Skip to content

Study Of The Effectiveness & Safety Of Lenalidomide Versus Chlorambucil As First Line Therapy For Elderly Patients With B-Cell CLL (The ORIGIN Trial)

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Openlabel, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Versus Chlorambucil as First-Line Therapy for Previously Untreated Elderly Patients With B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (The Origin Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00910910
Acronym
ORIGIN
Enrollment
450
Registered
2009-06-01
Start date
2009-10-13
Completion date
2018-05-09
Last updated
2019-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide as a first line therapy in treating patients with B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. This study will compare the effects (good and bad) of lenalidomide with chlorambucil.

Detailed description

After notification from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 12 July 2013, Celgene agreed to discontinue the lenalidomide treatment for all patients due to an imbalance in the number of deaths in patients treated with lenalidomide versus patients treated with chlorambucil. No specific causality for this imbalance has been identified to date. Investigators were instructed to immediately discontinue all participants from experimental lenalidomide treatment and inform their patients accordingly. Participants on the Chlorambucil arm may continue up to 12 months (13 cycles) with the last participant completing in March 2014. All randomized participants will continue to be followed for overall survival and secondary primary malignancies.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide

For patients with normal renal function (defined as CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min), 5 mg once daily on Days 1 through 28 of the first 28-day cycle, 10 mg once daily on Days 1 through 28 starting at the second cycle, 15 mg once daily starting at the third cycle and for the remainder of the study until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first. For patients with moderate renal impairment (defined as CrCl ≥ 30 to \< 60 mL/min), 2.5 mg once daily on Days 1 through 28 of the first 28-day cycle, 5 mg once daily on Days 1 through 28 starting at the second cycle, 7.5 mg once daily starting at the third cycle and for the remainder of the study until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first.

DRUGChlorambucil

Patients assigned to the chlorambucil arm will receive oral chlorambucil tablets at 0.8 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for a total duration of 12 months (approximately 13 cycles).

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must sign an informed consent form. 2. Age ≥ 65 years 3. Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. 4. Must have a documented diagnosis of B-cell CLL. 5. Must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2. 6. Must agree to follow pregnancy precautions as required by the protocol. 7. Must agree to receive counseling related to teratogenic and other risks of lenalidomide. 8. Must agree not to donate blood or semen as defined by the protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior treatment for B-cell CLL. 2. Any medical condition, that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form. 3. Active infections requiring systemic antibiotics. 4. Systemic infection that has not resolved \> 2 months prior to initiating lenalidomide 5. Pregnant or lactating females. 6. Participation in any clinical study or having taken any investigational therapy within 28 days. 7. Known presence of alcohol and/or drug abuse. 8. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement. 9. Prior history of malignancies, other than CLL, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥3 years. Exceptions include the following: * Basal cell carcinoma of the skin * Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin * Carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Carcinoma in situ of the breast * Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b) 10. History of renal failure requiring dialysis. 11. Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and/or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. 12. Prior therapy with lenalidomide. 13. Evidence of TLS at screening 14. Presence of specific hematology and/or chemistry abnormalities 15. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism 16. Venous thromboembolism within one year 17. ≥ Grade-2 neuropathy 18. Uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia 19. Disease transformation \[i.e. Richter's Syndrome (lymphomas) or prolymphocytic leukemia\]

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date of 14 March 2014From randomization to data cut off date of 31 March 2014; median follow up time for all participants was 12.6 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease included lymphadenopathy, an appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\> 1.5 cm), splenomegaly, hepatomegaly or other organ infiltrates, an increase by 50% or more in greatest determined diameter of any previous site or an increase by 50% or more in the sum of the product of diameters of multiple nodes. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)From first dose of study drug to date of data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014From randomization to the data cut-off date of 31 March 2014; Up to 53 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1140 days and 406 days for ChlorambucilAEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response Based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) GuidelinesUp to data cut-off date of 18 Feb 2013; approximately 39 monthsA best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as: Complete Remission (CR): * No lymphadenopathy * No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly * Absence of constitutional symptoms * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes * Platelets \> 100,000/ul * Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl * Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules; Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi): • CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation. Nodular Partial Response (nPR): • CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules. Partial Response (PR) requires: * ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count * ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy * ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen * 1 or more of the following: * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * Platelets \>100,000/ul
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response Based on IWCLL Guidelines With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; approximately 53 monthsA best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as: Complete Remission (CR): * No lymphadenopathy * No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly * Absence of constitutional symptoms * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes * Platelets \> 100,000/ul * Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl * Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules; Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi): • CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation. Nodular Partial Response: • CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules. Partial Response requires: * ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count * ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy * ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen * 1 or more of the following: * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * Platelets \>100,000/ul
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of ResponseUp to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 monthsDuration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) participants who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) participants who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 monthsDuration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) patients who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) patients who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression
Time to ResponseUp to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 monthsTime to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall SurvivalUp to data cut off of 31 March 2014; median follow-up for all participants was 18.8 monthsOverall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause.
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival at the Final AnalysisUp to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 monthsOverall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the subject was known to be alive for participants who were alive as of the data cutoff date and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to Create the FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Quality of Life InstrumentDay 1 and once every 8 weeksThe FACT-Leu scale is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of leukemia-specific health-related quality of life for acute and chronic disease. The FACT-Leu is described as including 27 items that assess 17 physical symptoms (fevers, bleeding, general pain, stomach pain, chills, night sweats, bruising, lymph node swelling, weakness, tiredness, weight loss, appetite, shortness of breath, functional ability, diarrhea, concentration, and mouth sores) and 10 emotional/social concerns (frustration with activity limitation, discouraged by illness, future planning, uncertainty, worry about illness, emotional lability, isolation, infertility concern, family worry, and worry about infections).
Euro Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireDay 1 and once every 8 weeksThe standardized extended version of EQ-5D was designed for the collection of health state values using a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating scale - a vertical 20 cm visual analogue scale with the end points labeled best imaginable health state at the top and worst imaginable health state at the bottom having numeric values of 100 and 0 respectively. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking (or placing a cross) in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions.
Number of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentUp to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 monthsSubsequent anti-cancer therapies administered to participants following the discontinuation of study drug (either Lenalidomide or Chlorambucil)
Time to Response for a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 monthsTime to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From randomization up to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; Up to approximately 39 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1086 days and 406 days for ChlorambucilAEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Deaths During the Treatment and Survival Follow-Up PhaseFrom the first dose of study drug up to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 monthsThe number of study participants deaths during the treatment and follow-up phase

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

118 sites randomized participants in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Columbia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Slovakia, Spain, Serbia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 1:1 to lenalidomide or chlorambucil and stratified by disease stage, presence of pre-defined co-morbidities and presence of at least one of the following poor prognostic factors: 11q deletion, 17 p deletion, unmutated IgVH and B2M\>4.0 mg/dL.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lenalidomide
For participants with normal renal function \[defined as Creatinine Clearance (CrCL ) ≥ 60 mL/min\], 5 mg lenalidomide by mouth (PO) once daily (QD) on Days 1 through 28 of the first 28-day cycle, 10 mg lenalidomide PO QD on Days 1 through 28 starting at cycle 2, 15 mg lenalidomide PO QD starting at cycle 3 and for the remainder of the study until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. For participants with moderate renal impairment (defined as CrCL ≥ 30 to \< 60 mL/min), 2.5 mg lenalidomide PO QD on Days 1 through 28 of the first 28-day cycle, 5 mg lenalidomide PO QD on Days 1 through 28 starting at cycle 2, 7.5 mg lenalidomide PO QD starting at cycle 3 and for the remainder of the study until PD or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first.
225
Chlorambucil
Chlorambucil oral tablets at 0.8 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for a total duration of 12 months (approximately 13 cycles).
225
Total450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event6335
Overall StudyCompleted 13 cycles of treatment0118
Overall StudyDeath93
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyOther11432
Overall StudyPD with histologic change02
Overall StudyPD without histologic change2723
Overall StudyProtocol Violation22
Overall StudyUntreated before cycle 112
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLenalidomideChlorambucilTotal
Age, Continuous73.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
73.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants83 Participants176 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
132 Participants142 Participants274 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
100 / 22493 / 223
other
Total, other adverse events
204 / 224184 / 223
serious
Total, serious adverse events
148 / 22490 / 223

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to date of data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Population: This is a smaller population used in this analysis (earlier cut-off date) prior to the last participant enrolled in the study. The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)30.8 months
ChlorambucilKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)23.0 months
Comparison: Stratification factors: Disease stage (Binet A or Binet B or Rai I or Rai II versus (VS) Binet C or Rai III or Rai IV); Presence of at least one of the co-morbidities Asparate transaminase (AST)/Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3.0 times Upper Limits of Normal (ULN,) Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 to \< 60 mL/min, Yes VS No); Presence of at least one 11q deletion, 17p deletion, unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy-chain Variable-region (IgVH) or Beta-2 Microglobulin (ß2M )\> 4.0 mg/L (Yes versus No VS Unknown)p-value: 0.32390% CI: [0.88, 1.66]stratified log rank
Primary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date of 14 March 2014

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease included lymphadenopathy, an appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\> 1.5 cm), splenomegaly, hepatomegaly or other organ infiltrates, an increase by 50% or more in greatest determined diameter of any previous site or an increase by 50% or more in the sum of the product of diameters of multiple nodes. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression.

Time frame: From randomization to data cut off date of 31 March 2014; median follow up time for all participants was 12.6 months

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date of 14 March 201430.8 months
ChlorambucilKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date of 14 March 201421.4 months
Comparison: Stratification factors: Disease stage (Binet A or Binet B or Rai I or Rai II versus (VS) Binet C or Rai III or Rai IV); Presence of at least one of the co-morbidities Asparate transaminase (AST)/Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3.0 times Upper Limits of Normal (ULN,) Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 to \< 60 mL/min, Yes VS No); Presence of at least one 11q deletion, 17p deletion, unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy-chain Variable-region (IgVH) or Beta-2 Microglobulin (ß2M )\> 4.0 mg/L (Yes versus No VS Unknown)p-value: 0.96790% CI: [0.76, 1.29]Log Rank
Secondary

Euro Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire

The standardized extended version of EQ-5D was designed for the collection of health state values using a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating scale - a vertical 20 cm visual analogue scale with the end points labeled best imaginable health state at the top and worst imaginable health state at the bottom having numeric values of 100 and 0 respectively. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking (or placing a cross) in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions.

Time frame: Day 1 and once every 8 weeks

Population: No data were collected for the EQ-5D QOL assessment. The EQ-5D analysis was not conducted due to the discontinuation of the lenalidomide arm.

Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to Create the FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Quality of Life Instrument

The FACT-Leu scale is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of leukemia-specific health-related quality of life for acute and chronic disease. The FACT-Leu is described as including 27 items that assess 17 physical symptoms (fevers, bleeding, general pain, stomach pain, chills, night sweats, bruising, lymph node swelling, weakness, tiredness, weight loss, appetite, shortness of breath, functional ability, diarrhea, concentration, and mouth sores) and 10 emotional/social concerns (frustration with activity limitation, discouraged by illness, future planning, uncertainty, worry about illness, emotional lability, isolation, infertility concern, family worry, and worry about infections).

Time frame: Day 1 and once every 8 weeks

Population: No data were collected for the FACT-Leu QOL assessment. Analysis was not conducted due to the discontinuation of the lenalidomide arm.

Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) participants who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) participants who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression

Time frame: Up to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Population: Intent to Treat population with an objective response as of 18 Feb 2013; includes responders

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of ResponseNA weeks
ChlorambucilKaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response105.3 weeks
p-value: 0.82690% CI: [0.58, 1.52]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014

Duration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) patients who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) patients who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression

Time frame: Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 months

Population: Intent to Treat population with an objective response as of 31 March 2014; includes responders.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014NA weeks
ChlorambucilKaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 201487.1 weeks
p-value: 0.14990% CI: [0.48, 1.05]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival at the Final Analysis

Overall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the subject was known to be alive for participants who were alive as of the data cutoff date and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.

Time frame: Up to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 months

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival at the Final Analysis74.3 Months
ChlorambucilKaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival at the Final Analysis70.5 Months
p-value: 0.70990% CI: [0.83, 1.34]stratified log rank
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to data cut off of 31 March 2014; median follow-up for all participants was 18.8 months

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan Meier Estimate of Overall SurvivalNA Months
ChlorambucilKaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival44.0 Months
p-value: 0.88390% CI: [0.73, 1.46]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post Treatment

Subsequent anti-cancer therapies administered to participants following the discontinuation of study drug (either Lenalidomide or Chlorambucil)

Time frame: Up to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 months

Population: The safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment (either lenalidomide or chlorambucil).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving plant alkaloids22 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentOther Analgesics and Antipyretics1 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving therapeutic products4 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentSpecific Antirheumatic Agents1 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving corticosteroids27 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentAntiemetics and Antinauseants0 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving other unspecified products0 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentCorticosteriods for Systemic Use0 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving antimetabolites34 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentImmunostimulants0 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentDrugs for Peptic ulcer and Gastric Reflex1 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving immunosuppressants3 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving alkylating agents107 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentImmunoglobulins1 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving antineoplastic aents93 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving cytotoxic antibiotics10 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentAntihistamine For Systemic Use1 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving additional CLL therapy125 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentAntihistamine For Systemic Use1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving antineoplastic aents86 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving antimetabolites24 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving corticosteroids16 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving plant alkaloids11 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving cytotoxic antibiotics3 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving immunosuppressants2 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving therapeutic products3 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving other unspecified products2 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentDrugs for Peptic ulcer and Gastric Reflex0 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentImmunoglobulins2 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentOther Analgesics and Antipyretics1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentSpecific Antirheumatic Agents0 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentAntiemetics and Antinauseants1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentCorticosteriods for Systemic Use1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentImmunostimulants1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving additional CLL therapy120 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentParticipants receiving alkylating agents106 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Time frame: From randomization up to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; Up to approximately 39 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1086 days and 406 days for Chlorambucil

Population: This is a smaller population used in this analysis (earlier cut-off date) prior to the last participant enrolled in the study. The safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment (either lenalidomide or chlorambucil) as of the data cut off date of 18 Feb 2013

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥1 TEAE leading to stopping either study drug61 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 3-4 TEAE173 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 Serious TEAE129 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 Serious TEAE related to any study drug95 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥1 Related TEAE leading to stopping either drug39 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 TEAE202 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 3-4 adverse event related to any study drug143 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 5 TEAE21 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ Grade 5 adverse event related to any study drug6 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug183 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 Serious TEAE76 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug139 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 TEAE186 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ Grade 5 adverse event related to any study drug1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 3-4 TEAE117 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 5 TEAE9 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥ 1 Serious TEAE related to any study drug46 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥1 TEAE leading to stopping either study drug34 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 3-4 adverse event related to any study drug82 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)≥1 Related TEAE leading to stopping either drug19 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Time frame: From randomization to the data cut-off date of 31 March 2014; Up to 53 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1140 days and 406 days for Chlorambucil

Population: The safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment (either lenalidomide or chlorambucil).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 TEAE216 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug194 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 3-4 TEAE188 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Grade 3-4 adverse event related to any study drug157 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ Grade 5 adverse event related to any study drug6 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 5 TEAE21 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 Serious TEAE148 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 Serious TEAE related to any study drug107 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥1 TEAE leading to stopping either study drug70 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥1 Related TEAE leading to stopping either drug46 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥1 Related TEAE leading to stopping either drug23 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 TEAE202 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug155 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 3-4 TEAE131 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Grade 3-4 adverse event related to any study drug90 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 5 TEAE11 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ Grade 5 adverse event related to any study drug1 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 Serious TEAE90 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥ 1 Serious TEAE related to any study drug53 participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014≥1 TEAE leading to stopping either study drug42 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response Based on IWCLL Guidelines With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014

A best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as: Complete Remission (CR): * No lymphadenopathy * No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly * Absence of constitutional symptoms * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes * Platelets \> 100,000/ul * Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl * Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules; Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi): • CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation. Nodular Partial Response: • CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules. Partial Response requires: * ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count * ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy * ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen * 1 or more of the following: * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * Platelets \>100,000/ul

Time frame: Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; approximately 53 months

Population: The Intent-to-Treat population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomidePercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response Based on IWCLL Guidelines With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 201460.9 percentage of participants with response
ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response Based on IWCLL Guidelines With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 201470.2 percentage of participants with response
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [0.45, 0.98]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response Based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Guidelines

A best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as: Complete Remission (CR): * No lymphadenopathy * No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly * Absence of constitutional symptoms * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes * Platelets \> 100,000/ul * Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl * Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules; Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi): • CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation. Nodular Partial Response (nPR): • CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules. Partial Response (PR) requires: * ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count * ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy * ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen * 1 or more of the following: * Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul * Platelets \>100,000/ul

Time frame: Up to data cut-off date of 18 Feb 2013; approximately 39 months

Population: This is a smaller population used in this analysis (earlier cut-off date) prior to the last participant enrolled in the study. The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomidePercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response Based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Guidelines51.9 percentage of participants
ChlorambucilPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response Based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) Guidelines62.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.03295% CI: [0.44, 0.96]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines

Time frame: Up to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Population: ITT participants with an objective response as of 18 February 2013

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideTime to Response8.6 weeks
ChlorambucilTime to Response8.1 weeks
Secondary

Time to Response for a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014

Time to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines

Time frame: Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 months

Population: ITT participants who had not progressed at the time of analysis; or those who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideTime to Response for a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 201410.4 weeks
ChlorambucilTime to Response for a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 20148.1 weeks
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Deaths During the Treatment and Survival Follow-Up Phase

The number of study participants deaths during the treatment and follow-up phase

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 months

Population: ITT population includes all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomideNumber of Participants Deaths During the Treatment and Survival Follow-Up Phase101 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Deaths During the Treatment and Survival Follow-Up Phase95 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026