Skip to content

Study Comparing High Cut-off Haemofiltration With Standard Haemofiltration in Acute Renal Failure

Pilot Randomised Controlled Study Comparing The Effect of High Cut-off Point Haemofiltration With Standard Haemofiltration In Patients With Acute Renal Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00912184
Enrollment
76
Registered
2009-06-03
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Acute, Shock

Keywords

Kidney failure, acute, Shock, Toxins, biological, Hemofiltration, High cut off/super high flux membranes

Brief summary

This trial aims to study the effect of combining continuous and a new polyamide membrane with larger pores in the treatment of critically ill patients with acute renal failure and low blood pressure (shock) requiring noradrenaline. The investigators wish to compare the clinical effect of this new therapy to that of haemofiltration with a standard membrane.

Detailed description

During acute renal failure, small and middle molecular-weight toxins accumulate. These molecules are difficult to remove by standard haemofiltration. Accordingly, they accumulate and contribute to morbidity in long-term dialysis patients. Molecules such as cytokines have been shown to play a central pathogenic role in critical illness. In critically ill acute renal failure patients, they accumulate in serum and likely contribute to much morbidity (fever, low blood pressure, myocardial dysfunction, renal failure itself etc.) Therefore, the removal of cytokines appears desirable. Although different approaches have been undertaken, all have had limited success due to complexity, limited efficacy or uncertain clinical response \[10-15\]. It is possible that in using a different and more porous membrane, the removal of cytokines would be much more efficient and that clinical benefits of blood purification would, therefore, be greater. A membrane of this kind is now available. It is a modification (moderate increase in pore size) of another standard material called polyamide, which has already been used in millions of people for dialysis and haemofiltration. The increased pore size of these new membranes is directed at a more effective removal of middle molecular-weight toxins such as cytokines.

Interventions

DEVICEStandard polyamide high flux membrane

Standard haemofiltration; CVVH; blood flow 200 ml/min, ultrafiltrate 25 ml/kg/hr, anticoagulation as clinically indicated, bicarbonate buffered replacement fluid

DEVICEHigh cut-off (super high flux) polyamide membrane

CVVH with standard haemofiltration settings; blood flow 200 ml/min, ultrafiltrate 25 ml/kg/hour, anticoagulation as clinically indicated, bicarbonate-buffered replacement fluid

Sponsors

Austin Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The treating clinician believes that the patient requires haemofiltration for acute renal failure * The patient is on noradrenaline infusion for haemodynamic support * The patient was commenced on noradrenaline or haemofiltration within the last 12 hours * The clinician is uncertain about the balance of benefits and risks likely to be conferred by treatment with different membranes * The treating clinicians anticipate treating the patient with haemofiltration for at least 72 hours * Informed consent has been obtained * The patient fulfils ONE of the following clinical criteria for initiating haemofiltration: * Oliguria (urine output \< 100 ml/6 hr) that has been unresponsive to fluid resuscitation measures. * Hyperkalemia (\[K+\] \> 6.5 mmol/L) * Severe acidemia (pH \< 7.2) * Urea \> 25 mmol/liter * Creatinine \> 300 mmol/L * Clinically significant organ oedema in the setting of ARF (e.g., lung)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient age is \< 18 years * Death is imminent (\< 24 hours) * There is a strong likelihood that the study treatment would not be continued in accordance with the study protocol * The patient has been treated with haemofiltration or other dialysis previously during the same hospital admission * The patient was on maintenance dialysis prior to the current hospitalisation * Any other major illness that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk associated with the subject's participation in this study * The patient is pregnant or is breastfeeding * The patient has previously been enrolled in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure for this study is noradrenaline free time in the first week after randomization24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The change in the levels of each of three key cytokines; IL-1, IL-6 and IL-1024 months

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026