Skip to content

Treatment of Type I Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus

Taping Versus Splinting Versus Above Elbow Casting for Type I Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00904137
Enrollment
12
Registered
2009-05-19
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type I Supracondylar Fracture of the Humerus

Keywords

Supracondylar fracture, humerus, elbow

Brief summary

Type I supracondylar fractures are elbow fractures that occur in children aged 3-10 years. Many different treatment options exist to treat this type of fracture. The purpose of this study is to compare three different treatment modalities with regards to pain experienced during treatment, the amount of pain medication needed during treatment, and any short-term complications. We hypothesize that above elbow casting and long-arm splinting will result in less pain and have fewer complications than taping the elbow in flexion.

Detailed description

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled into the study either by the attending physician in the Emergency Department at BC Children's hospital or by one of the study investigators. They will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: above elbow cast, long arm splint, or tape. After being treated, patients will be required to fill in a daily pain diary describing their level of pain and how much analgesia they are requiring. They will also be followed by regular phone calls to track any complications of treatment (e.g. loosening or shifting of cast/ splint/ tape, any skin breakdown, etc.). Patients will be seen for follow-up at three weeks post-injury in the Orthopedics Clinic at BCCH to have radiographs repeated, finish their treatment, and hand in their pain diaries.

Interventions

PROCEDURECast
PROCEDURESplint
PROCEDURETape

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients aged 4-12 years who present to the Emergency department at BC Children's hospital with a history of elbow trauma, and are diagnosed by the staff emergency physician to have a Type I supracondylar fracture of the humerus (as seen on AP and lateral radiographs of the elbow)

Exclusion criteria

* patients with neurovascular compromise associated with the fracture * a pre-existing diagnosis of metabolic or structural bone disease that predisposes them to fractures * presence of other fractures of the ipsilateral upper extremity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean pain intensity and median pain duration over treatment period3 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Amount of analgesia required during treatment period, incidence of complications associated with treatment3 weeks

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026