Skip to content

Short Incubation Methylaminolevulinate Photodynamic Therapy Without Occlusion

Safety and Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy With Short Incubation Methylaminolevulinate Without Occlusion in the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00926952
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-06-24
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2011-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Keywords

Actinic keratoses, actinic keratosis, methylamonolevulinate, photodynamic therapy, without occlusion, short incubation

Brief summary

Actinic keratoses on the face are often numerous and widespread. The application of Methylaminolevulinate (MAL) on individual lesions followed by the application of a plastic film on each lesion is difficult and takes time for subjects with many actinic keratoses. The waiting period of 3 hours between MAL cream application and red light exposure is also long for patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with MAL with a shorter cream application time (90 minutes) and when MAL is applied on the entire face without the plastic film.

Detailed description

A total of 20 patients with at least 5 non-hypertrophic actinic keratoses (AK) of the face were included in this open-label study. All AKs were mapped on a transparent template before the first PDT treatment. At Day 0, all patients received methylaminolevulinate (MAL) applied on the entire face (except the nose and peri-ocular area of 1-2 cm) without any skin preparation. One to two 2 g MAL tubes was used for the entire face. MAL was applied without occlusion. After a total of 90 +/- 5 minutes the skin was rinsed and exposed to 37 J/cm² of red light from an Aktilite™ device. Patients were seen at Week 4; if all facial AKs did not show a complete response to treatment, the MAL-PDT procedure was repeated at Week 4. Patients were seen again at Week 12 and 24. The primary endpoint was at Week 12. Patients came back at Week 24 for a final safety evaluation and to verify the recurrence of AK. Efficacy is evaluated by assessing the mean number of facial AK at Week 12 as compared to Day 0.

Interventions

DRUGMethylaminolevulinate (Metvix, Metvixia)

2-4 g of cream applied to entire face at Day 0 for 90 minutes without occlusion prior to light treatment. If any actinic keratoses remained after 4 weeks the treatment was repeated at Week 4.

DEVICEPhotodynamic Therapy (Aktilite)

Device set to 37 J/cm². Red light wavelength is approximately 630 nm.

Sponsors

Galderma Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older. * Patient with at least 5 actinic keratoses of the face at Day 0. * Patient was willing to use an adequate contraceptive method or was surgically sterile, post menopausal, abstinent or with a same sex partner. Adequate means of contraception included oral contraceptives, IUD in use for 30 days before Day 0, barrier methods and spermicide in use at least 14 days before Day 0. * Patient capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with allergy to methylaminolevulinate or any component of the vehicle which includes peanut and almond oil. * Patient with clinically significant sensitivity to visible light, porphyria or porphyrin sensitivity. * Patient used any topical treatment for actinic keratoses (including imiquimod and 5-fluouracil), on the face within 4 weeks preceding Day 0. * Patient had cryotherapy or surgery on the face within 4 weeks preceding Day 0. * Patient with any malignant skin lesion (such as basal cell carcinoma, invasive squamous cell carcinoma or Bowen's disease) on the face at Day 0. * Patient used photodynamic therapy, with any topical or systemic photosensitizer within 8 weeks preceding Day 0. * Patient was exposed to excessive ultraviolet radiation (UVB phototherapy, sun tanning salons) within the 4 weeks preceding Day 0. * Patient used any investigational drug within 4 weeks preceding Day 0. * Patient with problems of alcoholism or drug abuse in the past year. * Patient with any unstable or serious uncontrolled medical condition. * Current pregnancy or lactation. * Patient with any serious dermatological disorder, including malignancies that would either put the patient at risk or interfere with efficacy or safety evaluations. * Patient with Fitzpatrick phototype IV, V or VI (inadequate penetration of red light in dark skinned subjects. * Patients with extensive facial hair (e.g., beard) that would either impair red light exposure or interfere with lesion evaluation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Number of Facial Actinic Keratoses at Week 1212 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Actinic Keratosis Lesions With Complete Clinical Response at Day 0 and Week 120, 12 weeks
Mean Griffiths Photonumeric Scale for Photodamage Score at Week 1212 weeksGriffiths photonumeric scale was evaluated by the dermatologist. Patients were placed under natural daylight or fluorescent lighting for grading. A direct comparison was then made between the subjects and photographic standards (provided in reference 1). If an exact match could not be made to a grade then an inter-grade number was used used, for example 1, 3, 5, or 7. Zero (0) is the least amount of photodamage, 8 is the most amount of photodamage.
Mean Fine Wrinkling Score at Week 1212 weeksThis factor represents a visual assessment of the number and depth of superficial wrinkles (i.e. shallow indentations or lines). Fine wrinkles typically appear in periorbital and perioral regions and are usually found further from the eyes and mouth than are coarse wrinkles. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe
Number of Patients With Complete Clinical Response of All Actinic Keratoses at Week 1212 weeksThe proportion of patients with a complete clinical response is calculated by dividing the number of patients with a complete response at week 12 by the number of participants at baseline.
Mean Sallowness Score at Week 1212 weeksThis factor represents a visual assessment of color tone from very pink or rosy (0) to very sallow or pale (9). Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe
Mean Mottled Hyperpigmentation at Week 1212 weeksThis factor represents a visual assessment of light, patchy, mottled hyperpigmentation and solar freckling (including melasma) based on quantitative criteria such as the area/density of pigment, color intensity (dark vs. light), and uniformity of distribution (i.e. the more uneven or blotchy, the greater the score), Lentigines, nevi, and other pigmented lesions are not to be included in this assessment. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe
Number of Adverse Events12, 24 weeksTo study the safety of MAL-PDT performed without occlusion when red light exposure takes place 90 minutes after the application of MAL by tracking adverse events until week 12 and adverse events until week 24
Mean Coarse Wrinkling Score at Week 1212 weeksThis factor represents a visual assessment of the number and depth of coarse wrinkles (i.e. deep lines, furrows, or creases). Coarse wrinkles appear on the forehead, glabella, chin, and nasolabial and periorbital areas, and they tend to be located closer to the eyes and mouth than fine wrinkles. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period lasted from July 30, 2009 to July 14, 2010. Type of location was a medical research clinic.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no Occlusion
Patients have 2-4 g of Methylaminolevulinate (MAL) spread on the entire face without occlusion and wait 90 minutes prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT) using red light.
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no Occlusion
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age Continuous65.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.73
Descriptive Scale - Mean Coarse Wrinkling5.00 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Descriptive Scale -Mean Fine Wrinkling5.40 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76
Descriptive Scale - Mean Mottled Hyperpigmentation4.45 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14
Descriptive Scale - Mean Sallowness3.60 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.37
Mean Griffiths Photonumeric Scale for Photodamage Score5.40 Units on a scale.
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Mean Number of Actinic Keratosis lesions on face9.85 Lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.88
Region of Enrollment
Canada
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Number of Facial Actinic Keratoses at Week 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Number of Facial Actinic Keratoses at Week 122.70 LesionsStandard Deviation 2.32
Secondary

Mean Coarse Wrinkling Score at Week 12

This factor represents a visual assessment of the number and depth of coarse wrinkles (i.e. deep lines, furrows, or creases). Coarse wrinkles appear on the forehead, glabella, chin, and nasolabial and periorbital areas, and they tend to be located closer to the eyes and mouth than fine wrinkles. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Coarse Wrinkling Score at Week 124.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Secondary

Mean Fine Wrinkling Score at Week 12

This factor represents a visual assessment of the number and depth of superficial wrinkles (i.e. shallow indentations or lines). Fine wrinkles typically appear in periorbital and perioral regions and are usually found further from the eyes and mouth than are coarse wrinkles. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Fine Wrinkling Score at Week 124.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Secondary

Mean Griffiths Photonumeric Scale for Photodamage Score at Week 12

Griffiths photonumeric scale was evaluated by the dermatologist. Patients were placed under natural daylight or fluorescent lighting for grading. A direct comparison was then made between the subjects and photographic standards (provided in reference 1). If an exact match could not be made to a grade then an inter-grade number was used used, for example 1, 3, 5, or 7. Zero (0) is the least amount of photodamage, 8 is the most amount of photodamage.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Griffiths Photonumeric Scale for Photodamage Score at Week 124.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Secondary

Mean Mottled Hyperpigmentation at Week 12

This factor represents a visual assessment of light, patchy, mottled hyperpigmentation and solar freckling (including melasma) based on quantitative criteria such as the area/density of pigment, color intensity (dark vs. light), and uniformity of distribution (i.e. the more uneven or blotchy, the greater the score), Lentigines, nevi, and other pigmented lesions are not to be included in this assessment. Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Mottled Hyperpigmentation at Week 124.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Secondary

Mean Sallowness Score at Week 12

This factor represents a visual assessment of color tone from very pink or rosy (0) to very sallow or pale (9). Rating Category 0 None 1-3 Mild 4-6 Moderate 7-9 Severe

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionMean Sallowness Score at Week 123.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Secondary

Number of Actinic Keratosis Lesions With Complete Clinical Response at Day 0 and Week 12

Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionNumber of Actinic Keratosis Lesions With Complete Clinical Response at Day 0 and Week 12Day 0 - Total lesions at baseline197 Lesions
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionNumber of Actinic Keratosis Lesions With Complete Clinical Response at Day 0 and Week 12Week 12 - Lesions with complete clinical response143 Lesions
Secondary

Number of Adverse Events

To study the safety of MAL-PDT performed without occlusion when red light exposure takes place 90 minutes after the application of MAL by tracking adverse events until week 12 and adverse events until week 24

Time frame: 12, 24 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionNumber of Adverse EventsWeek 1211 Adverse events
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionNumber of Adverse EventsWeek 240 Adverse events
Secondary

Number of Patients With Complete Clinical Response of All Actinic Keratoses at Week 12

The proportion of patients with a complete clinical response is calculated by dividing the number of patients with a complete response at week 12 by the number of participants at baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was per protocol (PP). Imputation techniques were not required since all patients completed the study and no visits were missed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAL-PDT 90 Min Incubation, no OcclusionNumber of Patients With Complete Clinical Response of All Actinic Keratoses at Week 123 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026