Skip to content

Skeletal Versus Cutaneous Traction For Treatment of Femur Fractures

Evaluation of Skeletal Versus Cutaneous Traction for Diaphyseal Femur Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00916136
Enrollment
66
Registered
2009-06-09
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femur Fracture

Keywords

Pre-operative Traction, Traction, Proximal Femur Fracture, Femoral Fractures, Femoral Fracture, Skeletal Traction, Cutaneous Traction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are any differences in skeletal or cutaneous traction for the treatment of femur fractures.

Detailed description

Diaphyseal femur fractures are a common occurrence in busy level one trauma centers and even in the age of damage control orthopaedics most of these fractures are fixed definitively within 24 hours. The historical method of temporizing these fractures has been to place a distal femoral or proximal tibial skeletal traction pin. However, in the pediatric population skeletal traction is not utilized due to concern for physeal injury and cutaneous traction has been the gold standard for decades. Reasons for skeletal traction in adults are not well defined and there are no clinical studies showing that skeletal traction provides better outcomes in time of reduction in the operating theater or better pain control than cutaneous traction. With the ever increasing amount of high energy trauma seen by junior residents in the emergency department time constraints have become a large factor in patient care. Long delays for sedation and equipment procurement make stabilizing a diaphyseal femur fracture a time consuming experience. The purpose of this study is to determine whether differences exist between skeletal and cutaneous femoral traction in terms of: 1) time in patient consultation and fracture stabilization; 2) cost and risk to the patient due to lack of conscious sedation; 3) pain scores prior to surgery; 4) time of reduction of the diaphyseal femur fraction during surgical fixation; and 5) pain relief after traction application.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFemoral Traction

Femoral Traction is a temporary intervention to realign the broken bone and help relieve pressure and muscle spasms until operative fixation.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient willing to consent * 18 years of age or older * Sustained a diaphyseal femur fracture, open or closed * English competent * Isolated fracture on that extremity

Exclusion criteria

* Pathologic fracture * Sedated patient * Polytrauma to same extremity * Unable or not willing to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the Two Groups in Regards to Resident Time.while in Emergency Department (ED) up to 24 hoursTime from consult entered to time traction apparatus is applied.
Time to Pass Guidewire After Attaining Starting Pointwhile in Emergency Department (ED) up to 24 hoursTime to pass guidewire across reduced fracture once opening reamer is used in OR

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cutaneous Traction
Applied by using a strap on boot that attaches to the leg. A rope is attached to the boot. Weight is attached to the rope to use gravity to pull traction. The traction is left in place until patient is taken to surgery for reduction of the femur fracture.
37
Skeletal Traction
A small incision is made on the inside of the knee and a pin is surgically inserted through the bone. Weights are then attached that will pull traction on the broken femur. This traction pin will stay in until patient is taken to surgery for reduction of the femur fracture.
29
Total66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSkeletal TractionCutaneous TractionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants37 Participants66 Participants
Age, Continuous28.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
25.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.75
27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants37 participants66 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants30 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 370 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in the Two Groups in Regards to Resident Time.

Time from consult entered to time traction apparatus is applied.

Time frame: while in Emergency Department (ED) up to 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cutaneous TractionDifference in the Two Groups in Regards to Resident Time.24 minutes
Skeletal TractionDifference in the Two Groups in Regards to Resident Time.57 minutes
Primary

Time to Pass Guidewire After Attaining Starting Point

Time to pass guidewire across reduced fracture once opening reamer is used in OR

Time frame: while in Emergency Department (ED) up to 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cutaneous TractionTime to Pass Guidewire After Attaining Starting Point15 minutesStandard Deviation 24
Skeletal TractionTime to Pass Guidewire After Attaining Starting Point18 minutesStandard Deviation 17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026