Skip to content

Acupuncture Versus Placebo Acupuncture During In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Embryo Transfer

Acupuncture Versus Placebo Acupuncture During Ivf Embryo Transfer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00913354
Enrollment
635
Registered
2009-06-04
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2009-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

infertility, ivf, acupuncture

Brief summary

During IVF treatment, acupuncture at the time of embryo transfer may improve the pregnancy rate. This study aims to compare IVF pregnancy between two groups of patients that received either acupuncture or sham acupuncture (placebo)around embryo transfer

Detailed description

Acupuncture at the time of embryo transfer may improve the IVF pregnancy rate. This study aims to compare the IVF pregnancy between two groups of patients that undergo ivf/icsi treatment. The patients are randomized to receive either acupuncture or sham acupuncture (placebo)around embryo transfer

Interventions

DEVICEAcupuncture (Carbo®)

The acupuncture points were chosen according to traditional Chinese medicine and included DU20, M29, KS6, Mp8, and Le3 before embryo transfer and DU20, Co4, Mp10, M36, and Mp6 after embryo transfer.

DEVICEPlacebo acupuncture (Strietberger®)

The acupuncture points were the same as in the true acupuncture group, namely DU20, M29, KS6, Mp8, and Le3 before embryo transfer and DU20, Co4, Mp10, M36, and Mp6 after embryo transfer. Sham acupuncture needles used were the validated Strietberger® placebo-needle from the company, Asia Med. The needle is not fixed inside the copper handle and its tip is blunt. When the needle touches the skin it moves inside the handle and appears to be shortened. A pricking sensation is felt by the patient, simulating the puncturing of the skin. Developed by dr. Konrad Streitberger.

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 37 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* infertility * below 38 years * ivf or icsi treatment * fresh embryo transfer cycle * no more than two earlier embryo transfers with fresh embryos * embryo transfer on day 2 or 3 after oocyte aspiration, single or double embryo transfer

Exclusion criteria

* Frozen embryo transfer * oocyte donation * other alternative treatment during the cycle

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical pregnancy rate2005-2008

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026