Skip to content

Effects of Etanercept on the Heart, Veins and Thickness of Certain Major Arteries In Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

Effects of Etanercept on Endothelial Function and Carotid Intima-media Thickness (IMT) in Patients With Active AS

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00910273
Acronym
CREST
Enrollment
34
Registered
2009-05-29
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2016-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Keywords

IMT evaluation in AS patients treated with etanercept

Brief summary

Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients

Interventions

DRUGetanercept

etanercept 50 mg/week

Sponsors

Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of AS, as defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis. 2. AS with active disease as defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI, see Attachment 4) \>= 4 at screening visit. 3. Patients capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of complying with the treatment schedule and doses throughout the 52 weeks 4. Agreement by male subjects who are not surgically sterile and female subjects who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal to use reliable methods of birth control for the duration of the study. 5. Ability to self-inject drug or have a designee who can do so. 6. Ability to store injectable test article at 2ºC to 8ºC.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Pregnancy confirmed by test taken at screening in all women except those who were surgically sterile or at least 1 year postmenopausal. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception that needs to be continued for 15 days following discontinuation of the test article.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus\[-\] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (\*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ETChange in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETCRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ETBASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ETBASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score \* 100 = greater than or equal to 50%.
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ETASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ETASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) \* 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETPartial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETBASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ETWhile in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMeasurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMeasurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMeasurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETMeasurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETWhile participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETChest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ETASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants received etanercept (50 milligrams \[mg\]) subcutaneous (sc) injection once per week for 52 weeks.
18
Placebo
Participants received matched placebo sc injection once per week for 52 weeks.
16
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDiscontinuation of study by sponsor82
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy69
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanerceptPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous39.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69
46.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.14
42.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 183 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 180 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12

Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus\[-\] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (\*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Modified Intent to Treat Population (mITT): all randomized participants who received at least one dose of test article followed by at least one available evaluation; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12Baseline (n=17, 15)10.09 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 5.93
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)4.10 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 11.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12Baseline (n=17, 15)13.42 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 7.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)0.25 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 7.35
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: No difference in Change in FMD at 12 weeks for Etanercept and placebo.~Alternative Hypothesis: Difference in Change in FMD at 12 weeks for Etanercept and placebo.~Sample size of 36 subjects per treatment arm was planned based on an expected difference of 0.9 in FMD (Standard Deviation \[SD\] 1.5), with 80% power and 5% significance level.p-value: 0.60895% CI: [-5.14, 8.58]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

While in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)3.79 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 9.37
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)4.67 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 19.09
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)57.09 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 23.3
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)6.50 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 18.94
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)9.30 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 17.09
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)4.97 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 11.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)9.17 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 9.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)54.80 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 15.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-2.61 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 4.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)-2.79 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 6.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)1.88 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 2.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)7.50 degrees of movementStandard Deviation 8.35
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Measurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)103.02 cmStandard Deviation 17.46
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.34 cmStandard Deviation 9.58
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)2.01 cmStandard Deviation 12.78
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.54 cmStandard Deviation 13.09
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)2.14 cmStandard Deviation 13.18
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)2.46 cmStandard Deviation 21.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-2.50 cmStandard Deviation 8.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)94.69 cmStandard Deviation 15.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.13 cmStandard Deviation 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-4.21 cmStandard Deviation 8.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)1.33 cmStandard Deviation 1.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)0.90 cmStandard Deviation 7.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Measurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.54 cmStandard Deviation 1.48
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)3.01 cmStandard Deviation 3.77
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)10.25 cmStandard Deviation 6.25
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)2.06 cmStandard Deviation 2.35
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12(n=16, 12)0.09 cmStandard Deviation 3.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)2.38 cmStandard Deviation 2.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.80 cmStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)8.00 cmStandard Deviation 6.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.33 cmStandard Deviation 2.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12(n=16, 12)0.48 cmStandard Deviation 3.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.31 cmStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.69 cmStandard Deviation 1.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Measurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)5.00 cmStandard Deviation 4.31
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.38 cmStandard Deviation 0.78
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)1.23 cmStandard Deviation 3.02
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)1.41 cmStandard Deviation 3.79
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)1.39 cmStandard Deviation 3.88
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)2.48 cmStandard Deviation 4.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)4.77 cmStandard Deviation 4.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.10 cmStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.11 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)0.07 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)-0.02 cmStandard Deviation 0.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Measurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)14.31 cmStandard Deviation 2.74
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.01 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12(n=16, 12)-0.18 cmStandard Deviation 0.9
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.58 cmStandard Deviation 0.65
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.26 cmStandard Deviation 1
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)0.55 cmStandard Deviation 2.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.31 cmStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17, 15)14.91 cmStandard Deviation 5.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.36 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.43 cmStandard Deviation 0.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.10 cmStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12(n=16, 12)-0.33 cmStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

BASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17,15)6.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-1.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 13)-3.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-3.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-4.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 2)-4.49 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-3.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n= 17,15)6.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-5.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 2)-5.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 13)-1.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-3.05, -0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.02195% CI: [-3.7, -0.33]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)3.47 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)-0.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)3.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)0.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-1.74, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.02995% CI: [-1.72, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52

Change in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.15
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)-0.05 mmStandard Deviation 0.19
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Baseline (n=17, 14)0.76 mmStandard Deviation 0.16
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Baseline (n=17, 14)0.67 mmStandard Deviation 0.19
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.08
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)-0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.16
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)-0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.11
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)-0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.19
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Baseline (n=17, 14)0.65 mmStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)-0.27 mmStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Baseline (n=17, 14)0.77 mmStandard Deviation 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)-0.09 mmStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CCA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)0.08 mmStandard Deviation 0.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Baseline (n=17, 14)0.89 mmStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)-0.02 mmStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52CB Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2)0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Baseline (n=17, 14)0.75 mmStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52ICA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11)-0.07 mmStandard Deviation 0.28
Comparison: Week 12; Common Carotid Artery; Due to limited number of participants with visits after Week 12 analysis limited to Week 12p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-0.08, 0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12; Common Bulb; Due to limited number of participants with visits after Week 12 analysis limited to Week 12p-value: 0.51395% CI: [-0.13, 0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12; Internal Carotid Artery; Due to limited number of participants with visits after Week 12 analysis limited to Week 12p-value: 0.59295% CI: [-0.14, 0.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Chest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point; Due to limited number of participants with visits after Week 12 analysis limited to Week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.68 cmStandard Deviation 1.86
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.33 cmStandard Deviation 2.7
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)0.31 cmStandard Deviation 1.5
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)4.75 cmStandard Deviation 2.19
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)0.58 cmStandard Deviation 1.7
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)0.22 cmStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.13 cmStandard Deviation 2.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)4.50 cmStandard Deviation 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.42 cmStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.73 cmStandard Deviation 1.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.60 cmStandard Deviation 1.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)-0.37 cmStandard Deviation 1.53
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.57595% CI: [-0.89, 1.57]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.20495% CI: [-0.52, 2.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52

CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 4 (n=15, 13)-17.46 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 30.8
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-25.58 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 38.08
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Baseline (n=16, 15)19.66 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 31.66
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-20.96 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 37.81
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 12 (n=14, 12)-11.84 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 19.45
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-20.09 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 31.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-3.58 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 6.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Baseline (n=16, 15)11.83 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 4 (n=15, 13)-1.32 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 8.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 12 (n=14, 12)2.01 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 6.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-2.55 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 6.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-3.05 mg/liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 5.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=16, 15)42.85 mm/hrStandard Deviation 37.73
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13)-21.49 mm/hrStandard Deviation 28.82
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)-29.47 mm/hrStandard Deviation 36.84
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-31.89 mm/hrStandard Deviation 28.62
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-31.06 mm/hrStandard Deviation 25.13
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-37.47 mm/hrStandard Deviation 23.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-3.62 mm/hrStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=16, 15)45.80 mm/hrStandard Deviation 42.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)4.73 mm/hrStandard Deviation 15.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13)-1.25 mm/hrStandard Deviation 27.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-6.15 mm/hrStandard Deviation 7.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)4.40 mm/hrStandard Deviation 17.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52

BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) \* 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)

Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 13)2.56 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 9.51
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)3.89 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 10.56
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)6.24 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 5.53
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)8.14 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 5.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)12.13 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 5.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 13)-0.68 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 4.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)5.18 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 7.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)3.20 percentage of BA diameterStandard Deviation 5.75
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.47695% CI: [-3.35, 7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

While participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)7.67 cmStandard Deviation 3.98
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)-0.13 cmStandard Deviation 0.88
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)-0.44 cmStandard Deviation 1.11
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.14 cmStandard Deviation 1.89
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)0.78 cmStandard Deviation 2.06
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-0.24 cmStandard Deviation 1.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4)-0.40 cmStandard Deviation 1.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=17, 15)9.77 cmStandard Deviation 5.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.18 cmStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14)0.89 cmStandard Deviation 1.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3)-1.17 cmStandard Deviation 1.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12)0.53 cmStandard Deviation 2
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.04195% CI: [-2.13, -0.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.04895% CI: [-2.55, -0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Mean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=16, 15)11.31 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 4.18
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=15, 11)0.31 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.16
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)-0.07 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.51
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=8, 4)-1.72 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.52
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)1.65 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.92
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)1.49 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-2.58 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 8.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Baseline (n=16, 15)14.59 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 9.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 24 (n=8, 4)-1.40 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 4 (n=15, 11)0.33 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 4.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-6.98 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 10.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.13 micromole/liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 4.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

Mean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.55
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Baseline (n=16, 15)1.29 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.63
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Baseline (n=16, 15)4.39 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.97
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)0.10 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.28
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Baseline (n=16, 15)2.76 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.25
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.07 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.19
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.30 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.6
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.11 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.26
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.62
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.19 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.21
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Baseline (n=16, 15)0.96 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.54
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-0.01 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.24
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.27 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.34
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.27 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.61
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.33
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.04 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.20 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.50 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.61
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.24 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.56
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.22 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.48
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.33 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13)0.25 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.61
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)0.45 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.63
EtanerceptChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-0.82 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-0.99 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Baseline (n=16, 15)4.53 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13)-0.16 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)-0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Baseline (n=16, 15)3.02 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.34 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-0.01 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52LDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)0.46 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Baseline (n=16, 15)1.18 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)-0.00 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)-0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)0.30 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52HDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3)-0.02 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Baseline (n=16, 15)1.25 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12)-0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12)-0.12 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)-0.91 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TGL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4)-0.76 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52TC Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4)0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)56.3 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)88.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)29.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)38.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants with evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)29.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)56.3 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)77.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)23.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)25.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)25.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)22.2 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)40.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)5.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)25.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)25.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)37.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)44.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)40.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)11.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)7.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Partial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=15, 13)46.7 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=7, 4)71.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)29.4 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=4, 2)75.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=8, 4)87.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=4, 2)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=15, 13)38.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=7, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)68.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)87.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)88.9 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)41.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n=17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)46.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

BASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score \* 100 = greater than or equal to 50%.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)62.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)87.5 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)77.8 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)80.0 percentage of participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n= 17, 14)29.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 52 (n=5, 2)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 4 (n= 17, 14)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 12 (n=16, 13)23.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 24 (n=9, 4)100 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Week 36 (n=8, 4)75.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026