Skip to content

Surgical Ablation Versus No Surgical Ablation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery

Surgical Ablation Versus No Surgical Ablation for Patients With Persistent or Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00903370
Enrollment
260
Registered
2009-05-18
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2017-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Mitral Valve Stenosis

Keywords

Mitral Valve Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Surgery, Mitral Valve Disease, Ablation, Catheter, Catheter Ablation, Radiofrequency

Brief summary

The purpose of the research is to determine whether treating atrial fibrillation with surgical ablation during scheduled mitral valve surgery is better than mitral valve surgery by itself without the surgical ablation. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is a technique used by surgeons to deaden atrial heart tissue and block electrical signals that may be causing your heart to beat irregularly. There are no new procedures being tested in this study; both mitral valve surgery and surgical ablation are used regularly in patients who have mitral valve problems and atrial fibrillation, although no surgical ablation devices have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. What is not known with certainty, is whether patients with atrial fibrillation who are having planned mitral valve surgery would do better if they also had surgical ablation rather than medication alone to treat their atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of surgical ablation to planned mitral valve surgery for patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (within 6 months prior to randomization) reduces the incidence of postoperative heart arrhythmia compared to mitral valve repair with medication therapy alone. This is a randomized, multi-center trial which will enroll 260 subjects who will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to: (a) mitral valve surgery plus surgical ablation or (b) mitral valve surgery without ablation (control group). All patients will undergo ligation or excision of the left atrial appendage. Patients assigned to the ablation group will be further randomized (1:1) to one of two lesion sets: (1) pulmonary vein isolation only or (2) biatrial Maze lesions. The target population for this trial consists of adult patients with mitral valve disease requiring surgical intervention and persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. All patients who meet the eligibility criteria may be included in the study regardless of gender, race or ethnicity. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from AF, which will be measured by 3-day continuous monitoring at 6 months and 12 months post-ablation. The primary safety endpoint is a composite of death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, damage to peripheral structures, such as the esophagus, within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge (whichever is later).

Interventions

PROCEDUREMVS

All participants will have their left atrial appendage excised or excluded. For mitral regurgitation, the procedures will be a valve repair in the majority of cases. For valves that are not amenable to repair, and for most cases of mitral stenosis, a valve replacement will be performed.

DEVICEAblation

For participants treated by pulmonary vein isolation, two separate encircling lesions will be made around the left and right pulmonary veins. For participants treated with biatrial maze lesion set, the left atrial lesions will include, the two encircling lesions, as well as connecting lesions between to the pulmonary veins, from the pulmonary veins to the mitral valve annulus, and from the pulmonary veins to the left atrial appendage. The right pulmonary veins will be isolated first. Isolation will be confirmed by pacing the pulmonary veins at the previously identified threshold for capture. If no atrial capture is noted, it will be inferred that the right pulmonary veins were isolated. If atrial capture is noted, additional ablations on the atrial cuff will be performed until isolation is confirmed. This will be repeated on the left pulmonary veins.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Annetine Gelijns
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able to sign Informed Consent and Release of Medical Information forms * Age ≥ 18 years * Clinical indications for mitral valve surgery for the following: 1. Organic mitral valve disease; or 2. Functional non-ischemic mitral regurgitation; or 3. Ischemic mitral regurgitation with evidence of concomitant structural mitral valve disease Note: May include need for surgical management of functional tricuspid regurgitation or patent foramen ovale. May also include concomitant CABG, aortic arch or aortic valve procedure. Surgical intervention may be performed via sternotomy or minimally invasive procedure. * a) Persistent AF within 6 months prior to randomization, defined as non self-terminating AF lasting greater than 7 days but no more than one year, or lasting less than 7 days but necessitating pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion. * Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and * Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment within 6 months prior to randomization. * b) Longstanding persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of greater than one year duration. * Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and * Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment upon arrival in the OR. * Able to use heart rhythm monitor

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. AF without indication for mitral valve surgery 2. AF is paroxysmal 3. Evidence of left atrial thrombus by intra-operative TEE 4. Evidence of active infection 5. Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow subject to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study 6. Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy 7. Previous catheter ablation for AF 8. Life expectancy of less than one year 9. Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy 10. Enrollment in concomitant drug or device trials 11. Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism 12. FEV1 \< 30% of predicted value and/or need for home oxygen therapy 13. Women who are pregnant as evidenced by positive pregnancy test 14. Women of childbearing age who do not agree to be on adequate birth control throughout the period of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom From Atrial FibrillationMeasured at Month 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Composite of Death, Stroke, Serious Adverse Events (Cardiac and Non-cardiac), and Cardiac Re-hospitalizations Less Than 30 Days Post-procedure or Hospital DischargeLess than 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MVS Alone
Participants will undergo mitral valve surgery with ligation/excision of left atrial appendage. MVS alone: All participants will have their left atrial appendage excised or excluded. For mitral regurgitation, the procedures will be a valve repair in the majority of cases. For valves that are not amenable to repair, and for most cases of mitral stenosis, a valve replacement will be performed.
127
MVS + Ablation
Participants will undergo mitral valve surgery with ligation/excision of left atrial appendage plus surgical ablation with pulmonary vein isolation or biatrial lesion set. MVS + ablation: For participants treated by pulmonary vein isolation, two separate encircling lesions will be made around the left and right pulmonary veins. For participants treated with biatrial maze lesion set, the left atrial lesions will include the two encircling lesions, as well as connecting lesions between to the pulmonary veins, from the pulmonary veins to the mitral valve annulus, and from the pulmonary veins to the left atrial appendage. The right pulmonary veins will be isolated first. Isolation will be confirmed by pacing the pulmonary veins at the previously identified threshold for capture. If no atrial capture noted, it will be inferred that the right pulmonary veins were isolated. If atrial capture noted, additional ablations on the atrial cuff will be performed until isolation is confirmed.
133
Total260

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1310
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up68
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMVS + AblationMVS AloneTotal
Age, Continuous69.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
69.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants119 Participants242 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Female
57 Participants63 Participants120 Participants
Gender
Male
76 Participants64 Participants140 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
116 Participants112 Participants228 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
22 participants21 participants43 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
111 participants106 participants217 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 12740 / 133
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 12777 / 133

Outcome results

Primary

Freedom From Atrial Fibrillation

Time frame: Measured at Month 12

Population: Since the primary analysis is an intent-to-treat, outcomes were imputed for patients with missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MVS AloneFreedom From Atrial Fibrillation31.1 percentage of patients
MVS + AblationFreedom From Atrial Fibrillation61.8 percentage of patients
Secondary

Composite of Death, Stroke, Serious Adverse Events (Cardiac and Non-cardiac), and Cardiac Re-hospitalizations Less Than 30 Days Post-procedure or Hospital Discharge

Time frame: Less than 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MVS AloneComposite of Death, Stroke, Serious Adverse Events (Cardiac and Non-cardiac), and Cardiac Re-hospitalizations Less Than 30 Days Post-procedure or Hospital Discharge22.8 percentage of patients
MVS + AblationComposite of Death, Stroke, Serious Adverse Events (Cardiac and Non-cardiac), and Cardiac Re-hospitalizations Less Than 30 Days Post-procedure or Hospital Discharge31.6 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026