Skip to content

Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00905866
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-05-21
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2011-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperparathyroidism, Parathyroidectomy

Keywords

Quality of life, Hyperparathyroidism

Brief summary

There are three specific aims in the present study: 1. To validate the investigators' translated version of parathyroidectomy assessment of symptoms (PAS) questionnaire. 2. To evaluate the impact of parathyroidectomy on health-related quality of life in the investigators' patients with hyperparathyroidism. 3. To analyze the association between clinical variables and the presentation/severity of symptoms (and/or quality of life domains) in the investigators' patients.

Detailed description

Either primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism may necessitate parathyroidectomy in some patients to improve the related biochemical abnormalities or symptoms, or both. Many patients diagnosed with hyperparathyroidism today do not have the classic or historical severe manifestations such as osteitis fibrosa cystica or nephrocalcinosis. The well-known pentad of symptoms - painful bones, kidney stones, abdominal groans, psychic moans, and fatigue overtones - is more common, although most patients have few dramatic symptoms. The multifactorial causes for many of the symptoms that patients have make it difficult to know to what extent surgical intervention will alleviate the symptoms. Several endocrine surgeons from the western countries have used a standardized health status assessment tool such as the SF-36 (the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey) to assess symptoms and health state in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Results of the studies confirmed that these patients are indeed impaired in several domains and even seemingly asymptomatic patients benefit from parathyroidectomy. More recently, Canadian surgeon Pasieka designed and validated a disease-specific surgical outcome tool, the parathyroidectomy assessment of symptoms (PAS) score, for patients with hyperparathyroidism. Using this tool, several studies from different countries showed that the study group of patients with hyperparathyroidism had significantly more symptoms than controls, and some of the symptoms are remarkably ameliorated after surgery. In Taiwan, only a small number of studies have evaluated neuropsychiatric function and neuromuscular abnormalities in these patients. None of the studies has used a patient-based measure of health status or quality of life intended to capture patient-reported perceptions of health and function.

Interventions

OTHERPAS and SF-36 questionnaires

Patients who agree to participate in this study will be asked to fill out a translated PAS questionnaire and a Taiwan version of SF-36 before and after surgery

Sponsors

Mackay Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 and older

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who are illiterate or unable to complete questionnaire * Excluded by patient's clinician prior to recruitment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the impact of parathyroidectomy on health-related quality of life in patients with hyperparathyroidism1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To analyze the association between clinical variables and the presentation/severity of symptoms (and/or quality of life domains) in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy1 year

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026