Skip to content

Study on Bone Marrow Morphology in Adults Receiving Romiplostim for Treatment of Thrombocytopenia Associated With Immune Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP)

A Prospective, Phase IV, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study Evaluating Changes in Bone Marrow Morphology in Adult Subjects Receiving Romiplostim for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia Associated With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00907478
Enrollment
169
Registered
2009-05-22
Start date
2009-08-11
Completion date
2014-01-14
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura, Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Immune Thrombocytopenia, ITP

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in bone marrow morphology (structure) after long-term exposure to romiplostim.

Detailed description

Participants diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Guidelines were sequentially enrolled into the following groups: * Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 1 * Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 2 * Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 3. All participants received romiplostim for 3 years, unless withdrawn from the study early. Participants returned for one visit for End of Study (EOS) procedures 4 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation, or, for participants who were withdrawn from the study due to the presence of collagen fibrosis, or had a change to grade 3 reticulin, at 12 weeks after discontinuation of romiplostim.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALromiplostim

Romiplostim administered by subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of ITP according to American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines * Subject must have had a bone marrow biopsy within one year prior to planned first dose of romiplostim (with available bone marrow tissue block or unstained histological slides to send to a central laboratory for interpretation) or must consent to a pre-treatment bone marrow biopsy within 3 weeks prior to planned first dose of romiplostim. Central laboratory interpretation is required prior to first dose of romiplostim * Subject must agree to a scheduled bone marrow biopsy at Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 following romiplostim treatment and any unscheduled biopsies if clinically indicated * Subject ≥18 years of age * Baseline bone marrow reticulin grade of 0, 1, 2, or 3 according to the modified Bauermeister grading scheme as assessed by central laboratory interpretation * Platelet count \< 50 x 10\^9/L * Must have received at least 1 prior ITP therapy (examples of ITP therapy include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin \[IVIG\], splenectomy) * Subject (or legally-acceptable representative) is willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Baseline bone marrow biopsy positive for collagen fibrosis * Any known history of or currently active bone marrow stem cell disorder, hematological malignancy, myeloproliferative disorder, myelodysplastic syndrome * Any current active malignancy * Any prior exposure to cytostatic chemotherapy or radiotherapy for malignancy * Subject has undergone pacemaker placement, cardiac ablation of arrhythmia, and/or any current treatment with Vaughan Williams Class IA - IC and Class III agents (Vaughan Williams, 1970) * Subject has participated in any study evaluating pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (ie romiplostim or eltrombopag) * Subject has a known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E coli-derived product * Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed (at least 4 weeks since ending) other investigational device or drug trial(s) or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s) * Other investigational procedures are excluded * Subject of child-bearing potential is evidently pregnant (eg positive pregnancy test) or is breast feeding * Subject is not using adequate contraceptive precautions * Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and does not have a legally acceptable representative and/or is unable to comply with study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Collagen FibrosisAt Years 1, 2 or 3 after initial exposure of romiplostimThe percentage of participants who developed collagen fibrosis as evidenced by trichrome staining. Bone marrow biopsy samples were assessed using the modified Bauermeister grading scale by a central laboratory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis 12 Weeks After Romiplostim Discontinuation in Participants Who Developed Collagen Fibrosis at Years 1, 2, or 312 weeks after romiplostim discontinuationThe number of participants with collagen fibrosis as evidenced by trichrome staining 12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation in participants who developed collagen fibrosis at Years 1, 2, or 3 after initial exposure of romiplostim, assessed by the central laboratory using the modified Bauermeister grading scale.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed an Increased Modified Bauermeister GradeAt Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 post romiplostim exposureIncreased modified Bauermeister grade refers to an increase by ≥ 2 severity grades or an increase to grade 4 (ie, grade 0 to 2-4, grade 1 to 3-4, grade 2 to 4, or grade 3 to 4 over baseline). The modified Bauermeister scale provides a means of assessing the development of increased reticulin and collagen in bone marrow according to the following: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable; Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network; Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers; Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining); Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining).
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Total Cardiac Output Corrected (QTc) IntervalsBaseline, Week 3 and Week 12A clinically relevant change in QTc (Fridericia) interval is defined as an absolute QTc interval \>500 ms or a QTc Interval increase from Baseline \>60 ms post romiplostim exposure. 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) were performed in triplicate at Baseline, Week 3 and Week 12; the average of of the 3 values at each assessment was used.
Number of Participants With Improvement of Reticulin to a Grade of ≤ 2 for Participants Who Developed Grade 3 Reticulin12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuationThe number of participants who had any improvement of reticulin to a grade of ≤ 2 for participants who developed grade 3 reticulin after initial exposure to romiplostim as measured by the modified Bauermeister grading scale. The modified Bauermeister scale provides a means of assessing the development of increased reticulin and collagen in bone marrow according to the following: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable; Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network; Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers; Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining); Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining).
Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaFrom the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation or 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation for patients who developed collagen fibrosis or a change to grade 3 reticulin; the overall median treatment duration was 154 weeks.Anemia was identified by laboratory values with hemoglobin \< the lower limit of normal (LLN) or the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms prespecified by the sponsor. Neutropenia was identified by laboratory values with absolute neutrophil count \<1.8x10\^9/L or the MedDRA terms pre-specified by the sponsor. Severity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, based on the following: Grade 1: Mild AE; Grade 2: Moderate AE; Grade 3: Severe AE; Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5: Death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation or 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation for patients who developed collagen fibrosis or a change to grade 3 reticulin; the overall median treatment duration was 154 weeks.An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, or any such occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition from the first dose of investigational product through the last study visit. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that is fatal or life threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. The relationship of each AE to the study drug was assessed by the investigator. The severity of each AE was graded using using CTCAE 3.0; For any AEs not listed in CTCAE, the Amgen Standard Severity Scoring System was used: 1: Mild- Aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated; 2 Moderate- Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity; 3: Severe- Incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity; 4: Life-threatening; 5: Fatal.
Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinEvery 24 weeks and at the end of study visit (4 weeks or 12 weeks after study drug discontinuation).Two validated assays were used to test for antibodies to romiplostim, the thrombopoietin-mimetic peptide component of romiplostim (TMP) and to endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO). The first was an immunoassay to confirm the presence of antibodies. The second was a cell-based bioassay to detect neutralizing or inhibitory effects in vitro. If a sample was positive in both assays, a participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Persistent antibodies were those positive at the last timepoint tested and transient are defined as positive post-dose but negative at the last time point tested.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with a platelet count \< 50 x 10\^9/L. The first patient enrolled 11 August 2009 and the last patient was enrolled 11 November 2010. Participants were enrolled at 60 study centers in Australia, Europe, and North America.

Pre-assignment details

204 patients were screened, 35 were considered screen failures. Participants were enrolled sequentially into the following cohorts: • Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 1 • Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 2 • Bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 3.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1
Participants received once weekly romiplostim for 3 years and had a bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 1.
50
Cohort 2
Participants received once weekly romiplostim for 3 years and had a bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 2.
50
Cohort 3
Participants received once weekly romiplostim for 3 years and had a bone marrow biopsy at Baseline and Year 3.
69
Total169

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event312
Overall StudyDeath421
Overall StudyIneligibility determined001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyNoncompliance001
Overall StudyOther301
Overall StudyPhysician Decision203
Overall StudyPregnancy011
Overall StudyProtocol-specified criteria523
Overall StudyRequirement for alternative therapy123
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject896

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9
Any Prior History of Bone Marrow Abnormalities
No
48 participants47 participants64 participants159 participants
Any Prior History of Bone Marrow Abnormalities
Yes
2 participants3 participants5 participants10 participants
Had Splenectomy
No
28 participants35 participants46 participants109 participants
Had Splenectomy
Yes
22 participants15 participants23 participants60 participants
Number of Prior ITP Therapies
0
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Number of Prior ITP Therapies
1
16 participants16 participants29 participants61 participants
Number of Prior ITP Therapies
2
11 participants15 participants20 participants46 participants
Number of Prior ITP Therapies
3
8 participants9 participants10 participants27 participants
Number of Prior ITP Therapies
≥ 4
15 participants10 participants10 participants35 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
1 participants3 participants7 participants11 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
48 participants47 participants59 participants154 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants38 Participants49 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants12 Participants20 Participants55 Participants
Time Since ITP Diagnosis9.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29
10.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87
5.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.41
8.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 5043 / 5066 / 69154 / 169
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 5012 / 5028 / 6956 / 169

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis

The percentage of participants who developed collagen fibrosis as evidenced by trichrome staining. Bone marrow biopsy samples were assessed using the modified Bauermeister grading scale by a central laboratory.

Time frame: At Years 1, 2 or 3 after initial exposure of romiplostim

Population: Participants who had evaluable trichrome stain results

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis3.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous Thrombopoietin

Two validated assays were used to test for antibodies to romiplostim, the thrombopoietin-mimetic peptide component of romiplostim (TMP) and to endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO). The first was an immunoassay to confirm the presence of antibodies. The second was a cell-based bioassay to detect neutralizing or inhibitory effects in vitro. If a sample was positive in both assays, a participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Persistent antibodies were those positive at the last timepoint tested and transient are defined as positive post-dose but negative at the last time point tested.

Time frame: Every 24 weeks and at the end of study visit (4 weeks or 12 weeks after study drug discontinuation).

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of romiplostim.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinNeutralizing antibodies to romiplostim1 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinAntibodies to romiplostim7 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinPersistent antibodies to romiplostim4 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinTransient antibodies to romiplostim3 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinAntibodies to TMP4 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinPersistent antibodies to TMP1 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinTransient antibodies to TMP3 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinAntibodies to TPO6 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinPersistent antibodies to TPO2 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinTransient antibodies to TPO4 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies or Neutralizing Antibodies to Romiplostim or to Endogenous ThrombopoietinNeutralizing antibodies to TPO0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, or any such occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition from the first dose of investigational product through the last study visit. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that is fatal or life threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. The relationship of each AE to the study drug was assessed by the investigator. The severity of each AE was graded using using CTCAE 3.0; For any AEs not listed in CTCAE, the Amgen Standard Severity Scoring System was used: 1: Mild- Aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated; 2 Moderate- Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity; 3: Severe- Incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity; 4: Life-threatening; 5: Fatal.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation or 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation for patients who developed collagen fibrosis or a change to grade 3 reticulin; the overall median treatment duration was 154 weeks.

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of romiplostim

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation of study drug6 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 239 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 28 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation from study6 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)All adverse events46 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events14 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events4 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation of study drug1 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 325 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related fatal adverse events0 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events1 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 413 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events16 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 40 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation from study1 participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 32 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 48 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)All adverse events45 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 239 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 321 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events12 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation of study drug5 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation from study2 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events2 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events22 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 214 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 37 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 41 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events2 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation of study drug1 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation from study0 participants
Cohort 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related fatal adverse events0 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 33 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 416 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related fatal adverse events0 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 40 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 338 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation from study2 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events3 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 259 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation from study3 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events1 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events24 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation of study drug4 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related -> discontinuation of study drug2 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related grade ≥ 210 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events28 participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)All adverse events67 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis 12 Weeks After Romiplostim Discontinuation in Participants Who Developed Collagen Fibrosis at Years 1, 2, or 3

The number of participants with collagen fibrosis as evidenced by trichrome staining 12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation in participants who developed collagen fibrosis at Years 1, 2, or 3 after initial exposure of romiplostim, assessed by the central laboratory using the modified Bauermeister grading scale.

Time frame: 12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation

Population: Participants with collagen fibrosis at Year 1, 2 or 3 and with available trichome staining results 12 weeks after study drug discontinuation. One participant with collagen fibrosis refused the follow-up bone marrow biopsy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Collagen Fibrosis 12 Weeks After Romiplostim Discontinuation in Participants Who Developed Collagen Fibrosis at Years 1, 2, or 30 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of Reticulin to a Grade of ≤ 2 for Participants Who Developed Grade 3 Reticulin

The number of participants who had any improvement of reticulin to a grade of ≤ 2 for participants who developed grade 3 reticulin after initial exposure to romiplostim as measured by the modified Bauermeister grading scale. The modified Bauermeister scale provides a means of assessing the development of increased reticulin and collagen in bone marrow according to the following: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable; Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network; Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers; Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining); Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining).

Time frame: 12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation

Population: Participants with Grade 3 reticulin at Year 1, 2 or 3 and who had a follow-up bone marrow biopsy 12 weeks after romiplostim discontinuation. Two participants with grade 3 reticulin did not have a bone marrow biopsy performed 12 weeks after romiploastim discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Improvement of Reticulin to a Grade of ≤ 2 for Participants Who Developed Grade 3 Reticulin3 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Developed an Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade

Increased modified Bauermeister grade refers to an increase by ≥ 2 severity grades or an increase to grade 4 (ie, grade 0 to 2-4, grade 1 to 3-4, grade 2 to 4, or grade 3 to 4 over baseline). The modified Bauermeister scale provides a means of assessing the development of increased reticulin and collagen in bone marrow according to the following: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable; Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network; Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers; Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining); Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining).

Time frame: At Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 post romiplostim exposure

Population: Participants who had evaluable reticulin silver stain results

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants Who Developed an Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants Who Developed an Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade5.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants Who Developed an Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade12.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Total Cardiac Output Corrected (QTc) Intervals

A clinically relevant change in QTc (Fridericia) interval is defined as an absolute QTc interval \>500 ms or a QTc Interval increase from Baseline \>60 ms post romiplostim exposure. 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) were performed in triplicate at Baseline, Week 3 and Week 12; the average of of the 3 values at each assessment was used.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3 and Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of romiplostim.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Total Cardiac Output Corrected (QTc) Intervals0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Total Cardiac Output Corrected (QTc) Intervals0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Total Cardiac Output Corrected (QTc) Intervals0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or Neutropenia

Anemia was identified by laboratory values with hemoglobin \< the lower limit of normal (LLN) or the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms prespecified by the sponsor. Neutropenia was identified by laboratory values with absolute neutrophil count \<1.8x10\^9/L or the MedDRA terms pre-specified by the sponsor. Severity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, based on the following: Grade 1: Mild AE; Grade 2: Moderate AE; Grade 3: Severe AE; Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation or 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation for patients who developed collagen fibrosis or a change to grade 3 reticulin; the overall median treatment duration was 154 weeks.

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of romiplostim

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in anemia6.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in neutropenia8.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in anemia4.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in neutropenia6.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in anemia8.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants With CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 Shift in Anemia or NeutropeniaCTCAE grade ≥2 shift in neutropenia13.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026