Skip to content

A Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Idebenone in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) Patients

A Phase III Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Idebenone in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00905268
Acronym
MICONOS
Enrollment
232
Registered
2009-05-20
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2016-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Friedreich's Ataxia

Keywords

FRDA, idebenone, FRDA disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy, safety and tolerability of idebenone in 12 months of treatment in children and adults with Friedreich's Ataxia. This is a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial conducted in Europe. Efficacy outcomes include measures of neurological impairment and function, and measures of the heart.

Detailed description

Idebenone, a short-chain analogue of Co-enzyme Q10 (CoQ10), has the potential to moderate underlying causes of Friedreich's Ataxia through its antioxidant activity and its role as an electron carrier in the respiratory chain promoting mitochondrial ATP production. The current 12-month placebo-controlled treatment study in 232 patients aims to confirm the positive effect of idebenone on neurological function, as for instance observed in the recent 48-patient, 6-month NICOSIA study in children, using the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the newly developed Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS). In addition, the study aims to confirm the positive effect on cardiomyopathy associated with FRDA observed in several small studies. Cardiac anatomy and function will be assessed using echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging and cardiac MRI methods in patients with FRDA cardiomyopathy. In addition exercise capacity, measured as peak workload, will be assessed in patients able to comply with a modified exercise protocol.

Interventions

DRUGidebenone

12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.

DRUGPlacebo

12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.

Sponsors

Santhera Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented diagnosis of FRDA with confirmed FRDA mutations * Patients 8 years of age or older at baseline * Patients with body weight ≥ 25kg * Patients who in the opinion of the investigator are able to comply with the requirements of the study, including swallowing the medication * Negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at baseline (women of childbearing potential)

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with idebenone or Coenzyme Q10 within the past 1 month * Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding * Clinically significant abnormalities of clinical haematology or biochemistry including, but not limited to, elevations greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal of SGOT, SGPT, or creatinine * Past or present history of abuse of drugs or alcohol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is made up of a measure of ataxia, and activities of daily living subscale and a neurological subscale. The scores from the three subscales are added to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 159, with a higher score indicating a greater level of disability.
Proportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Marginweek 52The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome. ICARS Responder Analysis at Week 52: Percentage of subjects Improving by 2.5 Points or More.
Proportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate1 year(In the statistical analysis sub-population presenting with cardiac involvement as defined by the FRDA cardiomyopathy criteria)
Change in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 521 yearMean Change of Peak systolic longitudinal strain rate (PSLSR) from Baseline to Week 52 in subjects with cardiac involvement (FRDA-CM criteria), where positive value in PSLSR is a deterioration and negative value an improvement.
Change in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 521 yearAssessed by a modified exercise test, in a subset of patients able to undertake this. Wpeak has been calculated from the following formula: Workload last fully completed stage + (seconds completed in last stage / 60 \* (4 \[if arm ergonometry\] or 10 \[if leg ergonometry\])).

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: Idebenone
Patients under/equal 45 kg: idebenone 180 mg/day Patients over 45 kg: idebenone 360 mg/day idebenone: 12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.
57
Group B: Idebenone
Patients under/equal 45 kg: idebenone 450 mg/day Patients over 45 kg: idebenone 900 mg/day idebenone: 12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.
57
C: Idebenone
Patients under/equal 45 kg: idebenone 1350 mg/day Patients over 45 kg: idebenone 2250 mg/day idebenone: 12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.
59
D: Placebo
placebo Placebo: 12 months of 1 of 3 treatments arms of oral idebenone or placebo.Treatment taken 3 times daily with meals.
59
Total232

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalD: PlaceboGroup A: IdebenoneC: IdebenoneGroup B: Idebenone
Age, Continuous30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Region of Enrollment
Austria
13 participants5 participants2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
13 participants4 participants3 participants5 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
17 participants6 participants5 participants4 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
156 participants36 participants40 participants39 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
12 participants3 participants3 participants3 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
21 participants5 participants4 participants6 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants32 Participants23 Participants27 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
125 Participants27 Participants34 Participants32 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 5752 / 5752 / 5955 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 574 / 578 / 597 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52

The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and week 52

Population: The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication and had a confirmed diagnosis of FRDA, did not take idebenone within one month pre-Screening or between Screening and Visit 1, and were not under idebenone treatment at Baseline according to available PK results at Visit 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
Group B: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
C: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
D: PlaceboAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Secondary

Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52

The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is made up of a measure of ataxia, and activities of daily living subscale and a neurological subscale. The scores from the three subscales are added to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 159, with a higher score indicating a greater level of disability.

Time frame: Baseline and week 52

Population: The comparison was carried out in the ITT population, on data imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 520.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.19
Group B: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
C: IdebenoneAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 521.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
D: PlaceboAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 520.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.77
Secondary

Change in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 52

Mean Change of Peak systolic longitudinal strain rate (PSLSR) from Baseline to Week 52 in subjects with cardiac involvement (FRDA-CM criteria), where positive value in PSLSR is a deterioration and negative value an improvement.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Subgroup of subjects with cardiac involvement as defined by Friedreich's ataxia cardiomyopathy (FRDA-CM)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: IdebenoneChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 520.007 1/sStandard Deviation 0.22
Group B: IdebenoneChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 52-0.004 1/sStandard Deviation 0.265
C: IdebenoneChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 520.085 1/sStandard Deviation 0.227
D: PlaceboChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 520.024 1/sStandard Deviation 0.192
Secondary

Change in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 52

Assessed by a modified exercise test, in a subset of patients able to undertake this. Wpeak has been calculated from the following formula: Workload last fully completed stage + (seconds completed in last stage / 60 \* (4 \[if arm ergonometry\] or 10 \[if leg ergonometry\])).

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: IdebenoneChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 521.15 WattsStandard Deviation 16.362
Group B: IdebenoneChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 52-7.41 WattsStandard Deviation 34.499
C: IdebenoneChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 52-6.91 WattsStandard Deviation 20.179
D: PlaceboChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 52-1.54 WattsStandard Deviation 16.509
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate

(In the statistical analysis sub-population presenting with cardiac involvement as defined by the FRDA cardiomyopathy criteria)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Subgroup of subjects with cardiac involvement as defined by Friedreich's ataxia cardiomyopathy (FRDA-CM)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate50 percentage of patients
Group B: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate51.4 percentage of patients
C: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate30.3 percentage of patients
D: PlaceboProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate44.1 percentage of patients
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Margin

The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome. ICARS Responder Analysis at Week 52: Percentage of subjects Improving by 2.5 Points or More.

Time frame: week 52

Population: The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication and had a confirmed diagnosis of FRDA, did not take idebenone within one month pre-Screening or between Screening and Visit 1, and were not under idebenone treatment at Baseline according to available PK results at Visit 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Margin18.2 percentage of patients
Group B: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Margin23.6 percentage of patients
C: IdebenoneProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Margin23.7 percentage of patients
D: PlaceboProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Margin31 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026