Skip to content

Long Term Safety Study of Tanezumab in Chronic Low Back Pain

A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, LONG TERM STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00924664
Enrollment
849
Registered
2009-06-19
Start date
2009-08-20
Completion date
2011-06-22
Last updated
2021-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain monoclonal antibody nerve growth factor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of tanezumab for chronic low back pain. Patients who were randomized and treated with study medication in a previous chronic low back pain parent study will be eligible to enroll in this safety extension study at the Preferred Rollover Time Point visit or at the Early Termination visit of the parent study upon discontinuation due to lack of efficacy.

Detailed description

This study was terminated on 30 November 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab chronic low back pain clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 19 July 2010 for potential safety issues.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTanezumab 20 mg

Tanezumab 20 mg administered IV every 8 weeks for 3 administrations followed by SC administration every 8 weeks for 4 administrations over a period of 64 weeks

BIOLOGICALTanezumab 10 mg

Tanezumab 10 mg administered IV every 8 weeks for 3 administrations followed by SC administration every 8 weeks for 4 administrations over a period of 64 weeks

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent prior to completing any of the study procedures. * Female patients must meet one of the following criteria: 1\) Female patients of non childbearing potential - Must be post menopausal, defined as women who are \>=45 years old with amenorrhea for 24 consecutive months (regardless of FSH levels), or women who are amenorrheic for at least 1 year AND have a serum Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level greater than 30 IU/L at Screening for the parent double blind CLBP study; or Must be surgically sterile, defined as having had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy. 2.) Female patients of child bearing potential: must not be pregnant or lactating, and must be abstinent or use adequate contraception (2 forms of birth control, one of which must be a barrier method), and must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening (within 30 days prior to Baseline) and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline prior to initial dosing * Male patients must agree that they and their female spouses / partners will use adequate contraception (2 forms of birth control, one of which must be barrier method) or be of non childbearing potential. * Females of child bearing potential and males must be willing to use approved methods of contraception from commencement of screening procedures until 16 weeks after the last dose of IV study medication. * Patient must be able to comply with lifestyle guidelines, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures * Patient has been treated in a parent tanezumab double blind CLBP study * Patient has completed the Preferred Rollover Time Point visit of the double blind CLBP parent study or has been withdrawn for lack of efficacy. At least eight weeks but no more than 12 weeks have elapsed since the last study medication infusion in the parent study. Patients are permitted to enter the extension study up to 12 weeks after their last dose of study medication in their parent study (or 4 weeks after the End of Treatment visit)

Exclusion criteria

* Failed screening in a parent tanezumab double blind CLBP study * Withdrawn from a parent tanezumab double blind CLBP study for an adverse event * Pregnant women, lactating mothers, women suspected of being pregnant, and women who wish to become pregnant during the course of clinical study * Use of any investigational medication within 30 days prior to Baseline (3 months for any investigational biological other than tanezumab) or plans to receive an investigational medication other than the study medication during the course of this study * Patients who exited the parent double blind CLBP study because of lack of compliance, protocol violation (including not meeting entrance criteria), no longer willing to participate (for reasons other than lack of efficacy), or were lost to follow up in the parent double blind study * Patients who were randomized into the parent study in violation of inclusion or

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 48A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 448 days)AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score was calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 48A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Concentration of TanezumabBaseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64Analysis was done by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero.
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationBaseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 56Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationDay 1 up to Week 56Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of tanezumab received.
Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24, 56WPAI:SHP: 6-item, binary question on current employment, 3 questions on hours of work and work-loss, 2 questions based on 0-10 point scale to judge how CLBP affects ability to work, perform regular activities(0=no effect on work/activity, 10=completely prevented from working/activity). Four scores derived as percent: activity impairment, impairment while working, overall work impairment, work time missed. Total possible score: 0-100 (0=no impairment/high productivity, 100=completely impaired/low activity). Each of 4 scores expressed as impairment percentages, high percentage=more impairment, less productivity.
Number of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)Baseline up to Week 56Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics and muscle relaxants were permitted as concomitant medications for CLBP and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids, and viscosupplementation (eg, hyaluronan).
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesBaseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.
Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsBaseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 for intravenous infusion; Week 24, 32, 40, 56, 64 for subcutaneous injectionThe injection and infusion site reactions were assessed based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after administration (not related to needle insertion pain) of subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants who received study drug in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187) were eligible to be enrolled in this study, either at preferred rollover visit(Day 113) or due to early discontinuation in parent study for lack of efficacy. Dosing interval between last dose in parent study and first dose in this study was not less than 8 weeks and not more than 12 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tanezumab 10 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 10 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections at 8-week interval.
321
Tanezumab 20 mg
Participants who had previously received either tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5, 20 mg IV infusion every 8 weeks along with placebo matched to naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily; or placebo matched to tanezumab IV infusion every 8 weeks along with either naproxen 500 mg tablet or matching placebo orally twice daily in parent study A4091012 (NCT00876187), received a maximum of 5 tanezumab 20 mg IV infusions over 5 minutes at 8-week interval, followed by a maximum of 3 tanezumab 20 mg SC injections at 8-week interval.
527
Total848

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2339
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1015
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1012
Overall StudyOther2952
Overall StudyPregnancy11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation25
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated10
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor199330
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4771

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTanezumab 10 mgTanezumab 20 mgTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
79 Participants128 Participants207 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
182 Participants300 Participants482 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than (>) 64 years
60 Participants99 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
167 Participants277 Participants444 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
154 Participants250 Participants404 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
152 / 321277 / 527
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 32124 / 527

Outcome results

Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Walking Ability-2.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Sleep-3.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Normal Work-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Composite score-2.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: General Activity-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Composite score-3.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: General Activity-3.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Walking Ability-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Normal Work-3.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Sleep-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Walking Ability-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Sleep-3.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Normal Work-3.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Composite score-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: General Activity-3.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Normal Work-3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Composite score-3.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Walking Ability-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: General Activity-3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Sleep-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Walking Ability-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Sleep-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Normal Work-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Composite score-2.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: General Activity-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Composite score-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: General Activity-3.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Walking Ability-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Normal Work-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Sleep-3.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Sleep-3.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.13
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Composite score5.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Walking Ability-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Normal Work-3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Composite score-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: General Activity5.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Walking Ability5.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Normal Work5.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Sleep5.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: General Activity-3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Normal Work5.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Sleep5.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Composite score-3.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Composite score5.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: General Activity-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: Walking Ability5.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Walking Ability-3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Baseline: General Activity5.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Normal Work-3.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Sleep-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Composite score-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: General Activity-2.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Walking Ability-2.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Normal Work-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Sleep-3.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.72
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Sleep-3.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Normal Work-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: General Activity-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Composite score-2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Walking Ability-2.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48Change at Week 48: General Activity-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Walking Ability-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Normal Work-1.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Sleep-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Composite score-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 56

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Q1-Q4 measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Q5 (7 items) measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes). 7 items in Q5 averaged to obtain function composite score, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Walking Ability-2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Sleep-3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Normal Work-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Composite score-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: General Activity-2.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Composite score-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: General Activity-3.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Walking Ability-3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Normal Work-3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Scores (General Activity, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Sleep, Function Composite) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Sleep-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Worst Pain-3.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Average Pain-3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Pain right now-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Least Pain-2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Average Pain-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Worst Pain-3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Least Pain-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 16Change at Week 16: Pain right now-3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Worst Pain-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Average Pain-3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Least Pain-2.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Pain right now-3.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Pain right now-3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Worst Pain-3.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Least Pain-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 24Change at Week 24: Average Pain-3.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Least Pain-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Worst Pain-3.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Average Pain-2.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Pain right now-3.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Pain right now-3.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Average Pain-3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Worst Pain-3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 32Change at Week 32: Least Pain-2.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Worst Pain7.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Average Pain6.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Worst Pain-3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Average Pain-3.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Pain right now-3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Least Pain5.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Pain right now6.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Least Pain-2.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Worst Pain-3.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Least Pain4.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Average Pain6.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Least Pain-2.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Average Pain-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Pain right now6.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Change at Week 4: Pain right now-3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 4Baseline: Worst Pain7.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Worst Pain-3.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Least Pain-2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Average Pain-2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Pain right now-3.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Pain right now-3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Worst Pain-3.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Least Pain-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 40Change at Week 40: Average Pain-2.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Least Pain-0.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Average Pain-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Pain right now-2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Worst Pain-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 56

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8

BPI-sf: 11-item self-report questionnaire consists of 5 questions, to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Question/item 1-4 (Q1-Q4) measure impact of pain (worst, least, average, right now). Question 5 (Q5) consists of 7 items which measure level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each item answered on 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain/interference) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine/completely interferes).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Worst Pain-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Least Pain-2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Average Pain-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Pain right now-3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Average Pain-3.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Pain right now-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Least Pain-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Scores (Worst, Least, Average, Right Now) at Week 8Change at Week 8: Worst Pain-3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 160.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 160.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 240.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 240.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 320.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 320.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4Baseline0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4Change at Week 40.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4Change at Week 40.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4Baseline1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 400.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 400.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 480.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 480.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 56

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 56 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 560.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 80.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 80.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16-1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 16-1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 24-1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 32-1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4Baseline3.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4Change at Week 4-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4Baseline3.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 4Change at Week 4-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40-1.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 40-0.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 48

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 48-0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 56

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8

Participants answered: Considering all ways your low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition using scale assessing symptoms and limitations to carry out normal daily activities. Score range: 1-5. 1: Very Good (No symptoms and limitations); 2: Good (Mild symptoms and no limitations); 3: Fair (Moderate symptoms and some limitations); 4: Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most activities); 5: Very Poor (Very severe, intolerable symptoms and inability to carry all activities).

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8-0.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Low Back Pain at Week 8-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16-4.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.84
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 16-5.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24-4.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.64
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 24-5.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.61
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 32

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32-5.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.87
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 32-5.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score was calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 4

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4Baseline13.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4Change at Week 4-5.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4Baseline12.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.85
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 4Change at Week 4-5.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.47
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 40

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40-6.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 40-4.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.32
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 48

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data was not collected for tanezumab 10 mg arm at Week 48 since none of the participants received dosing beyond Week 32 and efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 48-2.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 56

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 56

Population: Data was not collected at Week 56 since efficacy assessment was not required after clinical hold.

Primary

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8

RMDQ: back-specific, participant administered questionnaire that assess how well participants with low back pain were able to function with regard to daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician. Total RMDQ score is calculated as the sum of number of statements checked. Total possible RMDQ score: 0 to 24, with higher scores indicated greater disability.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8-4.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 8-5.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.71
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 448 days)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs15 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs198 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs370 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs24 Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Tanezumab

Analysis was done by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to zero.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: Pharmacokinetic(PK) analysis set: participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039(NCT00924664), had at least 1 plasma concentration value above LLOQ. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Due to clinical hold, study was terminated prematurely, data was not collected at Week 64.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 8596.957 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 533.8274
Tanezumab 10 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 40542.571 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 240.5285
Tanezumab 10 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 24588.216 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 296.7509
Tanezumab 10 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 56250.512 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 393.9501
Tanezumab 10 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabBaseline393.519 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 659.815
Tanezumab 20 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 56502.320 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 676.1049
Tanezumab 20 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabBaseline427.871 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 771.2499
Tanezumab 20 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 81074.76 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 527.5588
Tanezumab 20 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 241276.75 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 770.0278
Tanezumab 20 mgPlasma Concentration of TanezumabWeek 401058.92 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 666.4789
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tanezumab 10 mgTime to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyNA days
Tanezumab 20 mgTime to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyNA days
Secondary

Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively. Data was not collected at Week 64 since assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationBaseline2599.9 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1893.7
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 244132.7 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1780.1
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 83771.1 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1472.3
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 404314.0 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1372.4
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 562855.5 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1651.8
Tanezumab 20 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 84470.2 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1773.6
Tanezumab 20 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 404446.7 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1807.1
Tanezumab 20 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationBaseline2025.4 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 2281.4
Tanezumab 20 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 563639.3 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1990.3
Tanezumab 20 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationWeek 244860.6 picogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1990.6
Other Pre-specified

Change From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56

WPAI:SHP: 6-item, binary question on current employment, 3 questions on hours of work and work-loss, 2 questions based on 0-10 point scale to judge how CLBP affects ability to work, perform regular activities(0=no effect on work/activity, 10=completely prevented from working/activity). Four scores derived as percent: activity impairment, impairment while working, overall work impairment, work time missed. Total possible score: 0-100 (0=no impairment/high productivity, 100=completely impaired/low activity). Each of 4 scores expressed as impairment percentages, high percentage=more impairment, less productivity.

Time frame: A4091012: Baseline, A4091039: Week 24, 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664). 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:impairment during work-26.30 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 24.79
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:activity impairment58.19 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.05
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:overall impairment-4.63 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:work time missed2.99 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 10.81
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:work time missed-1.49 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 10.33
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:overall impairment8.23 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.11
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:activity impairment-25.29 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 27.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:impairment during work48.77 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.56
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:overall impairment-3.25 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 21.39
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:work time missed-0.50 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 8.24
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 56:activity impairment-8.00 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 34.58
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 56:overall impairment1.75 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 16.76
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 56:impairment during work-10.00 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 28.28
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:activity impairment58.74 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 21.24
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:impairment during work47.98 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 23.66
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:overall impairment7.46 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 21.97
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 56:work time missed1.41 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 4.71
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Baseline:work time missed2.27 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 8.67
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:activity impairment-26.34 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 28.55
Tanezumab 20 mgChange From A4091012 (NCT00876187) Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 24 and 56Change at Week 24:impairment during work-21.36 percentage of impairmentStandard Deviation 26.84
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics and muscle relaxants were permitted as concomitant medications for CLBP and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids, and viscosupplementation (eg, hyaluronan).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)150 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Using Concomitant Medication for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)268 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies

Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, 24, 40, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this measure at any time point. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated at specific time points for each arm, respectively. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 84 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 400 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 243 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 561 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesBaseline1 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 561 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesBaseline0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 81 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 241 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesWeek 400 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site Reactions

The injection and infusion site reactions were assessed based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after administration (not related to needle insertion pain) of subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 for intravenous infusion; Week 24, 32, 40, 56, 64 for subcutaneous injection

Population: ITT analysis set. Data was not analyzed at Week 64 for SC injection since safety assessment was only required for 16 weeks after treatment discontinuation due to clinical hold.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsBaseline: Infusion site7 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 4: Infusion site0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 8: Infusion site5 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 16: Infusion site4 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 24: Infusion site0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 32: Infusion site0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 24: Injection site2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 32: Injection site0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 40: Injection site0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 56: Injection site0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 32: Injection site2 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsBaseline: Infusion site7 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 32: Infusion site0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 4: Infusion site0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 56: Injection site0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 8: Infusion site5 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 24: Injection site4 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 16: Infusion site5 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 40: Injection site0 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Injection and Infusion Site ReactionsWeek 24: Infusion site0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication

Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of tanezumab received.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 56

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IV or SC study medication during this study, A4091039 (NCT00924664).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 159 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 293 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 3169 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 40 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 50 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 171 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 28 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 31 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 37 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 1102 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 51 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 2145 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 242 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 3276 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of SC Doses: 1111 Participants
Tanezumab 20 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous and Subcutaneous Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 43 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026