Skip to content

Macular Pigment and Glare Disability

Effects of Lutein and Zeaxanthin Upon MPOD and Its Effects Upon Glare Disability, Photostress Recovery, and Contrast Enhancement in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00909090
Acronym
MP-GD
Enrollment
109
Registered
2009-05-27
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vision, Entoptic

Keywords

macular pigment, glare disability, lutein, photostress, chromatic contrast sensitivity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is: I. To measure MP optical density (MPOD) in two groups (experimental and placebo) of 50 subjects each (N = 100), during an Lutein + Zeaxanthin supplementation period of 12 months. II. To test the hypothesis that increases in MP (via 12 mg daily Lutein + Zeaxanthin supplementation) will result in significantly improved visual performance under disability glare conditions. III. To test the hypothesis that increases in MP (via 12 mg daily L + Z supplementation) will result in significantly reduced photostress recovery times. IV. To test the hypothesis that increases in MP (via 12 mg daily L + Z supplementation) will result in improved contrast enhancement.

Detailed description

The following measurements will be taken, before and after supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin: Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) Visual performance under glare conditions Photostress recovery times chromatic contrast sensitivity.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT12 mg Lutein + Zeaxanthin

10 mg FloraGlo lutein + 2 mg Optisharp zeaxanthin, taken once daily for one year

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVisually identical placebo

Visually identical placebo, taken once daily for one year

Sponsors

DSM Nutritional Products, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Georgia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Two arms: nutritional supplement vs. placebo.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Gender: male or female * Age: 18 - 40 years * BMI: 20-30 * No anticipated changes in dieting habits (as relevant to xanthophyll intake). * No anticipated surgical procedures. * Assessed as healthy, based on a pre-study examination including medical history, physical examination, and clinical laboratory. The examination will be performed by an MD or a Nurse Practitioner. * Willingness and ability to give written informed consent and willingness and ability to comply with the study requirements. * Corrected visual acuity (ETDRS): better than 20/60

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \<20 or \>30 * Age \<18 or \>40 years * Smokers * Current or history of relevant diseases (such as AMD) * Corrected visual acuity worse than 20/60 * Inability to reliably perform MPOD measurements by heterochromatic flicker photometry or any of the other ophthalmic tests of the study. * Any condition likely to interfere with normal gastro-intestinal absorption of xanthophylls. * Current use of xanthophyll containing supplements * Use of xanthophyll containing supplements in the past 6 months * Participation in any other study during last 1 month. * Blood donation during the last 3 months. * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to xanthophylls. * Regular intake of medications or supplements, which the principal investigator deems likely to confound the study outcomes. * Suspected lack of compliance with any requirements of the study. * Childbearing potential and unwillingness to refrain from acceptable anticonceptive measures (not including abstinence). * Current pregnancy or breast feeding * Any relevant abnormalities in the routine laboratory tests

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Macular Pigment Optical Densityevery three months for one year; 12-month measure reported.optical density of macular pigment layer of the neural retina at 30-minutes of retinal eccentricity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glare Disability12-month data point onlylight energy needed to obscure or veil a visual target; calculated as log-relative energy, which is the physical energy needed for the subject to report that the visual target has been veiled, given the intensity of the target, logged.
Photostress Recovery Timeimprovement in recovery time; baseline recovery time (sec) minus 12-month recovery time (sec)amount of time needed to recover from exposure to a bright light, and to regain sight of a visual target
Heterochromatic Contrast Sensitivity12-month data point onlyamount of short-wave light energy necessary to obscure of veil a visual target, calculated as log-relative energy, which is the physical energy needed for the subject to report that the visual target has been veiled, given the intensity of the target, logged.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was initiated in May, 2009. The enrollment period was rolling and lasted for 30 months. Enrollment closed in November, 2011. Participants were recruited from the local Athens, Clarke-County community and the University of Georgia student population.

Pre-assignment details

Key events: Telephone screening to confirm eligibility Enrollment Randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
12 mg Lutein + Zeaxanthin
10 mg FloraGlo lutein + 2 mg Optisharp zeaxanthin Intervention: 10 mg FloraGlo lutein + 2 mg Optisharp zeaxanthin, taken once daily for one year
53
Visually Identical Placebo
visually identical placebo Placebo: Visually identical placebo, taken once daily for one year
56
Total109

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1717

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVisually Identical PlaceboTotal12 mg Lutein + Zeaxanthin
Age, Continuous22.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.32
23.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97
23.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.61
BMI22.8 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.66
22.85 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.56
22.9 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
Iris Darkness2.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
2.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29
2.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants109 participants53 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Female
34 Participants65 Participants31 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Male
22 Participants44 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Macular Pigment Optical Density

optical density of macular pigment layer of the neural retina at 30-minutes of retinal eccentricity

Time frame: every three months for one year; 12-month measure reported.

Population: Participants who completed all four measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luten + ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.54 optical densityStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboMacular Pigment Optical Density0.42 optical densityStandard Deviation 0.1
p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Glare Disability

light energy needed to obscure or veil a visual target; calculated as log-relative energy, which is the physical energy needed for the subject to report that the visual target has been veiled, given the intensity of the target, logged.

Time frame: 12-month data point only

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luten + ZeaxanthinGlare Disability1.81 log relative energyStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboGlare Disability1.83 log relative energyStandard Deviation 0.11
Comparison: Analysis compared mean differences between placebo and intervention at the 12-month time point.p-value: 0.21Regression, Linear
Secondary

Heterochromatic Contrast Sensitivity

amount of short-wave light energy necessary to obscure of veil a visual target, calculated as log-relative energy, which is the physical energy needed for the subject to report that the visual target has been veiled, given the intensity of the target, logged.

Time frame: 12-month data point only

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luten + ZeaxanthinHeterochromatic Contrast Sensitivity1.21 log relative energyStandard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboHeterochromatic Contrast Sensitivity1.16 log relative energyStandard Deviation 0.1
Comparison: analysis conducted on mean change over one year, between groupsp-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Photostress Recovery Time

amount of time needed to recover from exposure to a bright light, and to regain sight of a visual target

Time frame: improvement in recovery time; baseline recovery time (sec) minus 12-month recovery time (sec)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luten + ZeaxanthinPhotostress Recovery Time10.5 secondsStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboPhotostress Recovery Time4.5 secondsStandard Deviation 6
Comparison: Analysis compared mean change from baseline to 12-month time points.p-value: 0.01t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026