Skip to content

Comparison of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (CICERO)

Coronary Versus Intravenous abCiximab Administration During Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - the CICERO Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00927615
Acronym
CICERO
Enrollment
534
Registered
2009-06-25
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2010-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

myocardial infarction, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, percutaneous coronary intervention, thrombus aspiration, myocardial perfusion

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is superior to intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Detailed description

The contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) consists of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) including thrombus aspiration and stenting. There is, however, still a high incidence of impaired post-procedural myocardial perfusion, which is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Intravenous (IV) administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab during primary PCI plays an important role in the treatment of patients with STEMI. With higher local drug concentrations, abciximab may have additional anti-platelet, anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory features. These possible benefits may be obtained by intracoronary (IC) administration of abciximab. Recent small- to medium-scaled studies have suggested that IC administration of abciximab instead of the (IV) route is associated with improved post-procedural myocardial perfusion and a clinically relevant reduction of major adverse cardiac events. Because of the limited number of patients included in these studies, a larger randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the effect of IC abciximab in patients with STEMI. Furthermore, the combined strategy of PCI with thrombus aspiration and IC use of abciximab has not been investigated. Therefore, the investigators intend to evaluate the effect of IC bolus administration of abciximab compared to IV bolus administration on post-procedural myocardial perfusion as assessed by the extent of ST-segment elevation resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The study is a single-center, prospective, randomized trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints.

Interventions

DRUGabciximab

0.25 mg/kg body weight (intracoronary)

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

a diagnosis of STEMI defined by * chest pain suggestive for myocardial ischemia for at least 30 minutes before hospital admission * time from onset of symptoms of less than 12 hours * ECG with ST-segment deviation of more than 0.1 mV in 2 or more leads

Exclusion criteria

* rescue PCI after thrombolytic therapy * need for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting * presence of cardiogenic shock * known existence of a life-threatening disease with a life expectancy of less than 6 months * inability to provide informed consent * contra-indications for the use of abciximab (active internal bleeding, history of stroke within 2 years, recent major surgery or intracranial or intraspinal trauma or surgery within 2 months, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, bleeding diathesis, severe uncontrolled hypertension, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, hypertensive or diabetic retinopathy, severe liver or kidney failure, and hypersensitivity to murine proteins)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
incidence of ST-segment resolution >70%30 to 60 minutes post-PCI

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flowpost-PCI
Myocardial Blush Grade (MBG)post-PCI
Incidence of distal embolizationpost-PCI
Bleeding complicationsin-hospital
enzymatic infarct sizein-hospital
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)30 days
persistent residual ST-segment deviation30 to 60 minutes post-PCI

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026