Skip to content

Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh

STOMAMESH Prospective Randomised Multicenter Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00917995
Acronym
STOMAMESH
Enrollment
241
Registered
2009-06-11
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2015-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parastomal Hernia

Keywords

parastomal hernia, prophylactic mesh, colostomy, hernia

Brief summary

Specific aim: To compare patients with colostomies with or without mesh at the primary operation. Primary endpoint is the incidence of parastomal hernia requiring surgery. All patients at participating centers scheduled for permanent colostomy, after signing informed consent and meeting inclusion criteria, will be randomised to formation of a stoma with or without mesh. If the inclusion criteria is fulfilled and informed consent is signed, the patient is randomised preoperatively.

Detailed description

Parastomal hernia is a relatively common and troublesome complication in patients with a stoma. The exact incidence is not known and depending on definitions and if a bulging is a hernia or not, as well as when after the operation the examination is performed, the incidence varies between 0-48%. A parastomal hernia may give the patient difficulties with appliance and leakage. From an economical point of view a stoma that requires special kinds of appliances is expensive. Theoretically, strengthening of the abdominal wall with a mesh at the the primary operation would reduce the risk for parastomal hernia. Recently presented data suggest that a mesh at the primary operation really does reduce the risk to develop a parastomal hernia. No negative side effects with the use of a mesh have been reported in these studies. All earlier studies have involved relatively small numbers of patients and short times of observation, and therefore under-dimensioned concerning potential negative late side-effects. Complications seen in other studies where mesh has been used in surgery of the bowel include fistulas and infections among others. To understand if mesh at the primary operation, in a safe way, reduces the risk for developing parastomal hernia compared to conventional surgery, is important to perform this new prospective randomised multicenter trial. Specific aim: To compare patients with colostomies with or without mesh at the primary operation. Primary endpoint is the incidence of parastomal hernia requiring surgery. All patients at participating centers scheduled for permanent colostomy, after signing informed consent and meeting inclusion criteria, will be randomised to formation of a stoma with or without mesh. If the inclusion criteria is fulfilled and informed consent is signed, the patient is randomised preoperatively.

Interventions

DEVICEPolypropylene Mesh, density 25-40g/square meter

colostomy with a prophylactic hernia mesh

Sponsors

Norrbottens Lans Landsting
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is scheduled for permanent colostomy elective or acute operation. The optimal site for stoma is marked preoperatively. * No previous stoma. * Over the age of 18. * Informed consent signed by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

* Expected lifetime less then 3 years. * Fecal peritonitis (perforated bowel with free intestinal content in the peritoneal cavity). * Previous stoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of parastomal hernias in the two groups at 12 and 36 months postoperativelyAt 12 and 36 months postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life related to healthAt 12 and 36 months postoperatively
The health care systems total cost related to the stomaAt 12 and 36 months postoperatively
Rate of infections 30 days postoperativelyAt 30 days postoperatively
Late complication related to the mesh leading to surgeryAt 12 and 36 months postoperatively

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026