Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Conditions
Keywords
Urgency, YM178, Urinary incontinence, Mirabegron, Micturition, Frequency, Urinary urgency incontinence, Overactive Bladder
Brief summary
The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.
Interventions
DRUGMirabegron
Mirabegron tablets
DRUGPlacebo
Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.
Sponsors
Astellas Pharma Inc
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly * Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥ 3 months * Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period * Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period
Exclusion criteria
* Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control * Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor * Patient is using medications intended to treat OAB * Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization * Patient has diabetic neuropathy * Patient has evidence of urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs * Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy * Patient has severe hypertension * Patient has participated in a clinical study within 30 days, or had participated in any previous study with mirabegron * Patient had an average total daily urine volume \> 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period * Patient has serum creatinine of \>150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) \> 3x ULN * Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 12 | The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 12 | The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 4 | The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency | Baseline and Week 12 | Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 12 | The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 12 | The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12 | The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12 | The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient. |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary. |
| Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency | Baseline and Week 12 | Percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline to Final Visit in mean level of urgency at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 0.24 for mean level of urgency. Mean level of urgency was derived from the average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale which ranged from 0 (No urgency) to 4 (Urge incontinence). |
| Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes | Baseline and Week 12 | Percentage of participants with a decrease from baseline to final visit in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 1.54 for mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4). The mean number of urgency episodes was derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale where a score 3=severe urgency and 4=urge incontinence. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline and Week 12 | The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Baseline and Week 12 | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Baseline and Week 12 | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Baseline and Week 12 | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Baseline and Week 12 | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Baseline and Week 12 | The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit. |
| Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Baseline and Week 12 | The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit. |
| Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Baseline and Week 12 | The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit. |
| Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Baseline and Week 12 | The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit. |
| Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Baseline and Week 12 | The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Baseline and Week 12 | The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Baseline and Week 12 | The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition. |
| Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline and Week 12 | The Clinician Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed the change in the patient's bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the physician at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'. |
| Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline and Week 12 | The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'. |
| Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline and Week 12 | The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in the patient's overall condition since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'. |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Baseline and Week 12 | The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Baseline and Week 4 | The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. |
Countries
Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Norway, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
After screening, 2030 patients took placebo run-in study drug in a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period. On completion of the run-in period, 1306 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo, mirabegron 25 mg or mirabegron 50 mg for 12 weeks.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. | 433 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. | 432 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. | 440 |
| Total | 1,305 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 15 | 18 | 12 |
| Overall Study | Eligibility criterion not met | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 11 | 4 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Medical History | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance with study procedures | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Randomized but never received study drug | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Taking exclusionary medications | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Violation of exclusion criterion | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 20 | 12 | 18 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Mirabegron 50 mg | Mirabegron 25 mg | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.97 | 60.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22 | 58.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85 | 58.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.73 |
| Duration of OAB symptoms | 93.4 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 103.02 | 92.7 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 97.88 | 96.3 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.77 | 91.3 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 96.82 |
| Mean level of urgency | 2.38 scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.56 | 2.41 scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.556 | 2.37 scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.573 | 2.36 scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55 |
| Mean number of micturitions per 24 hours | 11.63 micturitions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.108 | 11.69 micturitions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.227 | 11.66 micturitions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.117 | 11.54 micturitions STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.979 |
| Mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours | 1.93 nocturia episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.465 | 2.03 nocturia episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.528 | 1.94 nocturia episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.552 | 1.82 nocturia episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.332 |
| Mean number of pads used per 24 hours | 0.85 pads STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.666 | 0.84 pads STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 | 0.79 pads STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.449 | 0.91 pads STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.786 |
| Mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) per 24 hours | 5.60 urgency episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.508 | 5.81 urgency episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.559 | 5.54 urgency episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.622 | 5.43 urgency episodes STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.335 |
| Mean volume voided per micturition | 162.4 mL STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.33 | 158.4 mL STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.17 | 165.4 mL STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.24 | 163.5 mL STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.39 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 17 participants | 5 participants | 5 participants | 7 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 100 participants | 33 participants | 32 participants | 35 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 5 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 1183 participants | 400 participants | 394 participants | 389 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 897 Participants | 303 Participants | 293 Participants | 301 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 408 Participants | 137 Participants | 139 Participants | 132 Participants |
| Type of overactive bladder (OAB) Frequency | 414 participants | 117 participants | 135 participants | 162 participants |
| Type of overactive bladder (OAB) Mixed | 428 participants | 154 participants | 129 participants | 145 participants |
| Type of overactive bladder (OAB) Urge Incontinence | 463 participants | 169 participants | 168 participants | 126 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 51 / 433 | 64 / 432 | 69 / 440 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 12 / 433 | 7 / 432 | 4 / 440 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -0.96 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.122 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -1.36 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.124 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -1.38 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.123 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-0.74, -0.06]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.76, -0.08]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Primary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -1.18 micturitions | Standard Error 0.124 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -1.65 micturitions | Standard Error 0.125 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -1.60 micturitions | Standard Error 0.122 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-0.82, -0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-0.76, -0.08]ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency | -0.15 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.028 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency | -0.22 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency | -0.29 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.028 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-0.15, 0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.22, -0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | -1.35 urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.154 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | -1.68 urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.155 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | -1.94 urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.152 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-0.76, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-1.01, -0.16]ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -0.95 urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -1.31 urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.112 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -1.33 urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.111 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.67, -0.05]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.69, -0.08]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | 8.3 mL | Standard Error 2.23 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | 12.8 mL | Standard Error 2.24 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | 20.7 mL | Standard Error 2.2 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-1.6, 10.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.3, 18.6]ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Not anxious | 52 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Moderately anxious | 20 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Extremely anxious | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Missing data | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Not anxious | 239 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious | 77 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Missing data | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Not anxious | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Not anxious | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Moderately anxious | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Extremely anxious | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious | 74 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Moderately anxious | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Not anxious | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Not anxious | 243 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Extremely anxious | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Moderately anxious | 29 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Extremely anxious | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Not anxious | 50 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Not anxious | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious | 89 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Not anxious | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Extremely anxious | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Not anxious | 225 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Moderately anxious -> Not anxious | 58 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Not anxious | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Moderately anxious | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Moderately anxious | 33 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious | 6 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Not anxious -> Missing data | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score | Missing data -> Extremely anxious | 0 participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> No problems | 22 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Some problems | 16 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Missing data | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> No problem | 327 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 39 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> No problems | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> No problem | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 45 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> No problem | 310 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Some problems | 20 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> No problems | 31 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> No problem | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 48 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> No problem | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Confined to bed | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> No problem | 304 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Some problems -> No problems | 36 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Some problems | 33 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Confined -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | No problem -> Missing data | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score | Missing data -> Confined to bed | 0 participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> No pain | 58 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Moderate pain | 34 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Extreme pain | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Missing data | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> No pain | 209 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Moderate pain | 85 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Extreme pain | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain ->Missing data | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> No pain | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Moderate pain | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Extreme pain | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data-> No pain | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Moderate pain | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Extreme pain | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Moderate pain | 92 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Extreme pain | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain ->Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Moderate pain | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> No pain | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Moderate pain | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Extreme pain | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> No pain | 200 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Extreme pain | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Moderate pain | 36 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Extreme pain | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> No pain | 65 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data-> No pain | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Extreme pain | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Moderate pain | 87 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data-> No pain | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Extreme pain | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> Extreme pain | 7 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> No pain | 185 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain ->Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Moderate pain -> No pain | 75 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> No pain | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Moderate pain | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Moderate pain | 41 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Extreme pain -> Moderate pain | 13 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | No pain -> Missing data | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score | Missing data -> Extreme pain | 0 participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> No problems | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Some problems | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Missing data | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> No problem | 389 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> No problem | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 8 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> No problem | 385 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Some problems | 10 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> No problems | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> No problem | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 9 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> No problem | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> No problem | 403 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Some problems -> No problems | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Some problems | 6 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Unable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | No problem -> Missing data | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score | Missing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself | 0 participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> No problems | 35 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Some problems | 27 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Missing data | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> No problem | 313 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 30 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems->Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities-> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform -> Unable to perform | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> No problem | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 35 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems->Unable to perform usual activities | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities-> Some problems | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform -> Unable to perform | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> No problem | 303 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Some problems | 27 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> Missing data | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Unable to perform usual activities | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> No problems | 38 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> No problem | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform -> Unable to perform | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Some problems | 44 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> No problem | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems->Unable to perform usual activities | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> No problem | 293 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> Missing data | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Some problems -> No problems | 51 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities -> No problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Some problems | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Some problems | 31 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Unable to perform usual activities-> Some problems | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | No problem -> Missing data | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score | Missing data -> Unable to perform usual activities | 0 participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=376; 391; 395] | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=376; 391; 395] | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=376; 391; 395] | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Week 12 [N=357; 379; 371] | 1.18 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.156 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=377; 389; 388] | 1.05 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.154 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Week 12 [N=357; 379; 371] | 1.58 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.151 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=377; 389; 388] | 1.54 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.152 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Week 12 [N=357; 379; 371] | 1.94 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.153 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=377; 389; 388] | 1.88 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.152 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) included patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Week 12 [N=353; 366; 362] | -11.4 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.66 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=373; 376; 378] | -11.0 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.87 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Week 12 [N=353; 366; 362] | -12.3 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=373; 376; 378] | -11.9 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.18 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Week 12 [N=353; 366; 362] | -13.1 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.22 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=373; 376; 378] | -13.3 percent activity impairment | Standard Deviation 26.12 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Week 12 [N=123; 130; 128] | -11.6 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 26.44 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=130; 135; 134] | -11.5 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 26.09 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Week 12 [N=123; 130; 128] | -10.2 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 22.01 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=130; 135; 134] | -10.1 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 21.67 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Week 12 [N=123; 130; 128] | -13.0 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 23.89 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=130; 135; 134] | -13.1 percent impairment while working | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Week 12 [N=110; 115; 118] | -14.1 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 26.57 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=117; 119; 123] | -13.8 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 26.18 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Week 12 [N=110; 115; 118] | -11.0 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 23.65 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=117; 119; 123] | -10.8 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 23.33 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Week 12 [N=110; 115; 118] | -13.3 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 24.45 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=117; 119; 123] | -13.3 percent overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 24.21 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Week 12 [N=112; 118; 118] | 0.6 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 14.42 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=119; 122; 123] | 0.6 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 14.01 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Week 12 [N=112; 118; 118] | 0.7 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 15.63 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=119; 122; 123] | 0.7 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 15.37 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Week 12 [N=112; 118; 118] | -1.5 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 7.45 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=119; 122; 123] | -1.3 percent work time missed | Standard Deviation 7.35 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -0.62 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -0.96 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.122 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | -1.13 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.122 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.03995% CI: [-0.68, -0.01]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.85, -0.17]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was not utilized in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -0.78 micturitions | Standard Error 0.124 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -0.96 micturitions | Standard Error 0.124 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | -1.14 micturitions | Standard Error 0.122 |
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.395% CI: [-0.53, 0.16]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 6 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (8 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.03595% CI: [-0.71, -0.03]ANCOVA
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized for this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -0.15 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -0.10 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.025 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -0.19 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.03 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -0.19 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.028 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -0.12 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.025 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -0.23 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -0.20 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.025 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -0.30 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.029 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -0.26 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.028 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. LOCF was not utilized for this analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -1.17 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.162 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -0.90 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.143 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -1.60 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.162 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -1.51 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.159 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -0.97 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.143 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -1.72 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.157 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423] | -1.47 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.141 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385] | -1.99 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.157 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398] | -1.73 Urgency episodes | Standard Error 0.158 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 urgency incontinence episode (grade 3 or 4) at baseline. LOCF was not utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=231; 237; 236] | -1.02 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.101 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=256; 247; 249] | -0.63 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.107 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=226; 232; 227] | -1.06 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.105 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=231; 237; 236] | -1.33 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=256; 247; 249] | -0.98 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.109 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=226; 232; 227] | -1.32 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.104 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=256; 247; 249] | -1.12 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.109 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=226; 232; 227] | -1.39 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.104 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=231; 237; 236] | -1.39 Urgency incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.1 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized in this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 8 [N=377; 395; 399] | 9.8 mL | Standard Error 2.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 4 [N=415; 410; 424] | 7.6 mL | Standard Error 1.85 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 [N=366; 387; 386] | 8.2 mL | Standard Error 2.41 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 8 [N=377; 395; 399] | 15.7 mL | Standard Error 2.16 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 4 [N=415; 410; 424] | 10.6 mL | Standard Error 1.86 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 [N=366; 387; 386] | 13.6 mL | Standard Error 2.34 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 4 [N=415; 410; 424] | 17.8 mL | Standard Error 1.83 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 [N=366; 387; 386] | 22.5 mL | Standard Error 2.34 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 8 [N=377; 395; 399] | 17.9 mL | Standard Error 2.15 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 4 [N=403; 408; 417] | 8.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.73 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 8 [N=373; 393; 390] | 12.1 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 12 [N=360; 383; 377] | 13.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.84 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=406; 408; 419] | 13.0 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=406; 408; 419] | 14.3 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.79 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 4 [N=403; 408; 417] | 11.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.73 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 12 [N=360; 383; 377] | 14.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.81 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 8 [N=373; 393; 390] | 14.3 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=406; 408; 419] | 14.2 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.78 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 8 [N=373; 393; 390] | 13.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 12 [N=360; 383; 377] | 14.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.82 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score | Week 4 [N=403; 408; 417] | 9.2 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.72 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one nocturia episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=362; 362; 376] | -0.30 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.059 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=329; 349; 354] | -0.45 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.059 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=321; 342; 344] | -0.54 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.058 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=362; 362; 378] | -0.48 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.058 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=362; 362; 378] | -0.49 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.058 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=362; 362; 376] | -0.27 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.058 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=321; 342; 344] | -0.50 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=329; 349; 354] | -0.41 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.057 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=362; 362; 378] | -0.52 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.057 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=329; 349; 354] | -0.44 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.057 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=321; 342; 344] | -0.52 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.056 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=362; 362; 376] | 0.38 nocturia episodes | Standard Error 0.057 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one use of a pad at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=145; 136; 136] | -0.72 pads | Standard Error 0.117 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=131; 131; 128] | -0.97 pads | Standard Error 0.119 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=129; 129; 124] | -1.06 pads | Standard Error 0.125 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=145; 136; 137] | -0.99 pads | Standard Error 0.118 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=145; 136; 137] | -0.83 pads | Standard Error 0.122 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=145; 136; 136] | -0.59 pads | Standard Error 0.121 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=129; 129; 124] | -0.89 pads | Standard Error 0.125 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=131; 131; 128] | -0.79 pads | Standard Error 0.119 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=145; 136; 137] | -1.16 pads | Standard Error 0.121 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N=131; 131; 128] | -1.16 pads | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N=129; 129; 124] | -1.17 pads | Standard Error 0.127 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours | Week 4 [N=145; 136; 136] | -0.81 pads | Standard Error 0.12 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 4 [N=410; 410; 424] | 0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=410; 410; 424] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 12 [N=364; 386; 382] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 8 [N=381; 394; 399] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 12 [N=364; 386; 382] | 0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 8 [N=381; 394; 399] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=410; 410; 424] | 0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 4 [N=410; 410; 424] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=410; 410; 424] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 4 [N=410; 410; 424] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 8 [N=381; 394; 399] | 0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician | Week 12 [N=364; 386; 382] | -0.0 Physician visits | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 4 [N=402; 406; 418] | -12.2 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 8 [N=376; 389; 391] | -15.1 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.92 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 12 [N=360; 380; 378] | -17.5 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.94 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=405; 407; 422] | -16.0 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=405; 407; 422] | -17.9 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 4 [N=402; 406; 418] | -13.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.82 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 12 [N=360; 380; 378] | -18.0 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.91 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 8 [N=376; 389; 391] | -17.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.91 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=405; 407; 422] | -18.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.88 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 8 [N=376; 389; 391] | -18.5 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 12 [N=360; 380; 378] | -19.6 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.92 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score | Week 4 [N=402; 406; 418] | -12.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 4 [N=399; 401; 411] | 0.38 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.312 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 8 [N=368; 386; 383] | 3.14 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.389 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 12 [N=359; 379; 375] | 4.26 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.535 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=404; 406; 419] | 3.43 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.076 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=404; 406; 419] | 4.12 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.082 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 4 [N=399; 401; 411] | 2.43 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.929 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 12 [N=359; 379; 375] | 4.40 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.282 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 8 [N=368; 386; 383] | 3.95 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.766 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=404; 406; 419] | 4.96 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.225 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 8 [N=368; 386; 383] | 4.13 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.795 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 12 [N=359; 379; 375] | 5.59 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.112 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Week 4 [N=399; 401; 411] | 1.67 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.712 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. The number of patients included at each time point is noted as N. LOCF was not utilized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 236; 244; 241] | -1.04 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.117 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 231; 239; 232] | -1.08 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 236; 244; 241] | -1.38 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.116 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 231; 239; 232] | -1.36 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.118 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 236; 244; 241] | -1.39 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.116 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 231; 239; 232] | -1.43 Incontinence episodes | Standard Error 0.119 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N. LOCF was not used in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 377; 395; 399] | -1.09 micturitions | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 366; 387; 386] | -1.47 micturitions | Standard Error 0.122 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 377; 395; 399] | -1.52 micturitions | Standard Error 0.127 |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 366; 387; 386] | -1.68 micturitions | Standard Error 0.119 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 8 [N= 377; 395; 399] | -1.53 micturitions | Standard Error 0.127 |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Week 12 [N= 366; 387; 386] | -1.69 micturitions | Standard Error 0.119 |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 46.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 62.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 61.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 59.2 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 72.8 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 54.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 74.1 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 71.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 71.1 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 61.6 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 56.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 55.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 22.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 21.5 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 23.0 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 52.8 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 23.6 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 52.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 25.6 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395] | 55.2 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Major Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 25.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit | Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378] | 55.8 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 28.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 41.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 42.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 39.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 45.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 31.5 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 46.9 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 44.7 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257] | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241] | 41.9 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232] | 47.4 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit | Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255] | 36.5 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency
Percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline to Final Visit in mean level of urgency at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 0.24 for mean level of urgency. Mean level of urgency was derived from the average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale which ranged from 0 (No urgency) to 4 (Urge incontinence).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency | 36.6 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency | 40.5 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency | 44.8 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes
Percentage of participants with a decrease from baseline to final visit in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 1.54 for mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4). The mean number of urgency episodes was derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale where a score 3=severe urgency and 4=urge incontinence.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes | 44.6 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes | 57.7 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
The Clinician Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed the change in the patient's bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the physician at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 32 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 171 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 49 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 58 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 38 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 182 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 31 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 126 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 158 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 48 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 53 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 9 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 37 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 175 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 188 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 59 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 6 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 22 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 32 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 134 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 41 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 183 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 22 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 52 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 54 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 60 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 28 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 44 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 58 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 41 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 185 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 8 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 148 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 60 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 196 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 171 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 42 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 30 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 48 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 33 participants |
Secondary
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 35 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 160 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 14 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 18 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 48 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 26 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 54 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 49 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 52 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 105 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 54 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 18 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 188 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 173 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 6 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 23 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 194 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 4 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 52 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 105 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 11 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 176 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 23 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 57 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 57 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 33 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 185 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 15 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 60 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 57 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 36 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 7 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 9 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 45 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 188 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 13 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 202 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 39 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 124 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 51 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 42 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 48 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 45 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 37 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 49 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 42 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 174 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 12 participants |
Secondary
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in the patient's overall condition since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 42 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 173 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 160 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 46 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 19 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 47 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 53 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 33 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 50 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 112 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 47 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 188 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 19 participants |
| Placebo | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 19 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 194 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 12 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 47 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 115 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 12 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 176 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 19 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 60 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 54 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 39 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 185 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 62 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 54 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 43 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Worse | 0 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Very Much Improved | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Total | 188 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Worse | 5 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Worse | 11 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Very Much Improved | 38 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: No Change | 132 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Worse | 1 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Much Improved | 54 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Minimally Improved | 41 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Worse | 3 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: Minimally Improved | 49 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Improved | 47 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Much Improved | 51 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Much Improved | 11 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: No Change | 38 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Very Much Improved | 36 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Baseline: Total | 202 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Minimally Worse | 2 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Week 12: Total | 174 participants |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale | Final Visit: No Change | 43 participants |