Skip to content

Pharmacodynamics of Tafluprost 0.0015% Eye Drops: a Comparison Between the Preserved and Unpreserved Formulation

Pharmacodynamics of Tafluprost 0.0015% Eye Drops: a Comparison Between the Preserved and Unpreserved Formulation in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00918346
Enrollment
43
Registered
2009-06-11
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2006-04-30
Last updated
2010-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Hypertension, Open-Angle Glaucoma

Keywords

Ocular hypertension

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the pharmacodynamics (as expressed in intraocular pressure \[IOP\]) of two formulations of tafluprost 0.0015% eyedrops (preserved and unpreserved) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The primary aim of this study is to show that IOP reduction between the two formulations is equivalent at the end of the 4 week treatment period.

Interventions

Eye drops, 0.015 mg/ml, once daily to affected eye(s)

Sponsors

Santen Oy
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or more * A diagnosis of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension * Prior use of prostaglandin(s) * Intra ocular pressure of 22-34 mmHg in at least one eye

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy, or females of childbearing potential who are not using a reliable method of contraception * Previous participation in any clinical trial in which tafluprost was an investigational drug or use of contact lenses at screening or during the study * Presence of any abnormality or significant illness that could be expected to interfere with the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 1Week 1IOPs at week 1: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)
Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Intention to Treat Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)Baseline - Week 4Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.
Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Per Protocol Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)Baseline - Week 4Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurments analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.
Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at BaselineBaselineIOPs at baseline: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)
Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 4Week 4IOPs at week 4: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4Baseline - Week 4The time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 4 (IOP value at given timepoint at 4 weeks minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.
Overall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Baseline - Week 1The overall and time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 1 (diurnal IOP and IOP value at given timepoint at 1 week minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.

Countries

Finland, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

At 2 centers in Germany, 1 center in Finland: 14 September 2005 first patient screened 08 November 2005 first patient randomized 05 April 2006 last patient completed

Pre-assignment details

A total of 45 patients screened and 43 patients randomized. 2 screening failure patients: 1 withdrawn consent and 1 too low IOP (inclusion criterion 4).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Includes all 43 randomized patients (86 eyes)
43
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Treatment Period (4 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age Continuous65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Central corneal thickness
Left eye
547.0 micrometer
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.4
Central corneal thickness
Right eye
548.7 micrometer
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.8
Diagnosis - worse eyes
Capsular Glaucoma
3 eyes
Diagnosis - worse eyes
Ocular Hypertension
12 eyes
Diagnosis - worse eyes
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
28 eyes
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
43 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 4211 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 420 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline

IOPs at baseline: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline8 o'clock22.57 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.04
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline12 o'clock20.86 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.79
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline16 o'clock21.73 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.19
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline20 o'clock21.77 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.02
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline20 o'clock21.81 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.61
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline8 o'clock22.98 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.18
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline16 o'clock21.51 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.49
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline12 o'clock21.78 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.68
Primary

Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 1

IOPs at week 1: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)

Time frame: Week 1

Population: IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 18 o'clock16.43 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.11
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 120 o'clock16.26 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.2
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 112 o'clock15.77 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.6
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 116 o'clock16.23 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.73
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 18 o'clock16.21 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.7
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 116 o'clock15.83 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.99
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 112 o'clock15.72 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.92
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 120 o'clock16.16 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.08
Primary

Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 4

IOPs at week 4: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)

Time frame: Week 4

Population: IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 48 o'clock16.39 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.43
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 412 o'clock16.30 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.46
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 416 o'clock16.64 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.37
Preserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 420 o'clock17.21 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.91
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 420 o'clock17.01 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.44
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 48 o'clock16.80 mmHgStandard Deviation 3
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 416 o'clock16.71 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.53
Unpreserved FormulationIntraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 412 o'clock16.67 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.54
Primary

Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Intention to Treat Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)

Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.

Time frame: Baseline - Week 4

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT): randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Preserved FormulationPrimary Pharmacodynamic Variable Intention to Treat Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)0.01 mmHg
Comparison: H1 (the alternative hypothesis aimed to be proven): the unpreserved formulation is equivalent with the preserved formulationp-value: 0.9695% CI: [-0.46, 0.49]ANCOVA
Primary

Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Per Protocol Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)

Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurments analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.

Time frame: Baseline - Week 4

Population: Per Protocol (PP): randomized patients who completed the study per protocol (i.e. excluded from PP is the discontinued patient and a patient with major protocol violation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Preserved FormulationPrimary Pharmacodynamic Variable Per Protocol Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye)-0.05 mmHg
Comparison: H1 (the alternative hypothesis aimed to be proven): the unpreserved formulation is equivalent with the preserved formulationp-value: 0.8395% CI: [-0.52, 0.42]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4

The time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 4 (IOP value at given timepoint at 4 weeks minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.

Time frame: Baseline - Week 4

Population: ITT: randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Preserved FormulationChange From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4Timepoint 8:000.24 mmHg
Preserved FormulationChange From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4Timepoint 12:000.11 mmHg
Preserved FormulationChange From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4Timepoint 16:000.00 mmHg
Preserved FormulationChange From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4Timepoint 20:00-0.30 mmHg
Secondary

Overall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1

The overall and time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 1 (diurnal IOP and IOP value at given timepoint at 1 week minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.

Time frame: Baseline - Week 1

Population: ITT: randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Preserved FormulationOverall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Timepoint 8:00-0.32 mmHg
Preserved FormulationOverall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Overall-0.27 mmHg
Preserved FormulationOverall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Timepoint 12:00-0.25 mmHg
Preserved FormulationOverall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Timepoint 16:00-0.39 mmHg
Preserved FormulationOverall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1Timepoint 20:00-0.13 mmHg

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026