Skip to content

Non-pharmacological Intervention for Colonoscopy

Does Non-pharmacological Intervention Reduce Consumption of Propofol During Colonoscopy?

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00913861
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-06-04
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy, Hypnosis, Sedation

Keywords

endoscopy, comfort, non-pharmacological

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a non-pharmacological intervention reduces consumption of sedative drugs during colonoscopy. A reduction of sedative drugs may reduce side effects. This non-pharmacological intervention may increase patient's comfort and security.

Detailed description

Sedative and analgesic drugs are used in most patients related to pain and anxiety during the colonoscopy. Analgesia and sedation has adverse effects such as central respiratory depression, obstruction of the upper airways, hypoxia, hypotension and bradycardia. Non-pharmacological interventions had beneficial effects during percutaneous vascular or renal procedures. In this study we test the hypothesis that the adjunction of hypnosis to pharmacological sedation will decrease the quantity of sedative drugs used and will reduce the patient's anxiety and discomfort.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALhypnosis

Hypnosis: induction of hypnosis by visual fixation and recollection of a pleasant memory, suggestion of relaxation, of self-control and post-hypnotic suggestion for bowel relaxation.

Standard sedation: fentanyl 2x0,5 microg/kg at beginning of procedure and propofol PCS: 20mg bolus than 10mg/bolus, lock-out = 0.

Structured attention: verbal and nonverbal communication; attentive listening; provision of the perception of control; encouragement; use of emotionally neutral descriptors, focus on a sensations.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients classified as ASA 1 to 3 * colonoscopy with anesthesiological support * capacity of consenting

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * colonoscopy with gastroscopy * emergency * psychotic diseases * deafness * incapacity to understand french * addiction of drugs and alcohol * psychoactive drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total dose of propofolthe day of the colonoscopy, at the end

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
vital parametersduring all the procedure, every 5 minutes
patient's comfortduring the procedure every 10 minutes and 1 and 14 days after the colonoscopy
gastroenterologist's satisfaction and quality of the colonoscopythe day of the procedure, at the end of the procedure
patient's satisfactionbetween 5 minutes to 1 hour after the end of the procedure and 1 and 14 days after the colonoscopy
duration of the procedurethe day of the procedure
anxiety statebetween 30 minutes to one hour before coloscopy and between 5 minutes and 1 hour after the end of the procedure

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026