Skip to content

DNA Cytometry for Cervical Cancer Screening in China

Comparison of DNA Image Cytometry and Conventional Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening in China

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00902551
Acronym
DNACIC
Enrollment
25000
Registered
2009-05-15
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2009-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

DNA cytometry, Cytology, Diagnosis accuracy

Brief summary

Very few screenings of any kind will be possible during a woman's lifetime in most low-resource regions, where 80% of the half-million global cases of cervical cancer occur every year. Although a single round of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was associated with a significant decline in the rate of advanced cervical cancers and associated deaths, whether other methods like as DNA image cytometry can be used as an more accurate means than others in screening cervical cancer or not is yet to be verified. In addition, the accuracy of both DNA image cytometry and conventional cytology is not well known. The investigators hypothesized that DNA image cytometry was superior in screening cervical cancer than conventional cytology.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Currently or had been married * Not pregnant * Had an intact uterus with no prolapse * Had no history of cervical cancer * Living in China

Exclusion criteria

* Not willing to participate or finish the study at any time * History of cervical surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of cervical cancer.From the testing performed by the investigator (0h) to one year follow-up period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of death.One year follow-up period after screening.
The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.From the screening (0h) to one year follow-up period
Cervical inflammationFrom the screening (0h) to one year follow-up period

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026