Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia in the Emergency Department

Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia in the Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00910208
Enrollment
211
Registered
2009-05-29
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2019-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain, Analgesia, Analgesia, Patient-controlled, Emergency Medicine

Brief summary

The aims of this study are to assess efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) when applied to the Emergency Department setting and to compare the efficacy and safety of two PCA dosing regimens.

Detailed description

The safety, efficacy, and dosing of PCA will be assessed in a randomized trial with three treatment arms: 1. PCA with 1.0 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes, 2. PCA with 1.5 mg demand dosing every 6 minutes and 3. a non-PCA comparison group. All patients will receive a loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg morphine. All patients can receive additional analgesics as needed, at the discretion of the provider. We hypothesize that morphine supplied via PCA will provide superior analgesia without a greater incidence of adverse events when compared to non-PCA pain management; and that PCA demand dosing of 1.5 mg will be superior to 1.0 mg without more adverse events.

Interventions

DEVICEPatient-controlled analgesia

Intravenous morphine delivered via Curlin painsmart PCA device

DRUGmorphine

Intravenous morphine

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
Jacobi Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting to the ED with a chief complaint of abdominal pain of less than or equal to 7 days duration * Age 18 to 65 years * Patient deemed by the ED attending physician to require IV opioid analgesia

Exclusion criteria

* Current use of prescription or non-prescription opioids * Long-term use of opioids, chronic pain syndrome * Clinician suspicion of opioid dependence/abuse * Clinical suspicion of intoxication * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation \< 97% * Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mm Hg * Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines, or tricyclic antidepressants * History of renal insufficiency/renal failure * Prior allergic reaction to morphine * Inability to provide informed consent * Previous entry of patient into study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating ScaleBaseline and 30 minutes post treatmentParticipants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain. Change is measured by subtracting the 30 minute NRS score from the Baseline NRS score, thus higher numbers indicate greater decrease in pain, negative numbers indicate increase in pain from baseline to 30 minutes post-baseline.
Participants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 Minutes30 minutes post treatmentPain Intensity measured on Likert Scale. Participants self report pain level according to the scale by selecting from No relief, Slight relief, Moderate relief, A lot of relief, and Complete relief)
Long Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 HoursBaseline, 30, 60, 90, 120 post-treatmentParticipants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain Total analgesia is measured by a summary of change in pain that varies from 0 - no change to
Long Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 Minutes120 minutesParticipants aksed to and give range
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events2 hoursAdverse Events defined as: oxygen saturation \< 92%; respiratory rate \<10 breaths/min; systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Supplementary Analgesia2 hours post treatmentcount of participants who needed or did not needed additional analgesia

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment started April 3, 2009 and ended June 30, 2010. Patients were recruited by bilingual research associates in the Emergency Department of Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PCA 1 mg Demand Dose
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose followed by PCA with 1.0 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes Patient-controlled analgesia: Intravenous morphine delivered via Curlin painsmart PCA device morphine: Intravenous morphine
67
PCA 1.5 mg Demand Dose
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose followed by PCA with 1.5 mg morphine demand dosing every 6 minutes Patient-controlled analgesia: Intravenous morphine delivered via Curlin painsmart PCA device morphine: Intravenous morphine
70
Non-PCA Comparison Group
0.1 mg/kg morphine loading dose followed by additional analgesia supplemented as needed at the discretion of the treating physician, using usual procedures for monitoring and treating pain. morphine: Intravenous morphine
69
Total206

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-PCA Comparison GroupTotalPCA 1 mg Demand DosePCA 1.5 mg Demand Dose
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Initial Pain Score
Pain Score=10
31 Participants100 Participants37 Participants32 Participants
Initial Pain Score
Pain Score=7
13 Participants24 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Initial Pain Score
Pain Score=8
10 Participants35 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Initial Pain Score
Pain Score=9
11 Participants33 Participants11 Participants11 Participants
Initial Pain Score
Pain Score less than 7
4 Participants14 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/other
2 Participants14 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American - not Hispanic
25 Participants56 Participants16 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
37 Participants124 Participants41 Participants46 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - not Hispanic
5 Participants12 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants141 Participants43 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants65 Participants24 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 700 / 69
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 670 / 700 / 69
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 671 / 701 / 69

Outcome results

Primary

Long Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 Minutes

Participants aksed to and give range

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesNo relief7 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesA lot of relief22 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesModerate relief9 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesComplete relief18 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesSlight relief9 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesModerate relief8 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesNo relief6 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesSlight relief5 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesA lot of relief34 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesComplete relief16 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesComplete relief15 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesA lot of relief16 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesNo relief6 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesModerate relief13 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 120 MinutesSlight relief18 Participants
p-value: 0.033Chi-squared
Primary

Long Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 Hours

Participants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain Total analgesia is measured by a summary of change in pain that varies from 0 - no change to

Time frame: Baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120 post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 Hours-16.4 scores on a scale *minutes
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseLong Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 Hours-17.4 scores on a scale *minutes
Non-PCA Comparison GroupLong Term Efficacy: Total Analgesia Provided Over 2 Hours-13.6 scores on a scale *minutes
p-value: 0.06ANOVA
Primary

Participants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 Minutes

Pain Intensity measured on Likert Scale. Participants self report pain level according to the scale by selecting from No relief, Slight relief, Moderate relief, A lot of relief, and Complete relief)

Time frame: 30 minutes post treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesA lot of relief24 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesModerate relief18 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesNo relief4 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesSlight relief14 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesComplete relief7 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesModerate relief20 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesNo relief4 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesSlight relief10 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesA lot of relief31 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesComplete relief5 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesComplete relief12 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesA lot of relief25 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesNo relief4 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesModerate relief12 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupParticipants With Short Term Efficacy: Pain Relief by 30 MinutesSlight relief16 Participants
p-value: 0.47Chi-squared
Primary

Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events

Adverse Events defined as: oxygen saturation \< 92%; respiratory rate \<10 breaths/min; systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg)

Time frame: 2 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseSafety: Incidence of Adverse Events1 or more adverse events0 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseSafety: Incidence of Adverse EventsNo Adverse events67 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseSafety: Incidence of Adverse Events1 or more adverse events1 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseSafety: Incidence of Adverse EventsNo Adverse events69 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupSafety: Incidence of Adverse Events1 or more adverse events1 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupSafety: Incidence of Adverse EventsNo Adverse events68 Participants
p-value: 0.99Fisher Exact
Primary

Short Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating Scale

Participants will complete a survey in which they rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst imaginable pain, higher scores indicate worse pain. Change is measured by subtracting the 30 minute NRS score from the Baseline NRS score, thus higher numbers indicate greater decrease in pain, negative numbers indicate increase in pain from baseline to 30 minutes post-baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 30 minutes post treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseShort Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating Scale3.8 Units on a scale
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseShort Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating Scale4.0 Units on a scale
Non-PCA Comparison GroupShort Term Efficacy: Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by Patient Self Report on Numerical Rating Scale3.6 Units on a scale
p-value: 0.82ANOVA
Secondary

Need for Supplementary Analgesia

count of participants who needed or did not needed additional analgesia

Time frame: 2 hours post treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaNeeded supplementary medication4 Participants
PCA 1 mg Demand DoseNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaDid not need supplementary medication63 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaNeeded supplementary medication0 Participants
PCA 1.5 mg Demand DoseNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaDid not need supplementary medication70 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaNeeded supplementary medication20 Participants
Non-PCA Comparison GroupNeed for Supplementary AnalgesiaDid not need supplementary medication49 Participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026