Skip to content

What is the Effect of a Course for Treatment Providers on Their Patient Outcome

Does Training in Psychosocial Methods for Treatment Providers Improve Outcome for Pain Patients at Risk of Long-Term Disability? A Randomised Controlled Trail of a Course for Physical Therapists

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00902642
Enrollment
364
Registered
2009-05-15
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2006-08-31
Last updated
2009-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Physical therapy,, musculoskeletal pain,, psychosocial factors,, dissimilation,, evidence based,, education

Brief summary

The goal is to acquire more in-depth knowledge on physical therapists' attitudes towards and beliefs about psychosocial factors in back pain, how physical therapists integrate psychosocial factors into their clinical practice and the effects of a training program for physical therapists in psychosocial factors on clinical practice and thereby on patient outcome in terms of disability, pain, catastrophizing, and treatment satisfaction.

Detailed description

Neck and back pain continue to be extremely common, with a high prevalence and wide socio-economic consequences all over the industrialized world. Through the years a growing interest has risen for other factors than the pure biomedical or biomechanical. This has led to a new clinical model for the treatment of back pain; the biopsychosocial model of illness. Treatment based on the biopsychosocial model not only must address the biological basis of symptoms, but must incorporate the full range of social and psychological factors that have been shown to affect pain, distress and disability. Since there is today strong evidence indicating that psychosocial factors have a greater impact on disability then biomechanical or biomedical factors and strong evidence that psychosocial factors are strongly linked to the transition from acute to chronic pain, concept of psychosocial risk factors has been developed. Although the concept of psychosocial risk factors still is relatively new, there seems to be an international consensus about the importance of psychosocial risk factors for the prevention of the development of chronic pain but there appears to be considerable uncertainty about the clinical application. Health care providers' (HCPs') attitudes and beliefs appear to influence the information they provide to patients. This may subsequently result in different patient outcome depending on the HCPs' attitudes and beliefs. Physical therapists attitudes and beliefs are relatively unexplored but seem to have an effect on patients' attitudes and beliefs, which can affect patient outcome in terms of sick leave, health care use and function. HCP attitudes and beliefs towards psychosocial factors are relatively unexplored. Yet, it seems physical therapists do not necessarily accept new evidence-based information and may have difficulties in applying evidence-based information in their clinical practice. Implementation and dissemination of evidence-based psychosocial factors requires favourable attitudes, knowledge and skills to ensure a behavioural change on behave of the physical therapists.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALan eight day university training course designed to integrating psychosocial factors in clinical practice on a patient level

an eight day university training course on psychosocial factors for physical therapists

Sponsors

Örebro University, Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER
School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Örebro County Council
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Musculoskeletal pain, * Age between 18 and 65

Exclusion criteria

* Sick leave for more than 3 months during the past year as a result of present the musculoskeletal pain problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disabilitytreatment start and 6 month follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
catastrophizingtreatment start and 6 month follow up
treatment satisfaction6 month follow up
satisfaction with treatment result6 month follow up
Paintreatment start and 6 month follow up

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026