Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of Alendronate for Bone Mineral Density in HIV-infected Children and Adolescents

Impact of Oral Alendronate Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in HIV-infected Children and Adolescents With Low Bone Mineral Density

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00921557
Enrollment
52
Registered
2009-06-16
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2021-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infection

Keywords

Bone mineral density

Brief summary

HIV-infected children, youth, and adults have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than would be expected for HIV-uninfected people of similar age, weight and race. As the majority of perinatally HIV-infected U.S. children are entering or in adolescence, the potential for HIV-related impaired BMD during the adolescent peak of bone mass acquisition is of particular concern. The primary purpose of this study was to compare changes from pre-treatment levels of BMD of the lumbar spine after 24 and 48 weeks of alendronate treatment with placebo in HIV-infected children and adolescents.

Detailed description

Puberty is a time when the foundation is laid for healthy bone mass. Over the course of puberty, 26% of bone mass is established in the 4-year period of peak height velocity and up to 60% of adult peak bone mass is established. Factors that affect normal bone mineralization include calcium intake, vitamin D status, degree of physical and weight bearing activities, hormones, genetics, body weight, and general health and nutrition status. HIV-infected children, youth, and adults have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than would be expected for healthy people of similar age, weight, and race. As the majority of perinatally HIV-infected U.S. children are entering or in adolescence, the potential for HIV-related impaired BMD during the adolescent peak of bone mass acquisition is of particular concern. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in BMD of the lumbar spine from pre-treatment levels to 24 and 48 weeks after alendronate treatment or placebo in HIV-infected children and adolescents. Participants were randomized equally into one of three groups: Group 1A received alendronate for 96 weeks; Group 1B received alendronate for 48 weeks followed by placebo for 48 weeks; Group 2 received placebo for 48 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks. All three groups were followed off treatment for an additional 48 weeks. Participants also received vitamin D/calcium for the duration of the study and were asked to perform 60 minutes of weight-bearing exercise each day. Clinic visits were scheduled every 12 weeks after entry, with telephone contact visits one, four, and 28 weeks after entry and the week 48 visit. A physical exam and dental assessment was conducted at each clinic visit, and a history of adverse events collected. Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), hematology and chemistry panels were conducted at entry and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144. Lumbar spine and whole body (with head) BMD was measured using Hologic DXA scanners (QDR4500A, QDR4500W or Delphi A models). The primary analysis compared changes from entry to 24 and 48 weeks in lumbar spine BMD between Groups 1A and 1B combined (both on alendronate for initial 48 weeks) vs. Group 2 (on placebo for 48 weeks). Study participants were unblinded after 96 weeks of follow-up (the primary completion date) but remained on study, off study treatment, for an additional 48 weeks. Secondary laboratory outcomes listed in the protocol (bone marker turnover and Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand/Osteoprotegerin (RANKL/OPG) Ratio) and central fat content, which required application for additional funding for laboratory testing, will not be performed and no results will be available.

Interventions

DRUGAlendronate

Oral tablet taken once weekly: 70 mg if participant greater than 30 kg or 35 mg if participant less than or equal to 30 kg

DRUGPlacebo

Oral tablet taken once weekly

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium carbonate/vitamin D

Tablet taken once or twice daily: calcium carbonate (600 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) once daily for participants with 25-OH-vitamin D levels greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL or twice daily for those with 25-OH-vitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(Version 2.0 of protocol): * Documentation of HIV-1 infection * HIV-infection acquired before puberty * For participants receiving antiretroviral therapy, must have been on the same antiretroviral agents for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry and have a viral load less than 10,000 copies/mL. For participants not receiving antiretroviral therapy, must have not been on antiretroviral agents for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry and have no indication for therapy * Lumbar spine DXA BMD z-score less than -1.5 or history of fragility fracture within the prior 12 months (regardless of DXA result). * Available for routine dental exam and care every 6 months * Demonstrated ability and willingness to swallow study medications * Females of reproductive potential must have had a negative pregnancy test at screening and within 48 hours prior to study entry. They must also have agreed to avoid pregnancy while on the study and if engaging in sexual activity, use at least two forms of contraception. * Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide signed informed consent for children who could not provide consent for themselves.

Exclusion criteria

(Version 2.0 of protocol): * Body weight more than 300 lbs. * For female participants: if on Depo-Provera, they must have been on it for at least 1 year prior to study entry; if not on Depa-Provera, they must have not been on it for at least 1 year prior to study entry. * Anticonvulsant therapy * Proven growth hormone deficiency * Use of growth hormone in the 12 months prior to entry * Primary hyperparathyroidism * Hypoparathyroidism * Renal failure * Cushing syndrome * Active dental infection * Dental or periodontal disease expected to require more than basic restorative care * Pregnancy or lactation * Esophageal or gastric ulcer, chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, or aspirin use * Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): if on TDF, they must have been on it for at least 6 months prior to study entry; if not on TDF, they must have not been on it for at least 6 months prior to study entry. * Hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL * Any past pharmacologic treatment (except vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation) for low bone density * Inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes * Hypersensitivity to any component of alendronate * Hypocalcemia (less than the lower limit of normal established by the local laboratory in which it was performed) * Known abnormalities of the esophagus that delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia * 25-OH vitamin D less than 10 ng/mL in combination with elevated intact PTH above the upper limit of normal for the local laboratory in which it was performed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeeks 0, 24 and 48Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Results for Groups 1A and 1B combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Developing New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 0 to 48Signs, symptoms, and laboratory values were graded using the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0 (December 2004). Results for Groups 1A and 1B were combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeeks 0 and 96Percent change was calculated as (measurement at week 96 - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Includes Groups 1A and 1B only.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 0 and 96Percent change was calculated as (measurement at week 96 - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Includes Groups 1A and 1B only.
Safety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeeks 0 to 144Signs, symptoms, and laboratory values were graded using the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0 (December 2004).
Effect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDWeeks 0, 24 and 48A slope was fit for each participant to their percent change \[(measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline)\*100%\] in lumbar spine BMD from baseline. Results represent average changes in lumbar spine BMD over one year. Results are summarized for age, gender, ethnicity, tenofovir use, Tanner stage, bone age and vitamin D level. Only one participant was on steroids and none were using Dep-Provera. Inflammatory cytokine levels were not assayed. Results were combined for Groups 1A and 1B as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.
Effect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Weeks 0, 24 and 48A slope was fit for each participant to their percent change \[(measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline)\*100%\] in whole body (with head) BMD from baseline. Results represent average changes in whole body (with head) BMD over one year. Results are summarized for age, gender, ethnicity, tenofovir use, Tanner stage, bone age and vitamin D level. Only one participant was on steroids and none were using Dep-Provera. Inflammatory cytokine levels were not assayed. Results were combined for Groups 1A and 1B as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.
Percent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 48, 96 and 144Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T2 - measurement at time T2)/measurement at time T1 \* 100%.
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Bone Marker TurnoverWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Correlation of Changes in Bone Marker Turnover With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Percent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Lumbar Spine BMDWeeks 48, 96 and 144Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T2 - measurement at time T1)/measurement at Time T1 \* 100%.
Correlation of Changes in RANKL/OPG Ratio With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Central Fat ContentWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Correlation of Changes in Central Fat Content With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Percent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeeks 0, 48, 96 and 144Percent calculated as number of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<= 400 copies/ml relative to the number of participants with HIV-1 RNA measured at that time point.
Change in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeeks 0, 48, 96 and 144Change in percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells calculated as measurement at each time point minus baseline measurement
Change in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeeks 144Percentage of participants advancing in CDC HIV disease category from baseline throughout study follow-up
Percent of Participants With Detectable Urinary AlendronateWeeks 48, 96 and 144Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand/Osteoprotegerin (RANKL/OPG) RatioWeeks 0 and 48Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeeks 0, 24 and 48Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Results for Groups 1A and 1B were combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Countries

Brazil, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Fifty-two (52) study participants were recruited between November 5, 2009 and March 27, 2014, at 10 study sites: 8 in the United States and 2 in Brazil.

Pre-assignment details

Children and adolescents were randomly assigned to 3 treatment sequence groups. Two participants were enrolled, but because their baseline lumbar spine bone mineral density z-score was greater than -1.5 at their baseline visit, they never started study treatment and were taken off the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1A: Alendronate/Alendronate
Participants received alendronate for 96 weeks
15
1B: Alendronate/Placebo
Participants received alendronate for 48 weeks followed by placebo for 48 weeks
17
2: Placebo/Alendronate
Participants received placebo for 48 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks
18
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Weeks 0-48 (on Study Treatment)Baseline lumbar spine > -1.5200
Weeks 48-96 (on Study Treatment)Became a ward of the state001
Weeks 48-96 (on Study Treatment)Site Closure010
Weeks 96-144 (Off Study Treatment)Not able to attend clinic211
Weeks 96-144 (Off Study Treatment)Site closure100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal1A: Alendronate/Alendronate2: Placebo/Alendronate1B: Alendronate/Placebo
25-OH Vitamin D (ng/mL)
10 - < 20
6 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
25-OH Vitamin D (ng/mL)
20 - < 30
21 Participants7 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
25-OH Vitamin D (ng/mL)
>= 30
23 Participants7 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous16 years16 years16 years16 years
Age, Customized
11 - < 15 years
17 Participants7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
15 - < 19 years
23 Participants6 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 19 years
10 Participants2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Bone age15 years14 years15 years16 years
CD4 cell count (cells/mm^3)
>= 1000
12 Participants2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
CD4 cell count (cells/mm^3)
200 - <500
8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
CD4 cell count (cells/mm^3)
500 - < 1000
30 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
CDC HIV disease category
A/1
4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
CDC HIV disease category
B/2
8 Participants2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
CDC HIV disease category
C/3
38 Participants13 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/ml)
<= 400
41 Participants10 Participants15 Participants16 Participants
HIV-1 RNA (copies/ml)
>400
9 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm^2)0.70 g/cm^20.64 g/cm^20.66 g/cm^20.73 g/cm^2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black non-Hispanic
7 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (regardless of race)
36 Participants10 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White non-Hispanic
7 Participants3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
29 Participants9 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants6 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants10 Participants13 Participants11 Participants
Smoker
No
47 Participants15 Participants17 Participants15 Participants
Smoker
Yes
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Tanner stage
1
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Tanner stage
2
7 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Tanner stage
3
8 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Tanner stage
4
15 Participants1 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Tanner stage
5
17 Participants5 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Use of tenofovir
No
27 Participants8 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
Use of tenofovir
Yes
23 Participants7 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Whole body (with head) BMD (g/cm^2)0.87 g/cm^20.87 g/cm^20.86 g/cm^20.91 g/cm^2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 170 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1517 / 1718 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 152 / 173 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Developing New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing Fractures

Signs, symptoms, and laboratory values were graded using the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0 (December 2004). Results for Groups 1A and 1B were combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Time frame: Week 0 to 48

Population: All participants who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1: AlendronatePercentage of Participants Developing New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing Fractures5 Participants
2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Developing New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing Fractures2 Participants
Comparison: Comparison of percentage of participants experiencing primary safety outcomep-value: >0.99Fisher Exact
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Results for Groups 1A and 1B combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 24 and 48

Population: Includes all participants who started study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeek 2414.4 Percent change from baseline
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeek 4815.9 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeek 245.5 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Lumbar Spine BMDWeek 487.1 Percent change from baseline
Comparison: Comparison of percent change from baseline to week 24p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison of percent change from baseline to week 48p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Bone Marker Turnover

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Central Fat Content

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand/Osteoprotegerin (RANKL/OPG) Ratio

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Change in CD4 Percent From Baseline

Change in percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells calculated as measurement at each time point minus baseline measurement

Time frame: Weeks 0, 48, 96 and 144

Population: Participants who started study treatment and had CD4 percent available at week 0.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 144 - Week 01 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
1: AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 48 - Week 00 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
1: AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 96 - Week 00 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: PlaceboChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 144 - Week 0-1 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: PlaceboChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 96 - Week 0-1 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: PlaceboChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 48 - Week 01 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 144 - Week 0-4 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 96 - Week 02 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in CD4 Percent From BaselineWeek 48 - Week 01 percent of lymphocytes that are CD4 cell
Secondary

Change in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease Category

Percentage of participants advancing in CDC HIV disease category from baseline throughout study follow-up

Time frame: Weeks 144

Population: Participants who started study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1: AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 48 to 960 Participants
1: AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 0 to 481 Participants
1: AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 96 to 1440 Participants
2: PlaceboChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 48 to 961 Participants
2: PlaceboChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 0 to 480 Participants
2: PlaceboChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 96 to 1440 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 0 to 480 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 96 to 1440 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateChange in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HIV Disease CategoryWeek 48 to 960 Participants
Secondary

Correlation of Changes in Bone Marker Turnover With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Correlation of Changes in Central Fat Content With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Correlation of Changes in RANKL/OPG Ratio With Changes in Lumbar Spine and Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 48

Secondary

Effect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD

A slope was fit for each participant to their percent change \[(measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline)\*100%\] in lumbar spine BMD from baseline. Results represent average changes in lumbar spine BMD over one year. Results are summarized for age, gender, ethnicity, tenofovir use, Tanner stage, bone age and vitamin D level. Only one participant was on steroids and none were using Dep-Provera. Inflammatory cytokine levels were not assayed. Results were combined for Groups 1A and 1B as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 24 and 48

Population: Participants who started study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDOn Tenofovir24.8 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD25-0H Vit D>=30 ng/ml22.1 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDNot on Tenofovir19.9 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDHispanic23.6 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD25-OH Vit D<30 ng/ml22.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD11 - < 15 years37.1 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDFemale25.4 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDBone age < 15 years36.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD15 - < 19 years16.5 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDBone age>=15 years11.3 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDMale20.3 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDTanner stage <= 333.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD>= 19 years8.1 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDTanner stage >= 415.4 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDNon-hispanic19.4 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDTanner stage >= 45.9 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDMale6.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDFemale9.4 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDNon-hispanic4.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD11 - < 15 years10.6 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD15 - < 19 years8.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD>= 19 years1.9 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDOn Tenofovir6.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDNot on Tenofovir8.2 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD25-OH Vit D<30 ng/ml6.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMD25-0H Vit D>=30 ng/ml7.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDBone age < 15 years10.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDBone age>=15 years5.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDTanner stage <= 310.6 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Lumbar Spine BMDHispanic7.8 percentage of baseline
Secondary

Effect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.

A slope was fit for each participant to their percent change \[(measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline)\*100%\] in whole body (with head) BMD from baseline. Results represent average changes in whole body (with head) BMD over one year. Results are summarized for age, gender, ethnicity, tenofovir use, Tanner stage, bone age and vitamin D level. Only one participant was on steroids and none were using Dep-Provera. Inflammatory cytokine levels were not assayed. Results were combined for Groups 1A and 1B as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 24 and 48

Population: Participants who started study treatment and had Whole Body (with head) available at week 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.25-0H Vit D>=30 ng/ml15.1 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Male11.4 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Female14.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Non-Hispanic9.8 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Hispanic13.9 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.11 - < 15 years19.2 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.15 - < 19 years10.5 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.>= 19 years4.7 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.On tenofovir13.2 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Not on tenofovir11.6 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.25-0H Vit D<30 ng/ml10.6 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Bone age < 15 years19.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Bone age >=15 years7.7 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Tanner stage <= 318.0 percentage of baseline
1: AlendronateEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Tanner stage >= 49.4 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Bone age < 15 years8.4 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.On tenofovir5.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Male4.1 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Tanner stage <= 38.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Female8.2 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Not on tenofovir5.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Non-Hispanic0.3 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Bone age >=15 years2.3 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Hispanic6.1 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.25-0H Vit D<30 ng/ml5.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.11 - < 15 years8.0 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.25-0H Vit D>=30 ng/ml5.2 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.15 - < 19 years6.5 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.Tanner stage >= 43.8 percentage of baseline
2: PlaceboEffect of Other Known Bone Mineral Determinants (Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Steroid Use, Depo-Provera, Tenofovir, Pubertal Stage, Bone Age, Vitamin D Status) and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels on Changes in Whole Body (With Head) BMD.>= 19 years-0.3 percentage of baseline
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Lumbar Spine BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at week 96 - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Includes Groups 1A and 1B only.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 96

Population: Includes all participants who started study treatment and had measurements available at weeks 0 and 96

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Lumbar Spine BMD24.9 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Lumbar Spine BMD14.8 Percent change from baseline
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at week 96 - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Includes Groups 1A and 1B only.

Time frame: Weeks 0 and 96

Population: Includes all participants who started study treatment and had measurements available at weeks 0 and 96

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Whole Body (With Head) BMD19.6 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Whole Body (With Head) BMD10.3 Percent change from baseline
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T - measurement at baseline)/measurement at baseline \* 100%. Results for Groups 1A and 1B were combined as both were on alendronate for the first 48 weeks.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 24 and 48

Population: Participants who started treatment and had Whole Body (with head) BMD available at week 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeek 245.5 Percent change from baseline
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeek 4810.7 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeek 240.3 Percent change from baseline
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in Whole Body (With Head) BMDWeek 485.2 Percent change from baseline
Secondary

Percent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Lumbar Spine BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T2 - measurement at time T1)/measurement at Time T1 \* 100%.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96 and 144

Population: All participants who started study treatment and had measurements available at the two time points of interest

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Lumbar Spine BMD0.9 Percent change
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Lumbar Spine BMD2.0 Percent change
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Lumbar Spine BMD1.7 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Whole Body (With Head) BMD

Percent change was calculated as (measurement at time T2 - measurement at time T2)/measurement at time T1 \* 100%.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96 and 144

Population: All participants who started study treatment and had measurements available at both time points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1: AlendronatePercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Whole Body (With Head) BMD0.8 Percent change
2: PlaceboPercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Whole Body (With Head) BMD0.5 Percent change
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent Change From Week 48 to Week 96 (Group 1B), Week 48 to Week 144 (Group 1B), and Week 96 to 144 (Group 2) in Whole Body (With Head) BMD0.9 Percent change
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Detectable Urinary Alendronate

Outcome measure required additional funding for laboratory testing which was not available, so this outcome is not reported.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96 and 144

Secondary

Percent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/ml

Percent calculated as number of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<= 400 copies/ml relative to the number of participants with HIV-1 RNA measured at that time point.

Time frame: Weeks 0, 48, 96 and 144

Population: Participants who started study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1: AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 010 Participants
1: AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 4810 Participants
1: AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 9612 Participants
1: AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 14410 Participants
2: PlaceboPercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 14410 Participants
2: PlaceboPercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 016 Participants
2: PlaceboPercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 9612 Participants
2: PlaceboPercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 4816 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 14410 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 4814 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 9613 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronatePercent of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <= 400 Copies/mlWeek 015 Participants
Secondary

Safety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing Fractures

Signs, symptoms, and laboratory values were graded using the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0 (December 2004).

Time frame: Weeks 0 to 144

Population: All participants who started treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1: AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 48 to 961 Participants
1: AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 96 to 1443 Participants
1: AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 0 to 482 Participants
2: PlaceboSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 0 to 483 Participants
2: PlaceboSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 48 to 963 Participants
2: PlaceboSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 96 to 1444 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 0 to 482 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 96 to 1443 Participants
2: Placebo/AlendronateSafety as Measured by the Incidence of New Signs, Symptoms, Hematology or Chemistry Laboratory Values Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 or New Cases of Jaw Osteonecrosis, Atrial Fibrillation, or Non-healing FracturesWeek 48 to 962 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026