | 3.94 undergarments | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4
UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline UUI episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 | -1.54 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 | -2.36 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Error 0.16 |
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12
OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at both Weeks 4 and 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -13.81 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.46 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -20.48 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.58 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -22.96 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.46 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -28.08 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.58 |
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12
PVR volume is defined as volume of urine remaining in the bladder immediately after urination.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline | 26.51 mL | Standard Deviation 35.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | 1.83 mL | Standard Deviation 41.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -2.98 mL | Standard Deviation 35.95 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline | 25.69 mL | Standard Deviation 34.28 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | 13.43 mL | Standard Deviation 57.7 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | 13.58 mL | Standard Deviation 60.22 |
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week X minus mean score at baseline
Time frame: Screening, Week 12
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12 | 0.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Fesoterodine | Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12 | 0.15 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours
Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline frequency urgency sum rating greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours | 45.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
| Fesoterodine | Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours | 44.92 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.45 |
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at both Week 4 and 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Coping domain | 44.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.12 |
| Placebo | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Social interaction domain | 72.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.35 |
| Placebo | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Sleep domain | 40.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.51 |
| Placebo | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Total | 49.61 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.35 |
| Placebo | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Concern domain | 45.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.38 |
| Fesoterodine | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Total | 50.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.87 |
| Fesoterodine | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Concern domain | 46.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.88 |
| Fesoterodine | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Coping domain | 44.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.76 |
| Fesoterodine | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Sleep domain | 43.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.76 |
| Fesoterodine | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | Social interaction domain | 72.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.45 |
Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | 10.30 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 3.67 |
| Fesoterodine | Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | 10.02 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 3.54 |
Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline micturition frequency greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | 12.22 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 3.21 |
| Fesoterodine | Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | 12.11 micturitions per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline nocturnal urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | 2.87 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
| Fesoterodine | Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | 2.69 episodes per 24 hours | Standard Deviation 1.38 |
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state.
Time frame: Screening
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) | 28.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Fesoterodine | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) | 28.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at both Weeks 4 and 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score | 67.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.59 |
| Fesoterodine | Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score | 67.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.04 |
Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control
OAB-S: a validated self-administered instrument that evaluates OAB medication expectations, daily life with AB, and satisfaction with OAB medication and includes 3 stand-alone items that assess overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Satisfaction coded on scale of 1 to 5: (1=very satisfied to 5=very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically and results transformed: total score range 0 to100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control | 52.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.82 |
| Fesoterodine | Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control | 68.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.89 |
Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12
PPBC: a self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asks participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. The PPBC assessment is rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Deterioration=score difference is greater than 0; no change=score difference is 0; minor improvement=score difference is -1; major difference=score difference is less than or equal to -2.
Time frame: Screening, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: No problems at all | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Some very minor problems | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Some minor problems | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Moderate problems | 44.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Severe problems | 43.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Many severe problems | 11.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Deterioration | 12.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: No change | 42.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Minor improvement | 25.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Major improvement | 19.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Deterioration | 12.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: No change | 33.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Minor improvement | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Major improvement | 29.2 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Deterioration | 7.2 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: No problems at all | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: No change | 29.8 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Some very minor problems | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Minor improvement | 26.8 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Some minor problems | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Minor improvement | 27.5 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Moderate problems | 44.5 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: No change | 27.2 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Severe problems | 44.2 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Major improvement | 33.2 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Baseline: Many severe problems | 11.3 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12: Major improvement | 38.9 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4: Deterioration | 9.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response
Participant's response to question, overall, how satisfied are you with your OAB medication? was obtained on a 5 point scale, 1- very satisfied, 2- somewhat satisfied, 3- neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4- somewhat dissatisfied and 5- very dissatisfied. Response values 1 and 2 were combined into satisfied, and 4 and 5 were combined into dissatisfied.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had non-missing value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Not satisfied | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied | 15.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Satisfied | 47.3 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Not satisfied | 18.9 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied | 9.3 percentage of participants |
| Fesoterodine | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Satisfied | 71.8 percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Percent change of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -12.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 45 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -23.9 percent change | Standard Deviation 46.4 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -26.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 39.4 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -39.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 45 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline micturition frequency greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -5.1 percent change | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -10.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 22.4 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -12.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -17.8 percent change | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Percent change of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline nocturnal urgency episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -4.9 percent change | Standard Deviation 68.2 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -15.5 percent change | Standard Deviation 63.6 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -18.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 62.6 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -31.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 59.5 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
Percent change of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100\*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12
Population: FAS population. LOCF method was used to impute only Week 12 missing data but not Week 4 missing data. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who had baseline UUI episodes greater than 0 per 24 hours and non-missing change from baseline value at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -39.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 65.7 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -55.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 63.1 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 4 | -57.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 54.4 |
| Fesoterodine | Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Change at Week 12 | -71.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 51.4 |