Skip to content

Models of Screening, Brief Intervention With a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Opioid Patients in the Emergency Department

Models of Screening, Brief Intervention With a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Opioid Patients in the Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00913770
Enrollment
329
Registered
2009-06-04
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opiate Addiction

Keywords

opioid dependence, buprenorphine, brief intervention

Brief summary

Patients with heroin and prescription opioid dependence are at increased risk for adverse health consequences and often utilize the Emergency Department (ED) as their source of medical care. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment has been effective in decreasing high risk behaviors such as alcohol and tobacco use, and unsafe sexual practices. The data on the effectiveness of brief interventions with opioid dependence is limited. This prospective, randomized controlled trial of opioid dependent subjects (N=360) will compare two models of brief intervention with a control condition. ED patients with opioid dependence will be randomized to either: (1)Screening, Brief Intervention with a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT); (2) Screening, Brief Intervention with ED initiated Buprenorphine Treatment (SBI+Bup); or (3) standard care (SC) which includes a handout detailing substance abuse treatment centers in the area. The primary outcome will be self-reported engagement in formal substance abuse treatment at 30 days, verified by contact with the treatment program. Other outcomes measured at 30 days, 2, 6 and 12 months include changes in opioid use (self-report and urine toxicology analysis), HIV risk behaviors, and health care service utilization. The three interventions will also be compared on their cost-effectiveness. We will test the hypotheses that SBI+Bup will be superior to SBIRT and SC, and SBIRT will be superior to SC in (1)increasing the proportion of patients engaged in formal substance abuse treatment at 30 days; (2) reducing illicit opioid use; (3) reducing HIV risk behaviors; and (4) reducing health care service utilization. In addition, we hypothesize that the societal costs of SBI+Bup, per number of days of opioid abstinence, will be cost effective relative to SBIRT or SC; and that SBIRT will be cost effective relative to SC. Data analyses will be conducted on the intention to treat sample of randomized patients. This study, conducted by a research team with extensive experience evaluating brief interventions and treatments for opioid dependence, will be unique in its: (1) comparison of two models of brief intervention with standard care; (2) inclusion of an ED initiated treatment arm; (3) use of manual-guided interventions with systematic assessment of adherence and competence; and (4)collection of detailed cost data to help guide future healthcare policy.

Interventions

Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) is a manual-guided therapy that is designed to be feasible in the ED setting. The purpose of the BNI is to assist patients in recognizing and changing their drug use and HIV risk behaviors. It combines techniques based on motivational interviewing and a stage-model of change. The main goal of the interview is to decrease the subject's ambivalence about signing up for a formal drug treatment program.

DRUGBuprenorphine Initiation

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who present to the adult ED at Yale-New Haven Hospital (YNHH) who are: 1. 18 years or older, 2. meet criteria for opioid dependence as measured by the Mini-SCID, and 3. have a positive urine toxicology for opiates.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to read or understand English * Currently receiving formal substance abuse treatment * Current suicide or homicidal risk * Current psychotic disorder * Life-threatening or unstable medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospital admission * Unable to provide 2 phone contact numbers * Unwilling to be randomized and/or follow up as per study protocol, including release of information to assess treatment engagement at 30-days * Requiring opioid agonist medication for a pain-related diagnosis (contraindication to buprenorphine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)30 days post randomizationDefined as enrollment and receiving formal addiction treatment on the 30th day following randomization. This is assessed by direct contact with facility, clinician, or both.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Days of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days30 days post randomization

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Care
Standard Care including receiving a referral.
104
SBIRT
Screening, Brief Intervention and Facilitated Referral to Treatment Brief Intervention: Brief Negotiated Intervention (BNI) is a manual-guided therapy that is designed to be feasible in the ED setting. The purpose of the BNI is to assist patients in recognizing and changing their drug use and HIV risk behaviors. It combines techniques based on motivational interviewing and a stage-model of change. The main goal of the interview is to decrease the subject's ambivalence about signing up for a formal drug treatment program.
111
SBI+Bup
Screening, Brief Intervention and Buprenorphine initiation Brief Intervention with Buprenorphine initiation: Brief Negotiated Intervention is a manual-guided therapy designed for ED setting. Purpose- to assist patients recognize/change drug use and HIV risks. It combines techniques based on motivational interviewing and a stage-model of change. Goal- to decrease subject's ambivalence about accepting ED initiated buprenorphine treatment. Patients inducted onto buprenorphine in ED or home, based on level of withdrawal. ED induction goal- 8 mg first day. Home induction goal- 8 mg first day. Subjects receive supportive counseling and education by trained nurses in the PCC (seen within 24-72 hours of their ED visit). Following an initial 45-minute evaluation, the physician will administer Primary Care Management (PCM) weekly for 2 weeks, then every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and then monthly.
114
Total329

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyRefused11108
Overall StudyUnable to contact241913

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard CareSBIRTSBI+BupTotal
Age, Continuous31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
31.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants27 Participants28 Participants78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants84 Participants86 Participants251 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1040 / 1110 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1040 / 1110 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Self-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)

Defined as enrollment and receiving formal addiction treatment on the 30th day following randomization. This is assessed by direct contact with facility, clinician, or both.

Time frame: 30 days post randomization

Population: All subjects who were randomized to receive treatment were included in the primary analysis. 2 subjects were lost to follow up in the standard of care arm which is why 102 are included in the analysis instead of 104

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Standard CareSelf-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)4.99 Mean Number of Outpatient Visits
SBIRTSelf-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)5.67 Mean Number of Outpatient Visits
SBI+BupSelf-reported Engagement in Formal Substance Abuse Treatment at 30 Days (Verified by Contact With the Treatment Program)3.71 Mean Number of Outpatient Visits
Secondary

Days of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days

Time frame: 30 days post randomization

Population: All subjects who were randomized to receive treatment were included in the primary analysis. 2 subjects were lost to follow up in the standard of care arm which is why 102 are included in the analysis instead of 104

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Standard CareDays of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days2.3 Mean Number of Days
SBIRTDays of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days2.4 Mean Number of Days
SBI+BupDays of Self-reported Illicit Opioid Use in the Past 7 Days0.9 Mean Number of Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026