Ankylosing Spondylitis
Conditions
Keywords
IMT evaluation in AS patients treated with etanercept
Brief summary
Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients
Interventions
etanercept 50 mg/week
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of AS, as defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis. 2. AS with active disease as defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI, see Attachment 4) \>= 4 at screening visit. 3. Patients capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of complying with the treatment schedule and doses throughout the 52 weeks 4. Agreement by male subjects who are not surgically sterile and female subjects who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal to use reliable methods of birth control for the duration of the study. 5. Ability to self-inject drug or have a designee who can do so. 6. Ability to store injectable test article at 2ºC to 8ºC.
Exclusion criteria
1\. Pregnancy confirmed by test taken at screening in all women except those who were surgically sterile or at least 1 year postmenopausal. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception that needs to be continued for 15 days following discontinuation of the test article.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus\[-\] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (\*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET | Change in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. |
| Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Mean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Mean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET | BASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET | BASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score \* 100 = greater than or equal to 50%. |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain. |
| Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain. |
| Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain. |
| Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET) | BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) \* 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. |
| Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain. |
| Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Partial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET | While in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Measurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Measurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Measurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Measurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | While participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | Chest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection. |
| Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET | ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain. |
Countries
Italy
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Etanercept Participants received etanercept (50 milligrams \[mg\]) subcutaneous (sc) injection once per week for 52 weeks. | 18 |
| Placebo Participants received matched placebo sc injection once per week for 52 weeks. | 16 |
| Total | 34 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation of study by sponsor | 8 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 6 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Etanercept | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 39.47 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.69 | 46.83 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.14 | 42.93 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 5 Participants | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 18 | 3 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 18 | 0 / 16 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12
Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus\[-\] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (\*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Modified Intent to Treat Population (mITT): all randomized participants who received at least one dose of test article followed by at least one available evaluation; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 10.09 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 5.93 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 4.10 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 11.41 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 13.42 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 0.25 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 7.35 |
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
While in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 3.79 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 9.37 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 4.67 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 19.09 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 57.09 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 6.50 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 18.94 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 9.30 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 17.09 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 4.97 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 11.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 9.17 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 9.41 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 54.80 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 15.31 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -2.61 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 4.15 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | -2.79 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 6.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 1.88 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 7.50 degrees of movement | Standard Deviation 8.35 |
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 103.02 cm | Standard Deviation 17.46 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.34 cm | Standard Deviation 9.58 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 2.01 cm | Standard Deviation 12.78 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.54 cm | Standard Deviation 13.09 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 2.14 cm | Standard Deviation 13.18 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 2.46 cm | Standard Deviation 21.22 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -2.50 cm | Standard Deviation 8.69 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 94.69 cm | Standard Deviation 15.38 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.13 cm | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -4.21 cm | Standard Deviation 8.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 1.33 cm | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 0.90 cm | Standard Deviation 7.17 |
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.54 cm | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 3.01 cm | Standard Deviation 3.77 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 10.25 cm | Standard Deviation 6.25 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 2.06 cm | Standard Deviation 2.35 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12(n=16, 12) | 0.09 cm | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 2.38 cm | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.80 cm | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 8.00 cm | Standard Deviation 6.32 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.33 cm | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12(n=16, 12) | 0.48 cm | Standard Deviation 3.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.31 cm | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.69 cm | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 5.00 cm | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.38 cm | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 1.23 cm | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 1.41 cm | Standard Deviation 3.79 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 1.39 cm | Standard Deviation 3.88 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 2.48 cm | Standard Deviation 4.51 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.05 cm | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 4.77 cm | Standard Deviation 4.54 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.10 cm | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.11 cm | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 0.07 cm | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | -0.02 cm | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 14.31 cm | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.01 cm | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12(n=16, 12) | -0.18 cm | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.58 cm | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.26 cm | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 0.55 cm | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.31 cm | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17, 15) | 14.91 cm | Standard Deviation 5.49 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.36 cm | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.43 cm | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.10 cm | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12(n=16, 12) | -0.33 cm | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
BASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17,15) | 6.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -1.79 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.81 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 13) | -3.19 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.34 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -3.86 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -4.05 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 2) | -4.49 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -3.06 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.94 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n= 17,15) | 6.30 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -5.28 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.10 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 2) | -5.12 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 13) | -1.31 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 3.47 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.41 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | -0.73 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.50 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.88 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.35 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.58 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.81 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 3.98 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.75 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.75 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 0.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52
Change in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | 0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | -0.05 mm | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.76 mm | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.67 mm | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | 0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | -0.03 mm | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | -0.03 mm | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | -0.03 mm | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.65 mm | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | -0.27 mm | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.77 mm | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | -0.09 mm | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CCA Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | 0.08 mm | Standard Deviation 0.01 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.89 mm | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | -0.02 mm | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | CB Change at Week 52 (n=4, 2) | 0.03 mm | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Baseline (n=17, 14) | 0.75 mm | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52 | ICA Change at Week 12 (n=16, 11) | -0.07 mm | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Chest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point; Due to limited number of participants with visits after Week 12 analysis limited to Week 12
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.68 cm | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.33 cm | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 0.31 cm | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 4.75 cm | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | 0.58 cm | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 0.22 cm | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.13 cm | Standard Deviation 2.73 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 4.50 cm | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.42 cm | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.73 cm | Standard Deviation 1.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.60 cm | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | -0.37 cm | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52
CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=15, 13) | -17.46 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 30.8 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -25.58 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 38.08 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 19.66 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 31.66 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -20.96 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 37.81 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=14, 12) | -11.84 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 19.45 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -20.09 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 31.74 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -3.58 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 6.42 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 11.83 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 24.64 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=15, 13) | -1.32 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 8.19 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=14, 12) | 2.01 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 6.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -2.55 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 6.45 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -3.05 mg/liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 5.33 |
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 42.85 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 37.73 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13) | -21.49 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 28.82 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | -29.47 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 36.84 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -31.89 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 28.62 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -31.06 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 25.13 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -37.47 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 23.66 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -3.62 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 45.80 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 42.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 4.73 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13) | -1.25 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 27.53 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -6.15 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 7.52 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 4.40 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 17.39 |
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52
BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) \* 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)
Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 13) | 2.56 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 9.51 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 3.89 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 10.56 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 6.24 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 5.53 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 8.14 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 5.65 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 12.13 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 5.28 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 13) | -0.68 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 4.75 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 5.18 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 7.33 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 3.20 percentage of BA diameter | Standard Deviation 5.75 |
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
While participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 7.67 cm | Standard Deviation 3.98 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | -0.13 cm | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | -0.44 cm | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.14 cm | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 0.78 cm | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -0.24 cm | Standard Deviation 1.64 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=8, 4) | -0.40 cm | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=17, 15) | 9.77 cm | Standard Deviation 5.71 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.18 cm | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0.89 cm | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=5, 3) | -1.17 cm | Standard Deviation 1.61 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=16, 12) | 0.53 cm | Standard Deviation 2 |
Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Mean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n= number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 11.31 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 4.18 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=15, 11) | 0.31 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.16 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | -0.07 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=8, 4) | -1.72 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.52 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 1.65 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 1.49 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -2.58 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 8.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Baseline (n=16, 15) | 14.59 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 9.63 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 24 (n=8, 4) | -1.40 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 4 (n=15, 11) | 0.33 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 4.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -6.98 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 10.79 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.13 micromole/liter (µmol/L) | Standard Deviation 4.05 |
Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Mean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point; N=number of participants evaluable
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 1.29 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Baseline (n=16, 15) | 4.39 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | 0.10 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 2.76 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.07 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.30 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.11 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | 0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.19 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 0.96 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -0.01 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.27 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.27 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | 0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.04 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.20 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.50 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.24 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.22 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.33 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13) | 0.25 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 0.45 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Etanercept | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -0.82 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -0.99 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Baseline (n=16, 15) | 4.53 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 4 (n=16, 13) | -0.16 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | -0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 3.02 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | 0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | 0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.34 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -0.01 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | LDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | 0.46 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 1.18 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | -0.00 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | -0.03 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.08 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 0.30 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | HDL Change at Week 52 (n=4, 3) | -0.02 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Baseline (n=16, 15) | 1.25 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 4 (n=15, 12) | -0.06 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 12 (n=15, 12) | -0.12 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | -0.91 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TGL Change at Week 36 (n=7, 4) | -0.76 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 | TC Change at Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 0.14 millimole/Liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 56.3 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 38.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants with evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 56.3 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 23.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 11.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 7.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Partial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=15, 13) | 46.7 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=4, 2) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=8, 4) | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=4, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=15, 13) | 38.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=7, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n=17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 46.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
BASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score \* 100 = greater than or equal to 50%.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Population: mITT; N=number of participants evaluable; n=number of participants evaluable at specific time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 62.5 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n= 17, 14) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 52 (n=5, 2) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 4 (n= 17, 14) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 12 (n=16, 13) | 23.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 24 (n=9, 4) | 100 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 | Week 36 (n=8, 4) | 75.0 percentage of participants |