Skip to content

BIBF 1120 Versus Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase I-II Study of BIBF 1120 and FOLFOX Compared to Bevacizumab and FOLFOX in First Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00904839
Enrollment
128
Registered
2009-05-20
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate PFS rate at 9 months of BIBF 1120 in combination with mFolfox6 compared with mFolfox6 combined to bevacizumab in first line patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Interventions

DRUGBIBF 1120

BIBF 1120 100 and 150 mg capsules

standard i.v chemotherapy

DRUGBevacizumab

100 mg/Kg solution , IV infusion

IV standard chemotherapy

DRUGbevacizumab

100 mg/4 ml solution

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>= 18 years 2. Histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma 3. No previous oxaliplatin based chemotherapy is allowed unless disease free survival after the end of chemotherapy \> = 12 months 4. No previous therapy with VEGFR or EGFR inhibitors 5. No prior systemic therapy for metastatic CRC 6. No previous adjuvant therapy with fluoropyrimidines is allowed unless disease free survival after the end of chemotherapy \> 6 months 7. ECOG performance status \< = 2 8. Adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions: 9. No uncontrolled hypertension 10. Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Treatment with any investigational drug within 28 days of trial onset. 2. History of other malignancies in the last 5 years, in particular those that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results. 3. Serious concomitant disease, especially those affecting compliance with trial requirements or which are considered relevant for the evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the trial drug, 4. Major injuries and/or surgery or bone fracture within 4 weeks of trial inclusion, or planned surgical procedures during the trial period. 5. Significant cardiovascular diseases 6. History of severe haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event in the past 12 months. Known inherited predisposition to bleeding or to thrombosis. 7. Patient with brain metastases that are symptomatic and/or require therapy. 8. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival Rate at 9 Months (PFS-9)First treatment administration to nine monthsPFS-9 is defined as the time from first treatment with the trial drug until either the onset of progressive disease or death. A patient is defined as progression-free for 9 months if their PFS was at least 270 days. Progression is assessed according to following mentioned RECIST criteria (version 1.0). 1. 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. 2. The appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 daysPFS is defined as the time from first treatment with the trial drug until either the onset of progressive disease or death throughout the whole study. Progression is assessed according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0). In this endpoint, the Greenwood's variance estimate was used to calculate the Kaplan-Meier progression free survival median and its corresponding 95% confidence interval
Confirmed Objective Response RateFirst treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 daysObjective response rate is defined as a best response of either complete (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumour measurements had to be confirmed by repetition of the CT or MRI scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. This confirmation was necessary to avoid overestimating the response rate observed. The 95% confidence interval represent the Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval
Unconfirmed Objective Response RateFirst treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 daysObjective response is defined as a best response of either complete (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumour measurements had to be confirmed by repetition of the CT or MRI scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. This confirmation was necessary to avoid overestimating the response rate observed. The 95% Confidence interval represent the Clopper- Pearson exact confidence interval.
Resection RateFirst treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 daysSurgical excision of the lesions is allowed if the previous assessment of tumoral response occurred after at least 6 cycles of treatment. Resection Rate includes resection rates R0, R1 and R2 before progressive disease. Peto's variance estimate was used.
Tumor ShrinkageBaseline and day 85For each patient, the minimum percentage increase from baseline measurement (≤ 28 days before the beginning of the treatment) of the sum Longest diameter (LD) of target lesions was calculated based on the measurements of tumor size. The minimum percentage increase has been divided to four groups: 1. \<= - 30% 2. \> - 30% and \< 0% 3. \>= 0% and \< 20% 4. \>=20%
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAEFrom the first dose of study medication up to 28 days after the day of the last intake of study medication, up to 920 daysIncidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3.0).
Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).First two treatment cycles, up to 28 daysPercentage of patients with DLTs,AE were observed in Gastrointestinal,Hepatobiliary & skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder.Drug related DLT was defined:1)Gastrointestinal toxicity(vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea)or hypertension of CTCAEgrade(G)3 despite optimal supportive care/intervention.2)Non-haematological toxicity of G≥3 except AE:alopecia,nail modifications,& isolated elevation of gamma glutamyl transpeptidase.3)G4 neutropenia for\>7days(not associated with fever≥38.5°C).4)Neutropenia of G≥3 of any duration associated with fever≥38.5ºC.5)Platelets \<25,000/μLorG3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring transfusion.6)Inability to resume nintedanib dosing within14days of stopping due to treatment related toxicity.7)ALT and/or AST elevation of G≥3orG≥2 in conjunction with bilirubin G\>1. 8)Inability to recover from increase ALT/AST in conjunction with increase of bilirubin toALT/AST toG≤1 &bilirubin to normal or baseline within14days after nintedanib treatment interruption
Overall SurvivalFirst treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 daysOverall survival is defined as the time from first treatment until death. Greenwood variance was used for the calculation of 95% confidence interval.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve Over 12 Hours for Nintedanib in the Dosing Interval at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (AUCtau,ss,Norm) (Phase I)-0:05h before drug administration and 1h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h and 10h after drug administration.Area under the plasma concentration time-curve over 12 hours for Nintedanib in the dosing interval at steady state and normalized by the dosing unit administered (AUCtau,ss,norm) (Phase I)
Maximum Plasma Concentration for Nintedanib at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (Cmax,ss,Norm) (Phase I)-0:05h before drug administration and 1h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, and 10h after drug administration.Maximum plasma concentration for Nintedanib at steady state and normalized by the dosing unit administered (Cmax,ss,norm) (Phase I)
Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months of Global Health Status Scores.Baseline and 9 months.Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the change from baseline at 9 months for Global health status scores. Raw scores are transformed to scales of 0-100. A higher score is associated with a better quality of life for Global health status scores
Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Baseline and 9 months.Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the change from baseline at 9 months for functional scales, Symptom scales Chemotherapy side effects . The EORTC-QLQ-CR38 was composed of functioning scales (body image, future perspective, sexual enjoyment, sexual functioning) and symptom scales (chemotherapy side effects, defecation problems, symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract, micturition problems,female sexual problems, male sexual problems, stoma related problems, and weight loss). Raw scores are transformed to scales of 0-100. A higher score is associated with a better quality of life for functional scales and a worse quality of life for symptom scales.
Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.from baseline until end of treatment, up to 892 daysNumber of participants for Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the first use of stoma bag.
Exploratory Biomarker and Pharmacogenetic Analysis for VEGFDay 1, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and Day 127Exploratory biomarker and pharmacogenetic analysis for Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Note: This endpoint was not statistically analysed in this study.
Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD)First two treatment cycles, up to 28 daysDetermination of Maximum Tolerable Dose based on DLT incidence.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Maximum Tolerable Dose set (MTD): The first 12-18 patients randomised to the nintedanib treatment group, treated with nintedanib according to the dose escalation part of the study. The patient randomised to MTD analysis set were in Phase-1. The final data base lock date for this study was 23 JUL 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nintedanib + mFolfox6
Patients receiving nintedanib 150 mg or 200 mg twice daily in a form of a soft gelatine capsule plus mFolfox6: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², l-leucovorin 200 mg/m² or d, l-leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² (bolus) and 2400 mg/m² (infusion).
85
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6
Patients receiving bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every other week in a form of a bottles (injection concentrate solution) plus mFolfox6: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², l-leucovorin 200 mg/m² or d, l-leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² (bolus) and 2400 mg/m² (infusion).
41
Total126

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event054
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up012
Overall StudyNot treated101
Overall StudyOther than above097
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNintedanib + mFolfox6Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Total
Age, Continuous62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants21 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants20 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 8541 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
31 / 8522 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival Rate at 9 Months (PFS-9)

PFS-9 is defined as the time from first treatment with the trial drug until either the onset of progressive disease or death. A patient is defined as progression-free for 9 months if their PFS was at least 270 days. Progression is assessed according to following mentioned RECIST criteria (version 1.0). 1. 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. 2. The appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: First treatment administration to nine months

Population: Treated Set (TS) - The treated set includes all patients who were dispensed and were documented to have taken at least one dose of the trial drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Progression-free Survival Rate at 9 Months (PFS-9)62.1 percentage of Participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Progression-free Survival Rate at 9 Months (PFS-9)70.2 percentage of Participants
95% CI: [-27.8, 11.5]Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve Over 12 Hours for Nintedanib in the Dosing Interval at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (AUCtau,ss,Norm) (Phase I)

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve over 12 hours for Nintedanib in the dosing interval at steady state and normalized by the dosing unit administered (AUCtau,ss,norm) (Phase I)

Time frame: -0:05h before drug administration and 1h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h and 10h after drug administration.

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve Over 12 Hours for Nintedanib in the Dosing Interval at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (AUCtau,ss,Norm) (Phase I)1.46 ng*h/mL/mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 273
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve Over 12 Hours for Nintedanib in the Dosing Interval at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (AUCtau,ss,Norm) (Phase I)1.53 ng*h/mL/mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.1
Secondary

Confirmed Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate is defined as a best response of either complete (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumour measurements had to be confirmed by repetition of the CT or MRI scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. This confirmation was necessary to avoid overestimating the response rate observed. The 95% confidence interval represent the Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval

Time frame: First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Confirmed Objective Response Rate63.5 percentage of Participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Confirmed Objective Response Rate56.1 percentage of Participants
Secondary

Exploratory Biomarker and Pharmacogenetic Analysis for VEGF

Exploratory biomarker and pharmacogenetic analysis for Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Note: This endpoint was not statistically analysed in this study.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and Day 127

Secondary

Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAE

Incidence and intensity of Adverse Events with grading according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3.0).

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication up to 28 days after the day of the last intake of study medication, up to 920 days

Population: Treated Set (TS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 29 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 411 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 362 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 52 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 11 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 53 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 10 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 22 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 329 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events With Grading According CTCAECTCAE Grade 47 participants
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration for Nintedanib at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (Cmax,ss,Norm) (Phase I)

Maximum plasma concentration for Nintedanib at steady state and normalized by the dosing unit administered (Cmax,ss,norm) (Phase I)

Time frame: -0:05h before drug administration and 1h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 6h, 8h, and 10h after drug administration.

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Maximum Plasma Concentration for Nintedanib at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (Cmax,ss,Norm) (Phase I)0.294 ng/mL/mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 319
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Maximum Plasma Concentration for Nintedanib at Steady State and Normalized by the Dosing Unit Administered (Cmax,ss,Norm) (Phase I)0.278 ng/mL/mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34
Secondary

Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD)

Determination of Maximum Tolerable Dose based on DLT incidence.

Time frame: First two treatment cycles, up to 28 days

Population: MTD Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD)200 mg
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD)200 mg
Secondary

Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.

Number of participants for Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the first use of stoma bag.

Time frame: from baseline until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 121 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 301 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 63 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 541 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 241 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.No use of stoma bag68 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Baseline10 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.No use of stoma bag37 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Baseline4 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 60 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 120 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 240 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 300 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Number of Participants for Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the First Use of Stoma Bag.Week 540 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from first treatment until death. Greenwood variance was used for the calculation of 95% confidence interval.

Time frame: First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Overall Survival27.8 months
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Overall Survival33.4 months
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).

Percentage of patients with DLTs,AE were observed in Gastrointestinal,Hepatobiliary & skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder.Drug related DLT was defined:1)Gastrointestinal toxicity(vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea)or hypertension of CTCAEgrade(G)3 despite optimal supportive care/intervention.2)Non-haematological toxicity of G≥3 except AE:alopecia,nail modifications,& isolated elevation of gamma glutamyl transpeptidase.3)G4 neutropenia for\>7days(not associated with fever≥38.5°C).4)Neutropenia of G≥3 of any duration associated with fever≥38.5ºC.5)Platelets \<25,000/μLorG3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring transfusion.6)Inability to resume nintedanib dosing within14days of stopping due to treatment related toxicity.7)ALT and/or AST elevation of G≥3orG≥2 in conjunction with bilirubin G\>1. 8)Inability to recover from increase ALT/AST in conjunction with increase of bilirubin toALT/AST toG≤1 &bilirubin to normal or baseline within14days after nintedanib treatment interruption

Time frame: First two treatment cycles, up to 28 days

Population: MTD set: The first 12-18 patients randomised to the nintedanib treatment group, treated with nintedanib according to the dose escalation part of the study. The outputs (updated with cleaned and more complete data) that were used to decide on the MTD of nintedanib while the study was ongoing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Diarrhoea0.0 percentage of participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Hepatotoxicity0.0 percentage of participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Rash maculo-papular33.3 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Diarrhoea11.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Hepatotoxicity11.1 percentage of participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Percentage of Patients With Dose Limit Toxicity (DLTs) Incidence During the First Two Treatment Cycles (Phase I).Rash maculo-papular0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from first treatment with the trial drug until either the onset of progressive disease or death throughout the whole study. Progression is assessed according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0). In this endpoint, the Greenwood's variance estimate was used to calculate the Kaplan-Meier progression free survival median and its corresponding 95% confidence interval

Time frame: First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Progression-free Survival (PFS)10.5 months
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Progression-free Survival (PFS)15.4 months
Secondary

Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months of Global Health Status Scores.

Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the change from baseline at 9 months for Global health status scores. Raw scores are transformed to scales of 0-100. A higher score is associated with a better quality of life for Global health status scores

Time frame: Baseline and 9 months.

Population: Treated Set (TS). Number of analysed patients are the total number of patients who were analysed for the change from baseline at 9 months for Global health status scores

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months of Global Health Status Scores.-1.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-C30 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months of Global Health Status Scores.-9.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Secondary

Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.

Quality of life evaluation by a standardised questionnaires of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the change from baseline at 9 months for functional scales, Symptom scales Chemotherapy side effects . The EORTC-QLQ-CR38 was composed of functioning scales (body image, future perspective, sexual enjoyment, sexual functioning) and symptom scales (chemotherapy side effects, defecation problems, symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract, micturition problems,female sexual problems, male sexual problems, stoma related problems, and weight loss). Raw scores are transformed to scales of 0-100. A higher score is associated with a better quality of life for functional scales and a worse quality of life for symptom scales.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 months.

Population: Treated Set (TS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Sexual enjoyment (N=2, 3)-33.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 47.1
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Male sexual problems (N=5, 4)6.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 49.4
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Chemotherapy side effects (N=25, 11)20.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Micturition problems (N=25,11)-5.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Body image (N=24, 11)-3.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Stoma-related problems (N=4, 2)-4.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Defaecation problems (N=17, 8)-5.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Symptoms area of gastro-intestinal tract (N=25,11)-3.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Sexual functioning (N=15, 7)-11.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Weight loss (N=25,11)-21.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Female sexual problems (N=0, 0)NA units on scale
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Future perspective (N=25, 11)22.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 35.6
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Body image (N=24, 11)-3.5 units on scaleStandard Deviation 19
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Future perspective (N=25, 11)6.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 36
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Sexual enjoyment (N=2, 3)-11.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Sexual functioning (N=15, 7)2.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Chemotherapy side effects (N=25, 11)13.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Defaecation problems (N=17, 8)2.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Female sexual problems (N=0, 0)NA units on scale
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Male sexual problems (N=5, 4)4.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 16
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Micturition problems (N=25,11)-7.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Stoma-related problems (N=4, 2)2.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Symptoms area of gastro-intestinal tract (N=25,11)3.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 15
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Quality of Life Evaluation by a Standardised Questionnaires of EORTC: EORTC-QLQ-CR38 for the Change From Baseline at 9 Months.Weight loss (N=25,11)-12.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 47.8
Secondary

Resection Rate

Surgical excision of the lesions is allowed if the previous assessment of tumoral response occurred after at least 6 cycles of treatment. Resection Rate includes resection rates R0, R1 and R2 before progressive disease. Peto's variance estimate was used.

Time frame: First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Resection Rate19.5 percentage of Participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Resection Rate24.5 percentage of Participants
95% CI: [-15.3, 5.2]Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Tumor Shrinkage

For each patient, the minimum percentage increase from baseline measurement (≤ 28 days before the beginning of the treatment) of the sum Longest diameter (LD) of target lesions was calculated based on the measurements of tumor size. The minimum percentage increase has been divided to four groups: 1. \<= - 30% 2. \> - 30% and \< 0% 3. \>= 0% and \< 20% 4. \>=20%

Time frame: Baseline and day 85

Population: Treated Set (TS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage<=-30%58 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage>= 0% and < 20%4 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage>=20%2 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Tumor ShrinkageNon-evaluable2 participants
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage> - 30% and < 0%19 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Tumor ShrinkageNon-evaluable1 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage<=-30%29 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage> - 30% and < 0%7 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage>=20%0 participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Tumor Shrinkage>= 0% and < 20%4 participants
Secondary

Unconfirmed Objective Response Rate

Objective response is defined as a best response of either complete (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumour measurements had to be confirmed by repetition of the CT or MRI scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. This confirmation was necessary to avoid overestimating the response rate observed. The 95% Confidence interval represent the Clopper- Pearson exact confidence interval.

Time frame: First treatment administration until end of treatment, up to 892 days

Population: Treated Set (TS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nintedanib + mFolfox6Unconfirmed Objective Response Rate69.4 percentage of Participants
Bevacizumab + mFolfox6Unconfirmed Objective Response Rate73.2 percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026