Skip to content

SPIRIT PRIME Clinical Trial

SPIRIT PRIME Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00916370
Acronym
SPIRIT PRIME
Enrollment
525
Registered
2009-06-09
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Restenosis, Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

drug eluting stents, stents, Angioplasty, myocardial ischemia, coronary artery stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Restenosis, Long lesion

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the XIENCE PRIME and XIENCE PRIME Long Lesion (LL) Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) in improving coronary luminal diameter in subjects with symptomatic heart disease due to a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions, each in a different epicardial vessel.

Interventions

DEVICECore size Xience Prime

Core size includes a range of stent sizes.

DEVICEXience Prime Long Lesion (LL)

Long lesion stent sizes include a range of sizes.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject must be at least 18 years of age. 2. Subject or a legally authorized representative must provide written informed consent prior to any study related procedure, per site requirements. 3. Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia). 4. Subject must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. 5. Subject must agree to undergo all protocol-required follow-up procedures. 6. Subject must agree not to participate in any other clinical study for a period of one year following the index procedure. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 1. One or two de novo target lesions each in a different epicardial vessel. 2. If there are two target lesions, both lesions must satisfy the angiographic eligibility criteria for that registry. o Multiple focal de novo lesions in a target vessel that can be covered by a single stent are allowed. 3. The target lesion(s) must be located in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% and \< 100% with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1. 4. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with reference vessel diameter (RVD) by visual estimation of: * ≥ 2.25 mm and ≤ 4.25 mm for treatment by the core size XIENCE PRIME EECS * ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.25 mm for treatment by the XIENCE PRIME LL EECS 5. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with length by visual estimation of: * ≤ 22 mm for treatment by the core size XIENCE PRIME EECS * \> 22 mm and ≤ 32 mm for treatment by the XIENCE PRIME LL EECS

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has had a known diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) preceding the index procedure (CK-MB ≥ 2 times upper limit of normal) and CK and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of procedure. 2. The subject is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI, such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain with ischemic ECG changes. 3. Subject has current unstable cardiac arrhythmias associated with hemodynamic instability. 4. Subject has a known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30% (LVEF may be obtained at the time of the index procedure if the value is unknown and if necessary). 5. Subject has received coronary brachytherapy in any epicardial vessel (target or non target). 6. Subject has received any organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant. 7. Subject is receiving or scheduled to receive chemotherapy for malignancy within 30 days prior to or within one year after the index procedure. 8. Subject is receiving or scheduled to receive planned radiotherapy to the chest/mediastinum. 9. Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus etc.). 10. Subject is receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., heparin, coumadin). 11. Subject will require Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) post-procedure. 12. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, everolimus, cobalt, chromium, nickel, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 13. Elective surgery is planned within 12 months after the procedure that will require discontinuing either aspirin or clopidogrel. 14. Subject has a platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3 or \> 700,000 cells/mm3, a white blood cell (WBC) of \< 3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis). 15. Subject has known renal insufficiency (examples being but not limited to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 ml/kg/m2, serum creatinine level ≥ 2.5 mg/dL, or on dialysis). 16. Subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions. 17. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident/stroke or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months. 18. Subject has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. 19. Subject has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion. 20. Subject has other medical illness (e.g., cancer or congestive heart failure) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (i.e., less than one year). 21. Subject is currently participating in another clinical study that has not yet completed its primary endpoint. 22. Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)1 yearThe composite rate of: Cardiac Death Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) and Clinically Indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) per protocol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Success (Lesion Basis)From the start of index procedure to end of index procedureDevice success is defined as achievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \< 50% (by QCA).
Procedural Success (Subject Basis)From the start of index procedure to end of index procedureProcedure success is defined as achievement of a final in-stent diameter stenosis of \< 50% (by QCA). Per Protocol.
All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)In-hospital is less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure.Per Protocol
Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedurePer Protocol
Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion RevascularizationIn-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
Procedure TimeFrom insertion to withdrawal of guide catheterProcedure time is defined as time between insertion and withdrawal of guide catheter.
All TVR (CI and Non-CI)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
Cardiac Death/All MIIn-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure
Cardiac Death/ All MI30 daysPer Protocol
Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLRin-hospital
All Death/All MI/All Coronary RevascularizationIn-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedurePer Protocol
Stent ThrombosisAcute (≤1 day)Per protocol and per Academic Research Consortium (ARC, definite/probable)
All TLR (CI and Non-CI)In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Countries

Australia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects enrolled into this trial will be male and female subjects from the general interventional cardiology population. The study commenced on June 5, 2009 with the first subject enrolled on June 15, 2009. The last subject in the CSR was enrolled February 12, 2010, and the last subject enrolled in LLR was on April 6, 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Intention-to-treat (ITT) set includes 525 subjects: 415 in core size registry (CSR) arm and 110 in long lesion registry (LLR) arm. Full analysis set (FAS) (n=505, 401 in CSR arm and 104 in LLR arm) includes subjects who have received at least 1 of the following: the core size XIENCE PRIME or XIENCE PRIME LL stent system, including bailout.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Core Size Registry
Core size indicates the range of diameters of the stents used.
401
Long Lesion Registry
Use of long lesion stents.
104
Total505

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath31
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCore Size RegistryLong Lesion RegistryTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
167 Participants48 Participants215 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
234 Participants56 Participants290 Participants
Age, Continuous62.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23
63.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.44
62.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
Region of Enrollment
Australia
25 participants8 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
376 participants96 participants472 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
119 Participants39 Participants158 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
282 Participants65 Participants347 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
222 / 41251 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
203 / 41249 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

The composite rate of: Cardiac Death Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) and Clinically Indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) per protocol.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)4.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)7.7 percentage of participants
Primary

Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

The composite rate of: Cardiac Death Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) and Clinically Indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) per protocol.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)6.4 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)9.6 percentage of participants
Primary

Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

The composite rate of: Cardiac Death Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) and Clinically Indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) per protocol.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)8.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Lesion Failure (TLF)9.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)6.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)8.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)4.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)6.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)1.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)3.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)14.9 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)14.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)10.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Coronary Revascularization (TVR and Non-TVR)13.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization19 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization20.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization13.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization20.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization9.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization14.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization7.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization11.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization3.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization8.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization

Per Protocol

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization2.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death/All MI/All Coronary Revascularization5.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)3.1 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)2.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)2.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)2.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)

Time frame: In-hospital is less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)5.6 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)4.3 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)2.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)2.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)2.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TLR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)0.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TLR (CI and Non-CI)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)3.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)3.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)10 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)7.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)1.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)4.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

All TVR (CI and Non-CI)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)7.1 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryAll TVR (CI and Non-CI)7.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI

Per Protocol

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI1.7 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/All MI

Per Protocol

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/All MI2.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/All MI4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/All MI

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/All MI1.7 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/All MI4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/All MI

Per Protocol

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/All MI2.6 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/All MI5.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/All MI

Per Protocol

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/All MI2.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/All MI4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/All MI

Per Protocol

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/All MI3.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/All MI5.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Per Protocol

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR3.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR6.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Per Protocol

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR2.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR5.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Per Protocol

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR9.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR10.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Per Protocol

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR6.6 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR10.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Per Protocol

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR4.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR7.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR

Time frame: in-hospital

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR2.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryCardiac Death/ All MI/CI-TLR5.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization4.1 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization0.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization5.4 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization1.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization2.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated-Target Lesion Revascularization2.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)4.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)9.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)7.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)6.9 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)7.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)1.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)1.2 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)3.3 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryClinically Indicated Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR = TLR and Non-TLR in TV)3.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Device Success (Lesion Basis)

Device success is defined as achievement of a final in-stent residual diameter stenosis of \< 50% (by QCA).

Time frame: From the start of index procedure to end of index procedure

Population: The analysis was done to include only subjects with post index procedure cardiac enzyme data in window (between 8 hours post index procedure and hospital discharge). Therefore, the final analysis contained 403 ITT CSR subjects and 106 ITT LLR subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryDevice Success (Lesion Basis)98.2 percentage of lesions
Long Lesion RegistryDevice Success (Lesion Basis)97.6 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.3 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Non-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)0.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryNon-target Vessel MI (Q-wave, Non Q-wave)1.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Procedural Success (Subject Basis)

Procedure success is defined as achievement of a final in-stent diameter stenosis of \< 50% (by QCA). Per Protocol.

Time frame: From the start of index procedure to end of index procedure

Population: The analysis was done to include only subjects with post index procedure cardiac enzyme data in window (between 8 hours post index procedure and hospital discharge). Out of these subjects, 2 in the CSR and 1 in the LLR did not have QCA data and therefore were excluded. So, the final analysis contained 401 ITT CSR subjects and 105 ITT LLR subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryProcedural Success (Subject Basis)97.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryProcedural Success (Subject Basis)94.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Procedure Time

Procedure time is defined as time between insertion and withdrawal of guide catheter.

Time frame: From insertion to withdrawal of guide catheter

Population: The analysis was done to include only subjects with post index procedure cardiac enzyme data in window (between 8 hours post index procedure and hospital discharge). Therefore, the final analysis contained 403 ITT CSR subjects and 106 ITT LLR subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Size RegistryProcedure Time32.6 MinutesStandard Deviation 21.1
Long Lesion RegistryProcedure Time46.9 MinutesStandard Deviation 30.9
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per ARC, definite and probable

Time frame: Overall (0 - 1123 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per ARC, definite and probable

Time frame: Very Late (394 - 758 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol

Time frame: Late (31 - 1123 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol and per ARC

Time frame: Overall (0-393 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.5 percentage of participants
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol

Time frame: Overall (0-758 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per ARC, definite and probable

Time frame: Overall (0-758 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol

Time frame: Overall (0 - 1123 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis1.1 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol and per Academic Research Consortium (ARC, definite/probable)

Time frame: Acute (≤1 day)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.5 percentage of participants
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol and per ARC

Time frame: Subacute (>1 - 30 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol and per ARC

Time frame: Acute/Subacute (0 - 30 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.5 percentage of participants
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.5 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol and per ARC

Time frame: Late (31 - 393 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Core Size RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer ARC0.0 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent ThrombosisPer Protocol0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per protocol

Time frame: Late (31 - 758 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.3 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Stent Thrombosis

Per ARC, definite and probable

Time frame: Very Late (394 - 1123 days)

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryStent Thrombosis0.3 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryStent Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 180 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)1.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)1.7 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: In-hospital is defined as hospitalization less than or equal to 7 days post index procedure.

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)1.7 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)1.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)2.6 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)

Per Protocol

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants analyzed is based on FAS population, defined as subjects who have received the investigational study device and excludes subjects who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as subjects who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any DMR event (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Core Size RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)1.8 percentage of participants
Long Lesion RegistryTarget Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) - Q-wave and Non Q-wave (Defined as MI Not Clearly Attributable to a Non-target Vessel)4.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026